Soumettre la recherche
Mettre en ligne
Taylor2 ppt ch8
•
Télécharger en tant que PPT, PDF
•
2 j'aime
•
886 vues
SUNY Ulster
Suivre
CRJ235
Lire moins
Lire la suite
Signaler
Partager
Signaler
Partager
1 sur 15
Télécharger maintenant
Recommandé
Survey of state law on parental rights to waive liability for their minor children in the context of youth sports.
Is that parental liability waiver worth the paper?
Is that parental liability waiver worth the paper?
Dina Raymond
There is an entitlement to electronic discovery, while a document retention policy can provide a safe harbor. What are the duties to preserve documents, and what are the risks of destruction?
Document Retention Policies Intersect Electronic Discovery Obligations - by M...
Document Retention Policies Intersect Electronic Discovery Obligations - by M...
SHIMOKAJI IP
CRJ235
Taylor2 ppt ch9
Taylor2 ppt ch9
SUNY Ulster
Taylor2 ppt ch1
Taylor2 ppt ch1
SUNY Ulster
Chapter 15 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BEFORE TRIAL
Chapter 15 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BEFORE TRIAL
Lisa Greene
Module # 2 Civil Trial
Module # 2 Civil Trial
greggmorphew
Pre trial procedure 2011-12
Pre trial procedure 2011-12
Miss Hart
Chapter8
Chapter8
SUNY Ulster
Recommandé
Survey of state law on parental rights to waive liability for their minor children in the context of youth sports.
Is that parental liability waiver worth the paper?
Is that parental liability waiver worth the paper?
Dina Raymond
There is an entitlement to electronic discovery, while a document retention policy can provide a safe harbor. What are the duties to preserve documents, and what are the risks of destruction?
Document Retention Policies Intersect Electronic Discovery Obligations - by M...
Document Retention Policies Intersect Electronic Discovery Obligations - by M...
SHIMOKAJI IP
CRJ235
Taylor2 ppt ch9
Taylor2 ppt ch9
SUNY Ulster
Taylor2 ppt ch1
Taylor2 ppt ch1
SUNY Ulster
Chapter 15 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BEFORE TRIAL
Chapter 15 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BEFORE TRIAL
Lisa Greene
Module # 2 Civil Trial
Module # 2 Civil Trial
greggmorphew
Pre trial procedure 2011-12
Pre trial procedure 2011-12
Miss Hart
Chapter8
Chapter8
SUNY Ulster
Chapter 9 notes
81-260-1 Chapter 09
81-260-1 Chapter 09
mpalaro
Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice
Lisa Smith-Butler
COLORADO 15 The first specialized juvenile court in the United States was created on July 1, 1899, as part of an Illinois legislative act establishing the juvenile court division of the circuit court for Cook County.2 The 1899 Illinois legislation codified a more progressive way to treat wayward youth: instead of showing them the error of their ways by punishing them, the state would help youth correct their course and become productive, law-abiding citizens. Because the goal of the newly-created system focused on rehabilitation and not just punishment, the state law required only cursory legal proceedings that placed judicial economy and youth rehabilitation before due process.3 There was no role for defense attorneys—and little role for prosecutors—in that system. Social workers and behavioral scientists advised the court on the most appropriate disposition of the cases. For the first time, detained youth were separated from adult offenders and placed in training and industrial schools, as well as in private foster homes and institutions.4 This type of specialized juvenile court was quickly duplicated in the larger cities of the East and Midwest, so that by 1925, some form of juvenile court existed in all but two states.5 Until the 1960s, constitutional challenges to juvenile court practices and procedures were consistently overruled. Children were denied the rights to counsel, public adjudications, and jury adjudications. They did not have any immunity against self-incrimination. They could be convicted on hearsay testimony.6 They could also be convicted by only a preponderance of the evidence. Previous case law found that juvenile proceedings were civil in nature and that their purpose was to reha- bilitate rather than punish.7 Research on the juvenile justice system had begun to show that juvenile court judges often lacked legal training;8 that probation officers were undertrained and that their heavy caseloads often prohibited meaningful social intervention; that children were still regularly housed in adult facilities; and that juvenile correctional institutions were often, in reality, overcrowded and violent juvenile prisons serving as little more than breeding grounds for further criminal activity. In 1963, the United States Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel requires that indigent adults charged with a felony offense be appointed an attorney at public expense. In that seminal case, Gideon v. Wainwright,9 a unanimous court wrote that any person too poor to hire a lawyer cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him, explaining that “lawyers in criminal court are necessities, not luxuries.”10 In the wake of Gideon, in a series of cases starting in 1966, the Supreme Court extended this and other bedrock elements of due process to youth facing delinquency proceedings. Arguably the most important of these cases, In re Gault,11 held that juveniles facing delinquency pro ...
