SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  73
History of
Taxonomy
By:
7oB classroom
Introduction
 Fromancient China herbalist classify and
 organize the plants, indetifying its
 characteristics and interrelationship.
 Egyptians,Greeks, French also made
 contributions.
 AsAristotle, one of his contribution was to
 divide animals in without blood and with
 blood; or as Theofrastrus and Discorides.
 Othergreeks like Theofrastus, who wrote
 De Historian Plant arum, Which Contained
 480 species. Was based on growth
 form, and we still Recognize many of his
 plant generates, like Narcissus, Crocus
 and Cronus.
 Oras Discorides that give excellent
 descriptions of nearly 600 plants, including
 cannabis, colchicum, water
 hemlock, and peppermint, are contained
 in De materia medica.
 On  the other hand in the XVI century
 some Frenchs scientists as Linneaus and
 Plinius made great contributions.
 Pliniuscontribute with many books, but
  the only one that has survived is his
  Naturalism Historian, a work of 160
  volumes, in which he described several
  plants and gave them Latin names.
 He was called The Father of Botanical
  Latin.
 On  the other hand the simplicity of
  Linnaeus' trivial names revolutionized
  nomenclature, and soon binary
  nomenclature became to replace the
  phrase names.
 Binary System
 This set of presentations (hyperlinks) will
  introduce you to the interesting branch of
  Biology called, TAXONOMY. From the
  early taxonomy in ancient China you will
  end you're travel in the Taxonomy history
  with the change from phenetics to
  phylogenies in 1919.
Contents (index):
 1. Earliest taxonomy
 2. The Herbalists
 3. Early taxonomists
 4. Linnaean era
 5. Transforming botany and zoology into a
  science
 6. Rules for nomenclature
 7. From phonetics to phylogenies
 8. Phylocode
 Biblography
EARLIEST
TAXONOMY
BY: PEDRO JOSÉ GARCÍA
ROMERO AND MIGUEL
ÁNGEL GOMEZ VASQUEZ
GRADE: 7.B.
THE HISTORY
 Taxonomy     is as old
  as the language
  skill of mankind.
 When we speak
  about ancient
  taxonomy we
  usually mean the
  history in the
  Western world.
 However,  the earliest traces are not from the
 West, but from the East. Shen Nung, Emperor of
 China around 3000 BC He was a legendary
 emperor known as the Father of Chinese medicine
 and is believed to have introduced acupuncture.
 Around    1500 BC
  medicinal plants were
  illustrated on wall
  paintings in Egypt. The
  paintings gives us
  knowledge about
  medicinal plants in old
  Egypt and their names.
 In one of the oldest
  and largest papyrus
  rolls, Ebers
  Papyrus, plants are
  included as medicines
  for different diseases.
THE GREEKS
AND ROMANS
(subtitle)
ARISTOLE
 Aristotle  the Greek
  philosopher was
  the first to classify
  all living things.
 which he called
  animals with blood
  and without blood
  (such as
  insects, crustacean
  and testacies
  (mollusks).
THEOPHRASTUS
 Theophrastus   (370-285 BC) was a student of Aristotle
  and Plato.
 I wrote to all Known classification of plants, De
  Historian Plant arum, Which Contained 480 species.
 His classification was
  based on growth
  form, and we still
  Recognize many of his
  plant generates, like
  Narcissus, Crocus and
  Cronus.
 This is Carl Linnaeus
  accepted Because
  many of his generic
  names.
DIOSCORIDES
 Dioscorideswas a
  Greek physician.
 gathered knowledge
  about medicinal
  plants.
 Between  50-70 AD he wrote De Material
 Medical, which contained around 600 species.
 The classification in his work is based on the
 medicinal properties of the species.
PLINIUS
 Plinius(23–79 AD). He
  wrote many books, but
  the only one that has
  survived is his
  Naturalism Historian, a
  work of 160 volumes, in
  which he described
  several plants and
  gave them Latin
  names.
 The Father of Botanical
  Latin. Plinius died in
  Pompeii.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
 http://archive.awesomestories.com/movi
  es/stories/alexander_great/images/aristol
  e.jpg
 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c
  ommons/3/37/Plinyelder.jpg
 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c
  ommons/thumb/9/9c/Dioscorides01.jpg/2
  00px-Dioscorides01.jpg
By:
Amelia piedrahita
Maria isabel piedrahita
The Herbalists
 There
      is usually not much of a classification in the
 herbals, and the earliest works were merely copying
 Theophrastos and Dioscorides.
 With  time the herbals became more and
 more original with more elaborate woodcuts
 as illustrations.
Early
Taxnomists
By:
Daniel Ospina
Andrés Rodriguéz
 Itwas not until the end of the 16th century that
  taxonomic works became original enough to
  replace the ancient Greek works. One of the
  reasons for this was the development of optic
  lenses, whichnmade it possible to study details
  in the different species.




