Cliff's Natural Resources is a mining company that was facing a serious downturn in success from 2014 to 2015. As a part of the Battle on Bay Case Competition, my team and I analyzed Cliff's to provide a strategic recommendation to turn around the company.
6. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
• Snapshot:
• Major producer of Iron Ore and significant producer of high and
low volatile metallurgical coal
• Largest manufacturer of iron ore pellets in the U.S. Steel Industry
• Value of Operations:
• Iron Ore Pricing
• State of Steel Industry
• Penetration of International Expansion
• Diversified Mining Initiatives (graphite investments, coal
operations)
6
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES
CURRENT SITUATION:
SITUATION
7. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
7
CURRENT SITUATION:
IMPORTANT & RECENT EVENTS
SITUATION
Where Do You Go From Here?
JAN 2 2015
Completes Sale of
Logan County Coal (WV)
for $174 mil + $80 – 100
mil in tax savings
Operations at Bloom
Lake shut down
completely
TODAY
AUG 7 2014
Lourenco Gonclaves
appointed Chairman,
President and CEO
AUG 25 2014
Share Repurchase Plan
(up to $200 million)
NOV 19 2014
CLF seeks to pursue exit
options for Canadian
operations
NOV 21 2012
CLF sells 20% stake in
Zenyatta Albany Project
– Graphite Mine in the
Ring of Fire
OCT 27 2014
CLF posts a $5.7 billion
loss on asset write-down
SEPT 26 2014
Australian Mining
Companies express
interest in acquiring
CLF’s Australian assets
DEC 24 2014
CLF ordered to pay CAD
$7.5 million for fisheries
damage at Bloom Lake
JAN 1 2011
CLF buys Consolidate
Thomson (Bloom Lake)
OCT 7 2014
CLF bonds cut to Junk
(BB- to BBB-) after iron
ore plunge
OCT 28 2014
Gonclaves states that
Ring of Fire won’t be
developed in his lifetime
JAN 12 2015
Executive members of
CLF exercise equity
purchase
8. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
• Threats:
• Short-Term
• Iron ore pricing
• Declining need of iron ore in China
• Investor confidence is at an all time low
• Opportunities:
• Short-Term
• Diversified business
• Largest producer of iron ore pellets in NA
• Significant producer of coal in North America
8
EXTERNAL CONSIDERATIONS
CURRENT SITUATION:
SITUATION
13. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
13
• Eastern Canadian operations are costing money
• Coal operations costing money
• US and Asia-Pacific Iron Ore are only profitable segments
• Company spread thing over many areas
• No advantages over profits
CLF is no longer focused on the Value Proposition,
which has affected long-term profitability
TODAY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
SITUATION
25. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
25
• What went wrong:
• High production costs
• Decline in iron ore pricing
• Value of assets diminished with iron ore price decline
• Oversupply in iron
• Increase in international capacity
• Increased production from competitors to take advantage of China’s
buying and drive up profit margins
• No investors for Phase II
• Operations required $1.2 billion in investment for potential return
CANADIAN OPERATIONS: BLOOM LAKE
ANALYSIS:
ANALYSIS
29. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
29
• Iron ore is available in excess
• Combined that with excess steelmaking capacity and low
margins
• Mitigation:
• Refocus on US core business
• Expand capacity to compete with competitors profitability
OUTPUT FROM COMPETITORS
RISKS & CONTINGENCIES:
EY Global Steel 2014
“Excess capacity is the biggest threat to the sector.”
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
30. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
30
• 86% of business is in iron ore pellet manufacturing
• CLF is largest North American manufacturer of iron ore
pellets
• Declining prices shown to drive profits down
• Competitors have cut costs while increasing production to
inflate profits
IRON ORE PRICES
RISKS & CONTINGENCIES:
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
31. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
31
IRON ORE PRICES
RISKS & CONTINGENCIES:
• Mitigation:
• Restructure costs and find new efficiencies
• Increase productivity to at or near capacity
• Lower per unit production, increasing margins and profitability
• Chinese iron ore market continues to purchase excess
production as prices are low
• No opportunity cost of pursuing higher productionRISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
32. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
32
• Higher interest rates in the future if credit rating not
improved
• Current credit rating is below industry norms and results in
an impact on interest expense
• Doubling the dividend could result in cash leak that doesn’t
fix the overleverage issue
FALLING CREDIT RATING
RISKS & CONTINGENCIES:
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES COMPANY S&P Rating Moody's Rating
BHP BILLITON LIMITED A+ A1
RIO TINTO PLC A- A3
VALE SA-PREF A- Baa2
FORTESCUE METALS GROUP LTD BB+ Ba1
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC BB- Ba3
ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES INC B B3
SUNCOKE ENERGY INC B Ba3
33. SITUATION
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ANALYSIS
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
IMPLEMENTATION
CONCLUSION
33
FALLING CREDIT RATING
RISKS & CONTINGENCIES:
RISKS &
CONTINGENCIES
Long-term Debt Maturity Interest Rate Carrying Value Fair Value
Senior Notes - 700 Million 2021 4.89% 699.5 539.6
Senior Notes - 1.3 Billion (500M- 800M) 2020/2040 4.83% - 6.34% 1289.8 974.7
Senior Notes - 400 Million 2020 5.98% 398.6 341.8
Senior Notes - 500 Million 2018 4.14% 497.1 433
Revolving Loan 2017 1.87% 0 0
Equipment Loan Facilities 2020 Various 124.6 124.6
Fair Value Adjustment to Interest Rate Hedge 2.9 2.9
Total Long-term Debt 3,012.5 2,416.6
• Mitigation:
• Paying off debt to increase rating agency confidence
CLF share price down from record highs in 2011
Investor confidence waning
Dividend is cut $1 billion in equity issued
