1. A REPORT
On
IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL
LEARNING ON PERFORMANCE
Submitted By:
Waqas Ali Khan
MBA 14104
Submitted To:
Superior University
30/04/2014

2. ABSTRACT:
The learning culture concept is getting popular now a day’s because of its application in this
modern era and without a doubt there is an immense impact on learning culture on the
functioning of any industry, organization and sector. As long as the success of any organization
is based on the data of the employee that work for it, these activities can and, indeed, should
continue. Nevertheless, individual scholarship is simply a prerequisite for organizational
learning. Managers usually use the information within the manner that a layman can use his or
her skills, the materials and tools that are at hand to satisfy the blood line of a specific
scenario. Organizational performance includes the particular output or outcomes of a corporation
as measured against its meant outputs the goals and performances.
INTRODUCTION
A lot of Historians labored above the concept associated with mastering corporations that had
been coming forward in the course of the 20th century, however 21st century corporations face
swiftly modifying the environment, active constructions as well as globalization idea, most of
these include the sturdy effect on the organizational mastering or learning (Muhammad Sohaib,
Muhammad Ihsaan, Jahanzaib Yousaf, and Abdul Majeed, 2008). In a rapidly changing global
and uncertain atmosphere organizations should got to develop its capability of learning culture so
as to encourage the functioning grade of learning (Muhammad Sohaib, Muhammad Ihsaan,
Jahanzaib Yousaf, and Abdul Majeed, 2008). The arrangements, causing plenty of issues of
environmental constraints, there needs to be some form of modification which have to be
realistic and should be undergone by proper procedures of organization learning, organizational
learning is always self motivated because it invariably conveys the essentials of organizational
growth, expansion and innovation (Wageeh A. Nafei, Nile M. Khanfar, Belal A. Kaifi, 2011).
After new data are made or non inheritable, data management mechanisms have to be in a
position to manage the routes into the organization’s remembrance in an extraordinary way that
brought up its effects and long period reusability (William R. King, 2010). The rising phase of
organization learning analysis introduces a viewpoint that learning is not only the attitude of the
individual; learning may also happen on a bunch level and is expedited by
an organizational climate that has the environment and motivation for learning (Lorraine S.
Nemeth, 1997). Organizational learning is the only approach that can be undertaken using the
maximum data by deploying the right methods to gain the maximum output (William R. King,
2010).
Researchers have measured structure information in a very sort of ways that. One approach
measures organizational information by measure psychological feature of structural members
and organizational learning occurs in a very context which incorporates the organization and also
the external atmosphere within which the governing body is surrounded (Hodgkinson &
Sparrow, 2002). These roles of members, tools, and tasks and their networks are the first
mechanisms in systems through that structure learning happen and the data are made, captured,

3. and onward. Member’s are the media through that learning typically occurs in organizations.
Individual members additionally function data repositories in organizations (Gherardi, 2006,
Levitt & March, 1988, Miner & Haunschild, 1995). From an associate organizational learning
perspective, organizational rules will be taught to be formalized routines, and convention
production and alter may well be imagined to be outcomes of structure learning processes,
structure learning as a 2 stage method within the 1st level, organizations adapt their behavior
once performance falls wanting aspirations, and in the second phase, they accommodate their
dreams to achieve performance (Martin Schulz, 2001).

4. ORGANIZAITONAL LEARNING IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE
INFORMATION
DISTRIBUTION
INFORMATION
INTERPRETATION
INFORMATION
ACQUISITION

