For more information, see http://reliefline.ca Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.

1. Relief Line
Project Assessment
Coordinated Transit Consultation Program
Public Information Centre
June 13-25, 2015

2. Overview of Presentation
2
1. Coordination of Rapid Transit Studies
2. Overview of Key Studies
• GO RER/SmartTrack Background
• SmartTrack Eglinton West Feasibility Study
• Scarborough Subway Extension Project Assessment
3. Relief Line Project Assessment

3. Why are we here?
3
• We are seeking your opinions and comments on the work
currently underway.
• What we hear will be used to inform our work going forward.
• Sharing your thoughts is very important in order for the needs of
the community to be reflected in the final review.
• The best results will come by more people participating in and
contributing to the conversation. We need your input.

4. 4
Coordination of
Rapid Transit
Studies

5. How is Network Transit Planning Coordinated?
5
• Metrolinx, the City and TTC are all working together
• Four major transit initiatives are interrelated:
• Other projects planned or under construction:
• Major projects are all interrelated and have a significant impact on the
overall transit network
‒ Connections between future projects and connections with existing lines will
form the foundation of an improved network
• We are currently in the process of undertaking the integrated
assessment of these projects through detailed ridership modelling
‒ Work on each project will inform the other analysis
‒ GO Regional Express Rail (RER)
‒ SmartTrack concept
‒ Scarborough Subway Extension
‒ Relief Line
‒ Finch West LRT
‒ Sheppard East LRT
‒ Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension
‒ Eglinton Crosstown LRT

6. Public Engagement for Transit Planning Initiatives
6

7. 7
Updated Transportation Model
• An updated transportation model will help us understand how each
project is related.
• Key features of the GTAModel V4.0 model system include:
– Covers the entire GTHA using 2011 TTS for the base data
– The model explicitly represents individuals and households
– The model considers how a person’s trips fit together instead of
considering each trip in individually
– Trips are modelled for entire 24-hour week-day time period (using five
time periods)
– The transit assignment model considers crowding on the system and fares
of different paths
• Critical timelines for modelling work:
June 2015 – Draft results of transportation modelling
– Report on employment land use modelling
July 2015 – Report on transportation modelling results

8. 8
Timing
Current • Public consultation in June, 2015 on all projects
Mid/late
Summer
• Further analysis and assessment of options for each project
• Public consultation on project recommendations in
September, 2015
Fall • Report to Council October/November, 2015 on results and
public consultations and recommendations for next steps on
each project
Future
Work
• Issue Notice of Commencement for Final Project Review in
2016

9. Overview of Key Studies
 GO RER/SmartTrack
 SmartTrack Eglinton West Feasibility Study
 Scarborough Subway Extension Project Assessment

10. 10
GO Regional Express Rail (RER)
• Over the next ten years, Metrolinx will introduce RER including 15-
minute, two-way, all-day transit service on most of the seven GO lines
(and significant service improvements on the other lines).
• Across the system, this will mean:
‒ Electrification of several corridors that will
reduce travel times by up to 20% and
reduce operating costs
‒ Four times the number of train trips
outside of rush hour and on weekends
‒ Twice the number of trips during rush hour
‒ Benefits for all 19 existing GO stations in
Toronto and the potential for new stations
‒ Infrastructure requirements of 150
kilometres of new, dedicated GO track and
dozens of new tunnels and bridges

11. 11
RER and SmartTrack
• SmartTrack builds on RER and the existing GO network
– Proposes enhanced service on three existing corridors – Stouffville,
Lakeshore East, Kitchener
– Proposes a heavy rail corridor connecting Mount Dennis to the
Mississauga Airport Corporate Centre
• SmartTrack concept features
– Service frequency of 15 minutes or better
– All stop service in both directions
– TTC fare option
– Additional stations along the three existing GO corridors
– Electrified trains
• City Council has directed staff to further evaluate the SmartTrack
concept and report back
– This includes the Eglinton West SmartTrack Feasibility Review

12. 12
The SmartTrack concept
builds on RER

13. SmartTrack Eglinton West Corridor – Objectives
13
• In February, 2015, City Council
directed staff to review the
feasibility of SmartTrack options
between Mt. Dennis Station and
the Mississauga Airport
Corporate Centre
• The first step is a high-level
feasibility review of various
options to connect Mount
Dennis station to the Mississauga
Airport Corporate Centre.

