Municipalities are dealing with numerous financial constraints, and trying to improve or expand systems is often trumped by maintaining deteriorating assets. Discover the potential benefits of Performance Contracting (PC). PC is an alternate delivery method to the traditional CIP process for the implementation of operational cost saving and energy saving projects. While the PC process has been used extensively in municipal buildings for decades -- primarily for HVAC and lighting improvements -- it has only recently begun to be used by water and wastewater utilities for process-centric improvements to treatment plants, pump/lift stations and other assets.
3. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 3 4
The challenge is to sustain water quality
and cut operating costs…
Energy consumption is the single largest variable
expenditure item in water and wastewater treatment
It is also the largest opportunity to scale down operating
costs by scaling up energy efficiency
EPA Challenges, Consent Decrees, Energy Neutrality Goals
25%
Just making real-time
energy intelligence
available to operators
and managers can help
to cut operating costs
by as much 25%.
30%
On average, energy
consumption accounts for
up to 30% of a water
plant’s operating costs.
3
87%
Pumping can account for
up to 87% of a water
system’s total energy
costs.
4. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 4
Challenges
Capital Dollar Competition - Internal
Property values down, sales tax revenue down, etc
Escalating Energy Costs
Increasing over the next 20 year horizon
Staff Attrition – Voluntary or Directed
Less personnel required to accomplish more
Regulatory Impacts
Unfunded mandates, consent decrees, complex
technologies
Operational Efficiencies & Performance Enhancement
Do more with less with aged infrastructure
5. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 5
Our Solutions
Capital Dollar
Competition – Internal on
- Internal
Tax revenue receipts are
down – Systems must
operate and provide
service
PC offers opportunity to
generate savings to offset
capital needs
Staff Attrition – Voluntary or
Directed
Do more with less Solutions that employ
technology and automation
to achieve results
Escalating Energy Costs
Absence of long term power
purchase agreements
Solutions reduce energy
costs – 20 – 40% over
status quo
Regulatory Impacts
Unfunded mandates and
system corrections
Solutions mitigate regulatory
impacts
Operational Efficiencies &
Performance Enhancement
Systems aged – inability to
extract operational efficiency
and performance
enhancement
Implementation of
technology and automation
6. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 6
How to Overcome Challenges?
• Alternative Project Delivery Mode – Performance Contracting
• Legislatively Approved and Regulated
• Significant National Precedence in Water Sector
• 15 to 30% Efficient ($) in Contrast to Traditional Procurement
• 20 to 40% Operational Cost Savings through Solutions
• Owner Protected through Solution Risk Transfer
• Guaranteed Savings Supported by ESCO Balance Sheet
7. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 7
Definitions:
•ESPC – Energy Savings Performance
Contract
A partnership between a Municipality or
Water Wastewater (W/WW) District and
an ESCO to accomplish energy savings
projects without up-front capital costs.
•ESCO – Energy Services Company
A company that develops, installs and
arranges financing for projects to improve
energy efficiency and reduce operation
and maintenance costs at a Municipality
or W/WW facilities with guaranteed
results.
8. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 8
Facility / Plant improvement & infrastructure renewal program
Energy savings created by: Energy Conservation Measures (ECM’s) = installing efficient
pumps, motors, blowers, drives, process optimization, automation, energy
monitoring, self generation of power including renewables and CHP, aeration & oxygen
transfer, solids stream management, etc.
Savings are guaranteed by Energy Services Company
What is Energy Savings Performance Contracting?
Reductions
From:
•Less Electricity
•Less Chemicals
•Less
Maintenance
•Biogas Reuse
•Less Natural
Gas
9. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 9
Long Payback
Cost Savings
Quick Payback
Cost Savings
A comprehensive approach
•Fine Bubble Diffusers
•SCADA System
•VFDs
•Aeration System
Optimization
•Biogas for CHP
•Optimize Digester
Performance
10. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 10
Energy Bill
Energy Efficiency Improvements
Reliability Improvements
Equipment Replacements / Repairs
Goal = Budget Neutrality
After performance contracting, the budget remains the same or less, and
energy savings pay for the facility improvements.
Example of Annual Energy Budget:
11. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 11
• Develop, design and arrange financing for projects
• Install and maintain the energy efficient equipment
• Typically works with preferred consulting engineers
• Measure, monitor and verify the project’s energy savings
• Guarantees both the maximum project cost and the projected
energy savings
What does the ESCO provide?
12. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 12
Capital Investment – Leveraging
Financial Options
General Obligation Bonds
Capital Lease Purchase Agreement
Revenue Pledge – Enterprise Fund Pledge
Performance Contracting allows for attractive financing options –
Customer’s investment back into the Customer’s water enterprise
Turnkey energy efficiency solutions
Performance Risk assumed by ESCO
Fixed price contract
Payment and Performance Bonds
Savings Guarantee by ESCO
● ESCO provides flexibility for Customer to choose budget neutral results OR
Customer to focus on much –needed improvements that could not
previously been paid for except for the blend of measures that provide net
savings available.
13. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 13
Water Distribution Energy Conservation
Measures (ECMs)
1
The primary ECM is for
improving the efficiency of
water booster or high
service pumps
SCADA
Leak Detection & Repair
Water Meters – AMR/AMI
14. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 14
Water Treatment ECMs
Pump Optimization and Control
Power Conditioning, Power Factor Correction
Lighting, HVAC, Solar Power
Water Conservation, Smart Irrigation, Reclaimed
Water
Demand Monitoring and Control Improvements
Motor Efficiency Upgrades
VFDs and Motor Controls
1
15. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 1515
Water ECM Metrics – Save 10-20%
Water Treatment Plants Energy Saving
Increase Pumping Efficiency (Optimization) 5-10%
Replace Inefficient Motors and Install VFDs 5-10%
Optimize Pump Efficiency 5-10%
Demand Monitoring and Control Optimization 3-5%
Power Factor, Harmonics, Power Quality 3-5%
Water Distribution System
Reduce Water Loss (AMI/AMR/ Leak Management) 10-15%
Reduce water flow resistance in pipes 10%
Increase Pumping Efficiency at High Services Pumps 5-10%
Replace Inefficient Motors and Install VFDs 5-10%
Optimize Pump Efficiency 5-10%
Demand Monitoring and Control Optimization 3-5%
16. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 16
Wastewater Collections ECMs
Wastewater collection systems primarily lift
water, therefore, VFDs have limited application
for energy efficiency.
Lift Station optimization is under development
SCADA, MCCs and pumps controls can be
evaluated on a case by case basis.
Pump and Motor efficiency
1
17. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 17
Potential ECMs – Wastewater Treatment
Aeration Improvements (Blowers, DO, Diffusers)
Digester Improvements (Mixing, FOG, HS Waste)
Cogeneration (CHP)
Demand Monitoring and Control Improvements
Power Conditioning, Power Factor Correction
Motor, Pump Efficiency, VFDs and Controls
Lighting, HVAC, Solar Power
Low Energy Mixing, CEPT
Water Conservation, Smart Irrigation, Reclaimed Water
1
18. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 1818
Wastewater ECM Metrics – Save 30-50%
Wastewater Treatment Plants Energy Savings
Optimize Pump Efficiency 5-10%
Replace Inefficient Motors and Install VFDs 5-10%
Aerobic (HE Blowers, Fine Bubble, DO Control, Mixing) 25-35%
Demand Monitoring and Control 3-5%
Power Factor, Harmonics, Power Quaility 3-5%
Anaerobic (Cogeneration, HSW, FOG, LE Mixing) 30-70%
Wastewater Collection System
Replace inefficient motors and Install VFDs 5-10%
Optimize Pump Efficiency 5-10%
Optimize Operating Schedule 5-10%
19. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 191 Johnson Controls
Aeration
Diffuser Upgrade
Aeration Blower Upgrade
Dissolved Oxygen Control &
Aeration Blower Control
20. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 202 Johnson Controls
DIGESTER GAS TO
ENERGY
21. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 21
Solar PV
Solar PV mounted on carport, roofs, available acreage
21
22. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 22
Wind Turbines
Wind has a real impact on power generation at a site
and reduction in amount of power to be purchased
22
23. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 23
Denison, TX population 25K, MGD plant operating at 3 MGD
Project Cost
7,943,747
Guaranteed Annual Savings
$217,727
Projected One-Time Rebate
$195,000
• Lighting, EMS, HVAC
• Improvements to their Aeration Basin & Aerobic Digester including new fine bubble
diffusion grids
• Replacement of 750 hp of blowers and 400 hp of pumps
• Replacement of 3 old switchgear/MCC’s
Project Scope
Project Enablers
• Existing relationship with City Manager
• Proposed improvements were already known issues
• Budget $ already set aside for some improvements
City of Denison Case Study
24. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 24
Slow Water and sewer rate increases
Redirect funds already being spent on utilities
A solution with multiple benefits
Guarantee performance and financials so that you are assured this is
a good decision
Legislative mandates
Reach energy requirements and defer mandates
Facility improvement & infrastructure renewal
Tackle deferred maintenance Issues with no capital funding source
Energy Performance Contracts have
helped Cities & Special Districts
Reach sustainability goals
Reduce carbon footprint and provide GHG reporting
25. Schneider Electric – Buildings Business 25
Thank you!