Took back buy back of debt signal and investors responded negatively – debt trading at huge discount
Casablancas plan (with New CEO) to lead a turn-around with a multi-step plan:
Divest infrastructure
Includes: leaving Canada, potentially leaving Australia
Sell non-core assets:
Logan County Cole
Double dividend:
Increase investor confidence in commitment to turn around (signaling effect)
Reduce costs (SG&A, exploration)
Divest from all Canadian operations
Divest from all Canadian operations
Divest from all Canadian operations
This is a no brainer but it bears repeating
Iron ore estimate for pellets – premium: $100 metrix tonne – we don’t foresee, because of future likely demand, that a significant decline will affect share value – this number here is only based on current production levels in US iron ore operations
Forecasted to stay low or go lower ($50)
Obviously we trade at a premium (iron ore pellets)
Divest from all Canadian operations
Divest from all Canadian operations
BEST CASE: sell the assets, buy back shares/debt with proceeds: increase shareholder value
CURRENT CASE: hold assets, close the mine and take the hit
WORST CASE: invest in operations and continue to see losses
WORST CASE: Bankruptcy
Discussion about the institutions and processes for environmental impact assessment brought out a number of differing views depending upon regional circumstances. In Yukon, the "Development Assessment Process" (DAP), in the view of First Nations, could give them an even greater role than they have under either the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act or the Yukon environmental assessment processes. At present, however, negotiations seem stalled, and with a deadline of February 1997 for completion, doubts are growing about DAP's future.
For the Inuvialuit, the screening and review procedures developed under the Inuvialuit Final Agreement (1984) are believed to serve the region quite well. The current mining initiative at Darnley Bay, should it come before the Screening Committee and Review Board, will raise the possibility of mine development impacts on caribou calving to the south of the community of Paulatuk, outside the proposed national park. Similar concerns may be faced by the Inuit to the east of Bathurst Inlet, where the Boston gold deposit, located in the calving grounds of the Bathurst herd, is being explored. It is important to distinguish here between difficult issues and the ability of the assessment processes to deal effectively with those issues. In dealing with assessment, the focus of CARC's investigation will be the process rather than the "difficult choices" among activities and impacts.
In those jurisdictions with claims-based EIA structures and procedures, the issue of the independence of the EA bodies from the political and administrative arms of aboriginal society has been raised. Of particular interest is whether reaching an impact and benefits agreement before an EA decision constrains the range of choices the EA body can consider. The resolution of this issue may not mean that all impact and benefit agreements must await EA decisions, but some clarification of roles, responsibilities, timing, and co-ordination is needed. As more land claims are settled, with new EA organizations and processes, the issues of independence and rigorous analysis will continue to be raised.
Another EA issue that surfaced in the Western Arctic is the harmonization of EA processes where development proposals transcend land-claim boundaries. In addition, there is the task of harmonizing aboriginal EA processes with those of federal and territorial/provincial jurisdictions.
------------------
Universal concern for the social, economic, and cultural impacts from all stages of mineral development is juxtaposed against a keen interest by aboriginals in participating in the benefits of economic development. For many aboriginal people, the challenge to integrate "culture and economics" means trying to infuse resource development decisions with the customs, traditions, and values of their societies. For others, the challenge is to plan in ways that limit the "boom and bust" swings in market economies. For still others, the issue is to prevent social pathologies and all the socio-psychological problems these conditions bring upon communities, especially among children. As women, in particular, give testimony to these cultural issues, there is a sentiment in some quarters that women can and should play more central roles in development decision making.
After the miners are gone, people from the various northern regions will remain and still will need to find ways to sustain themselves and their families. CARC's NMP research team has centred on the concept of "healthy communities," believing that environmentally sustainable development depends on sustainability in social, economic, cultural, and political (self-governing) realms. This suggests that both social impact assessments and socio-cultural community planning should be part of the overall mineral development process.
Opportunity
The Northern Minerals Programme will attempt to assess the state of both these concerns in the Slave Geological Province (SGP). As aboriginal communities in other jurisdictions wish, these initiatives could be expanded to examine cultural. economic. and social issues outside the SGP.
----------------------------
People everywhere spoke of environmental protection -- protecting the land, protecting wildlife and habitat, protecting communities and their cultures, protecting the futures of their grandchildren, protecting important harvesting areas and environmentally significant regions and processes, and protecting their sacred places. All of these are intertwined. Many communities depend significantly on caribou for food, and all acknowledge the challenge that mining brings to the calving grounds, river crossings, migration routes, and wintering sites. These concerns were raised for the Porcupine, Bluenose, Bathurst, Kaminuriak, Melville Peninsula, and George River herds.