14. SmartTrack Eglinton West Corridor – Potential
Corridors and Conceptual Alignments
14
• Three corridor options will be tested for feasibility
– A continuous heavy rail spur connection from the Kitchener GO corridor
connection by way of Eglinton Avenue West
– A separate heavy rail corridor along Eglinton Avenue West with a transfer at
Mt Dennis
– A continuous heavy rail spur connection diverging from the existing GO
corridor somewhere in the vicinity of Highway 27 into the airport and south
to the Mississauga Airport Corporate Centre
• The feasibility of each alignment will be evaluated from the
following perspectives:
– Technical (i.e. design and engineering)
– Land use
– Regulatory and legislative
– Service concept (i.e. ability to integrate with other transit services)
– Financial

15. Note - All station location and alignment options
being considered are located within the study area.
Residents across Scarborough and the entire City
of Toronto will benefit from transit and
transportation network improvements created by
the Scarborough Subway Extension
Scarborough Subway Extension – Study Area
15

16. • Nine potential corridors have
been assessed
– Preliminary evaluation has
identified three best performing
• Consultation to-date:
– Two public meetings
– Stakeholder Advisory Group
– Interactive workshop
– Online consultation
• Looking for public feedback on:
– Existing conditions
– Short listed corridors
– Preliminary evaluation of
corridors
– Potential alignments and station
locations
Scarborough Subway Extension – Current Work
16

17. Relief Line
Project Assessment

18. 18
Study Status
• In 2014, Relief Line Project Assessment launched to determine preferred
alignment and station locations
• In March 2015, public and stakeholder consultation was held to review
the long list of potential station options and draft evaluation criteria
WE ARE HERE

19. Focus of Today’s Consultation for the Relief Line
19
We are seeking feedback on:
1. Evaluation results of station location options
2. Four potential corridors connecting Downtown and Danforth Subway

20. • Relief Line is identified in The Big Move Regional
Transportation Plan and is a ‘Next Wave’ priority
project. No funding has yet been committed for the
Relief Line.
• YRNS and Relief Line Project Assessment are
complementary:
– Relief Line Project Assessment is determining a
preferred alignment between Downtown and Dnforth
through a comprehensive evaluation framework.
– YRNS/Metrolinx is examining timing for a relief line and
other regional network options to provide relief to the
Yonge subway.
Yonge Relief Network Study (YRNS)
20
• YRNS recognizes the importance the Relief Line in the context of the regional
transit network, as the Yonge Subway serves both local and regional travel demand.
• YRNS is being conducted in partnership with the City of Toronto, TTC, and York
Region.

21. 21
Study Area
Note - All station location and
alignment options being considered are
located within the study area. Residents
from across the entire City of Toronto
will benefit from transit and
transportation network improvements
created by the Relief Line.

22. Evaluation Process
22
WE ARE HERE

23. SERVING PEOPLE
STRENGTHENING
PLACES
SUPPORTING
PROSPERITY
Evaluation criteria
based on principles
and criteria developed
during the Official Plan
Review process
“Feeling Congested?”
Evaluation Framework
23

24. What We Heard During March Consultations
Key Messages
• Relief Line needs to be part of an integrated transit network,
including connections to subway lines, streetcar system, SmartTrack,
and GO system
• Important to plan for future extension of the Relief Line to the north
and west
• Don’t tear up Queen and King Street during construction
• Protect neighbourhoods, parks and cultural heritage
• Look for ways that the Relief Line can provide opportunities for city
building and redevelopment around stations
• Link important destinations, including the Financial District, St.
Lawrence Market, City Hall, the Distillery District, Greektown, Gerrard
Square, and George Brown College
24

25. 25
Results of
Potential Station
Areas Evaluation

26. Results of Potential Station Areas Evaluation
• 45 potential station areas
were identified and
evaluated
‒ In Downtown
‒ Along the Danforth
‒ Key activity areas, east
and west of the Don
River
• Preliminary evaluation
has identified those
station areas that would
best achieve objectives
for the project and the
communities
26

27. 27
Key Station Evaluation Findings:
• Bay Street – close to area of high
employment density
• King / Wellington corridor stands out:
‒ Proximity to highest employment
density
‒ Ability to extend west along existing
public right-of-way
• Queen Street serves key destinations
such as the Eaton Centre, St. Michael’s
Hospital and City Hall
• Front Street / Union Station has high
existing pedestrian volumes
• Adelaide and Richmond are more
challenging to extend to the west
Downtown Stations

28. Downtown Stations
28
What We Heard During March Consultations
• Many respondents commented that Union Station is already congested
and that a different station should be considered for a Downtown
terminus
• Respondents noted that a Relief Line corridor on streets such as
Wellington, Richmond or Adelaide Streets would not disrupt streetcar
services
• Key destinations noted by respondents include the Financial District,
Eaton Centre, Ryerson University, City Hall, St. Michael’s Hospital

29. 29
• The public rights-of-way to the north of
Greenwood would not allow for a straight
alignment following public rights-of-way
• Donlands and Chester have limited ability to
use existing public rights-of-way
• Carlaw and Jones would require lengthier
connections between the existing subway
station and the Relief Line
• Coxwell cannot directly reach Thorncliffe Park
along a future northern extension
Key Station Evaluation Findings
• Pape and Broadview stand out:
‒ High surface transit and walk-in
passenger volumes
‒ Designated as Avenues
‒ Ability to extend north following
existing public rights-of-way
‒ Can facilitate a future northern
extension to key destinations
such as Thorncliffe Park
Connection to the Danforth Subway

30. Connection to the Danforth Subway
30
What We Heard During March Consultations
• Pape Station received the vast majority of comments in support of a
connection to the Danforth Subway. Pape station has many key transit
connections and provides an amble opportunity for a northern
extension.
• There were many comments in support of Broadview Station as that
there is key surface transit connections and the potential to investigate
a future connection to the nearby Richmond Hill GO line.
• Respondents commented that redevelopment opportunities may exist
at Greenwood and Coxwell stations.
• Key destinations documented by respondents including Greektown,
Centennial College and Withrow Park.

