Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, School Law, Use of School Facilities, Religous Rights of Teachers, Religous Freedom of Expression, Religous Rights in Schooling, Due Process, Freedom of Expression, School Prayers, Termination, Due Process
The Supreme Court did not rule on the case because the father was not the custodial parent and the mother did not oppose the pledge.
Participation of school staff may be deemed as an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. Employees are not required to leave the room when students pray on their own
Court has ruled in some cases against silent meditation because the word prayer appears as part of the process. Feel it is the intent to restore prayer into the public school system.
Sweeny Graduation Sweeny Baccalaureate Ceremony with town minister
Wright v. Houston ISD- Wanted to require the teaching of every theory of human origin Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County- school books deemed to promote secular humanism