Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Scott Swinton
1. Supply and Demand for Ecosystem Services
from Agriculture
Scott M. Swinton
Michigan State University
Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics
True Cost of Food workshop, London, December 4-5, 2013
2. Ecosystem services from agriculture come
bundled together
Services TO
- Climate regulation
- Water provision
- Soil provision
- Pollination
- Pest regulation
- Genetic diversity
Disservices TO
- Pests & diseases
Swinton et al, Ecol Econ 2007
Farm Mgt:
Supplemental inputs
Enterprise choices
AGRICULTURE
(with Forestry &
Aquaculture)
Services FROM
- Food & fiber
- Aesthetics
- Recreation
- Carbon sequestration
- Biodiversity conserv.
Disservices FROM
- Water pollution
- Health risks from
agrochemicals
- Greenhouse gasses
- Wildlife habitat loss
3. Environmental Values arise from supply and
demand, analogous to markets
Demand
Supply
Willingness to pay for
extra unit
Cost to supply extra unit
(“willingness to accept”
payment)
Economic value:
Demand=Supply
Market “price” where all
goods produced are sold
source: wikipedia.org
4. Drivers of Supply (by Producers) & Demand
(by Consumers) of Ecosystem Services
For farmer suppliers to provide more ES:
Direct cost (incl. equipment & resource base)
Opportunity cost (foregone earnings)
Environmental attitudes & information
For consumers to demander more ES:
Income
Environmental attitudes & information
6. Supply & demand for crop system with most
climate & lake benefits: Michigan, USA 2008-09
Payment (US$/acre)
100
Wheat added to corn-soya rotation.
Agrochemicals cut by 1/3.
Winter cover crop.
75
Farmer supply:
Better
stewardship
Less GHG &
eutrophic lakes
50
Resident
demand:
Less GHG &
eutrophic
lakes
25
0
0
Ma, 2011
2
1
Michigan Cropland (million acres)
3
7. Take-away messages
Farmers mostly willing to adopt practices
that produce more ES.
Changed practices Multiple ES
Citizens mostly willing to pay for less
eutrophic lakes & less GHG emissions.
Equilibrium payment ~$45/acre ≈10%
higher price at typical yields and prices.
Would change practices on 35-50% of
Michigan corn-grain & soy land