   Replacement of Greek´s
   Taxo
 One of the earliest authors (taxonomists) was
 Caesalpino (1519–1603) in Italy, who is sometimes
 called "the first taxonomist". In 1583 he wrote “De
 Plantis”, a work that contained 1500 species.




     “The First Taxonomist”
 Two Swiss brothers Bauhin (1541–1631;
 1560–1624) wrote the work Pinax Theatri
 Botanici in 1623.The word Pinax means
 register, and the work is a listing of 6000
 species, species were known with many
 different names in different books, and
 Pinax Theatri Botanici made a welcome
 order in the taxonomic world.




              The Brothers Bauhin
   The English naturalist John
    Ray (1627–1705) wrote
    several important works
    through his life, the most
    important contribution
    was the establishment of
    species as the ultimate
    unit of taxonomy. In 1682
    he published Methodus
    Plantarum Nova, which
    contained around 18 000
    plant species, a result of
    a relatively narrow
    species concept.
                                  Jhon Ray
 In France Joseph Pitton de Tournefort (1656–1708)
  constructed a botanical classification that came to
  rule in botanical taxonomy until the time of Carl
  Linnaeus. In 1700 he published Institutiones Rei
  Herbariae, in which around 9000 species were listed
  in 698 genera; he put primary emphasis on the
  classification of genera, and many genera were
  accepted by Linnaeus and still in use today.



                  Joseph Pitton de
                  Tournefort
 Tournefort's plant classification was
 exclusively based on floral characters.
 Tournefort's system was the one used by
 Linnaeus as a young student, but whereas
 Tournefort denied the presence of sexuality
 in plants, Linnaeus on the contrary based his
 system on that argument.
References:
    https://encrypted-
     tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSYyXTAycs4C7vL-
     zV9qouUtuLmj3MMIIpEZBDQACxFVKy4R2qw
    https://encrypted-
     tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRhnFQJr0UZYaqzkr0GZnZ
     wQY2KJjAAJole5faZ172X4U_1QxeCNQ
    https://encrypted-
     tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR3S_0RaoTnTEZH6gN_Dvz
     zaUmB4bYLVjln7HcbOw_8tD5rS_mJGA
    https://encrypted-
     tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTseDyMyyg840V-
     kMqMPoBlNpnMhDJp_G5pUi13gLLJ7OUiQNKR
    https://encrypted-
     tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT0piIRpzzprmK1DUj_Y2q6
     YrkUwU9065Q4J347PZhtwoUNxiIAww
    https://encrypted-
     tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSAobB8uUiBJQccOeZZqJ
     SCxEn_liZG5JHuDmjlTibZIEkOkbya
    https://encrypted-
     tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTm_skwfCxvao04nHr3Opz
     6-U-HPP9b7QyJT923y56Hl03cZ44v
Linnean era
By:
Andrés Duque De Grieff
   2.1. Starting point of modern taxonomy
   For nomenclatural reasons two works of Carl
    Linnaeus (1707–1778, Fig. 4) are regarded as the
   The trivial names were intended for fieldwork and
    education, and not to replace the earlier phrase
    names. The phrase names included a description
    of the species that distinguished it from other
    known species in the genus. With an expanded
    knowledge of the global fauna and flora through
    17th and 18th century scientific expeditions, a
    large number of new species were found and
    named, and more terms had to be added to
    each phrase name. By the time of Linnaeus the
    situation was really bad. Linnaeus counted 8530
    species of flowering plants in 1753.
   starting points of modern botanical and
    zoological taxonomy: the global flora Species
    Plantarum,published in 1753 and the tenth
    edition of Systema Naturae in 1758 including
    global fauna. The reason for this is that
    Linnaeus introduced in these books a binary
    form of species names called "trivial names"
    for both plants and animals. For each species
    he created an epithet that could be used
    together with the genus name.
 Withan expanded knowledge of the
 global fauna and flora through 17th and
 18th century scientific expeditions, a large
 number of new species were found and
 named, and more terms had to be added
 to each phrase name. By the time of
 Linnaeus the situation was really bad.
 Linnaeus counted 8530 species of flowering
 plants in 1753.
 Thesimplicity of Linnaeus' trivial names
 revolutionized nomenclature, and soon
 binary nomenclaturecame to replace the
 phrase names.
 Today, every plant or animal name
 published before 1753 or
 1758, respectively, is called "pre-Linnaean"
 and is thus not valid.
TRANSFORMING
BOTANY AND
ZOOLOGY INTO A
SCIENCE
By:
María Del Mar Oyola &
María Alejandra Martínez
CARL LINNAEUS
 Carl Linnaeus started his career by
 publishing a system of all living things and
 minerals in 1735 called System Nature.
STAMENS AND PISTILS


