2. Disclosure Statements
• Alix
C.
Michel
• David
J.
Ward
• Michael
L.
Warren
The three faculty for this activity have disclosed no relevant, real or
apparent personal or professional financial relationships.
3. Learning Objectives
1. IdenGfy
current
liabiliGes
facing
pharmacists.
2. Evaluate
cases
brought
against
a
pharmacist
to
show
best
pracGces.
3. Establish
methods
for
improving
a
pharmacist’s
pracGce.
5. Troubles That Break Down Your Door
Pharmacy Robberies
• Chain
Pharmacies
reported
517
armed
robberies
January
‘12-‐January
’13
• Retail
Pharmacies
reported
214
armed
robberies
January
‘12-‐January
’13
6.
7. How Robberies Impact Pharmacies
• Psychological
impact
• Loss
of
employees
• Loss
of
business
• Time
and
expense
– DEA,
police
and
insurance
invesGgaGon
and
reporGng
8. What keeps pharmacists up at night
Police Arrest Second Suspect In Pharmacy Robbery, Murder
Sep 22, 2013 - myfoxphili.com
Prosecutors to seek death penalty against ex-lawman in pharmacy
slayings, robbery
Sep 17, 2013 - Knoxnews.com
Pharmacy Shooting: 2 people dead, 2 injured in shooting at East
Tennessee pharmacy
May 24, 2013 - WBIR-TV
NY Pharmacy Robbery Leaves Suspect, ATF Agent Dead in Confused
Shootout
Jan. 1, 2012 - WACB-TV
Suspect Arrested in New York Pharmacy Killings
June 22, 2011 - ABC News
9. “Hardening the Target” –
Making the store less attractive
• Employees
trained
on
suspicious
persons
and
behaviors
and
what
to
do
if
a
robbery
occurs
• Front
counter
easily
visible
from
the
outside
• Video
surveillance
prominent
• High
pharmacy
counter
• Bullet
resistant
glass
• Time
delay
safe
10. “2nd level” Protection
• Tracking
devices
• DNA
and
other
marking
technologies
• Verified
alarms
• Community
policing
–
– Know
the
police
– Share
informaGon
– Suspicious
person
alerts
12. What to Do If Robber Enters Building
• Remain
as
calm
as
possible
• Comply
but
don’t
volunteer
• Make
sure
the
robber
understands
what
you
are
about
to
do
• Observe
• Do
not
a2empt
to
chase
or
apprehend
the
robber
13. What to do after Robber has left
• Immediately
lock
all
doors
• Call
police
• Take
notes
on
what
happened
• Preserve
evidence
18. Problems that Knock at Your Door
Why pharmacist liability is so high
• Pharmacists
are
consistently
viewed
as
the
“last
line
of
defense”
in
making
sure
a
prescripGon
is
right
–
that
it
is
the
correct
drug,
that
dosage
is
correct
and
that
the
person
should
be
receiving
the
prescripGon
How
that
applies
to
prescrip/on
narco/cs
19. Problems that Knock at Your Door
The Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
• The
United
States
Controlled
Substances
Act
(CSA)
is
the
statutory
basis
for
federal
oversight
of
controlled
substance
regulaGon
in
the
United
States.
• The
CSA
provides
the
pharmacist
an
affirmaGve
obligaGon
to
only
fill
prescripGons
that
are
“issued
in
the
usual
course
of
professional
treatment,”
and
prescripGons
that
do
not
meet
this
requirement
are
considered
improper.
20. • The
pharmacist
must
exercise
sound
professional
judgment
regarding
the
validity
of
a
prescripGon
prior
to
dispensing.
The
pharmacist
should
not
assume
that
every
controlled
substance
prescripGon
is
improper,
but
rather
take
affirma8ve
steps
to
ensure
the
prescrip8on’s
validity
21. Source of Pharmacists’ Corresponding
Responsibility
• (A)n
order
purporGng
to
be
a
Rx
issued
not
in
the
usual
course
of
professional
treatment
or
in
legiGmate
and
authorized
research
is
not
a
Rx
within
the
meaning
and
intent
of
secGon
309
of
the
Act
(21
U.S.C.