COLORADO 15The first specialized juvenile court in the Uni.docx
COLORADO 15The first specialized juvenile court in the Uni.docx
clarebernice
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
screaminc
American bar association child law practice
American bar association child law practice
screaminc
Juvenile Justice System Comment by Jamie Price: Good job with the title page Chalyne A. Arvie CPSS235 26FEB2018 JAMIE PRICE Running head: JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM 1 JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM 7 Juvenile Justice System Juvenile Justice System Development Comment by Jamie Price: Good job with using headings. But your first paragraph should be an introduction. Introduce the main points that will be covered. Let the reader know where the paper is going. Refer to my help documents associated with this assignment for assistance with creating a good academic introduction. In the United States, the adolescent court framework was established more than ten years before the main court establishment in 1899 in Illinois. Before its formation, all youngsters were considered as adults or grownup where they were punished in similar ways as adults. Prior to the creation of juvenile courts, the common law's infancy defense provided the only special protections for young offenders charged with crimes. The common law conclusively presumed that children younger than seven years of age lacked criminal capacity, while those fourteen years of age and older possessed full criminal responsibility. Comment by Jamie Price: This is good information but you need to cite your work. If the information isn’t common knowledge, you need to cite it using in-text citations. Some basic formats are: Blah blah blah (Last name, year). According to Last name (year), blah blah blah. Last name (year) reported that “blah blah blah” (p. #). “Blah blah blah” (Last name, year, p. #). The history of the juvenile justice system dates as far back as to the bible to Roman Era time. In this period, it was the parent’s responsibility to punish their children, unless the child is in need of a more severe consequences. In the middle ages, common law was established in England. The use of shires, reeves, and chancellors were used. When being punished, the English used the same punishments on children over the age of seven as an adult. In eighteenth-century London, jails were created based upon workhouses. On July 1899, United States established the first juvenile justice system located in Illinois. The Illinois legislature passed the Illinois Juvenile Act that would disciple accordingly to children under the age of sixteen. The juvenile courts were to take jurisdiction over the children (Champion, Merlo, & Benekos, 2013). Comment by Jamie Price: Try to remove unnecessary words. “is in need of a” = needs Comment by Jamie Price: Good job citing your work. Predominant Philosophy of the Juvenile System Alterations in the social origination ideology of youngsters and the system of cultural control in the nineteenth-century y led to the establishment of the very first juvenile court in 1899. To differentiate between the young and adult offenders, progressive philosophers made efforts to reform the juvenile court system. They developed new thoughts regarding adolescence and made the court ...
Juvenile Justice SystemComment by Jamie Price Good job.docx
Juvenile Justice SystemComment by Jamie Price Good job.docx
tawnyataylor528
Unit V: Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Impact on the Juvenile Justice System in America Introduction • We are now starting Unit V: Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Impact on the Juvenile Justice System in America. • So far, we have covered and discussed the historical background of juvenile delinquency and the juvenile justice system in the United States, criminological theories that help to expand our understanding of juvenile delinquency, the complex relationship between police officers and juveniles, juvenile gangs, and key actors that help play crucial roles as they relate to the structure of the juvenile court system. Unit V: U.S. Supreme Court Rulings • If you will recall, you learned about juvenile defense attorneys, juvenile prosecuting attorneys, and the juvenile court judge in the previous unit. • In this unit, you will take what you have learned and expand your knowledge, exploring U.S. Supreme Court cases that helped define and direct juvenile corrections, juvenile defense attorneys, juvenile prosecuting attorneys, and juvenile court judges. Unit V: U.S. Supreme Court Rulings • Before we begin, watch the video linked below that continues the story of Little John, a juvenile. https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_c ontent/courses/emergency_services/bcj/bcj 2201/15K/video/unitv_video.mp4 • Click here to access the transcript for this video. https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_content/courses/emergency_services/bcj/bcj2201/15K/video/unitv_video.mp4 https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/CSU_Content/courses/Emergency_Services/BCJ/BCJ2201/15K/transcripts/BCJ2201_UnitV_Transcript.pdf https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_content/courses/emergency_services/bcj/bcj2201/15K/video/unitv_video.mp4 https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_content/courses/emergency_services/bcj/bcj2201/15K/video/unitv_video.mp4 Consider the Following You will want to start thinking about this question as you read through the following U.S. Supreme Court decisions and cases: • How does this case directly relate to juvenile defense attorneys and juvenile court judges who preside over juvenile court cases? Court Cases The information below provides a brief description of some of the cases we will explore. Figure 1: U.S. Supreme Court decisions impacting juvenile court system. (“U.S. Supreme Court Cases,” 1999) https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/9912_2/juv2.html https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/9912_2/juv2.html Kent v. United States So, let’s begin by examining the first landmark case you will learn about: Kent v. United States. Before we can examine the case, we need to know the background and historical makeup of the case. • In 1961, Morris Kent was a 16-year-old juvenile who was charged with rape and robbery. • While in custody, Kent confessed to the criminal charges and crimes against him. Kent v. United States • Kent’s defense lawyer filed a request ...
