Sagebrush Seedling Recruitment Following Tebuthiuron Application
1. Sagebrush seedling recruitment following
tebuthiuron application
Sara Germain, Rebecca Mann, Kari Veblen, Tom Monaco
Dept. of Wildland Resources, SURCO, NRCS CIG, Utah Agricultural Experiment Station,
USDA-ARS Forage and Range Research Lab.
2. Ecological Site-Based Management
Goals
1.Work with ranchers to increase forage for livestock.
2. Determine amount of shrub reduction in response to treatments
3. Evaluate how these responses vary with Ecological Site
3. Cedar Fort: Snakeweed
Gutierrezia sarothrae
Bear Lake: Sagebrush
Artemisia spp.
Birdseye: Rubber Rabbitbrush
Ericameria nauseosus
Park Valley: Greasewood
Sarcobatus vermiculatus
Study Area
Two Ecological Sites
per ranch
4. Bear Lake Site Specifics
Ecological Site: Upland Stony Loam
Soils: Lonjon Silt Loam
Elevation: 2225m
Temperature: 6 C
Precipitation: 305-406mm
Shrubs
Wyoming Big Sagebrush
Black Sagebrush
Rubber Rabbitbrush
Green Rabbitbrush
Bitterbrush
Saskatoon Serviceberry
Grasses/Forbs
Wheatgrass
Needle + Thread
Prairie Junegrass Lupine
Buckwheat
Arrowleaf Balsamroot
Aster
5. Tebuthiuron and Sagebrush
What is tebuthiuron?
Soil active herbicide used to kill mature shrubs
How was it applied?
Flew on pellets in fall 2012 – tebuthiuron 20P (2.5 lbs/ac)
Research Questions
1. How does tebuthiuron affect young Sagebrush?
2. Does tebuthiuron affect Sagebrush seedling emergence?
7. Sampling
Sagebrush density by age class: dead, mature, young
• 1 Summer after treatment July 2013
• 2 Summers after treatment July 2014
Seed rain trap – capture seed from this year
• Autumn October – Nov 2013
• Winter/Spring December – May 2014
Seed bank samples – capture seed from previous years
8. Grow-out trials
Grew 200 sub-samples per trial (3 trials) in USDA greenhouse, counted and
identified seedlings as they emerged (n=40 per trial)
• 2 Seed rain – sagebrush only
• 1 Seed bank – sagebrush, shrubs, forbs, grasses
9. Results – Density
At the ranch...
• Mature sagebrush decreased
• Young sagebrush increased
Why?
• Mature sagebrush is killed, opening new
niches for young sagebrush to grow
• Application rate may be too low to kill
young plants
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Sagebrush Density after Tebuthiuron Treatment
2013 2014
Mean Number of Sagebrush
Year
Young
Mature
10. Results - Seed Rain
In the greenhouse...
• Fewer Sagebrush seedlings
emerged from treated samples
than control samples
Why?
• Higher mortality of mature
sagebrush means fewer
reproducing plants
• Is tebuthiuron reducing the
viability of seeds from plants in
treated areas?
11. Results - Seed Bank
In the greenhouse...
• No differences in seedling emergence (sagebrush, forbs, or grasses).
Why?
• Viability of seed bank doesn’t seem to be affected by treatment.
12. Tebuthiuron and Sagebrush Management
On an Upland Stony Loam E.S:
• Initial reduction of mature Sagebrush is effective
• Success may be offset by the failure to target reestablishment
mechanisms
• Repeated applications, or use with other management tools, likely
necessary to keep sagebrush densities low over time: this may be
more costly
13. Acknowledgements
Monty Weston Property Owner
Justin Williams Field Assistance
Rebecca Mann Graduate Student Advisor
Kari Veblen Faculty Advisor
Tom Monaco Experimental Design
Notes de l'éditeur
Ranch owners aim to reduce dominance of the shrub on their property; we worked with each to select an herbicide appropriate for their situation. All four ranches were treated as of this summer... Work with ranchers to improve range by decreasing dominant shrub, in turn releasing grasses/forbs from competition to increase forage for livestock.
Determine the magnitude of shrub reduction in response to treatments and rate of recovery of target shrubs.
The key for us, is that underlying each of these shrub dominated sites are two differing soil types & associated ecological sites.
This allows us to study how ecological sites will differ in their response to our given management actions over the course of the four year project.
Evaluate how outcomes of shrub management tactics vary due to Ecological Site, eight total Ecological Sites in study area.
Stars are the locations of the four ranches that we have partnered with and where we are performing field experiments.
At each of these ranches, one target shrub species dominates the overstory…
These shrubs are over abundant at these ranches due to site responses to past management.
Set the stage –
(western , slender, intermediate, bluebunch)
Shrubby/sulfur buckwheat
not much cheatgrass, snakeweed problem
Grazing throughout the study
Otherwise known as spike
Commonly used , but Tends to reestablish within 1-2 decades
Young = not yet of reproductive age
Seedling emergence = production from treated plants and seed bank
After we flew on pellets, we walked out and visually confirmed control areas. The clumping of control is because there was significant drift of pellets and it was difficult to find clear areas.
Sagebrush density 2013 and 2014 by age class to compare treat/control in years directly following application
Seed rain – capture this year’s seeds
Seed bank – capture previous year’s seeds
1) We confirmed the efficacy of tebuthiuron at decreasing mature sagebrush
2) Young sagebrush increased in density following treatment – treated areas now more dense than control
We observed fewer seedlings emerge from treated areas – while this is most likely an artifact of fewer reproducing mature plants after treatment, I would like to know what the direct effects are on seed viability. Never counted seeds – could be same amount of seeds but lower viability in treated areas.
When mature shrubs die back, these seeds are free to germinate and grow in newly opened niches.
When aiming to control sagebrush, important to calculate costs based on necessity of future applications. Of course this is going to depend on the site, area being treated, and the optimal sagebrush density you’re aiming for.