 Inthis he introduced the sexual system of
  plants, an artificial classification based on
  the sexual parts of the flower
 thestamens and pistils. In a time when
 people debated whether plants had
 sexuality or not, this suggestion from an
 unknown person not belonging to any
 classical European school of natural
 sciences more or less shocked the
 scientific world.
    However, the practical use of the system
    and Linnaeus careful observations
    persuaded the critics and Linnaeus sexual
    system of plants became the highest
    fashion also outside the scientific
    community.
References:
   https://www.google.com.co/search?num=10
    &hl=es&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&bi
    w=1241&bih=606&q=carl+linnaeus&oq=carl+li
    nna&gs_l=img.3.0.0j0i24l2.1411.10718.0.12206.
    16.12.3.1.1.0.485.1839.9j1j4-
    2.12.0...0.0...1ac.187.2804.17j13.30.0...0.0...1c.1
    .R5RYd74MzvA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_
    qf.&bvm=bv.41018144,d.eWU&fp=6c8ff21798
    9c200&biw=1241&bih=567
Rules for
Nomenclature
By:
David Patiño
Santiago Sanguino
 Oneof the first attempts to create rules in
 botanical taxonomy was made by
 Augustin Pyramus de Candolle (1778–
 1841) in Théory élémentaire de la
 botanique in 1813.
 Kuntze's
         strict application of insufficient
 nomenclature laws and the nomenclatural
 mess he made triggered botanists to create
 a code of botanical nomenclature. In
 Europe this was decided on a botanical
 congress in Vienna in 1905.
 Theinitiation of a zoological code started
 somewhat later. In 1842 a British ornithologist
 Hugh Edwin Strickland (1811–1853)
 elaborated the first nomenclatural laws for
 zoology, the "Strickland Code
REFERENCES
 https://www.google.com.co/search?num
 =10&hl=es&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source
 =hp&biw=1441&bih=678&q=nomenclatur
 e&oq=nomenclature&gs_l=img.3...0.0.1.15
 8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1ac.yxZV9ct8q6o
From phonetics
to phylogenies
BY:
PABLO MEJÍA
AND
MATEO RESTREPO
THEY WERE THE FIRST BIOLOGIST CONSTRUCTION
 OF EVOLUTIONARY TREES .
 THEGERMAN BIOLOGIST WILLI HENNIG (1913–
 1976) FOUNDED THE CLADISTIC ERA IN
 1966, BY STATING THAT ONLY SIMILARITIES
 GROUPING SPECIES (SYNAPOMORPHIES)
 SHOULD BE USED IN CLASSIFICATION, AND
 THAT TAXA SHOULD INCLUDE ALL
 DESCENDANTS FROM ONE SINGLE ANCESTOR
 (THE RULE OF MONOPHYLY). HYPOTHESIS ON
 SYSTEMATICS COULD NOW BE TESTED
 THROUGH CLADISTIC METHODS.
Phylocode
By: Pablo Gallego
Vélez.
 With the breakthrough of cladistics
 analysis and constructions of
 phylogenetic hypotheses, the taxonomy
 built on the Linnaean hierarchic system
 became a matter of intense discussion
 and criticism.
 Two zoologists from USA, Kevin de Queiroz and
 Jacques Gauthier, started the discussions in the
 1990's and laid the theoretical foundation to a
 new nomenclatural code for all organisms, the
 PhyloCode. A meeting in Harvard in 1998 drew
 out the lines for a PhyloCode, and a first draft
 was published on the web in 2000.
 ThePhyloCode reflects a philosophical shift
 from naming species and subsequently
 classifying them (i.e., into higher taxa) to
 naming both species and clades.
 Themain idea with the PhyloCode is that only
 species and clades should have names, and
 that all ranks above species are excluded from
 nomenclature.
 The  aim is to change current names as
 little as possible and to build the stability
 on clades rather than on ranks.
 The PhyloCode is still only a draft, it is
 controversial, and has led to a worldwide and
 very interesting debate. Its success will depend
 on the number of taxonomists that will use it for
 their taxonomic work.
Bibliography
(References)
Manuela Millán y Laura
Restrepo
 http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/chinese/emperors.ht
 mlPicture%20of%20Ebers%20papyrus