Opportunity
The interest of these communities and organizations coincides with that of CARC's Northern Minerals Programme. There clearly is an opportunity to broaden the focus on environmentally significant and protected areas to include an examination of comparative regional approaches to protection and management through sustainable use of renewable resources.
---------------------------------
Increased levels of anxiety and/or expectation in the community, particularly if local knowledge is not used in gathering data Changes in wealth distribution due to community members’ involvement in data gathering Community conflict due to ‘divide and conquer’ tactics by companies
Health and Safety impacts on workers and local communities Disruption of local livelihood activities Disruption of family life, in creased violence against women, substance abuse, increased pressure on women for family responsibilities Inceased conflicts among community members
Show an almost universal concern for the protection of the natural environment, and insist that exploration and development be undertaken in such a way as to minimise the impacts on the nonhuman world; ß Insist that their Local/Traditional Ecological Knowledge (Lo/TEK) be accorded epistemological status in the development of Environmental Impact Assessments and the design of mitigation and remediation measures; ß Demand a share in the financial benefits of resource developments on their traditional territories, especially where these developments may damage traditional economies such as trapping or hunting, and that they be compensated for such damage; ß Where a land claim is outstanding, have a strong preference to resolve the claim, or at a minimum to have signed Impact Benefit Agreements, before any development goes ahead.
Aligned with Cliffs’ Human Rights Policy is the fair consideration of indigenous peoples. Given the increasing globalization of our operations, Cliffs’ relationships with local populations are essential for corporate citizenship. Engagement with indigenous populations near our active and proposed mine operations to establish and foster relationships is critical to the way Cliffs does business. Mutually beneficial agreements with such groups creates cultural awareness, establishes a foundation for economic independence in the communities, and educates us on the responsibilities associated with culturally sensitive heritage sites.
When we advance developments in Canada within areas that affect Aboriginal communities, we seek to work collaboratively so affected communities can benefit. We also seek to create opportunities to enhance the social well-being and economic prospects for these communities. Additionally, we support land-use planning initiatives that First Nations communities undertake, working with them to address associated recommendations.
Bloom Lake Impact and Benefit Agreement
At our Bloom Lake operations in Quebec, we have established an Impact and Benefit Agreement (IBA) with the Innu community of Takuaikan Uashat Mak Mani-Utenam. This agreement covers a range of aspects including employment, workplace, Innu business opportunities, protection of the environment and preservation and promotion of Innu Culture.
We work with the Innu Takuaikan Uashat mak Mani-Utenam community to build trusting working relationships. Together we have established a coordination committee, which has the primary responsibility for building and maintaining good relationships between all parties, along with achieving the agreement outcomes.
To promote and inform the Innu community on different aspects of our operations, we also support a member of the Innu nation who writes a monthly newsletter, published in Innu and French, that keeps the community apprised of Cliffs’ initiatives.
Bois Forte Tribal Representatives Visit Hibbing Taconite
In September 2013, three representatives from the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa visited the Hibbing Taconite mine in Minnesota. The group toured the mine, plant, tailings basin and reclamation sites. They also visited the Hill of Three Waters, where three major watersheds diverge. The site was also used by Ojibwe Indians many years ago for council meetings prior to battle.
Recognizing the importance of this site, our Hibbing Taconite operation has left the area untouched. We also provide access to Native American tribal representatives when asked. The Bois Forte representatives performed some of their native rituals at the site and shared information about their culture with tour guides from Hibbing Taconite and Cliffs.
Land Disputes
In 2013, we did not experience any significant land disputes with Indigenous or Aboriginal communities.
Incidents Involving the Rights of Indigenous People
During 2013, we had no identified incidents of violations involving the rights of Indigenous peoples.
$800k to education
$1.8mil to health
$1.7 to commu
-------------------------------
Although we ultimately decided to indefinitely suspend the project, we made significant progress in 2013 with our Chromite Project. We advanced our feasibility study and strengthened relationships among Aboriginal communities and other stakeholders throughout Northern Ontario.
Unfortunately, challenges surrounding the access and infrastructure that would allow us to move the chromite from the remote mine to existing road and rail infrastructure in Ontario’s Near North grew in prominence. The question of how to build infrastructure in the remote region became even more challenging following the unexpected and disappointing decision of Ontario’s Mining and Lands Commissioner in September 2013 not to dispense with consent from a mineral-rights holder as part of an easement application that would have allowed for the construction of an all-weather road to the proposed site of the mine and concentrator.
Although other issues, including the delay in approval of the Terms of Reference for the Ontario Environmental Assessment process, contributed to our decision to suspend the Chromite Project in November 2013, the infrastructure and access issue remains a key obstacle to the Ring of Fire development.
The decision of the Ontario Mining and Lands Commissioner is currently scheduled for appeal in Ontario’s Divisional Court in June 2014. In the meantime, we continue to engage with First Nations and government partners on infrastructure development that will benefit both the project and communities.