31. 31
Key Station Evaluation Findings:
• Pape / Gerrard has good
redevelopment potential and offers
opportunities for multiple connections
to existing and future transit
• Queen / Broadview has connections
with multiple streetcar routes and
supports redevelopment
opportunities
• Unilever site has good redevelopment
potential and opportunities to
connect to future transit; however,
there are technical challenges (such as
flood protection and soil
contamination)
• Queen / Degrassi and Queen / Jones
are physically constrained
East of the Don River

32. 32
Key Station Evaluation Findings:
• Stations along Sherbourne have more
potential because of higher population
and employment densities
• A station at Regent Park addresses social
equity and could support redevelopment
• Front / Cherry serves areas of new
development and can provide surface
transit connections to the Portlands
• King / Cherry is physically constrained
with less redevelopment potential
• Lakeshore / Cherry and River / Queen
would be challenging to construct and
would have flooding risks
West of the Don River

33. What We Heard During March Consultations
East of the Don River
• The project team received broad support for stations at Gerrard Square and
the Unilever site
• There was strong support to not have a station at Queen/Degrassi due to
community concerns about impacts to nearby park space. This station
scored low on the technical evaluation and will not be carried forward
• Key destinations documented by respondents including Leslieville,
Chinatown, Bridgepoint Health and Gerrard Square
West of the Don River
• Respondents noted that the Relief Line could provide opportunities for city
building and redevelopment particularly in areas such as the West Donlands
• Important destinations noted by respondents include St. Lawrence Market
and George Brown College
East and West of the Don River
33

34. 34
Potential
Corridors

35. Development of Potential Corridor Options
35
• Consider results of technical evaluation and public input
on potential station areas
• Determine best connecting stations in Downtown and to
Danforth Subway
• Identify best opportunities for future expansion to the
west and north
• Link key activity areas with highest potential, based on
city-building criteria
• Utilize public rights-of-way as much as possible to
minimize impacts to private property
• Consider technical requirements of subway operations
(e.g. curves, grades, trackwork)

36. Potential Corridors
36
• Four potential corridors have been
identified for further, more detailed
consideration:
 Corridor A – Broadview to Queen/Richmond
 Corridor B – Pape to Queen/Richmond
 Corridor C – Broadview to King/Wellington
 Corridor D – Pape to King/Wellington via Queen
• These corridors have the highest
potential to address the full range of
project objectives and city-building
criteria
• Potential corridors and their stations
will be further evaluated to identify a
preferred corridor
KEY MAP

37. Corridor A – Broadview to Queen/Richmond
37
• Provides service along the
Queen/Richmond corridor
with potential for inline
stations near:
– Broadview/Gerrard
(Bridgepoint Health)
– Regent Park
– Queen/Sherbourne (Moss
Park)
• Connection to the Danforth
Subway at Broadview
• Connection to the YUS Line
along Queen

38. • Provides service along the
Queen/Richmond corridor
with potential for inline
stations near:
– Gerrard Square (potential
connection to SmartTrack)
– Queen/Broadview Area
– Unilever Lands
– Queen/Sumach
– Queen/Sherbourne (Moss
Park)
• Connection to the Danforth
Subway at Pape
• Connection to the YUS Line
along Queen
Corridor B – Pape to Queen/Richmond
38

39. Corridor C – Broadview to King/Wellington
39
• Provides service along the
King/Wellington corridor
with potential for inline
stations near:
– Broadview/Gerrard
(Bridgepoint Health)
– Queen/ Broadview
– Front/Cherry
– King/ Sherbourne
• Connection to the Danforth
Subway at Broadview
• Connection to the YUS Line
along King

40. Corridor D – Pape to King/Wellington via Queen St.
40
• Provides service along the
King/Wellington corridor
with potential for inline
stations near:
– Gerrard Square (potential
connection to SmartTrack)
– Queen/Broadview Area
– Unilever Lands
– King/Cherry
– King/ Sherbourne
• Connection to the Danforth
Subway at Pape
• Connection to the YUS Line
along King

41. Next Steps
41
• With the information gathered
through this series of consultation,
we will:
– Select a preferred corridor based on
technical evaluation and public input
– Develop potential alignments within
the preferred corridor
• The next phase of consultation will
focus on the potential alignment
options within the preferred
corridor

42. Stay Involved
42

43. Questions?