    http://www.ub.unileipzig.de/site.php?pag
    e=die_ubl/sosa/rundgang/ebers&lang=d
    e&stil=fcMateriaMedicaofDioscoridesat
   http://www.bnnonline.it/biblvir/dioscoride/dio
    scoride.htm
   Linné online
 http://www.linnaeus.uu.se/online/index-
 en.htmlInternational Code of Botanical
 Nomenclature
   http://www.iczn.org/PhyloCode





 http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/
  http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn main.htm
 International Code of Zoological

Contenu connexe

Tendances (20)

What is Systematics
What is Systematics What is Systematics
What is Systematics
 
ICBN BOTANY.pptx
ICBN BOTANY.pptxICBN BOTANY.pptx
ICBN BOTANY.pptx
 
Taxonomy
TaxonomyTaxonomy
Taxonomy
 
Taxonomic key
Taxonomic keyTaxonomic key
Taxonomic key
 
Species concept
Species conceptSpecies concept
Species concept
 
Bionomial nomenclature
Bionomial nomenclatureBionomial nomenclature
Bionomial nomenclature
 
Artificial system of classification
Artificial system of classificationArtificial system of classification
Artificial system of classification
 
3.4 phylocode
3.4 phylocode3.4 phylocode
3.4 phylocode
 
Species concept
Species conceptSpecies concept
Species concept
 
Bracket key and indented key
Bracket key and indented keyBracket key and indented key
Bracket key and indented key
 
Biosystematics, and types of taxonomy
Biosystematics, and types of taxonomyBiosystematics, and types of taxonomy
Biosystematics, and types of taxonomy
 
1.unit lesson 1- Introduction to plant taxonomy
1.unit lesson 1- Introduction to plant taxonomy1.unit lesson 1- Introduction to plant taxonomy
1.unit lesson 1- Introduction to plant taxonomy
 
Principles of taxonomy
Principles of taxonomy Principles of taxonomy
Principles of taxonomy
 
Taxonomy
TaxonomyTaxonomy
Taxonomy
 
Importance and Applications of Systematics evolution
Importance and Applications  of Systematics evolutionImportance and Applications  of Systematics evolution
Importance and Applications of Systematics evolution
 
Biosystematics.
Biosystematics. Biosystematics.
Biosystematics.
 
