5. +
Three types of rural regions (OECD)
Rural territories within Functional Urban Areas
…part of the catchment area of the urban core; development intimately linked to
the city
Main challenges: service delivery in the face of consolidation; skills development to meet
urban labour market demands; managing land use policy brought by increasing pressures
from the core
Rural outside but close to a Functional Urban Area
…generally resilient local economies with good industrial mix, attracting new
residents
Main challenges: competition for land and landscape driven by urban style growth; old and
new residents differ over needs and visions
Rural areas remote from the Functional Urban Area
…dominated by primary industrial sectors
Main challenges: build on areas of absolute and comparative advantage; improve
connectivity to export markets; ensure appropriate skills development, and provision
of essential services
6. +
Rural growth – scale of investment?
Poultry production units near Naberezhnye Chelny, Tatarstan
Biorefining in Indiana, USA
7. +
Regional development Freeport in
Tatarstan – rural?
new openings for rural growth?
development of human and social capital in rural areas?
8. +
OECD view of rural development
“As policymakers consider strategies to encourage national
economic growth, they should draw on the growth potential of
rural areas …
“…recognising that due to lower population density and other
attributes specific to rural places, they face challenges that are
different than those in urban areas
“Technological innovation, increasing labour productivity and
international openness have provided new business
opportunities to rural dwellers
“Most rural communities work regularly with both small and
large neighbouring urban centres … due to economic
interactions”
9. +
Creating Breakthrough Innovations
Frans Johansson – author of the Medici Effect – at the
University of Nebraska Rural Futures Conference (2012)
“Live and work at the intersection – where ideas
from different fields and cultures meet and collide
“Interdisciplinary collaboration is important in
ensuring success in rural areas”
Is “meeting and colliding” more difficult than in urban
areas?
(because the population is sparse and higher education
attracts the brightest potential to the cities? … and will the
internet bridge the separation between rural and urban in
the future?)
10. +
And where does this innovation
score?
Heriot-Watt weaves
together Harris
Tweed history and
future
11. +
Rural development principles: look
for your assets!
• OECD Rural Working Party history
over 15 years
• Concern about rural quality of life, as
growth concentrated in urban areas …
• … made worse by agriculture shedding
labour and mechanising
• Invest in local assets – place
and people
• Land – a key asset in the provision of
ecosystems services … provided to
city consumers (cf Nature’s Metropolis)
contributing to urban growth
12. + Rural growth potential from ecosystems
services (often consumed in urban areas)
Provisioning services i.e. products obtained from
ecosystems
Food e.g. crops, fruit, fish
Fibre and fuel e.g. timber, wool
Biochemicals, natural medicines and pharmaceuticals
Genetic resources: genes and genetic information used for
animal/plant breeding and biotechnology
Ornamental resources e.g. shells, flowers
13. + Rural growth potential in ecosystem regulating
processes
Air-quality maintenance: ecosystems contribute chemicals to and
extract chemicals from the atmosphere
Climate regulation e.g. land cover can affect local temperature and
precipitation; globally ecosystems affect greenhouse gas
sequestration and emissions
Water regulation: ecosystems affect e.g. the timing and magnitude
of runoff, flooding etc.
Erosion control: vegetative cover plays an important role in soil
retention/prevention of land/asset erosion
Water purification/detoxification: ecosystems can be a source of
water impurities but can also help to filter out/decompose organic
waste
Natural hazard protection e.g. storms, floods, landslides
Bioremediation of waste i.e. removal of pollutants through storage,
dilution, transformation and burial
14. + Rural growth potential in cultural services
(enjoyed by urban dwellers too)
Many societies place high value on the maintenance of important
landscapes or species
Aesthetic values: many people find beauty in various aspects of
ecosystems
Recreation and ecotourism bring visitors and opportunities for
business growth
Rural areas are the inspiration for art, folklore, architecture etc
Many religions attach spiritual and religious values to ecosystems
and landscapes
Social relations: ecosystems affect the types of social relations
that are established e.g. fishing societies
15. +
Urban rural – the dissolving
boundary
Rural areas provide lots of potentially useful and services that benefit
urban areas, but often non-market goods and difficult to reward rural
producers
And where are rural areas anyway? Lots of research BUT, searching for
the definitive urban rural boundary = the holy grail
Some OECD progress; but migration an issue in GDP per head analysis
the urban folk who travel out to rural areas for work; and
the mobile, educated rural young people who move to cities
Michael Woods: “We need to be thinking about rural areas in the twenty
first century not just in relation to the metropolitan society of regional
cities, … but also in terms with how they fit within an increasingly
globalised economy and society – and how they retain a “rural” identity in
this expanded context”
16. +
Globalisation and Europe’s Rural
Regions (Woods et al in DERREG)
What’s happening globally?
integration of economic systems
increased mobility of goods and capital across national borders
concentration of economic influence in transnational corporations with a footloose
approach to capital accumulation
increased mobility of people
intensification of communication networks
stretching of social relations
circulation and hybridization of culture and knowledge systems.