Unit V Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Imp.docx
Unit V Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Imp.docx
marilucorr
Power Point Presentation on the newest cases in Juvenile Law Arena.
Juvenile Case Law Update
Juvenile Case Law Update
Disability Rights Center of Kansas
Presentation given at a continuing Legal Education Seminar at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, KS, December 2008.
Juvenile Case Law Update
Juvenile Case Law Update
guesta13f3a
The law has long defined a line between juvenile and adult offenders, but that line has been drawn at different places, for different reasons. Early in United States history, the law was heavily influenced by the common law of England, which governed the American colonies. One of the most important English lawyers of the time was William Blackstone. Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, first published in the late 1760s, were widely read and admired by our nation’s founders.
The history of juvenile justice
The history of juvenile justice
Shamori Williams
Adolescent Transfer_APLS 2009
Adolescent Transfer_APLS 2009
Suzanne Kaasa
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
Karon Washburn Rowden
Ch 17 Pretrial Process
Ch 17 Pretrial Process
rharrisonaz
Chapter13
Chapter13
SUNY Ulster
This presentation explores the rights of children of abuse, neglect, and abandonment to be represented in juvenile court and receive zealous advocacy on his/her behalf. Models of representation are addressed and the impact of the Kenny A. v. Perdue class action lawsuit on attorneys' duties in providing counsel to children.
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
bartoncenter
Case law updatepaper5807
Case law updatepaper5807
screaminc
✍️
Brown V. Board Of Education Case
Brown V. Board Of Education Case
Dani Cox
7 Juvenile Justice Procedures Chapter Learning Objectives On completion of this chapter, students should be able to do the following: Understand and discuss juvenile court procedures Discuss the rights of juveniles at various stages, from taking into custody through appeals Understand requirements for bail, notification, and filing of petitions Discuss procedures involved in detaining juveniles What Would You Do? It is Friday night and you are in bed. Your 13-year-old daughter is spending the night with a friend. The two girls told you they were going to a movie and back to her friend’s home. Her friend’s older sister, who is 18, is going to drive them to and from the movie. At approximately 2:15 a.m. you get a phone call. The caller identifies herself as Lisa Strom, an employee of the Forten County Detention Center. She says that your daughter has been taken into custody for curfew violation, possession of alcohol by a minor, peace disturbance, and assaulting a police officer. Ms. Strom informs you that your daughter will be held in detention pending a review of her case by a juvenile intake officer. This review will take place within the next 24 hours and you will receive another phone call once the juvenile intake officer decides to hold or release the child. She states that you are allowed to visit your daughter once within the next 24 hours and informs you that visitation is allowed between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. that day. The only question you can think to ask is if your daughter is okay. Ms. Strom says your daughter is going through the intake process and is in good health. You hang up the phone wide awake and wondering what to do next. What Would You Do? 1. Would your daughter be classified as a status offender or a delinquent, according to the charges? 2. What would be your next course of action? Would you contact a lawyer, wait for the phone call from the juvenile intake officer, visit your daughter during visiting hours, or do something else? 3. If you were the juvenile intake officer, would you continue to detain this child or release her to her parents pending court? Juvenile court acts discuss not only the purposes and scope of the juvenile justice system but also the procedure the juvenile courts are to follow. Proceedings concerning juveniles officially begin with the filing of a petition alleging that a juvenile is delinquent, dependent, neglected, abused, in need of supervision, or in need of authoritative intervention. Most juvenile court acts, however, also discuss the unofficial or diversionary activities available as remedies prior to the filing of a petition such as a stationhouse adjustment and a preliminary conference. A stationhouse adjustment occurs when a police officer negotiates a settlement with a juvenile, often with his or her parents, without taking further official action (a full discussion of stationhouse adjustments follows in Chapter 8). A preliminary conference is a voluntary meeting arranged by .