Iczn(The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature )
Iczn(The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature )Iczn(The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature )
Iczn(The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature )
 
Species concepts 4
Species concepts 4Species concepts 4
Species concepts 4
 
PLANT NOMENCLATURE
PLANT NOMENCLATUREPLANT NOMENCLATURE
PLANT NOMENCLATURE
 
Taxonomic characters 7
Taxonomic characters 7Taxonomic characters 7
Taxonomic characters 7
 

Similaire à History of taxonomy

Similaire à History of taxonomy (20)

History of taxonomyyyyy
History of taxonomyyyyyHistory of taxonomyyyyy
History of taxonomyyyyy
 
History of Plant Classification.pptx
History of Plant Classification.pptxHistory of Plant Classification.pptx
History of Plant Classification.pptx
 
Taxonomy by Ayushi Srivastava
Taxonomy by Ayushi SrivastavaTaxonomy by Ayushi Srivastava
Taxonomy by Ayushi Srivastava
 
Taxonomy history original todo
Taxonomy history original  todoTaxonomy history original  todo
Taxonomy history original todo
 
Taxonomy original
Taxonomy originalTaxonomy original
Taxonomy original
 
Taxonomy original
Taxonomy originalTaxonomy original
Taxonomy original
 
Taxonomy history original todo
Taxonomy history original  todoTaxonomy history original  todo
Taxonomy history original todo
 
1.4 early taxonomists
1.4 early taxonomists1.4 early taxonomists
1.4 early taxonomists
 
1. earliest taxonomy
1. earliest taxonomy1. earliest taxonomy
1. earliest taxonomy
 
Plant systematics
Plant systematicsPlant systematics
Plant systematics
 
Introduction to Systematic Botany
Introduction to Systematic BotanyIntroduction to Systematic Botany
Introduction to Systematic Botany
 
Animal Systematics Lecture 1
Animal Systematics Lecture 1Animal Systematics Lecture 1
Animal Systematics Lecture 1
 
Taxonomy n Systematics
Taxonomy n SystematicsTaxonomy n Systematics
Taxonomy n Systematics
 
Plant And Animal Taxonomy
Plant And Animal TaxonomyPlant And Animal Taxonomy
Plant And Animal Taxonomy
 
2. linnaean era
2. linnaean era2. linnaean era
2. linnaean era
 
Common Herbal Plants, Dr. L.T.M. Muungo
Common Herbal Plants, Dr. L.T.M. MuungoCommon Herbal Plants, Dr. L.T.M. Muungo
Common Herbal Plants, Dr. L.T.M. Muungo
 
2014 herbsbybotanicalname-140206153740-phpapp02 (1)
2014   herbsbybotanicalname-140206153740-phpapp02 (1)2014   herbsbybotanicalname-140206153740-phpapp02 (1)
2014 herbsbybotanicalname-140206153740-phpapp02 (1)
 
Angiosperm classifications
Angiosperm classificationsAngiosperm classifications
Angiosperm classifications
 