5. LITERATURE REVIEW:
INFORMATION ACQUISITION:
The idea of acquisition is often easier to explain in terms of the transfer of property rights,
however, not very easy once the property being acquired is as unclear as information and also the
acquirer as ambiguous as a company (Brian R. Gaines, 2014) The main meaning of the subject is
to decrease the knowledge acquisition ambiguity and lots of authors take into account
organizational learning because the basic side of competition and make a bundle with the
knowledge gaining and performance development through sharing between knowledge and
industry outcome have usually been unspoken, there's slightly pragmatic proof to hold up this
angle, particularly in conditions of transformation financial outcomes. (Tomislav Hernaus,
2006). Organizational learning may be a complicated method that refers to the event of latest
information retaining of that data and has the potential to bring positive outcomes in the
behavior, sturdy knowledge society are sensible as making, getting and sharing information,
furthermore as at behavior to replicate fresh data and approaching (Miha Skerlavaj, 2010). The
approaches, however, terribly totally different agree that advanced routines can cause the
acquisition of latest data as a result of the interpretations fabricated from ideas among the
organization. The behavior of the data in seeking system is thus important to the successful
acquisition and transfer of information because it can confirm what's out there to
be taken and whether or not it's been brought in from outside or whether or
not it's a statement of a thought already in a situation (Deborah Blackman, Steven Henderson,
2010). The acquisition of recent organizational information is important to new venture success.
So as to base choices on the foremost up-to-date data, organizations should place systems into
place to extend their capability to raised perceive data within the external atmosphere. A method
of getting and exploitation outside data in environmental scanning (Thaddeus McEwen, 2004).
Businesses gain information from its interior and outside sources, firms will obtain knowledge of
the exterior atmosphere through varied ways, as a new worker and collaborating with different
organizations (McGraw-Hill, 1996).
In distinction to information creation, information gaining needs the hunt for gratitude of and
incorporation of probabilistic important information, typically as of not only inside but external
the organization information gaining determine on information flow – information formation,
gaining, modification, storage, transport, distribution and use of goods and services. This part
helps structure, flow concerning improvement, entity education, cooperative wisdom and
cooperative deciding (William R. King, 2010). Organizational learning method may be a series
of 3 steps: data, gaining, informed understanding, and behavioral and psychological feature

6. transpose. Corporations which got raised a powerful knowledge society are sensible as making,
deed and passing data, furthermore as a behavior to replicate new data and insight (Tomislav
Hernaus, 2006). A small work of interrogation of the impact of management education, culture
and creativity that is naturally mistreated isn't simply information required, acquire and pass
along, however, somewhat an exact positioning of attitudes and morals required for innovations
to occur (Miha Skerlavaj, 2010). The contention is that this restriction results in a great deal of
what's publicized as data acquisition, if truth be told being information gathering, which whether
or not this info typically will be translated into operational data is additional problematic than
often supposed (Deborah Blackman, Steven Henderson, 2010). External information acquisition
is that the generator of intelligence for the firm. Market signals are known, and information on
these signals is understood to organize new knowledge. The interpretation could be a central
factor in the accomplishment and creation of recent structure data (Thaddeus McEwen, 2004).
Data acquisition methods involve the depth psychology of proof and inductive causative
reasoning and information regarding acquisition by a company presents some abstract and word
issues, and it's necessary to own operational definitions of the notions concerned (Brian R.
Gaines, 2014)
INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION:
Information just fit in with people, organizations could change just through representative
turnover, it infers that learning is converted through its entry into an organizational learning
taking in as the authoritative courses of action pointed at increasing the value of the information
obtained and imparted all around the firm (Francois Therien, 2010). Research compelling
elements of organizational learning taking in Concluded that have been recognized 9
fundamental variables in authoritative taking in. These components incorporate Systems
considering, group taking in, mental models, perfect and vision center, aptitude and mastery
personals, trying different things with new methodologies, gain from past meetings, gaining from
others, and meting out information to others (Shahram Gilaninia, Mir Abdolhasan Askari
Rankouh, Milad Abbas Poor Gildeh, 2013). If staff believed they may constitute a contribution
to the overall presentation, they may build up a great deal of helpful perspective in the
management of information distribution (Jessica Keyes, 2008). Learning offering alludes to
spread and diffusion of information. In other words, information management is the practice to
increase the value of data by catching inferred information and changing over it to express
learning, by separating, putting forth, recovering and dispersing information and by constructing
and examining new information (Mariel Alejandra Alet, Omar Chiotti1, María Rosa Galli, 2003).
Organizational learning is a determined by the authoritative activities, information procurement,
knowledge distribution, data elucidation, and memory that intentionally or unknowingly
influence on the positive promotion of the organization (Shahram Gilaninia, Mir Abdolhasan
Askari Rankouh, Milad Abbas Poor Gildeh, 2013). In organizational learning, the learning
administration frameworks incorporate existing segments at both infrastructural and substance

