2. “Coastal Ecosystems”
“In 1995 more than 2.2 billion people, 39% of the world's
population, lived within 100 kilometers (km) of a
coastline. Add to these the millions more who vacation
in coastal regions annually. In 1997 more than 18.8
million tourists visited the Caribbean alone.
“Coastal ecosystems are also an important food source. In
1997, 64 million metric tons of fish and shellfish were
harvested from oceans and inland waters and 29
million metric tons from aquaculture for human
consumption. Another 29 million metric tons were
processed for animal feed. “
4. “Natural and Altered Landcover within 100Km of a Coast”
http://www.pbs.org/earthonedge/ecosystems/coastal1.html
5. “Biogeochemistry”
“Biogeochemistry has matured as a scientific discipline as we have come to recognize that
the current human impact on our planet may disrupt the stable chemistry of our
evolutionary environment, which is at least partially determined by the diversity of
species that occupy this planet with us. The level of CO2 in the atmosphere, the amount
of precipitation that falls on land, the content of nitrogen and phosphorus in rivers, and
the silicon that is deposited in ocean sediments are all determined by biota – ranging
from bacteria to higher plants. Life’s diversity – the bio in biogeochemistry – performs a
great service to us, which we must understand better if we are to preserve its function.”
David M. Karl, William H. Schlesinger, in Treatise on Geochemistry (Second Edition), 2014
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/coastal-landscape/pdf
6. “Salt Marsh Biogeochemistry—An Overview”
“Salt marshes are fluid in terms of geomorphology, biogeochemistry, and
their role in the coastal landscape. They are subject to the synergistic effects
of global scale climate forcings and local-scale human impacts… there has
been a large increase in the number of published papers that have
examined biogeochemical responses to environmental changes such as
increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations, eutrophication of coastal
waters, and climate change/global warming. Salt marsh responses to these
and other stressors occur at the scale of soil biogeochemistry, plant
productivity, and geomorphology and may likely alter the role of marshes in
the coastal landscape. “
-- Craig Tobias, Scott C. Neubauer, “Salt Marsh Biogeochemistry—An Overview,”
(in Coastal Wetlands, 2019)
7. NOAA: Tides and Currents
“The word "tides" is a generic term used to define the alternating rise and fall in sea level with
respect to the land, produced by the gravitational attraction of the moon and the sun. To a
much smaller extent, tides also occur in large lakes, the atmosphere, and within the solid
crust of the earth, acted upon by these same gravitational forces of the moon and sun.
Additional nonastronomical factors such as configuration of the coastline, local depth of
the water, ocean-floor topography, and other hydrographic and meteorological influences
may play an important role in altering the range, interval between high and low water, an
times of arrival of the tides.
“The most familiar evidence of the tides along our seashores is the observed recurrence of high
and low water - usually, but not always, twice daily. The term tide correctly refers only to
such a relatively short-period, astronomically induced vertical change in the height of the sea
surface (exclusive of wind-actuated waves and swell); the expression tidal current relates to
accompanying periodic horizontal movement of the ocean water, both near the coast and
offshore (but as distinct from the continuous, stream-flow type of ocean current).
“Knowledge of the times, heights, and extent of inflow and outflow of tidal waters is of
importance in a wide range of practical applications such as the following: Navigation through
intracoastal waterways, and within estuaries, bays, and harbors; work on harbor engineering
projects, such as the construction of bridges, docks, breakwaters, and deep-water channels;
the establishment of standard chart datums for hydrography and for demarcation of a base
line or "legal coastline" for fixing offshore territorial limits both on the sea surface and on the
submerged lands of the Continental Shelf; provision of information necessary for underwater
demolition activities and other military engineering uses; and the furnishing of data
indispensable to fishing, boating, surfing, and a considerable variety of related water sport
activities.”
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/restles1.html
10. “Between Pacific Tides”: Coastal Systems
Protected Outer Coast
Outer-Coast Rocky Shores
Outer-Coast Sandy Beaches
Open Coast
Open-Coast Rocky Shores
Open-Coast Sandy Beaches
Bays and Estuaries
Rocky Shores of Bays and Estuaries
Sand Flats
Eelgrass Flats
Mud Flats
Wharf Piling
Exposed Piles
Protected Piles
11. “Outer-Coast Sandy Beaches”
“PRESUMABLY because of their usually limited extent, the sandy beaches of the
protected outer coast are the most barren of all intertidal areas. They occupy a
strange position, biologically speaking. They are distinct, on the one hand, from
the typical Pacific sandy beach, which is completely exposed and subjected to
violent surf but nevertheless supports a highly specialized fauna, although it is
neither abundant nor greatly varied. In closed bays, sounds, and sloughs, on the
other hand, we find the completely protected sandy beaches supporting a fauna
both rich and varied. No doubt the total area available for colonization is the chief
factor in both the latter cases, for characteristic animals will not develop for a type
of region that is represented by small and widely separated areas only, like the
sandy beaches in question. Such beaches ordinarily occur in short stretches of a
few hundred yards or a few miles, between outcroppings of rock and are almost
destitute of life. It might reasonably be asked why such areas are not colonized by
the animals of surf-swept beaches; the answer is, apparently, that the animals of
surf-swept beaches will not tolerate the more sheltered conditions. The same
answer, reversed, would apply to completely protected bay animals, for whom
these areas would be too exposed. At any rate, barrenness is the rule, and we have
three animals to record from the semi-sheltered sandy beaches, ignoring those
forms which may occasionally be washed up from other habitats. “
17. Primary Forces
in the Intertidal Environment
Desiccation
Light
Salinity
Wave Shock/ Sand Scour/ Rock Movement
Predation
Competition: Food/ Space
Intra-specific: mates
Inter-specific
30. “Beach Wrack”???