Arya
AryaArya
Arya
 
ppt presnttionArya
ppt presnttionAryappt presnttionArya
ppt presnttionArya
 

History of taxonomy

  • 2. Introduction  Fromancient China herbalist classify and organize the plants, indetifying its characteristics and interrelationship.
  • 3.  Egyptians,Greeks, French also made contributions.
  • 4.  AsAristotle, one of his contribution was to divide animals in without blood and with blood; or as Theofrastrus and Discorides.
  • 5.  Othergreeks like Theofrastus, who wrote De Historian Plant arum, Which Contained 480 species. Was based on growth form, and we still Recognize many of his plant generates, like Narcissus, Crocus and Cronus.
  • 6.  Oras Discorides that give excellent descriptions of nearly 600 plants, including cannabis, colchicum, water hemlock, and peppermint, are contained in De materia medica.
  • 7.  On the other hand in the XVI century some Frenchs scientists as Linneaus and Plinius made great contributions.
  • 8.  Pliniuscontribute with many books, but the only one that has survived is his Naturalism Historian, a work of 160 volumes, in which he described several plants and gave them Latin names.  He was called The Father of Botanical Latin.
  • 9.  On the other hand the simplicity of Linnaeus' trivial names revolutionized nomenclature, and soon binary nomenclature became to replace the phrase names.  Binary System
  • 10.  This set of presentations (hyperlinks) will introduce you to the interesting branch of Biology called, TAXONOMY. From the early taxonomy in ancient China you will end you're travel in the Taxonomy history with the change from phenetics to phylogenies in 1919.
  • 11. Contents (index):  1. Earliest taxonomy  2. The Herbalists  3. Early taxonomists  4. Linnaean era  5. Transforming botany and zoology into a science  6. Rules for nomenclature  7. From phonetics to phylogenies  8. Phylocode  Biblography
  • 12. EARLIEST TAXONOMY BY: PEDRO JOSÉ GARCÍA ROMERO AND MIGUEL ÁNGEL GOMEZ VASQUEZ GRADE: 7.B.
  • 13. THE HISTORY  Taxonomy is as old as the language skill of mankind.  When we speak about ancient taxonomy we usually mean the history in the Western world.
  • 14.  However, the earliest traces are not from the West, but from the East. Shen Nung, Emperor of China around 3000 BC He was a legendary emperor known as the Father of Chinese medicine and is believed to have introduced acupuncture.
  • 15.  Around 1500 BC medicinal plants were illustrated on wall paintings in Egypt. The paintings gives us knowledge about medicinal plants in old Egypt and their names.  In one of the oldest and largest papyrus rolls, Ebers Papyrus, plants are included as medicines for different diseases.
  • 17. ARISTOLE  Aristotle the Greek philosopher was the first to classify all living things.  which he called animals with blood and without blood (such as insects, crustacean and testacies (mollusks).
  • 18. THEOPHRASTUS  Theophrastus (370-285 BC) was a student of Aristotle and Plato.  I wrote to all Known classification of plants, De Historian Plant arum, Which Contained 480 species.
  • 19.  His classification was based on growth form, and we still Recognize many of his plant generates, like Narcissus, Crocus and Cronus.  This is Carl Linnaeus accepted Because many of his generic names.
  • 20. DIOSCORIDES  Dioscorideswas a Greek physician.  gathered knowledge about medicinal plants.
  • 21.  Between 50-70 AD he wrote De Material Medical, which contained around 600 species.  The classification in his work is based on the medicinal properties of the species.
  • 22. PLINIUS  Plinius(23–79 AD). He wrote many books, but the only one that has survived is his Naturalism Historian, a work of 160 volumes, in which he described several plants and gave them Latin names.  The Father of Botanical Latin. Plinius died in Pompeii.
  • 23. BIBLIOGRAPHY  http://archive.awesomestories.com/movi es/stories/alexander_great/images/aristol e.jpg  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ommons/3/37/Plinyelder.jpg  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ommons/thumb/9/9c/Dioscorides01.jpg/2 00px-Dioscorides01.jpg
  • 25. The Herbalists  There is usually not much of a classification in the herbals, and the earliest works were merely copying Theophrastos and Dioscorides.
  • 26.  With time the herbals became more and more original with more elaborate woodcuts as illustrations.