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
sleeperharwell
Ch 14 Criminal Responsibility and Defenses
Ch 14 Criminal Responsibility and Defenses
rharrisonaz
JUVENILE CURFEWS Issues. Definitions of terminologies used. Conclusions and inferences made on the issue. Evidence and facts on conclusions made Analysis of evidence used to make conclusions 1 Placing a juvenile curfew or specific rules that children under the age of 18 years of age has been a long going argument and is a topic with great opposing views. In this presentation we will look at the issues, go over the definitions for some of the common terminology and look at both sides of the arguments with supporting evidence for both. 1 The Argument: Should there be a legal curfew and driving restrictions to those under 18? Definitions legal curfews: laws that legally limit or prohibit ones ability and right to enjoy certain state of affairs as he was used to. juvenile curfews: are passed in state and local levels to limit or prohibit persons under 18 from enjoying certain privileges. restriction: to deny access to or prohibit. issue is very controversial as its constitutionality is often contested under 1st, 4th,5th, 9th and 14th amendments that protect individuals fundamental rights 2 The first term is legal curfews: laws that legally limit or prohibit ones ability and right to enjoy certain state of affairs as he was used to. Next is juvenile curfews: are passed in state and local levels to limit or prohibit persons under 18 from enjoying certain privileges. The term restrictions is to deny access or prohibit. This leads to questions of the constitutional rights of individuals covered under the 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th and 14th amendments. 2 Amendments 1st: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” 4th: “enforced the notion that “each man’s home is his castle”, secure from unreasonable searches and seizures of property by the government. It protects against arbitrary arrests, and is the basis of the law regarding search warrants, stop-and-frisk, safety inspections, wiretaps, and other forms of surveillance, as well as being central to many other criminal law topics and to privacy law.” 5th: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” 3 Cornell Law The first would cover if a person under the age of the ...
JUVENILE CURFEWSIssues.Definitions of terminologies used.C.docx
JUVENILE CURFEWSIssues.Definitions of terminologies used.C.docx
DIPESH30
Microbiology: Viruses
2020 microbiology viruses final
2020 microbiology viruses final
SUNY Ulster
Analgesia
Analgesia
Analgesia
SUNY Ulster
Contenu connexe
Similaire à Taylor2 ppt ch8
Chapter 9 notes
81-260-1 Chapter 09
81-260-1 Chapter 09
mpalaro
Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice
Lisa Smith-Butler
COLORADO 15 The first specialized juvenile court in the United States was created on July 1, 1899, as part of an Illinois legislative act establishing the juvenile court division of the circuit court for Cook County.2 The 1899 Illinois legislation codified a more progressive way to treat wayward youth: instead of showing them the error of their ways by punishing them, the state would help youth correct their course and become productive, law-abiding citizens. Because the goal of the newly-created system focused on rehabilitation and not just punishment, the state law required only cursory legal proceedings that placed judicial economy and youth rehabilitation before due process.3 There was no role for defense attorneys—and little role for prosecutors—in that system. Social workers and behavioral scientists advised the court on the most appropriate disposition of the cases. For the first time, detained youth were separated from adult offenders and placed in training and industrial schools, as well as in private foster homes and institutions.4 This type of specialized juvenile court was quickly duplicated in the larger cities of the East and Midwest, so that by 1925, some form of juvenile court existed in all but two states.5 Until the 1960s, constitutional challenges to juvenile court practices and procedures were consistently overruled. Children were denied the rights to counsel, public adjudications, and jury adjudications. They did not have any immunity against self-incrimination. They could be convicted on hearsay testimony.6 They could also be convicted by only a preponderance of the evidence. Previous case law found that juvenile proceedings were civil in nature and that their purpose was to reha- bilitate rather than punish.7 Research on the juvenile justice system had begun to show that juvenile court judges often lacked legal training;8 that probation officers were undertrained and that their heavy caseloads often prohibited meaningful social intervention; that children were still regularly housed in adult facilities; and that juvenile correctional institutions were often, in reality, overcrowded and violent juvenile prisons serving as little more than breeding grounds for further criminal activity. In 1963, the United States Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel requires that indigent adults charged with a felony offense be appointed an attorney at public expense. In that seminal case, Gideon v. Wainwright,9 a unanimous court wrote that any person too poor to hire a lawyer cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him, explaining that “lawyers in criminal court are necessities, not luxuries.”10 In the wake of Gideon, in a series of cases starting in 1966, the Supreme Court extended this and other bedrock elements of due process to youth facing delinquency proceedings. Arguably the most important of these cases, In re Gault,11 held that juveniles facing delinquency pro ...