Uneven geographies of globalization illustrated by different degrees of
global engagement
local embeddedness of rural businesses
international mobility and migration of rural populations
value placed on environmental capital and sustainable rural development
governance, capacity building and knowledge systems in rural regions
17. +
Lots of research already
EU Rural research themes FP7 FP6 preFP6 otherstudies
Drivers and trends
FARMPATH,
DERREG
TRANSMANGO
FARO,
AG2020
DORA
SCENAR2020II, SCAR
Foresight
Rural differentiation/typologies PASHMINA,RUFUS SCARLED
OECD typology,
Territorial Indicators
Rural theory ETUDE
RAPIDO
ASPIRE EDORA (ESPON)
Sustainable
development/ecosystems
SOILSERVICECLAIM
AnaEEE, ENVIEVAL
QuESSA
COCONUT
MEACAP
SEAMLESS
SENSOR
renewableenergy
(OECD)
New land management VOLANTE EU-LUPA (ESPON)
Rural employment/enterprise RURAL JOBS CARERA
TERA
RUREMPL
O
SERA, SEGIRA
Value chains GLAMUR
Social dimension SOFAR RESTRIM DEMIFER (ESPON)
multifunctionality/public goods PRIMA, ARANGE
MULTAGRI
TOP-MARD
MEA-SCOPE
EUROLAN PUBLIC GOODS
Knowledge systems/innovation
SOLINSAVALERIE
AgriSPIN(H2020)
urban-rural interaction PUREFOOD
SUPURBFOOD
PLUREL RURBAN(OECD)
governance CORASON PRIDE RuralPolicyReviews
(OECD)
policyimpact
RuDI, SPARD
CAP-IRE
TERESA,
CEEC-
AGRIPOLICY
IMPACT TIPTAP(ESPON)
18. +
But, how much has it helped shape
investments, policy or delivery?
Some research is driven by academics – delivering excellent
science through published papers and academic conferences
But, “Rural growth opportunities” ought to warrant a wider
approach to dissemination
So… what does this mean for EU research going forward?
First, pull together and communicate what we know from recent
work
And then address the challenges and opportunities over the next
two decades
… always bearing in mind the potential users/beneficiaries
19. +
So, how can research help policymakers
and investors in the 2020s and 2030s?
Big challenges/opportunities
Changing climate (water management, changes in crops)
Action to mitigate global emissions
Action to adapt to global emissions
Economic growth in BRICS and other emerging economies
Globalisation of trade
ICT and internal communication >> innovation potential
Migration (into EU)
Internal migration (between regions, urban/periurban/rural)
Ageing population (especially in rural areas)
Identify alternative realistic goals of European rural policy (outcome:
success = ???) and potential roadmaps to reach them
20. + AND - Apply sustainable development thinking to rural growth?
Draft schema prepared by University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership
21. +
Research into policy, into practice
“Good research never finds the definitive answers …
… but identifies convincingly more areas needing research”
So, how many legislators or officials are lucky enough to have timely research
findings to help design new instruments?
For example, are the EU’s latest CAP greening measures founded in good research and
analysis?
What effects will first pillar payments under the current CAP have on innovation,
productivity gains and economic diversification?
So…
COMMUNICATE FINDINGS IN APPROPRIATE LANGUAGE TO MINISTERS, OTHER
POLITICIANS, EXECUTIVE STAFF, MAYORS, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, AND
MOTIVATE RURAL ACTORS!
Tell them how it can help shape their principles and the policies they want to deliver
Academic papers are simply not sufficient
22. +
Rural growth opportunities:
a phased recipe?
First – know the context
Pull together all recent research
Explore futures scenarios given big challenges (eg
SCENAR 2030 encompassing all rural resources
and potential urban consumption)
Use “Big Data” to plot interrelation between rural
and other areas – domestically, internationally
Then – establish the development potential
Better specification of ecosystems services
potential – and its translation into policy,
instruments and practice
Economic spin-offs from investment in
ecosystems services; rewarding those who deliver
(eg farmers) as well as spin off business (eg
tourism)
…and explore how obstacles to success
can be removed
• The “drive gap” in rural institutions (local
government and economic development)
and equally in many small rural businesses
Look for good practice illustrations
• Comparative studies of success factors in
both leading and lagging areas
… and engage government and industry
leaders in the conclusions
23. +
A final word from Angel Gurria,
OECD Secretary General
“The success of large numbers of rural regions highlights
the potential that can be tapped when rural communities
are able to mobilise their place-based assets”
So, how can HORIZON 2020 research involving DG Agri and
colleagues in other DGs with interests in land use and
development help
take forward social science and local economic theory
help identify the place-based assets with potential
help politicians at all levels shape spending, taxation and regulation
help give rural communities confidence to invest
… and
thus encourage new openings for rural growth in an increasingly global
world
Notes de l'éditeur
Introduce myself [RAPIDLY] as more a user of research (interested in evidence and knowledge based policymaking) than an academic analyst identifying gaps in research or work under way that will need follow on projects.
Recognise the need for excellent science, research that helps industrial leadership, and the need to address key societal challenges.