  • 28.  Itwas not until the end of the 16th century that taxonomic works became original enough to replace the ancient Greek works. One of the reasons for this was the development of optic lenses, whichnmade it possible to study details in the different species. Replacement of Greek´s Taxo
  • 29.  One of the earliest authors (taxonomists) was Caesalpino (1519–1603) in Italy, who is sometimes called "the first taxonomist". In 1583 he wrote “De Plantis”, a work that contained 1500 species. “The First Taxonomist”
  • 30.  Two Swiss brothers Bauhin (1541–1631; 1560–1624) wrote the work Pinax Theatri Botanici in 1623.The word Pinax means register, and the work is a listing of 6000 species, species were known with many different names in different books, and Pinax Theatri Botanici made a welcome order in the taxonomic world. The Brothers Bauhin
  • 31. The English naturalist John Ray (1627–1705) wrote several important works through his life, the most important contribution was the establishment of species as the ultimate unit of taxonomy. In 1682 he published Methodus Plantarum Nova, which contained around 18 000 plant species, a result of a relatively narrow species concept. Jhon Ray
  • 32.  In France Joseph Pitton de Tournefort (1656–1708) constructed a botanical classification that came to rule in botanical taxonomy until the time of Carl Linnaeus. In 1700 he published Institutiones Rei Herbariae, in which around 9000 species were listed in 698 genera; he put primary emphasis on the classification of genera, and many genera were accepted by Linnaeus and still in use today. Joseph Pitton de Tournefort
  • 33.  Tournefort's plant classification was exclusively based on floral characters. Tournefort's system was the one used by Linnaeus as a young student, but whereas Tournefort denied the presence of sexuality in plants, Linnaeus on the contrary based his system on that argument.
  • 34. References:  https://encrypted- tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSYyXTAycs4C7vL- zV9qouUtuLmj3MMIIpEZBDQACxFVKy4R2qw  https://encrypted- tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRhnFQJr0UZYaqzkr0GZnZ wQY2KJjAAJole5faZ172X4U_1QxeCNQ  https://encrypted- tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR3S_0RaoTnTEZH6gN_Dvz zaUmB4bYLVjln7HcbOw_8tD5rS_mJGA  https://encrypted- tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTseDyMyyg840V- kMqMPoBlNpnMhDJp_G5pUi13gLLJ7OUiQNKR  https://encrypted- tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT0piIRpzzprmK1DUj_Y2q6 YrkUwU9065Q4J347PZhtwoUNxiIAww  https://encrypted- tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSAobB8uUiBJQccOeZZqJ SCxEn_liZG5JHuDmjlTibZIEkOkbya  https://encrypted- tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTm_skwfCxvao04nHr3Opz 6-U-HPP9b7QyJT923y56Hl03cZ44v
  • 36. 2.1. Starting point of modern taxonomy  For nomenclatural reasons two works of Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778, Fig. 4) are regarded as the  The trivial names were intended for fieldwork and education, and not to replace the earlier phrase names. The phrase names included a description of the species that distinguished it from other known species in the genus. With an expanded knowledge of the global fauna and flora through 17th and 18th century scientific expeditions, a large number of new species were found and named, and more terms had to be added to each phrase name. By the time of Linnaeus the situation was really bad. Linnaeus counted 8530 species of flowering plants in 1753.
  • 37. starting points of modern botanical and zoological taxonomy: the global flora Species Plantarum,published in 1753 and the tenth edition of Systema Naturae in 1758 including global fauna. The reason for this is that Linnaeus introduced in these books a binary form of species names called "trivial names" for both plants and animals. For each species he created an epithet that could be used together with the genus name.
  • 38.
  • 39.  Withan expanded knowledge of the global fauna and flora through 17th and 18th century scientific expeditions, a large number of new species were found and named, and more terms had to be added to each phrase name. By the time of Linnaeus the situation was really bad. Linnaeus counted 8530 species of flowering plants in 1753.
  • 40.  Thesimplicity of Linnaeus' trivial names revolutionized nomenclature, and soon binary nomenclaturecame to replace the phrase names.
