Title of Workshop: HealthLIt4Kids: Building health literacy from the schoolyard
Objectives
1. Develop a shared understanding of health literacy.
2. Consider the impact of health literacy on health, education and health equity.
2. Define a Health Literate school.
3. Explore and classify HealthLit4Kids Artefacts using Nutbeam’s Health Literacy Framework (Functional, Interactive and Critical Health Literacy, 2000).
4. Identify barriers and enablers to the transferability of HealthLit4Kids Program
Workshop Format
Interspersed with didactic presentation of information, the workshop participants will engage in the following activities:
1. WARMUP (Think-Pair-Share): Workshop facilitators invite participants to explore their own definitions of health literacy and record this on sticky notes. In pairs or small groups the definitions are shared and discussed. Small groups then share their definition with all participants.
2. BINGO (team work): Five HealthLit4Kids primary schools in Tasmania have brainstormed and defined their notion of a health literate school. In small groups, the participants will be provided with these definitions and invited to use them to identify 5 commonalities and 5 differences across the 5 schools. The first group to identify 5 commonalities and 5 differences wins! The groups will then combine the 5 definitions.
3. Small Group Learning: Each small group will be assigned an area of the Australian Curriculum for Health and Physical Education and asked to classify the HealthLit4Kids artefacts within each area according to Nutbeam’s (2000) framework.
4. Facilitated Discussion or Debate: The participants will be divided into two teams to debate the following statement: “HealthLit4Kids can be readily incorporated into our primary school”. Each team will prepare either an affirmative or negative argument for a facilitated debate.
Learning goals
Workshop participants will learn:
1. Health literacy development in childhood can lead to better health outcomes and reduce the risk of non-communicable disease
2. Schools play a key role in breaking the cycle of health inequalities by promoting health literacy through education that provides students with the literacy skills to understand health information, solve health problems and make critical health decisions
3. How HealthLit4kids can be transferred into other school settings.
Contact Details workshop facilitators:
Dr Rosie Nash rmcshane@utas.edu.au
Dr Shandell Elmer shandell.elmer@utas.edu.au or slelmer@swin.edu.au
2. 1. Develop a shared understanding of health literacy.
2. Consider the impact of health literacy on health, education and
health equity.
3. Define the characteristics of a Health Literate school.
4. Explore and classify HealthLit4Kids Artefacts using Nutbeam’s
(Functional, Interactive and Critical) Health Literacy Framework
5. Identify barriers and enablers to implementing HealthLit4Kids
Program in your school, daily practice.
Session Objectives
3. Time Activity
5:30 -5:35pm Introductions
5:35 -5:40pm WARMUP
5:40-5:50pm What is HealthLit4Kids?
5:50-6:00pm BINGO
6:00-6:10pm MIX & MATCH
6:10-6:20pm DEBATE
6:20-6:30pm Close
Session Overview
5. “Health literacy is the ability to make sound health
decisions in the context of everyday life; at home, in
the community, at the workplace, the health care
system, the market place and the political arena. It is a
critical empowerment strategy to increase people’s
control over their health, their ability to seek out
information and their ability to take responsibility.”
Kickbusch, Wait and Maag (2005)
Definition
8. Principles Description
1. Outcomes focused Improved health and reduced health inequalities
2. Equity driven All activities at all stages prioritise disadvantaged groups and
those experiencing inequity in access and outcome
3. Co-design approach In all activities at all stages, relevant stakeholders engage
collaboratively to design solutions
4. Needs- diagnostic
approach
Participatory assessment of local needs using local data
5. Driven by local wisdom Intervention development and implementation is grounded in
local experience and expertise
6. Sustainable Optimal health literacy practice becomes normal practice and
policy
7. Responsiveness Recognise that health literacy needs and the appropriate
responses vary across individuals, contexts, countries, cultures
and time
8. Systematically applied A multilevel approach in which resources, interventions,
research and policy are organised to optimise health literacy
OpHeLiA
10. Each small group will be assigned 5 Lesson Plans and asked to identify which
area of the ACHPE they address and to classify the HealthLit4Kids artefacts within
each area according to Nutbeam’s (2000) framework.
• Which area of the ACHPE does the lesson plan relate to?
• Which dimension of health literacy is addressed?
Open Education Resource:
http://www.utas.edu.au/health/community-programs/healthlit4kid
MIX “n” MATCH
11. MIX “n” MATCH
Functional Interactive Critical
Researching and applying
information relating to
knowledge and services to
respond to a health-related
question
Requires more advanced
knowledge, understanding
and skills to actively and
independently engage with
a health issue and to apply
new information to
changing circumstances
Ability to selectively access
and critically analyse health
information from a variety of
sources (which might include
scientific information, health
brochures or messages in the
media) to take action to
promote personal health and
wellbeing or that of others.
Factual information about
risks, medications, health
services
Searching for online health
information
Self-confidence to act on
advice
Community action event
(social determinants)
ACHPE, Nutbeam (2000)
Which area of the ACHPE does the lesson plan relate to?
Which dimension of health literacy is addressed?
13. Where to from here?
• You can start discussions about HealthLit4Kids in your school
• HealthLit4Kids Summary
• Registration of Interest
CLOSE
Notes de l'éditeur
Health literacy can be improved through education and is a measurable outcome to health education • Differences in educational methods, media and content will result in different learning outcomes • Improving functional health literacy based on relatively limited communication of factual information on health risks, and on how to use medications and health care services
Improving interactive health literacy will require the use of more interactive forms of health education directed towards improving self-confidence to act on information and advice received. • This is best delivered in a more structured educational setting, or through well designed on-line learning programmes. • Good examples can be found in: - school health education programs, - health clinic education
Improving critical health literacy involves health education that is more interactive and may include the communication of information to support a variety of health actions to address both personal and social determinants of health. • The content of health education should not only be directed at changing personal lifestyle but also at raising awareness of the social determinants of health, and actions which may lead to modification of these determinants. • This also has implications for the education and communication methods, challenging health educators to communicate in ways that draw upon personal experience, invite interaction, participation and critical analysis.
Develop health literacy
Health literacy can be understood as an individual’s ability to gain access to, understand and use health information and services in ways that promote and maintain health and wellbeing. The Health and Physical Education curriculum focuses on developing knowledge, understanding and skills related to the three dimensions of health literacy:
functional dimension –interactive dimension –critical dimension –