SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  31
Elections, Political Parties, Interest Groups
State control of elections within their borders
Congress has the power to change state election laws.
Courts use judicial review to change state electoral laws.
Voting in Texas
• You must be a US citizen to vote.
• You must be 18 years of age on election day.
• You must register to vote.
• Registration to vote in Texas:
• Voters are registered by county.
• Voters must have lived in the county for 30 days prior to registering.
• Texas closes registration 30 days before an election.
• Some states allow election day registration
• Registration requirement important restriction on voting
• Citizens do not register as a member of a political Party in Texas
Historical Impediments to African American Voting
Intimidation and Exclusion of African Americans and Hispanics
• 1903: Texas switched to party primary elections to choose nominees
• White Primary
• Democratic party excluded African Americans from membership and voting in primary
• 1923: state legislature excludes African Americans from voting in Democratic primary
• In Nixon v Herndon (1927), the US Supreme Court ruled against Texas, holding that the law was such a
clear violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
• State legislature immediately passed a law granting the authority to the executive committee of each
party to exclude black voters
• Nixon v Condon (1932), with the Court again citing the Fourteenth, and noting that the state was, in
effect, making the decision for the party.
• Texas Democrats approach next asimply allowed the Texas Democratic Party, voting at its state
convention, to ban African Americans from the primary.
• The Court allowed this rule to stand in Grovey v Townsend (1937), agreeing parties were private clubs
• In Smith v Allwright (1944), the Court struck down Townsend and ruled that parties are “an agency of
the state” that must abide by constitutional law and not thwart voting rights
Historical Impediments to Voting in Texas
• Poll Tax
• From 1902, Texas charged citizens a poll tax to register to vote.
• $1.50 - $1.75 per year at a time when average wage was $0.22.
• In 1964, the Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution barred poll
taxes in all elections for national office.
• Texas then created separate ballots for national and state elections where
everyone could vote in national elections but those paying the poll tax could
vote in state election
• Ruled a violation of due process and outlawed by United States v. State of
Texas, 252 F. Supp. 234 (W.D. Tex. 1966)
• SCOTUS let the district court stand without a full hearing
US Congress moves to protect voting rights
Voting Rights Act of 1965
• Section 2: No voting qualification or prerequisite shall be applied by any state to abridge
voting due to race or color. (language groups added) does not require intent
• The Attorney General has brought several cases under Section 2
• Individuals and groups can bring lawsuits challenging practices under section 2
• Section 3: Attorney General may appoint federal examiners to oversee any court orders
resulting from a 15th Amendment lawsuit against a state or any political subdivision.
• “Bail-in provision:” Court may suspend any voting qualifications or “devices” it finds to have been used for
racial discrimination, and retain jurisdiction over the rules and practices of such a subdivision, through such
examiners, for as long as it deems necessary. Requires finding of intent to discriminate
• Section 4: States and subdivisions meeting certain qualifications based on previous use of
literacy tests, very low turnout rates, and other objective indicators as of November 1964 are
immediately and automatically to fall under Section 5.
• Section (a) “bail-out” provision: a subdivision may petition to exit coverage of Section 5 if it has complied
with all requirements for at least 5 years.
• Section 5: Subdivisions falling under the criteria of Section 4 or the bail-in provisions of
Section 3 must get “pre-clearance” from the Justice Department before making any changes
in its laws on electoral systems, representational arrangements, or voter qualifications.
• US District Court of the District of Columbia can also review changes for “pre-clearance”
Pre-clearance Today
• Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013)
• The criteria in Section 4 for determining which jurisdictions must seek pre-
clearance were invalidated by SCOTUS min a 5-4 vote
• Congress can write new rules for determining which jurisdictions must seek pre-
clearance under Section 5 but has not done so.
• The “bail-in” provision of Section 3 remains a path under which jurisdictions
may be required to seek pre-clearance.
• Courts can respond to current intentional discrimination
• Several jurisdictions have been bailed in by courts
• Latest Texas jurisdiction under section 3 pre-clearance
• Patino et al v. City of Pasadena et al, No. 4:2014cv03241 - Document 151 (S.D. Tex.
2017)
• Alberto Patino, et al v. City of Pasadena, No. 17-20030 (5th Cir. 2017)
• Pasadena agrees to court decisions and is placed under Section 3 pre-clearance
Texas Motor Voter Registration Online
Plaintiff: Jarrod Stringer
Defendant: Carlos H. Cascos and Steven C. McCraw
Case
Number:
5:2016cv00257
Filed: March 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding
Judge:
Orlando L. Garcia
Nature of
Suit:
Civil Rights: Voting
Cause of
Action:
28:1331 Fed. Question
In a 2018 ruling, U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia of
San Antonio found that Texas was in violation of the
federal National Voter Registration Act and the
Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause because it
treated voters who dealt with their driver’s licenses
online differently than those who obtained or renewed
their licenses in person at Texas Department of Public
Safety offices.