COLORADO 15The first specialized juvenile court in the Uni.docx
COLORADO 15The first specialized juvenile court in the Uni.docx
clarebernice
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
screaminc
American bar association child law practice
American bar association child law practice
screaminc
Juvenile Justice System Comment by Jamie Price: Good job with the title page Chalyne A. Arvie CPSS235 26FEB2018 JAMIE PRICE Running head: JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM 1 JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM 7 Juvenile Justice System Juvenile Justice System Development Comment by Jamie Price: Good job with using headings. But your first paragraph should be an introduction. Introduce the main points that will be covered. Let the reader know where the paper is going. Refer to my help documents associated with this assignment for assistance with creating a good academic introduction. In the United States, the adolescent court framework was established more than ten years before the main court establishment in 1899 in Illinois. Before its formation, all youngsters were considered as adults or grownup where they were punished in similar ways as adults. Prior to the creation of juvenile courts, the common law's infancy defense provided the only special protections for young offenders charged with crimes. The common law conclusively presumed that children younger than seven years of age lacked criminal capacity, while those fourteen years of age and older possessed full criminal responsibility. Comment by Jamie Price: This is good information but you need to cite your work. If the information isn’t common knowledge, you need to cite it using in-text citations. Some basic formats are: Blah blah blah (Last name, year). According to Last name (year), blah blah blah. Last name (year) reported that “blah blah blah” (p. #). “Blah blah blah” (Last name, year, p. #). The history of the juvenile justice system dates as far back as to the bible to Roman Era time. In this period, it was the parent’s responsibility to punish their children, unless the child is in need of a more severe consequences. In the middle ages, common law was established in England. The use of shires, reeves, and chancellors were used. When being punished, the English used the same punishments on children over the age of seven as an adult. In eighteenth-century London, jails were created based upon workhouses. On July 1899, United States established the first juvenile justice system located in Illinois. The Illinois legislature passed the Illinois Juvenile Act that would disciple accordingly to children under the age of sixteen. The juvenile courts were to take jurisdiction over the children (Champion, Merlo, & Benekos, 2013). Comment by Jamie Price: Try to remove unnecessary words. “is in need of a” = needs Comment by Jamie Price: Good job citing your work. Predominant Philosophy of the Juvenile System Alterations in the social origination ideology of youngsters and the system of cultural control in the nineteenth-century y led to the establishment of the very first juvenile court in 1899. To differentiate between the young and adult offenders, progressive philosophers made efforts to reform the juvenile court system. They developed new thoughts regarding adolescence and made the court ...