7. levels, connecting people and data frameworks connected with community, information
concentrated errands. Legal documents that handle unequivocal substance, and also functions
that empower imparting and disseminating unsaid substance, must be transiently and spatially
coordinated (Mariel Alejandra Alet, Omar Chiotti1, María Rosa Galli, 2003). Organizational
climate among the context of however information distribution, adjust interested in the company
method, plus in addition the amount of that information distribution was appeared to profit the
way of managing deals and resolve to support data distribution (Jessica Keyes, 2008).
Enhancing the information distribution power of the economy through cooperative networks and
also the diffusion of technology and providing the providing conditions for the structural
modification at the farm level to maximize the advantages of engineering for producing. (ocde,
1996). We characterize knowledge management as the process of managing learning. All things
weighed, we restrain information management to the drills that don't increase the value of
learning and learning administration is concerned with the securing and correspondence of
learning and distribution of knowledge (Francois Therien, 2010). An interesting event in any
association is distributing information to places where it is required and might be connected and
once more, workstation based data framework spares an undeniably important role to run,
alongside paper-based frameworks and vis-a-versa social collaboration. In view of their open
capacity, information distribution is important for more beneficial outcomes (Brian T. Pentland,
1995).
Knowledge has become a lot of necessary for organizations than other monetary resources,
market situation, technology, or the other company quality, people might come back and pass
away, however valuable information cannot be lost or the organization starves to death. The
information system refers to the management of gaining and generated information or the
company and it includes the gaining, creation, storage, distribution, and use of information
(McGraw-Hill, 1996). Interim knowledge transfer is excused by the method through that single
firm is associated with the expertise of another and the information transfer will be reckoned a
method within which a company recreates and maintains a fancy, causally ambiguous set of
routines during a new setting (Eric W. K. Tsang, 2009).
INFORMATION INTERPRETATION:
The basic conflict between individual stimulus-response learning and intentional psychological
feature learning, the companies learning approach considers learning not just as adoption to
contingencies, however, as learning through insights, understanding and interpretation (Peter
Pawlowsky, 2001). The necessary planning of patterns of interpretation that they are wide verity,
high stability, subtlety and negatively are mentioned below, together with consideration on
methodology (Martina Fuchs, 2013). They spread up the idea's conceptualizing collective
information bases of organizations that are the outcomes of learning from direct expertise,
learning from interpretations like stories, paradigms, frames of reference, culture and learning
from the expertise of others (Peter Pawlowsky, 2001). Interpretation looks to play a very

8. important role, however patterns of interpretation are advanced, jointly shared mindsets and
mutual rules that are neither accidental concepts nor selective individual opinions and patterns of
interpretation approach challenges the discussion close information in financial based results it
guarantees to clarify the mindsets that guide economic selections, ways to and activities in an
broader manner, focusing specially on the role of interpretation ( Martina Fuchs, 2013).
PERFORMANCE:
Organizational learning will impact the performance of workers and their satisfaction with new
technology implementation and structure impact is assessed by changes of organizational
performance on margin of profit, price effectiveness, competitive advantages, client satisfaction,
sales turnover, and effectiveness of administration processes (Vincent Chou, 2007).
Organizations which change their knowledge flow correspondingly force raise their output.
Organizational education (OL) is measured likely on the top encouraging theme in the
contemporary administrative prose. Organizational knowledge course is an arrangement of three
stages: information gaining, knowledge, understanding, and behavioral and cognitive changes.
Organization depending on the best learning philosophy is good at creating, gaining and
transferring knowledge, as well as at altering behavior to reflect innovative knowledge and
vision. (Tomislav Hernaus).
Organizational learning replicates in ‘accompanying changes’ (Garvin, 1993). If no interactive or
cognitive changes happen, organizational learning has in fact, not happened and the only thing
that leftovers unused is probably for improvements (Tomislav Hernaus).
In order to survive with the present external opportunities and threats, it is contended that
organizations have to study, that is, attain new knowledge and skills that will recover their
prevailing and future performance. Therefore, researchers endorse that the most effective
strategy of associating and improving a company’s competitive edge and performance is
organizational learning. (Islam Mohamed Salim, 2011). Research also designates that the
consequences of organizational learning on firm performance is expected to be both direct and
unintended because the creation of the advanced culture through learning allows the firm to
accomplish an improved competitive situation and above-average performance (Islam Mohamed
Salim, 2011).
There are noteworthy and meaningful correlations between complete organizational learning and
its subscales with structural performance. Overall organizational learning and its sub-scales have
a momentous role in organizational performance. The most significant finding of this research is
the empirical evidence about the presence of strong, statistically substantial, positive affiliation
between organizational learning and organizational performance. In other words, organizations
which ripen their learning processes correspondingly will upturn their performance. The study
also exposed, and confirmed some earlier conclusions, that financial measures only are not good
predictors of organizational performance. (Somaye, Maryam, Fakhroldin, Shahram and Sabri,
2013).

