Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
As indexing2011
1. Taxonomies - A Foundation for
more
Christine JM. Connors
TriviumRLG LLC
A presentation to the American Society of Indexers at their Annual Conference, April 29, 2011, Providence, RI
2. The Continuum
Thesaurus
Ambiguity Control
Folksonomy Synonym Ring Synonym Control
Hierarchical Relationships
Personalized Labels Synonym Associative Relationships
Control Scope Note
(Equivalency) (BT, NT, RT, USE, SeeAlso)
Less Complexity More
Taxonomy Ontology
List Ambiguity Control Ambiguity Control
Ambiguity Synonym Control Synonym Control
Control Hierarchical Relationships Hierarchical Relationships
(BT, NT) Associative Relationships
Classes
Properties
Localization
Annotation
Reasoning
“NOT”
See NISO Z39.19-2005
3. Ontology
Thesaurus
Taxonomy
Power
Synonym Ring
List
Folksonomy
Complexity
The Continuum
We are building more complex and powerful data architectures; all types are available for
use on the semantic web
4. NT
England
Britain BT
NT
NT BT
BT Wales
Great
Britain NT
NT
BT Scotland
BT
United NT Northern
Kingdom BT Ireland
5. NT
England
Britain BT
God and my right
NT
NT BT
BT Wales
motto Great
Britain NT
flag NT
BT Scotland
BT
United NT Northern
Kingdom BT Ireland
anthem
God Save the Queen
official
language
English
capital
legislature
London
Parliament
6. NT
England
Britain BT
God and my right
NT
NT BT
BT Wales
motto Great
Britain NT
flag NT
BT Scotland
BT
Royal United NT Northern
Peculiar
Kingdom BT Ireland
anthem
God Save the Queen
official
language
English currency
pound sterling
capital
legislature
not
London euro
Parliament
9. How would you index?
✤ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13217693
✤ Aboutness vs. occurrence
10. Simile Exhibit - Flags
http://simile-widgets.org/exhibit/examples/flags/flags.html
11. Capabilities
✤ Business development - market analysis, use cases
✤ Technical development - servers, apps, web
✤ Information architects
✤ Information scientists - define, organize, link
✤ User interface and interaction designers - user studies, structural
design
12. Why do clients care?
✤ Reduce, reuse, recycle
✤ Use less storage space
✤ Purpose content for multiple delivery channels and services
✤ Mashup content
✤ Increase revenue and customer satisfaction
✤ Improved findability
✤ Brand management
13. Why do clients care?
✤ Reduce time to action
✤ More finely tuned analytical capabilities
✤ Competitive intelligence
✤ Reduce risk
✤ More granular legal and business models for more precise
compliance certification
✤ Comply with regulations
✤ e.g. XBRL (adopting semantic capabilities)
14. Thank you
Text
Christine Connors
TriviumRLG LLC
cjmconnors@triviumrlg.com
FOAF: http://triviumrlg.com/foaf.rdf
Nick: CJMConnors on Twitter, LinkedIn, Slideshare
Notes de l'éditeur
\n
\n
A list can be a pick list, an index, an authority file\nAmbiguity Control\nChristine Connors vs. Christine Conners :(\n\nList of food\nWe recently had a long holiday weekend, usually highlighted by barbecues, so let’s start with a list of food: hot dogs, hamburgers, buns, mustard, mayo, ketchup, onions, pickles, chips, salad, cookies, etc etc\n\n-----------\nA synonym ring is what we think Roget’s Thesaurus is.\nSynonym Control (Equivalence Relationships)\nKetchup or Catsup\n\n----------\nHierarchical Relationships\nIs A, Part of type relationships\nWhere would you put the poor tomato?\nTomato - vegetable? Fruit? Both? It’s part of ketchup, should it be linked to ketchup under condiments? \nMono-hierarchical vs. poly-hierarchical\n\n\n\n------------\nAssociative Relationships - See Also\nSalt and Pepper - Spice? Condiment? Or would it be helpful to tell the user who is looking at Spices to also review Condiments? (or, do it for them -- Steve Krug’s Don’t Make Me Thnk)\nSee NISO Z39.19-2005\nBT = Broader Term\n NT = Narrower Term\n RT = Related Term (“See also”)\n SN = Scope Note\n UF = Used For\n USE = “See” (Refers reader from variant term to vocabulary term.)\n------------\nGet to define your own relationship types!\nLocalization\nAnnotation\nReasoning\n“NOT”\n\nOntology 101 by Natalya Foy and Deb McGuinnes \nSemantic Web for the Workind Ontologist by Dean Allemang and James Hendler\n----------------------------\n\n\nThere is NO ONE RIGHT WAY to build any of these. They are an ART and a SCIENCE. The IA, UX, UI, etc - all human-computer interaction models for your system are important inputs to the design. \n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
I can do my BT/NT stuff, but I can also create classes and properties that i need for my own application\n\nI can also say NO - this object is NOT part of a certain class or have a certain property. In this diagram, I could easily add a branch for the British Isles, define it as having England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands etc, but be able to state specifically that Ireland is not part of the United Kingdom, so as not to create confusion for a machine processing the concept base. The power of no.\n\nI an also now take this graph (presuming I’d encoded it properly) and link it to other graphs that define the UK if I choose.\n