§
829)
and
the
person
knowingly
filling
such
a
purported
Rx,
as
well
as
the
person
issuing
it,
shall
be
subject
to
the
penal8es
provided
for
violaGons
of
the
provisions
of
law
relaGng
to
controlled
substances.
21
C.F.R.
§
1306.04(a)
22. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
U.S. v. Hayes 1979 (Texas)
• Pharmacist
filled
34
prescripGons
for
Dilaudid
for
paGent
(3400
pills)
and
75
prescripGons
for
Preludin
in
month
1
• 101
prescripGons
for
Dilaudid
and
137
prescripGons
for
Preludin
in
month
2
• Prescribing
Doctor
was
transient
alcoholic
that
lived
part-‐Gme
with
pharmacist
23. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
U.S. v. Hayes 1979 (Texas)
• Pharmacist:
Cannot
have
a
"corresponding
responsibility"
to
that
of
a
pracGGoner
because
he
cannot
prescribe
at
all
but
only
dispense;
an
a2empt
by
regulaGon
to
impose
on
him
the
obligaGons
of
a
prescriber
must,
therefore,
be
ineffectual.
24. • Court:
Pharmacist
may
not
fill
a
wri2en
order
from
a
pracGGoner,
appearing
on
its
face
to
be
a
prescripGon,
if
he
knows
the
pracGGoner
issued
it
in
other
than
the
usual
course
of
medical
treatment.
The
regulaGon
gives
"fair
noGce
that
certain
conduct
is
proscribed.“
We
affirm
the
Convic8on.
25. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
U.S. v. Irwin 1981 (Texas)
• Delivery
of
Controlled
Substance
• Delivery
of
controlled
substance
was
other
than
for
a
legiGmate
medical
purpose
and
in
the
usual
course
of
professional
pracGce
• Conduct
was
knowing
and
intenGonal
26. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
Med. Shoppe-Jonesborough v. DEA 2008
The
regulaGon
requires
pharmacists
to
use
common
sense
and
professional
judgment,
which
includes
paying
a2enGon
to
the
number
of
prescrip8ons
issued,
the
number
of
dosage
units
prescribed,
the
dura8on
and
paNern
of
the
alleged
treatment,
the
number
of
doctors
wri8ng
prescrip8ons
and
whether
the
drugs
prescribed
have
a
27. high
rate
of
abuse.
When
pharmacists'
suspicions
are
aroused
as
reasonable
professionals,
they
must
at
least
verify
the
prescrip8on's
propriety,
and
if
not
saGsfied
by
the
answer
they
must
refuse
to
dispense.
28. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
Holiday CVS 2012 FL
ViolaGon
of
“corresponding
responsibility”
in
administraGve
cases
required
• Delivery
of
controlled
substance
• Red
flag
that
was
or
should
had
been
recognized
• QuesGon
raised
by
the
red
flag
not
resolved
conclusively
prior
to
dispensing
29. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
Holiday CVS 2012 FL
The
“irresolvable”
red
flags:
• Prescriber
in
Fort
Lauderdale,
paGent
had
out
of
state
address,
and
paGent
paid
cash
for
oxycodone
• Same
red
flags
+
prescripGon
filled
in
close
sequence
for
individuals
from
out
of
state
30. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
Holiday CVS 2012 FL
The
“irresolvable”
red
flags:
• Dispensing
oxycodone
30
mg
and
15
mg
products
to
the
same
paGent
• Prescribers
whose
prescribing
pa2ern
suggests
a
one
size
fits
all
concept
32. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
Top Rx Pharmacy (2013)
ViolaGon
of
“corresponding
responsibility”
in
administraGve
case
required
• Delivery
of
controlled
substance
• A
red
flag
that
was
or
should
have
been
recognized
• The
quesGon
raised
by
the
red
flag
is
not
resolved
conclusively
prior
to
dispensing
33. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
Top Rx Pharmacy (2013)
Red
flags
based
on
state
law
• Dispensing
is
unlawful
if
pharmacist
knows
or
should
know
that
the
prescripGon
was
issued
outside
a
valid
physician-‐
paGent
relaGonship
• Can
judge
validity
of
physician-‐paGent
relaGonship
on
1. Manner
in
which
prescripGons
are
received
2. Number
of
prescripGons
for
controlled
substances
issued
by
the
pracGGoner
3. Number
of
paGents
receiving
controlled
substances
34. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
Top Rx Pharmacy (2013)
Red
flags
based
on
statements
made
by
pharmacy
employees:
“To
the
extent
[the]
statements
consGtuted
a
red
flag,
[the
pharmacy]
should
have
stopped
all
controlled
substances
dispensing
unGl
resolved.”
