2. Typically, projects are managed by focusing
on the delivery of the tasks that make up the
project
3. Projects over budget, not providing planned
specs or scope
Too long lead times of projects
Chaotic hoop-jumping and midnight oil-
burning to meet project due dates
Reluctance to take on new projects
4. Project management becomes a chaotic
exercise, resulting in inordinate pressure to
meet task due dates and frequent replanning
of the project , but the long-established
strategy of focusing on task completion does
not seem to work too well.
5.
6. Conflict is addressed by risk management
efforts that provides little more than
compromise or "optimization." Trim a little
safety in one task, risk a little lateness
against the promise. Add a little safety in
another task, extend the project a little. There
is never really a satisfactory compromise.
7. This is a proven "whole system" approach to
project management that doesn't rely on
managing a project based on a series of
supposedly "safe" task estimates.
8. Using buffers in order to protect the project
due date
Thanks to the statistics of aggregation, these
buffers can be much shorter than the sum of
the spread out safeties they replace, hence
shortening the overall lead-time of the
project.
9. Task behaviors are also impacted favorably
The now shortened expected durations drive
a sense of urgency and help to drive out
resource distractions and the urge to multi-
task
10. Most importantly,the resulting schedule is
now largely immunized from variation and
uncertainty
15-25% shorter than traditional schedules