12. Do teachers’ mean scores on Technology Familiarity Survey differ by treatment method? FF: 4.5/5 VC: 4.1/5 Name Technology Post July Tech 1 Tech 2 Post May Support Type Teacher 1 Temperature 2 5 5 5 VC Teacher 1 TI84 2 3 4 5 VC Teacher 1 Light 2 2 5 5 VC Teacher 1 Doc Camera 1 5 5 5 VC Teacher 2 Doc Camera 1 3 5 5 FF Teacher 2 TI84 2 3 3 2 FF Teacher 2 Temperature 5 3 5 5 FF Teacher 2 pH 5 3 5 5 FF
13.
14.
15.
16.
17. Teacher n Face-to-Face Videoconferencing Assigned n 14 15 Participated n (t-test, p=0.1772) 9 6 Rates of participation in FF/VC session 64% 40% Rates of implentation in teaching/taping lesson 42% 40% Item 1. Level of satisfaction with sessions 4.5/5 4.1/5 2. Number of strengths cited (% of teachers reporting positives) 16 (100%) 4 (50%) 3. Number of weaknesses cited 1 (11%) 1 (17%) 4. Scores on familiarity with technology* 4.5/5 4.6/5 5. Number of teachers who seek additional support 4 (44%) 1 (17%)
18. Vernier Probeware Vernier Probeware Presentation Equipment Magnetic Field Sensor Gas-Pressure Sensor mimio Dual-Force Sensor pH Probe Document Camera Go! Motion Sensor Conductivity Probe Projector Temperature Probe Heart Rate Monitor Graphing Calculators Light Sensor Laptop computer with accessories