35. Corresponding Responsibility
Doctrine
Top Rx Pharmacy (2013)
Conclusively
resolving
red
flags
• Judged
using
“reasonable
pharmacist
standard”
• Steps
necessary
to
resolve
red
flags
are
influenced
by
circumstances
giving
rise
to
the
red
flags.
36. What are “Red Flags”?
• PrescripGons
for
controlled
substances
from
mulGple
doctors
• PaGent
receives
more
than
one
controlled
substance
to
treat
the
same
indicaGon
• PaGent
has
prescripGons
for
large
quanGGes/
doses
of
controlled
substances
37. What are “Red Flags”?
• PaGent
seeks
early
refills
• PaGent
travels
long
distance
• Prescribing
physician
located
at
great
distance
• PaGent
receives
opiate,
benzodiazepine
and
carisopridol
(cocktail)
38. What are “Red Flags”?
• Filling
mulGple
prescripGons
for
strongest
formulaGon
• PaGents
travelling
in
groups
• Large
porGons
of
prescripGons
for
controlled
substances
issued
by
one
prescriber
• Large
percentage
of
prescripGons
paid
for
in
cash.
39. What are “Red Flags”?
• Failing
to
call
other
pharmacists
to
inquire
as
to
why
they
refuse
to
fill
prescripGons
filled
by
a
parGcular
prescriber
• Cash
payments
in
combinaGon
with
other
red
flags
• Drug
is
inconsistent
with
prescriber
area
of
pracGce
40. What are “Red Flags”?
• PaGent
refers
to
drug
in
street
slang
• MulGple
people
from
same
address
receive
controlled
substances
• Family
members
receive
controlled
substances
from
same
prescriber
• State
board
or
law
enforcement
acGon
against
prescriber
• Lack
of
valid
doctor-‐paGent
relaGonship
41. How to Resolve Red Flags
• Use
PDMP
• Talk
to
paGents
you
know
• Extensively
talk
to
paGents
you
don’t
know
• Contact
the
Prescriber
• Document
all
communicaGon
with
Prescriber
• Verify
Prescriber
DEA
number
42. How to Resolve Red Flags
• Talk
with
other
pharmacists
• Use
your
insGncts
• If
not
comfortable,
refuse
to
fill
the
prescripGon
52. Possible
“red
flags”
that
could
lead
to
the
prescripGon
being
denied
include:
• A
pain
medicaGon
not
previously
filled
at
Walgreens
• A
new
doctor
wriGng
a
prescripGon
for
the
same
pain
medicaGon
• A
doctor
wriGng
a
prescripGon
who
is
not
in
a
“reasonable
geographic
locaGon”
near
the
pharmacy.
53. • A
paGent
paying
for
a
prescripGon
in
cash
• A
paGent
seeking
an
early
refill
of
a
prescripGon
• A
paGent
seeking
an
“excessive”
number
of
pills
• A
paGent
taking
the
same
pain
medicaGon
for
more
than
6
months
55. What’s old is new again…
1914
1940
1970
2001
2010
?
The Harrison Act and
Restricted Access
Death bed
or Combat
The pendulum
shifts
The 5th Vital sign,
“non-addictive”
Oxycontin
CDC declares
an epidemic
History
doesn’t
repeat
itself, but it
rhymes
- Mark Twain
Congress declares a
pain free decade.
56. But Wait…What a Generation of
Doctors Learned Was Wrong.
PBS
special,
5/2/13
60. TRENTON — The licenses of three New Jersey pharmacists have been
suspended following their arrests last month and allegations that they
participated in an illegal prescription drug ring, state authorities said today.
The suspensions — handed down against Daniel Podell, 87, of Clark;
Howard Hirsh, 61, of Cranbury; and Lawrence Zaslow, 59, of Cherry Hill —
will remain in effect until further action by the state Board of Pharmacy
and the resolution of the criminal charges.