“Spiller found that washed-up seaweed is in fact a resource "subsidy" that's consumed by flies
and small amphipods such as beach fleas, which in turn are eaten by lizards and predatory
arthropods like spiders.
“Seaweed also decomposes directly into the soil, providing nutrients to plants. In the study, the
growth rate of land-based plants near seaweed-subsidized plots was 70 percent higher than in
non-seaweed-subsidized plots.
“In subsidized plots, the density of lizards also increased rapidly, averaging 63 percent higher than
in non-subsidized plots. In addition, lizards shifted their diets to marine-based prey.
“When clumps of seaweed appeared on the scene, they attracted marine amphipods that
reproduce rapidly. Lizards then went from land-based vegetation to seaweed to feast on the
treasure trove.
“The addition of seaweed also led to an increase in insect damage to plants living along the
beach. When lizards moved to seaweed from land-based vegetation, their usual prey--plant-
eating insects--were free to go on a spree, decimating plant leaves as they munched.
” ‘What we saw may be called a 'fertilization effect' in which seaweed adds nutrients to plants,
increasing their growth rate,’ says Spiller, ‘and a 'predator-diet-shift effect' in which lizards shift
from eating land-based prey to consuming small, marine detritivores that breed in seaweed.’ "
https://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc_summ.jsp?cntn_id=124910&org=NSF
43. “Just a few hundred years ago, thousands of sea otters peppered the coast of California, dwarfing
the current population of less than 3000 animals. A host of human impacts are to blame for
keeping otters near the edge of extinction today—loss of habitat, competition for food, diseases
carried by our pets and oils spills, to name just a few. But only the fur trade could whittle the
otter population down to the few dozen that were left in the early 1900s.
“When Russian explorer Vitus Bering stumbled upon a group of otters living on the Commander
Islands in 1741, he probably didn’t anticipate that these animals would play a role in changing
boundary lines on the world map and unhinging the fragile coastal ecosystem of North America.
What was clear was the value of their pelts. With up to a million hairs per square inch, otter fur
was prized for its softness and warmth—the warmest in the animal kingdom. For comparison, we
only have about 100,000 hairs on our heads.
“Until the late 19th century, Russian fur traders hop scotched through Alaska’s Aleutian Islands,
killing most of the curious, slow-moving otters in their path and then shipping the furs off to
profitable markets in back home in Russia and in China, Japan, and Europe. In the process, the
hunters decimated a relative of the manatee called the Stellar’s sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas).
These slow-swimming kelp-eaters provided the on-the-go meals the hunters needed. But unlike
sea otters, the sea cows didn’t survive the onslaught. The otter fur trade wiped them from
existence.”
Fur Trade
61. “Kelp forests are strongly influenced by macroinvertebrate grazing on fleshy macroalgae. In the
North Pacific Ocean, sea otter predation on macroinvertebrates substantially reduces the
intensity of herbivory on macroalgae. Temperate Australasia, in contrast, has no known predator
of comparable influence. These ecological and biogeographic patterns led us to predict that (i)
the intensity of herbivory should be greater in temperate Australasia than in the North Pacific
Ocean; thus (ii) Australasian seaweeds have been under stronger selection to evolve chemical
defenses and (iii) Australasian herbivores have been more strongly selected to tolerate these
compounds. We tested these predictions first by measuring rates of algal tissue loss to herbivory
at several locations in Australasian and North Pacific kelp forests. There were significant
differences in grazing rates among sea otter-dominated locations in the North Pacific (0-2% day-
1), Australasia (5-7% day-1), and a North Pacific location lacking sea otters (80% day-1). The
expectations that chronically high rates of herbivory in Australasia have selected for high
concentrations of defensive secondary metabolites (phlorotannins) in brown algae and increased
tolerance of these defenses in the herbivores also were supported… These findings suggest that
top-level consumers, acting through food chains of various lengths, can strongly influence the
ecology and evolution of plantherbivore interactions.” __ Steinberg, et al. “Evolutionary
Consequences of Food Chain Length in Kelp Forest Communities,” PNAS 92:18 8145-8148 (1995)
https://www.pnas.org/content/92/18/8145
(A) Number of sites in the dataset (n = 1,454) by ecoregion (16). Gray shading indicates ecoregions where kelps are present but for which no data were available. (B) Range of dates within each study within each ecoregion, with line shading indicating the weight of studies within that range.