Contact Information:
Kevin Bell
Program Manager
Schneider Electric – Professional Services
Phone: 916-508-0535
Email: kevin.bell@schneider-electric.com
Meet Our
Specialists at
WEFTEC 2013
October 7 – 9, 2013 McCormick Place South
Chicago, IL
Booth 3019
Notes de l'éditeur
Focuses on life cycle costs of operation – not first costsLeverages guaranteed savings over the life of project – usually 10-15 yearsIs a Procurement and alternative delivery model Almost all states have specific legislation for using an ESPC
Goal – leverage all savings possible to get the most work done – use what you’re already spending to buy what you need (remove excess items from facility study wishlist and free up money for more improvements)Blend, combine quick payback w/ long payback, goal is a comprehensive solution, quick payback items spin out cash to pay for the long payback items – long payback items are what is needed – short payback items aren’t necessarily on your improvement plan list
Topic: Wastewater Rules of Thumb Note to Facilitator: Review the bullets on the slide.
Topic: Wastewater Rules of Thumb Note to Facilitator: Review the bullets on the slide.
Topic: Wastewater Rules of Thumb Note to Facilitator: Review the bullets on the slide.
GraphicSolutions Portfolio
how does this all apply to the city of Denison, Tx?Denison is a fairly small town of 25K people in TX.We had a relationship with the city manager and knew they had more needs than capital. They had a plant that had a fair amount of deferred maintenance and through careful planning may have had just enough money to fix their most pressing needs. They had 1 6 MGD plant, but it was operating between 2 and 3 MGD. The biggest problem was that they had a 5-section aeration basin with failed gates, so that had to aerate the entire basin all of the time. They could not close any of the gates. In addition, they had some broekn diffusion pipin so that instead of having ¾’ holes or so in their pipes, they had whole 4” pipes blowing air into one portion of the basin and thus was not aerating well. We developed the project to include fine bubble diffusion throughout the aeration basin and replaced 500 Hp of of blower running full bore to 300 HP installed, added VFD and actually they run about 150HP most of the time. We were able to reduce the plant’s energy spend by 50%.We worked carefully with the city’s preferred Consulting Engineering (Allen Plummer) partner. The relationship was rocky at first as they were not convinced in our approach, but soon engaged and helped us design the improvements.In addition to almost $3.5M in energy savings over 15 years, we were able to secure a $200K rebate from the local electrical utility.We took the capital they had set aside and leveraged this to 2X investment which allowed them to spend $$ on non-payback items such as electrical switchgear, stainless steel automated bar screens and improvements to other city buildings.
So, how does this all apply to the city of Denison, Tx?Denison is a fairly small town of 25K people in TX.We had a relationship with the city manager and knew they had more needs than capital. They had a plant that had a fair amount of deferred maintenance and through careful planning may have had just enough money to fix their most pressing needs. They had 1 6 MGD plant, but it was operating between 2 and 3 MGD. The biggest problem was that they had a 5-section aeration basin with failed gates, so that had to aerate the entire basin all of the time. They could not close any of the gates. In addition, they had some broekn diffusion pipin so that instead of having ¾’ holes or so in their pipes, they had whole 4” pipes blowing air into one portion of the basin and thus was not aerating well. We developed the project to include fine bubble diffusion throughout the aeration basin and replaced 500 Hp of of blower running full bore to 300 HP installed, added VFD and actually they run about 150HP most of the time. We were able to reduce the plant’s energy spend by 50%.We worked carefully with the city’s preferred Consulting Engineering (Allen Plummer) partner. The relationship was rocky at first as they were not convinced in our approach, but soon engaged and helped us design the improvements.In addition to almost $3.5M in energy savings over 15 years, we were able to secure a $200K rebate from the local electrical utility.We took the capital they had set aside and leveraged this to 2X investment which allowed them to spend $$ on non-payback items such as electrical switchgear, stainless steel automated bar screens and improvements to other city buildings.