Authorities allege several pain management clinics in Florida provided
prescriptions for painkillers such as oxycodone, hydromorphone and
morphine sulfate to patients who had no medical need for them.
64. Emerging Trends
Walgreens Loses $1.4M for Sharing Patient’s
Private Medical Info
Walgreens
pharmacist
whose
husband
was
the
ex-‐boyfriend
of
customer
at
the
pharmacy
suspected
ex
of
giving
her
husband
a
sexually
transmi2ed
disease,
so
she
used
her
authority
at
the
pharmacy
to
access
ex’s
medical
records.
She
shared
ex’s
sensiGve
medical
details
with
her
husband,
who
later
sent
ex
a
text
message
indicaGng
he
knew
the
records’
contents.
65. Even
though
ex
called
the
pharmacy
to
complain,
pharmacist
was
allowed
to
access
the
informa8on
a
second
8me.
The
suit
accused
Walgreens
of
negligence
in
its
supervision
of
pharmacist,
though
the
company
fought
back
by
arguing
that
pharmacist’s
illegal
acts
weren’t
associated
with
her
employer-‐authorized
conduct.
A
judge
disagreed
and
sent
the
quesGon
to
a
jury,
which
found
the
company
liable
for
80%
of
the
damages
owed
to
ex.
Walgreens
indicated
it
would
appeal
the
decision.
(Indiana)
66. Prescriber Education
• In
April
2011,
FDA
announced
the
elements
of
a
Risk
EvaluaGon
and
MiGgaGon
Strategy
(REMS)
to
ensure
that
the
benefits
of
extended-‐release
and
long-‐acGng
(ER/LA)
opioid
analgesics
outweigh
the
risks.
• As
part
of
the
REMS,
all
ER/LA
opioid
analgesic
companies
must
provide:
67. •
EducaGon
for
prescribers
of
these
medicaGons,
which
will
be
provided
through
accredited
conGnuing
educaGon
(CE)
acGviGes
supported
by
independent
educaGonal
grants
from
ER/LA
opioid
analgesic
companies.
•
InformaGon
that
prescribers
can
use
when
counseling
paGents
about
the
risks
and
benefits
of
ER/LA
opioid
analgesic
use.
68. TIRF REMS Access Program
• The
Transmucosal
Immediate
Release
Fentanyl
(TIRF)
Risk
EvaluaGon
and
MiGgaGon
Strategy
(REMS)
program
is
an
FDA-‐required
program
designed
to
ensure
informed
risk-‐benefit
decisions
before
and
during
treatment,
to
ensure
appropriate
use
of
TIRF
medicines.
• The
purpose
of
the
TIRF
REMS
Access
program
is
to
miGgate
the
risk
of
misuse,
abuse,
addicGon,
overdose
and
serious
complicaGons
due
to
medicaGon
errors
with
the
use
of
TIRF
medicines.
• You
must
enroll
in
the
TIRF
REMS
Access
program
to
prescribe,
dispense,
or
distribute
TIRF
medicines
74. Questions?
Alix
C.
Michel
Alix@MichelandWard.com
(423)
602-‐9522
David
J.
Ward
David@MichelandWard.com
(423)
602-‐9523
Michael
L.
Warren,
ARM,
OHST,
CCLS Risk
Manager,
Pharmacists
Mutual
Insurance
(800)
247-‐5930
ext.
7229
75. Disclaimer
This
presenta8on
is
provided
with
the
understanding
that
the
presenters
are
not
rendering
legal
advice
or
services.
Laws
are
constantly
changing,
and
each
federal
law,
state
law,
and
regula8on
should
be
checked
by
legal
counsel
for
the
most
current
version.
We
make
no
claims,
promises,
or
guarantees
about
the
accuracy,
completeness,
or
adequacy
of
the
informa8on
contained
in
this
presenta8on.
Do
not
act
upon
this
informa8on
without
seeking
the
advice
of
an
aNorney.
76. This
outline
is
intended
to
be
informa8onal.
It
does
not
provide
legal
advice.
Neither
your
aNendance
nor
the
presenters
answering
a
specific
audience
member
ques8on
creates
an
aNorney-‐
client
rela8onship.