Texas Motor Voter Registration Online: Judge Orlando Garcia
again orders Texas to register 3 voters who tried to register online
November 13, 2019: 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a federal district judge’s (Orlando
Garcia) ruling eral law by failing to register residents to vote when they updated their driver’s licenses
online. The panel of three federal judges that considered the case did not clear the state of
wrongdoing but instead determined that the three Texas voters who had brought the lawsuit did
not have standing to sue.
Round 2: U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia of San Antonio on Thursday (01/30/2020) issued an
injunction requiring the state to allow the registrations of three plaintiffs in a suit over the state's
voting rules. At a later date, the court is expected to issue a larger ruling covering all Texans' ability to
register online.
Federal law requires that states conduct voter registration wherever they allow driver's license
renewal, and some 40 states now allow online voter registration.
Types of Elections
• Primary Elections
• Held by parties to choose
nominees for the general
election
• In Texas, nominees must win a
MAJORITY of the vote
• No majority; hold a RUNOFF
election of top two
• General Election
• Held by political jurisdiction to
decide which party’s candidate
will serve in the office
• In Texas, it requires only a
PLURALITY (highest vote total)
to win the office
• Special Elections: elections not held on the regular schedule
• to fill vacancies in legislative or executive offices
• to authorize bonds
• to ratify or reject amendments to the Texas constitution
Types of Primary Elections
Basic Types
• Open
• Voters are free to vote in the
primary of either party
• Closed
• Voters must register as a member
of a party and can only vote in
that parties primary
• Jungle Primary: aka top 2
primary, blanket primary, non-
partisan open primary
• used in some elections in
California, Louisiana, Nebraska,
and Washington
Primaries in Texas
• Quasi Open
• On primary election day, voters
choose to participate in the
primary election process (primary
and runoff primary) of one party
• EG: if you vote in the Democratic
primary you can only vote in the
Democratic primary runoff
Types of Primary Elections
• Non-partisan methods of choosing candidates for a general election are
created in some states for specific types of elections.
• Various names are applied to this type of election; jungle primary, top two
primary, blanket primary, non-partisan open primary
• How do they work? Office seekers declare for a spot on the ballot for some office.
Voters cast ballots for these candidates. If a candidate wins a majority, that person
wins the office. If no candidate wins a majority, the top two vote getters face each
other in a subsequent election. Some states refer to this second election as the
general election and some call it a runoff election.
• This subsequent election can occur between two members of the same party
Direct and Indirect Primaries
Direct Primary
• Voters choose the party nominee for
office directly
• Texas requires direct primary winners to
achieve a majority vote (50% plus one
vote
• If no candidate gets a majority a runoff
election is held between top 2 vote
getters.
• Other states may not require a majority.
• Examples: governor, plural executive,
TX and US house and senate
Indirect Primary
• Presidential preference primaries are
indirect primaries.
• Voters choose a presidential candidate
but the results of that vote determine
the number of delegates to the party
nominating convention pledged to
each candidate
2020 Republican Presidential Preference Primaries in Texas
155 delegates; 108 by district and 47 at large (statewide)
Delegates soft pledged based on
Congressional District results
• 108 district delegates are to be allocated to
presidential contenders based on the primary
results in each of the 36 congressional districts:
• Each congressional district is assigned 3 National
Convention delegates.
• These delegates are allocated to the presidential
contenders as follows:
• Candidate over 50% gets 3 of the district's
delegates. [
• No candidate over 50% but at least 1 candidate
gets 20% or more of the vote; plurality winner gets
2 and second place 1
• If no candidate receives 20% of the vote then the
top 3 vote getters each receive 1 delegate.
Delegates soft pledged based on
statewide results
• 47 at-large delegates: 10 delegates plus 34 bonus
delegates plus 3 RNC delegates will be allocated
to the candidates based on statewide primary
results. These delegates are allocated to the
presidential contenders as follows:
• Candidate gets over 50%, that candidate is
allocated all 47 at-large delegates. [
• No candidate gets over 50% but 2 get 20%, 47 at-
large delegates are allocated proportionally among
those candidates receiving 20% or more.
• No candidate gets over 50% but 1 gets 20%, 47 at-
large delegates are allocated proportionally
between the candidate receiving 20% and the
candidate receiving the next highest vote total
• If no candidate receives 20% of the vote, allocate
the 47 at-large delegates proportionally.