Juvenile Justice SystemComment by Jamie Price Good job.docx
Juvenile Justice SystemComment by Jamie Price Good job.docx
tawnyataylor528
Unit V: Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Impact on the Juvenile Justice System in America Introduction • We are now starting Unit V: Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Impact on the Juvenile Justice System in America. • So far, we have covered and discussed the historical background of juvenile delinquency and the juvenile justice system in the United States, criminological theories that help to expand our understanding of juvenile delinquency, the complex relationship between police officers and juveniles, juvenile gangs, and key actors that help play crucial roles as they relate to the structure of the juvenile court system. Unit V: U.S. Supreme Court Rulings • If you will recall, you learned about juvenile defense attorneys, juvenile prosecuting attorneys, and the juvenile court judge in the previous unit. • In this unit, you will take what you have learned and expand your knowledge, exploring U.S. Supreme Court cases that helped define and direct juvenile corrections, juvenile defense attorneys, juvenile prosecuting attorneys, and juvenile court judges. Unit V: U.S. Supreme Court Rulings • Before we begin, watch the video linked below that continues the story of Little John, a juvenile. https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_c ontent/courses/emergency_services/bcj/bcj 2201/15K/video/unitv_video.mp4 • Click here to access the transcript for this video. https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_content/courses/emergency_services/bcj/bcj2201/15K/video/unitv_video.mp4 https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/CSU_Content/courses/Emergency_Services/BCJ/BCJ2201/15K/transcripts/BCJ2201_UnitV_Transcript.pdf https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_content/courses/emergency_services/bcj/bcj2201/15K/video/unitv_video.mp4 https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/csu_content/courses/emergency_services/bcj/bcj2201/15K/video/unitv_video.mp4 Consider the Following You will want to start thinking about this question as you read through the following U.S. Supreme Court decisions and cases: • How does this case directly relate to juvenile defense attorneys and juvenile court judges who preside over juvenile court cases? Court Cases The information below provides a brief description of some of the cases we will explore. Figure 1: U.S. Supreme Court decisions impacting juvenile court system. (“U.S. Supreme Court Cases,” 1999) https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/9912_2/juv2.html https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/9912_2/juv2.html Kent v. United States So, let’s begin by examining the first landmark case you will learn about: Kent v. United States. Before we can examine the case, we need to know the background and historical makeup of the case. • In 1961, Morris Kent was a 16-year-old juvenile who was charged with rape and robbery. • While in custody, Kent confessed to the criminal charges and crimes against him. Kent v. United States • Kent’s defense lawyer filed a request ...
Unit V Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Imp.docx
Unit V Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Imp.docx
marilucorr
Power Point Presentation on the newest cases in Juvenile Law Arena.
Juvenile Case Law Update
Juvenile Case Law Update
Disability Rights Center of Kansas
Presentation given at a continuing Legal Education Seminar at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, KS, December 2008.
Juvenile Case Law Update
Juvenile Case Law Update
guesta13f3a
The law has long defined a line between juvenile and adult offenders, but that line has been drawn at different places, for different reasons. Early in United States history, the law was heavily influenced by the common law of England, which governed the American colonies. One of the most important English lawyers of the time was William Blackstone. Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, first published in the late 1760s, were widely read and admired by our nation’s founders.
The history of juvenile justice
The history of juvenile justice
Shamori Williams
Adolescent Transfer_APLS 2009
Adolescent Transfer_APLS 2009
Suzanne Kaasa
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
Karon Washburn Rowden
Ch 17 Pretrial Process
Ch 17 Pretrial Process
rharrisonaz
Chapter13
Chapter13
SUNY Ulster
This presentation explores the rights of children of abuse, neglect, and abandonment to be represented in juvenile court and receive zealous advocacy on his/her behalf. Models of representation are addressed and the impact of the Kenny A. v. Perdue class action lawsuit on attorneys' duties in providing counsel to children.
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
bartoncenter
Case law updatepaper5807
Case law updatepaper5807
screaminc
✍️
Brown V. Board Of Education Case
Brown V. Board Of Education Case
Dani Cox
7 Juvenile Justice Procedures Chapter Learning Objectives On completion of this chapter, students should be able to do the following: Understand and discuss juvenile court procedures Discuss the rights of juveniles at various stages, from taking into custody through appeals Understand requirements for bail, notification, and filing of petitions Discuss procedures involved in detaining juveniles What Would You Do? It is Friday night and you are in bed. Your 13-year-old daughter is spending the night with a friend. The two girls told you they were going to a movie and back to her friend’s home. Her friend’s older sister, who is 18, is going to drive them to and from the movie. At approximately 2:15 a.m. you get a phone call. The caller identifies herself as Lisa Strom, an employee of the Forten County Detention Center. She says that your daughter has been taken into custody for curfew violation, possession of alcohol by a minor, peace disturbance, and assaulting a police officer. Ms. Strom informs you that your daughter will be held in detention pending a review of her case by a juvenile intake officer. This review will take place within the next 24 hours and you will receive another phone call once the juvenile intake officer decides to hold or release the child. She states that you are allowed to visit your daughter once within the next 24 hours and informs you that visitation is allowed between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. that day. The only question you can think to ask is if your daughter is okay. Ms. Strom says your daughter is going through the intake process and is in good health. You hang up the phone wide awake and wondering what to do next. What Would You Do? 1. Would your daughter be classified as a status offender or a delinquent, according to the charges? 2. What would be your next course of action? Would you contact a lawyer, wait for the phone call from the juvenile intake officer, visit your daughter during visiting hours, or do something else? 3. If you were the juvenile intake officer, would you continue to detain this child or release her to her parents pending court? Juvenile court acts discuss not only the purposes and scope of the juvenile justice system but also the procedure the juvenile courts are to follow. Proceedings concerning juveniles officially begin with the filing of a petition alleging that a juvenile is delinquent, dependent, neglected, abused, in need of supervision, or in need of authoritative intervention. Most juvenile court acts, however, also discuss the unofficial or diversionary activities available as remedies prior to the filing of a petition such as a stationhouse adjustment and a preliminary conference. A stationhouse adjustment occurs when a police officer negotiates a settlement with a juvenile, often with his or her parents, without taking further official action (a full discussion of stationhouse adjustments follows in Chapter 8). A preliminary conference is a voluntary meeting arranged by .
