1. Name : Nathasya Alfisyahr Sasongko
Number : 20
Class : XII Science 1
Similarity
1. Yes. Both the letter was applying for a job.
2. Both of the letter was wrote on 2019. The first letter was wrote on June 20, 2019 and
the second letter was wrote on January 15, 2019
3. Yes. Mary was a freelance writer for a local newspaper and “Femme” Magazine.
Besides, Smith has office experience in the engineering field. He is familiar with drafting
and computer application.
4. Yes. Mary add her qualification, such as her experience with edit for overall flow
content, grammar, and spelling. Besides, Smith also add his qualificationt. He has a good
personality, and office experience. He also has HVAC design and fabrication experience.
5. Yes. They mention it in last paragraph.
6. No, I think they don’t. In personal data, we must add suc as place of birth, full name,
date of birth, and email address. Both Mary and Smith don’t mention their personal data
completely.
7. I think their attitude was good.
Differences
1. Both of the letter have the different topic. The first letter is about application for an
editor position, and the other about applicant for an engineer position.
2. Mary know from an advertisement, and Smith know from website named
JasperTRAK.com.
3. From the letter, we know that Memphis Magazines are looking for an editor. Besides,
PMTM are looking for engineering intern.
4. Mary was a freelance writer for a local newspaper and “Femme” Magazine. Besides,
Smith has office experience in the engineering field. He is familiar with drafting and
computer application.
5. No. I think Mary is older than Smith. Because from the letter, Smith is still a university
student.
6. I think only Mary who will be employed in a company. Because Mary’s working
experience is more extensive than Smith.
7. Smith’s letter begin with his working experience. While Mary’s letter begin with
where and when she see the position advertised.
2. Match the Phrases
1. A
2. D
3. E
4. B
5. C
Application Letter
1. To apply a job. The first letter is to apply for customer service position. And the
second letter is apply for teaching position.
2. The first letter is to apply for the position of customer service. Besides, the second
letter is to apply for the position of teacher.
3. Both applicants know it from an advertisement.
4. I think the first applicant is skillful. He has completed his master degree, has a job
experience as a marketing consultant for 3 years, and also has cerificate for having been a
consellor. So, we can conclude that the first applicant is qualified
5. From the letter 1, we can conclude that he has master degree that equal to S2,. And
from the letter 2 we can conclude that he has bachelor degree that equal to S1.
6. The first person apply for an IT position, while the second person apply for an
insurance administrator position.
7. From both Personal Profile Statement, we can infer, that :
Applicant 1 : the applicant who write the letter is a motivated, adaptable, responsible,
discipline, and diligent person. He also has methodical, customer-focused approach, and
strong dive. And, he is good at managed something so it can be finished ontime and
within budget.
Applicant 2 : the applicant who write the letter is a flexible experienced person. He has a
skill to managed time, good communicator, he also used to work in a team, and has
respectful manner negotiating when dealing with problems so he can achieve beneficial
agreement. Also, he is always enthusiastic to learn and undertake newchallenge.
8. So, collaboratively means that the applicant must work in a team. And I think that
applicant 2 can work collaboratively with his team. Because in his personal profile
statement, he says that he is a good communicator and used to working in a team.
9. I think the applicant 1 is more suitable for those condition. Because, in his letter he
says that he managed to launch and migration of two major IT system on time.
10. From the text we can conclude that, the application 1 is a dilligent person. He is
ambitous, hard worker, and discipline.