2020 Democratic Presidential Preference Primary;
262 delegates; 228 soft pledged; 34 unpledged
149 delegates soft pledged based on
results in the 31 state senate districts
• 149 total by senate district
State Senate
District
Delegates State Senate
District
Delegates
SD1 4 SD17 5
SD2 5 SD18 4
SD3 4 SD19 5
SD4 5 SD20 5
SD5 5 SD21 5
SD6 4 SD22 4
SD7 4 SD23 8
SD8 5 SD24 3
SD9 4 SD25 6
SD10 6 SD26 6
SD11 4 SD27 4
SD12 4 SD28 2
SD13 8 SD29 4
SD14 10 SD30 3
SD15 6 SD31 2
SD16 5 TOTAL 149
79 delegates soft pledged based on
results of the statewide primary vote
• 79 total by statewide at-large vote
49 soft pledged delegates based on the statewide
at-large primary vote
30 soft pledged PLEO (Party Leaders and Elected
Officials) delegates based on the statewide at-
large primary vote
34 UNPLEDGED PLEO delegates aka “Superdelegates”
• 21 Democratic National Committee Members
• 13 Members of Congress (0 Senators, 13 US Representatives
***** Super delegates cannot vote in the first round in 2020
General Elections in Texas: presidential years
even numbered years
• Elections in Presidential Years
• US President
• Held to decide which ticket gets the electoral college votes of the state
• 48 states, including Texas, allocate electoral college votes on a winner take all
basis (Nebraska and Maine allocate electoral college votes proportionally)
• Nebraska has 5 electors
• 2 allocated according to statewide vote
• 3 allocated to winner of the vote counted in their 3 US House districts
• Maine has 4 electors
• 2 allocated according to statewide vote
• 2 allocated to winner of the vote counted in their 2 US House districts
• TEXAS: 38 electoral college votes (winner take all)
General Elections in Texas
• General Elections held every 2 years
• US offices
• US House: all 36 House seats
• Single member districts
• Plurality decision rules
• US Senate: approximately 1/3 of all senate seats up for election (6 year terms)
• In 2018, only one of Texas’ US senators was up for election (Republican Ted Cruz)
• Approximately ½ of the 31 members of Texas state senate (4-year terms)
• Single member districts
• Plurality decision rules
• All 150 members of Texas house
• Single member districts
• Plurality decision rules
General Elections in Texas; non-presidential
years
• General Elections held between Presidential elections (midterms)
• US offices
• US House: all 36 House seats
• Single member districts
• Plurality decision rules
• US Senate: approximately 1/3 of all senate seats up for election (6 year terms)
• In 2018, only one of Texas’ US senators was up for election (Republican Ted Cruz)
• Texas State Offices
• Approximately ½ of the 31 members of Texas state senate (4 year terms)
• Single member districts
• Plurality decision rules
• All 150 members of Texas house
• Single member districts
• Plurality decision rules
• Offices of Texas Plural executive
Political Parties
• Party in the electorate; party identification of individuals
• Do you think of yourself as a Democrat, Republican, Independent, Other
• Party in Government; party affiliation of elected officials
• Which party nominated the office holder?
• Party Organization; party officials and party meetings
Party In the Electorate
• Party Identification (Party ID)
• Feb 2020 Texas Policy Project Poll
•Democrat 43%
•Independent 8%
•Republican 48%
Party in Government
US Legislative Branch
US House Partisan Balance
Party 116th Congress
Democratic 235
Republican 198
Vacancies 2
Total 435
US Senate Partisan Balance
Party 116th Congress
Democratic 45
Republican 53
Independent 2
Total 100
Congressional Partisan Breakdown from Texas
Party U.S. Senate U.S. House Total
Democratic Party 0 13 13
Republican Party 2 23 25
TOTALS as of March 2019 2 36 38
US Senate US House
Party in Government
Texas State Legislature
Party As of March 2019
Democratic Party 12
Republican Party 19
Vacancies 0
Total 31
Party As of March 2019
Democratic Party 67
Republican Party 83
Vacancies 0
Total 150
Texas State Senate 2019 Texas State House 2019
Party in Government
Plural Executive
Statewide
Ken Paxton Republican Party Attorney General of Texas
Greg Abbott Republican Party Governor of Texas
Dan Patrick Republican Party Lieutenant Governor of Texas
Sid Miller Republican Party Texas Commissioner of Agriculture
Glenn Hegar Republican Party Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
George P. Bush Republican Party Texas Land Commissioner
Wayne Christian Republican Party Texas Railroad Commission
Ryan Sitton Republican Party Texas Railroad Commission
Christi Craddick Republican Party Texas Railroad Commission
By Districts
Georgina Perez Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 1
Patricia Hardy Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 11
Pam Little Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 12
Aicha Davis Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 13
Sue Melton-Malone Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 14
Marty Rowley Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 15
Ruben Cortez Jr. Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 2
Marisa Perez-Diaz Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 3
Lawrence Allen Jr. Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 4
Ken Mercer Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 5
Donna Bahorich Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 6
Matt Robinson Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 7
Barbara Cargill Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 8
Keven Ellis Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 9
Party Organization
Republican
• Republic National Committee
• Republican Senatorial Committee
• Republican Senatorial Conference
• House Republican Conference
• Republican Governors Association
• Republican State Leadership Committee
• Texas State Republican Party
• Officials
• State Executive Committee
• 1 woman and 1 man from each of the 31 state senate districts
• County Chairs
• Tarrant County Executive Committee
Democratic
• Democratic National Committee
• Senate Democratic Caucus
• House Democratic Caucus
• Democratic Governors Association
• Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee
• Texas State Democratic Party
• Officials
• State Executive Committee
• 1 woman and 1 man from each of the 31 state senate districts
• Democratic National Committee (Texas)
• County Parties
Interest Groups
• Interest groups are organizations of people who share common
political interests and aim to influence public policy by
electioneering and lobbying.