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
sleeperharwell
Ch 14 Criminal Responsibility and Defenses
Ch 14 Criminal Responsibility and Defenses
rharrisonaz
JUVENILE CURFEWS Issues. Definitions of terminologies used. Conclusions and inferences made on the issue. Evidence and facts on conclusions made Analysis of evidence used to make conclusions 1 Placing a juvenile curfew or specific rules that children under the age of 18 years of age has been a long going argument and is a topic with great opposing views. In this presentation we will look at the issues, go over the definitions for some of the common terminology and look at both sides of the arguments with supporting evidence for both. 1 The Argument: Should there be a legal curfew and driving restrictions to those under 18? Definitions legal curfews: laws that legally limit or prohibit ones ability and right to enjoy certain state of affairs as he was used to. juvenile curfews: are passed in state and local levels to limit or prohibit persons under 18 from enjoying certain privileges. restriction: to deny access to or prohibit. issue is very controversial as its constitutionality is often contested under 1st, 4th,5th, 9th and 14th amendments that protect individuals fundamental rights 2 The first term is legal curfews: laws that legally limit or prohibit ones ability and right to enjoy certain state of affairs as he was used to. Next is juvenile curfews: are passed in state and local levels to limit or prohibit persons under 18 from enjoying certain privileges. The term restrictions is to deny access or prohibit. This leads to questions of the constitutional rights of individuals covered under the 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th and 14th amendments. 2 Amendments 1st: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” 4th: “enforced the notion that “each man’s home is his castle”, secure from unreasonable searches and seizures of property by the government. It protects against arbitrary arrests, and is the basis of the law regarding search warrants, stop-and-frisk, safety inspections, wiretaps, and other forms of surveillance, as well as being central to many other criminal law topics and to privacy law.” 5th: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” 3 Cornell Law The first would cover if a person under the age of the ...
JUVENILE CURFEWSIssues.Definitions of terminologies used.C.docx
JUVENILE CURFEWSIssues.Definitions of terminologies used.C.docx
DIPESH30
Similaire à Taylor2 ppt ch8
(20)
81-260-1 Chapter 09
81-260-1 Chapter 09
Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice
COLORADO 15The first specialized juvenile court in the Uni.docx
COLORADO 15The first specialized juvenile court in the Uni.docx
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
Np v state_of_georgia_usa_statement_of_interest
American bar association child law practice
American bar association child law practice
Juvenile Justice SystemComment by Jamie Price Good job.docx
Juvenile Justice SystemComment by Jamie Price Good job.docx
Unit V Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Imp.docx
Unit V Significant U.S. Supreme Court Rulings and the Imp.docx
Juvenile Case Law Update
Juvenile Case Law Update
Juvenile Case Law Update
Juvenile Case Law Update
The history of juvenile justice
The history of juvenile justice
Adolescent Transfer_APLS 2009
Adolescent Transfer_APLS 2009
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
SIJS and SAPCRS Autosaved update 072416
Ch 17 Pretrial Process
Ch 17 Pretrial Process
Chapter13
Chapter13
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
Child's Right to Counsel in Dependency Proceedings
Case law updatepaper5807
Case law updatepaper5807
Brown V. Board Of Education Case
Brown V. Board Of Education Case
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
7 Juvenile Justice ProceduresChapter Learning Objectives.docx
