1) The document discusses different types of evidence used in managing NEC, including textbooks, experience, published studies, and guidelines. Higher levels of evidence include systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials.
2) Factors that can help or hinder the development of NEC are discussed, such as breast milk, feeding strategies, and supplements like arginine and glutamine. Studies have looked at whether interventions like H2 blockers or probiotics can prevent NEC.
3) The best evidence for managing NEC comes from meta-analyses, randomized trials, and guidelines, but these are not always possible. It is important to consider other outcomes in addition to NEC.
3. What are the types of Evidence?
Textbooks
Learned it from my professor
Conferences
My own experience
What we did in residency
Published studies
Others
4. Evidence Pyramid
Type of Study
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort studies
Case Control studies
Case Series/Case Reports
Expert Opinion/ Animal research
5. generation synthesis policy application 5
decisions
4
2 3
1
Knowledge Translation
Steps from evidence generation to clinical application
1. generation of evidence from research; 2. evidence summary and synthesis; 3.
forming clinical policy; 4. application of policy; 5. individual clinical decisions, including
a) patient’s circumstances, b) patient’s wishes, and c) evidence
6. Level of Evidence and Grades of
Recommendation
USPSTF: United States Preventive Services Task Force
SORT: Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy
CEBM: Center for Evidence Based Medicine
GRADE system
Many others
7. CEBM: Levels of Evidence (LOE)
Therapy/Prevention Prognosis Diagnosis DDx/ Symptom Economic and
Etiology/Harm prevalence Decision analysis
1a SR (with homogeneity)
of RCTs
1b RCT with narrow CI
1c All or none
2a SR (with homogeneity)
of cohort studies
2b Individual cohort study
or low quality RCT
2c “Outcomes” research
3a SR (with homogeneity)
case control studies
3b Individual case-control
study
4 Case series/low quality
cohort and case-control
5 Expert opinion/bench
research
8. CEBM: Grades of Recommendation (GOR)
Used to grade a clinical recommendation based on a body of
evidence:
A: consistent Level 1 studies
B: consistent Level 2 or 3 studies, or extrapolation from Level
1 studies
C: Level 4 studies, or extrapolation from Level 2 or 3 studies
D: Level 5 studies, or troublingly inconsistent or inconclusive
studies from any level
9. GRADE System: Individual Studies
Uses four tiers for grading quality of evidence in a study for
a particular outcome…
High: further research unlikely to change our certainty or
the effect size
Moderate: further research is likely to change our
certainty and perhaps the effect size
Low: further research likely to change our certainty and
our estimate of the effect size
Very low: estimate of effect is uncertain
10. GRADE System: Individual Studies
Start: RCT=3, observational study=1, other evidence=0
Subtract: -1 or -2 for quality problems, -1 for reporting bias, -1
for sparse data, -1 or -2 for problems with applicability, etc.
Add: +1 for evidence of dose response effect, +1 if plausible co-
founders should have been in opposite direction, +1 or +2 for
evidence of “association,” etc.
12. METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted on VLBW infants
(birth weight less than 1500 g) managed at 2 institutions
The NICUs at both institutions follow an identical
strategy for respiratory management of VLBW infants
15. Formula milk versus maternal breast milk
for feeding
preterm or low birth weight infants
Ginny Henderson, Mary Y Anthony, William McGuire
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4, 2009
16. Authors’ conclusions
There are no data from randomised trials of formula milk
versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth
weight infants.
17. Prevention of NEC
Breast milk
Trophic feeds
Advancing feeds
Use of H2 Blockers
Arginine and Glutamine supplementation
Oral Antibiotics
Oral IVIG
Probiotics
18. H2 Blockers and NEC
Ronnie Guillet, MD, PhDa, Barbara J. Stoll, MDb, C. Michael Cotten, MDc, Marie Gantz, PhDd, Scott
McDonald, BSd,W. Kenneth Poole, PhDd, Dale L. Phelps, MDa, for members of the National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network PEDIATRICS Volume 117, Number 2,
February 2006
Case-control study was conducted, and the results were analyzed with
conditional logistic regression.
Infants of 401 to 1500 g in birth weight who were cared for in 1 of the
19 (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network centers from
September1998 to December 2001.
19. H2 Blockers and NEC
Three controls were matched to each NEC case on the
basis of birth-weight category (401–750, 751–1000,
1001–1250,and 1251–1500 g), race , and center.
Either enteral or parenteral ranitidine (Zantac),
famotidine (Pepcid), or cimetidine (Tagamet) before 120
days of age, death, or discharge.
20. Ranitidine is Associated With Infections,
Necrotizing Enterocolitis, and Fatal Outcome
in Newborns
Newborns with birth weight ranging between 401 and 1500
g or gestational age between 24 and 32 weeks, consecutively
observed in 4 Italian NICUs
MEAP 2012 Terrin et al Pediatrics 2012;129;e40
22. Summary
Meta-analysis and RCTs are best evidence ( sometimes not
possible)
Look at other important outcomes
Look at guidelines and analysis in secondary publications and
EBM organizations
Notes de l'éditeur
This is often referred to as the "evidence pyramid". It is used to illustrate the evolution of the literature. The base of the pyramid is where information usually starts with an idea or laboratory research. As these ideas turn into drugs and diagnostic tools they are tested in laboratories models, then in animals, and finally in humans. The human testing may begin with volunteers and go through several phases of clinical trials before the drug or diagnostic tool can be authorized for use within the general population. Randomized controlled trials are then done to further test the effectiveness and efficacy of a drug or therapy. As you move up the pyramid the amount of available literature decreases, but increases in its relevance to the clinical setting. Meta-Analysis takes the systematic review (see below) a step further by using statistical techniques to combine the results of several studies as if they were one large study. Systematic Reviews usually focus on a clinical topic and answer a specific question. Extensive literature searches are conducted to identify studies with sound methodology. The studies are reviewed, assessed, and summarized according to the predetermined criteria of the review question. Randomized Controlled Trials are carefully planned projects that study the effect of a therapy or test on real patients. They include methodologies that reduce the potential for bias and that allow for comparison between intervention groups and control groups (no intervention). Evidence for questions of diagnosis is found in prospective trials which compare tests with a reference or "gold standard" test. Cohort Studies take a large population and follow patients who have a specific condition or receive a particular treatment over time and compare them with another group that is similar but has not been affected by the condition being studied. Cohort studies are not as reliable as randomized controlled studies, since the two groups may differ in ways other than in the variable under study. Case Control Studies are studies in which patients who already have a specific condition are compared with people who do not. These types of studies are often less reliable than randomized controlled trials and cohort studies because showing a statistical relationship does not mean than one factor necessarily caused the other. Case Series consist of collections of reports on the treatment of individual patients. Case Report is a report on a single patient. Because they are reports of cases and use no control groups with which to compare outcomes, they have no statistical validity . Practice Guidelines are systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient make decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. Guidelines review and evaluate the evidence and then make explicit recommendations for practice. The pyramid serves as a guideline to the hierarchy of evidence available. You may not always find the best level of evidence to answer your question. In the absence of the best evidence, you then need to consider moving down the pyramid to other types of studies.