  • 41.  Today, every plant or animal name published before 1753 or 1758, respectively, is called "pre-Linnaean" and is thus not valid.
  • 42. TRANSFORMING BOTANY AND ZOOLOGY INTO A SCIENCE By: María Del Mar Oyola & María Alejandra Martínez
  • 43. CARL LINNAEUS  Carl Linnaeus started his career by publishing a system of all living things and minerals in 1735 called System Nature.
  • 44.
  • 45. STAMENS AND PISTILS  Inthis he introduced the sexual system of plants, an artificial classification based on the sexual parts of the flower
  • 46.  thestamens and pistils. In a time when people debated whether plants had sexuality or not, this suggestion from an unknown person not belonging to any classical European school of natural sciences more or less shocked the scientific world.
  • 47. However, the practical use of the system and Linnaeus careful observations persuaded the critics and Linnaeus sexual system of plants became the highest fashion also outside the scientific community.
  • 48.
  • 49. References:  https://www.google.com.co/search?num=10 &hl=es&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&bi w=1241&bih=606&q=carl+linnaeus&oq=carl+li nna&gs_l=img.3.0.0j0i24l2.1411.10718.0.12206. 16.12.3.1.1.0.485.1839.9j1j4- 2.12.0...0.0...1ac.187.2804.17j13.30.0...0.0...1c.1 .R5RYd74MzvA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_ qf.&bvm=bv.41018144,d.eWU&fp=6c8ff21798 9c200&biw=1241&bih=567
  • 51.  Oneof the first attempts to create rules in botanical taxonomy was made by Augustin Pyramus de Candolle (1778– 1841) in Théory élémentaire de la botanique in 1813.
  • 52.  Kuntze's strict application of insufficient nomenclature laws and the nomenclatural mess he made triggered botanists to create a code of botanical nomenclature. In Europe this was decided on a botanical congress in Vienna in 1905.
  • 53.  Theinitiation of a zoological code started somewhat later. In 1842 a British ornithologist Hugh Edwin Strickland (1811–1853) elaborated the first nomenclatural laws for zoology, the "Strickland Code
  • 54. REFERENCES  https://www.google.com.co/search?num =10&hl=es&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source =hp&biw=1441&bih=678&q=nomenclatur e&oq=nomenclature&gs_l=img.3...0.0.1.15 8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1ac.yxZV9ct8q6o
  • 55. From phonetics to phylogenies BY: PABLO MEJÍA AND MATEO RESTREPO
  • 56.
  • 57. THEY WERE THE FIRST BIOLOGIST CONSTRUCTION OF EVOLUTIONARY TREES .
  • 58.  THEGERMAN BIOLOGIST WILLI HENNIG (1913– 1976) FOUNDED THE CLADISTIC ERA IN 1966, BY STATING THAT ONLY SIMILARITIES GROUPING SPECIES (SYNAPOMORPHIES) SHOULD BE USED IN CLASSIFICATION, AND THAT TAXA SHOULD INCLUDE ALL DESCENDANTS FROM ONE SINGLE ANCESTOR (THE RULE OF MONOPHYLY). HYPOTHESIS ON SYSTEMATICS COULD NOW BE TESTED THROUGH CLADISTIC METHODS.
  • 60.  With the breakthrough of cladistics analysis and constructions of phylogenetic hypotheses, the taxonomy built on the Linnaean hierarchic system became a matter of intense discussion and criticism.
  • 61.  Two zoologists from USA, Kevin de Queiroz and Jacques Gauthier, started the discussions in the 1990's and laid the theoretical foundation to a new nomenclatural code for all organisms, the PhyloCode. A meeting in Harvard in 1998 drew out the lines for a PhyloCode, and a first draft was published on the web in 2000.
  • 62.  ThePhyloCode reflects a philosophical shift from naming species and subsequently classifying them (i.e., into higher taxa) to naming both species and clades.
  • 63.  Themain idea with the PhyloCode is that only species and clades should have names, and that all ranks above species are excluded from nomenclature.
  • 64.  The aim is to change current names as little as possible and to build the stability on clades rather than on ranks.
  • 65.  The PhyloCode is still only a draft, it is controversial, and has led to a worldwide and very interesting debate. Its success will depend on the number of taxonomists that will use it for their taxonomic work.
  • 68. http://www.ub.unileipzig.de/site.php?pag e=die_ubl/sosa/rundgang/ebers&lang=d e&stil=fcMateriaMedicaofDioscoridesat
  • 69. http://www.bnnonline.it/biblvir/dioscoride/dio scoride.htm  Linné online
  • 71. http://www.iczn.org/PhyloCode 
  • 73.  http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn main.htm  International Code of Zoological