9. Performance is an essential feature for SME existence and sustainability where performance
factors such as revolution and organizational learning have been originated to outgrowth
business expansion, technological advancement, and wealth conception in both start-up and
present firms hence being a important aspect of supervision of the association and businesses.
Whereas, those found to be deprived performers, absence of innovation, organizational learning,
have restricted access to information on market prospects and healthy opportunities, high-priced
business 2development services and deficiency of finance, adequate technical and administration
support services. Organizational learning has strong impacts on a firm’s performance and its
achievements that proffer it towards the growth. It is addressed that the connection between a firm’s
organizational learning and its performance, emphasizing that learning generates new knowledge
which can support firms respond rapidly to customers’ needs and industry variations. Some authors
have also found in their previous researches that organizational learning yields auspicious and
positive results in organizations. (Apolot Stella, 2012).
Several of researchers have revealed in their studies that organizations cannot survive and
sustained their completive edge in the market without the organizational learning. To have a
great positioning and edge in the global economy, companies have to align themselves towards
the changes and have to learn recent trends of environment. (Jack Welch, 1994)
Hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1:
H1: there is relationship between information acquisition and performance
H0: there is no relationship between information acquisition and performance
Hypothesis 2:
H1: there is relationship between information distribution and performance
H0: there is no relationship between information distribution and performance
Hypothesis 3:
H1: there is relationship between information interpretation and performance
H0: there is no relationship between information interpretation and performance

10. Methodology
First hand data was collect by means of prearranged accepted and self-administered survey. The
questions were close-ended. The investigator realized that the respondents had realistic approach
on the complete course of the practice of organizational learning in different mode on employee
performance. The likert scale was worn to assess sensitivity, feelings, ideals and actions and to
facilitate make light of partisanship and compose promising use quantitative analysis. The
respondent have to choose the value of consideration which is being available to him by the
questionnaire which is most likely Strongly Disagree, disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree
and all these are assigned with the particular scales like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
The questionnaire was developed and consisted of two parts. The initial section of inquiry was to
hit into the important knowhow and the sketch of the respondents. This help the investigator to
locale knowledge of that is targeted.
ResearchArea
The follow a line of investigation sheltered all the employees in private organizations working in
Pakistan. The learning area was limited to Lahore because it is the densely populated and one of
the financial hub of Pakistan and a good number of the parent offices of the banks, different
companies and organizations are beneath concern are to be found in Lahore.
ResearchArea
The follow a line of investigation sheltered all the employees in private organizations working in
Pakistan. The learning area was limited to Lahore because it is the densely populated and one of
the financial hub of Pakistan and a good number of the parent offices of the banks, different
companies and organizations are beneath concern are to be found in Lahore.
Sample Size
The researcher used 300 employees of different perspective organizations.
Data Analysis
After the completion of the questionnaire filling phase the acquired data has been go through the
SPSS software for the analysis and the interpretation of the data and after that the conclusion is
given on its basis’s.

11. RELIABILITY ANALYSIS:
SR NO CONSTRACT NO OF ITEM CRONBACH’S
ALPHA
1 ORGANIZATIONAL
ACQUISITION
7 0.699
2 ORGANIZATIONAL
DISTRIBUTION
6 0.745
3 ORGANIZATIONAL
INTERPRETATION
5 0.779
4 PERFORMANCE 4 0.807
If we see the above table that is showing the reliability analysis of all the variables, the value of
Cronbach's Alpha for each variable is more than 0.70 or near to it, which gives the authenticity
of our respondent’s data. It also gives us the certificate to move forward in our study.
REGRESSION:
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 11.810 .694 16.458 .000
OLA .012 .019 .009 3.171 .002
OLD .134 .012 .214 4.830 .001
OLI .856 .014 .981 63.280 .000
a. DependentVariable:PRF

12. Regression analysis is shown in the above table. The main purpose of finding the regression
analysis is that shows the equation that will be helpful to find the impact of between two
variables. The regression analysis clearly shows that there is a immense impact of organizational
learning on performance. The test also show ‘s the significance statistically which is less then
0.05.
ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 1937.596 3 645.865 1.419E3 .000a
Residual 134.317 295 .455
Total 2071.913 298
a. Predictors:(Constant),OLI, OLA, OLD
b. DependentVariable:PRF
These results show you the variance between groups and the variance within groups and it show
that there is significant relationships Sig=0. 000
Correlations
Performance Information_ acq Information_ distr Information _inter
Performance
Pearson Correlation 1 .632**
.851**
.852**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 300 300 300 300
Information_ acq
Pearson Correlation .632**
1 .553**
.699**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 300 300 300 300
Information_ distr
Pearson Correlation .851**
.553**
1 .864**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 300 300 300 300
information _inter Pearson Correlation .852**
.699**
.864**
1

13. Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 300 300 300 300
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is been shown in the above table. Where the chosen four variable is been examined.
The results shows that they are absolutely correlated to performance (r=.852, p = .000, and r=
.699, p= .000,r=.864,p=.000) accordingly. As we can see that there is a common association in
between information distribution and information acquisition (r= .851, p = .000) so it shows that
there is a active relationship between both of them, the variables –information acquisition,
information distribution, information interpretaion– are positively correlated to performance (r=
.852, p = .000, and r= .851, p= .000, accordingly). The results depict that the correlations are less
then the significance value which is 0.05. so there will be no correlation rejected in the above
case.

14. DISCUSION AND CONCLUSION:
A theoretical framework for analyzing organizational learning and used the framework to
produce an outline of analysis on companies learning. Knowledge will flow out of the
organization into the surroundings and is also embedded within the organization. Organizational
learning has a great impact on the performance of different organization in such manner through
which they can optimize their profit although it’s a slow process. Notably, once organizations
have interaction during a new learning challenge, performance usually suffers, or seems to
suffer, within the short term. Another implication that appears from the results of this study is
that though learning organization formation facilitates modification, adaptation and innovation,
and therefore organization growth and evolution, they're not as equally effective once it involves
such bottom-line organizational performance as productivity, quality and gain. The fact
that organizational learning will influence companies performance, however, there are more
variables that influence the general performance of those corporations.
FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTION:
 This research is based on non-financial performance, so there is a room for research on
financial performance.
 More variables can be added in it.
 More sample size should be taken into account.
LIMITATIONS:
 As I’m a student so I don’t have enough time and resources.
 The sample size should be exceed from the chosen one.
REFERENCES:
Hammad Sohaib, Muhammad Ihsaan, Jahanzaib Yousaf, and Abdul Majeed, (2008). Factors
Affecting the Organizational Learning: A Study of Banking Sector of Pakistan.

15. William R. King, (21010). Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning
Wageeh A. Nafei, (2011), Leadership Styles and Organizational Learning: An Empirical Study
on
Saudi Banks in Al-Taif Governorate Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Vincent Cho, (2007). A study of the impact of Organizational Learning on information system
effectiveness.
Mariel Alejandra Alet, Omar Chiotti1, María Rosa Galli, (2003). A Distributed Knowledge
Management Conceptual Model for Knowledge Organizations.
Thaddeus McEwen, (2004). Knowledge acquisition and organizational learning through
environmental scanning.
Tomislav Hernaus, (2006). Relationship between organizational learning and organizational
performance: The case of Crothia.
Hamdan Hasan Al-Onizat, (2012). How Learning Organization Supports the Intellectual
Capital Field Study at Jordanian Banks.
Organization for economic co-operation and development, (1996).
Deborah Blackman and Steven Henderson, (2010). Does A Learning Organization Facilitate
Knowledge Acquisition And Transfer?
Ehsan Rasoulinezhad, (2011). Measuring the Role of Knowledge Management Processes in the
Commercial Banks of Iran.
Peter Pawlowsky, (2001). Organizational Learning in Various Environmental Conditions.
Martina fuchs, (2013). Knowledge and Patterns of Interpretation: Two Complementary
Approaches for a Better Understanding of Mental Constructions in Economic Geography
Brian T. Pentland, (1995). Information and systems and organizational learning: The social
epistemology of organizational knowledge systems.
Dr. Jessica Keyes, (2008). Identifying the barriers to knowledge sharing in Knowledge intensive
organizations.
Lorraine S. Nemeth, (1997). Measuring Organizational Learning.

16. Brian R. Gaine, (2014). Organizational knowledge acquisition.
Miha Skerlavaj , (2010). Organizational learning culture, innovative culture and innovations in
South Korean firms.
Shahram Gilaninia, Mir Abdolhasan Askari Rankouh, Milad Abbas Poor Gildeh, (2013).
Overview in the importance of organizational learning and learning organization.
McGraw-Hill, (1996), Building the Learning Organization.
Martin Schulz, (2001). Organizational learning: Companions of organizational learning.
Erica Wiseman, (2007). The institutionalization of organizational learning.