Ch 14 Criminal Responsibility and Defenses
Ch 14 Criminal Responsibility and Defenses
JUVENILE CURFEWSIssues.Definitions of terminologies used.C.docx
JUVENILE CURFEWSIssues.Definitions of terminologies used.C.docx
Plus de SUNY Ulster
Microbiology: Viruses
2020 microbiology viruses final
2020 microbiology viruses final
SUNY Ulster
Analgesia
Analgesia
Analgesia
SUNY Ulster
Anesthetic equipment
Anesthetic equipment
Anesthetic equipment
SUNY Ulster
Canine and feline anesthesia
Canine and feline anesthesia
Canine and feline anesthesia
SUNY Ulster
Anesthetic agents and adjuncts
Anesthetic agents and adjuncts
Anesthetic agents and adjuncts
SUNY Ulster
Veterinary Drug Use, Prescribing, Acquisition and Pharmacy Management
Veterinary drug use, prescribing, acquisition and pharmacy management
Veterinary drug use, prescribing, acquisition and pharmacy management
SUNY Ulster
Patient Preparation
Patient preparation
Patient preparation
SUNY Ulster
Introduction to Anesthesia
Introduction to Anesthesia
Introduction to Anesthesia
SUNY Ulster
Session 8 renal cancer cds
Session 8 renal cancer cds
Session 8 renal cancer cds
SUNY Ulster
Session 7 gi lutd liver spring
Session 7 gi lutd liver spring
Session 7 gi lutd liver spring
SUNY Ulster
Session 6 therapy adv rxns recovery k9
Session 6 therapy adv rxns recovery k9
Session 6 therapy adv rxns recovery k9
SUNY Ulster
Session 5 therapeutic nutrition obesity diabetes
Session 5 therapeutic nutrition obesity diabetes
Session 5 therapeutic nutrition obesity diabetes
SUNY Ulster
Session 2 basic nutrients
Session 2 basic nutrients
Session 2 basic nutrients
SUNY Ulster
Nutrition for patients with cardiac disease
Nutrition for patients with cardiac disease
Nutrition for patients with cardiac disease
SUNY Ulster
Small animal nutrition dogs and cats
Small animal nutrition dogs and cats
Small animal nutrition dogs and cats
SUNY Ulster
Veterinary Instruments
Veterinary Instruments
Veterinary Instruments
SUNY Ulster
Suture Patterns
Sutures
Sutures
SUNY Ulster
Session 1 intro and digestive systems 2018(1)
Session 1 intro and digestive systems 2018(1)
Session 1 intro and digestive systems 2018(1)
SUNY Ulster
213 suny lecture 01 intro, etruscans, myths fall 2014
213 suny lecture 01 intro, etruscans, myths fall 2014
213 suny lecture 01 intro, etruscans, myths fall 2014
SUNY Ulster
Cutting-edge clothing from upcycled materials.
"Refashioned" Art212
"Refashioned" Art212
SUNY Ulster
Plus de SUNY Ulster
(20)
2020 microbiology viruses final
2020 microbiology viruses final
Analgesia
Analgesia
Anesthetic equipment
Anesthetic equipment
Canine and feline anesthesia
Canine and feline anesthesia
Anesthetic agents and adjuncts
Anesthetic agents and adjuncts
Veterinary drug use, prescribing, acquisition and pharmacy management
Veterinary drug use, prescribing, acquisition and pharmacy management
Patient preparation
Patient preparation
Introduction to Anesthesia
Introduction to Anesthesia
Session 8 renal cancer cds
Session 8 renal cancer cds
Session 7 gi lutd liver spring
Session 7 gi lutd liver spring
Session 6 therapy adv rxns recovery k9
Session 6 therapy adv rxns recovery k9
Session 5 therapeutic nutrition obesity diabetes
Session 5 therapeutic nutrition obesity diabetes
Session 2 basic nutrients
Session 2 basic nutrients
Nutrition for patients with cardiac disease
Nutrition for patients with cardiac disease
Small animal nutrition dogs and cats
Small animal nutrition dogs and cats
Veterinary Instruments
Veterinary Instruments
Sutures
Sutures
Session 1 intro and digestive systems 2018(1)
Session 1 intro and digestive systems 2018(1)
213 suny lecture 01 intro, etruscans, myths fall 2014
213 suny lecture 01 intro, etruscans, myths fall 2014
"Refashioned" Art212
"Refashioned" Art212
Taylor2 ppt ch8
1.
Chapter 8 Juvenile
Law and Procedure
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Télécharger maintenant