Five themes proposed for DG Agri HORIZON 2020 are welcome. Interdependence between “new openings for rural growth” and “development of human and social capital in rural areas” is important; OECD, EC, national governments can highlight the potential for growth, but are local people and organisations equipped to deliver?
Local experience; how much research at the EC level actually influences outcomes on the ground? Evaluation is important. HERCULES study looking at special vehicles to manage cultural landscapes – such as the Cotswolds AONB. Easy to report on the bodies and what they do; harder to evaluate their achievements and thus recommend best practice.
In addressing the agenda, we have to recognise the very wide range of rural conditions across the EU, which means that rural development may have different goals and different drivers in different places; as the OECD has recently reminded us.
But that should also allow us to study success factors in relatively successful areas, and see if they can be translated into areas where the need is more acute.
We also need to be clear that while rural and urban areas are physically separate – the boundaries between them are increasingly hard to draw.
So please – no more research about precise rural urban boundaries. Different nations and different cultures define them in different ways. So academic analysis that seeks to provide comparative analysis finds little traction among policymakers.
In any case, significantly, many elements of rural production – and of rural potential – are of interest to consumers who increasingly live in cities. And many city services are of importance to those who live in areas of sparse population.
Improved communication – whether roads, broadband and mobile telephony – is increasing the interdependency over distance. The internet and delivery services have brought the supermarket to every home in rural England. And urban citizens anywhere can see the latest craft products at the Henningsvaer pottery in northern Norway - which could inspire a journey benefiting tourist operators there too.
And what do we mean by rural growth anyway? Biofuel production in the US has created huge plants in relatively empty rural areas – rather than ship raw material to urban zones for processing.
Modernisation of agriculture near Naberezhnye Chelny – in Tatarstan in the Russian Federation - has created this extensive egg and chicken processing business. It currently produces 100,000 tonnes of meat a year; and the further units are being constructed to increase the output by 50%.
You can see the city in the background. Is this a rural growth opportunity? Most workers come from the city – rather than the rural areas – a city that used to make all the tractors needed in the whole Soviet bloc.
And about half an hour from where the tractors were built - what about this huge new freeport style development in rural Tatarstan. One part of it now assembles imported tractors.
While the land itself was not particularly productive for farming, or other ecosystem services, sustainable development goals would have prioritised brownfield sites in urban areas. Among the drivers for using this site were the access to good roads and rail, and an existing power station.
Some way from the city – but I think DG Agri would not categorise this as a rural growth opportunity. While some workers are local, many travel some distance from Naberezhnye Chelny and other towns.
Exploiting the potential of rural areas (as well as urban) is important for national economic growth, but there are also risks associated with single industry towns if the market for their products declines.
These examples are an illustration that physical geography has limitations in defining rural development as a concept. In reality, however, there are large tracts of agrarian Europe (“Rural areas remote from Functional Urban Areas”) and consumption Europe (“Rural areas outside but close to Functional Areas) where the OECD’s work has helped consideration about how best to stimulate rural growth – both because it helps the social and economic challenges of those living away from urban and suburban areas; and because growth in rural regions can make a positive contribution to national growth.
Large plants may play a part, but always mindful of avoiding single industry towns in remote areas – dependent on just one big business. Russia and North America have that challenge to bear in mind.
in practice we should also be looking at business opportunities that involve smaller dispersed investments, drawing on the local growth potential and the scope for innovation.
Recent research by Frank Rowley and Philip McCann, published in Spatial Economic Analysis looks at the challenge of innovation – using Big Data.
As the OECD has affirmed – there is plenty of potential for growth in rural areas, based around what it has a lot of – LAND.
This was always the case. See Cronon’s history of Chicago and how Chicago’s great and good effectively shaped a huge hinterland to the west. In Europe, could we say the same about Brussels today?
Remind ourselves of the range of ecosystem services rural areas can offer urban areas (and the return factor that many services needed by rural people can only be delivered from cities - which is why it’s wrong to use the phrase rural economy in any meaningful way)
FLASH THROUGH THESE SLIDES IN 20 SECONDS EACH!
Here are some conclusions from just one
Who in the audience has read all of these; or more than half of these…
And when I was the Head of a Government department, how much of the findings influenced the advice that was put to my Ministers – even after appointing a Director of Science.
More recently, I was invited to be the Science Policy Adviser for the VOLANTE project. This was fascinating – in terms of the case studies and modelling, as well as the engagement with stakeholders. There were lots of things I wanted to pull out and put to governments – and to organise engagement between the experts in the team and policymakers across Europe.
So I have a big question for those who hold the research budgets…
illustrate the importance of system thinking, using a diagram devised for Cambridge University linking the six main ambitions of sustainable development with the government, business and financial instruments that need to come together to deliver them. This is a draft. But so many of the principles can inform rural growth – and make sure it last.
Pleased that DG Agri is working with DG Environment, DG Regions and Cities, DG Energy etc
As a discussant, here are my suggestions for the content of a RURAL GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAMME
But, it’s important to present the full findings and implications well. That means…