• Lobbying involves persuasion to convince an elected official or
bureaucrat to help enact a law, craft a regulation, or do
something else that a group wants.
• Electioneering is activity designed to influence the outcome of an
election. It could involve elections for political office or a TX
constitutional amendment or any other decision made by voting.
Interest groups and political parties
• Both try to influence policy outcomes and election of candidates.
• The major difference is that parties have a formal role in
nominating candidates for general elections and interest
groups do not.
• Parties play a direct role in organizing legislative bodies but
interest groups play only an indirect role
• Majority party holds top leadership and committee positions
Lobbying
Inside Strategies
• Direct contact to influence policymakers
• Written Reports/ testimony
• Draft legislation or regulations
• Groups can sue policy makers directly
• Groups often provide amicus curia (friend of
the court) briefs to influence court decisions
Outside Strategies
• Grassroots lobbying
• Mobilize members to contact
decisionmakers
• Change public opinion
• Education
Electioneering
• 501(c) Groups — Nonprofit, tax-exempt groups organized under section 501(c)
of the Internal Revenue Code that can engage in varying amounts of political
activity, depending on the type of group.
• For example, 501(c)(3) groups operate for religious, charitable, scientific or
educational purposes. These groups are not supposed to engage in any
political activities, though some voter registration activities are
permitted.
• 501(c)(4) groups are commonly called "social welfare" organizations that may
engage in political activities, as long as these activities do not become
their primary purpose.
• Similar restrictions apply to Section 501(c)(5) labor and agricultural groups.
• Similar restrictions apply to Section 501(c)(6) business leagues, chambers of
commerce, real estate boards and boards of trade.
Electioneering
• 527 Group — A tax-exempt group organized under section 527
of the Internal Revenue Code to raise money for political
activities.
• These groups are typically created by parties, candidates, groups,
committees or associations organized for the purpose of
influencing an issue, policy, appointment, or election, at any level
og government, be it national, state or local.
• Such organizations can raise unlimited funds from individuals,
groups, corporations or labor unions, but they must register with
the IRS and disclose their contributions and expenditures.
Political Action Committees (PACS)
• Political Action Committee (PAC) — A political committee that raises and spends limited "hard" money
contributions for the express purpose of electing or defeating candidates.
• Organizations that raise soft money for issue advocacy may also set up a PAC.
• Most PACs represent business, such as the Microsoft PAC; labor, such as the Teamsters PAC; or ideological
interests, such as the EMILY's List PAC or the National Rifle Association PAC.
• An organization's PAC will collect money from the group's employees or members and make contributions in
the name of the PAC to candidates and political parties.
• Individuals contributing to a PAC may also contribute directly to candidates and political parties, even those
also supported by the PAC.
• A PAC can give $5,000 to a candidate per election (primary, general or special) and up to $15,000 annually to
a national political party.
• PACs may receive up to $5,000 each from individuals, other PACs and party committees per year.
• A PAC must register with the Federal Election Commission within 10 days of its formation, providing the
name and address of the PAC, its treasurer and any affiliated organizations.
Super PACs and Hybrid PACs
• Super PACs arose following the July 2010 federal court decision SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election
Commission.
• Technically known as independent expenditure-only committees, super PACs may raise unlimited sums of
money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals, then spend unlimited sums directly to
overtly advocate for or against political candidates.
• Unlike traditional PACs, super PACs are prohibited from donating money directly to political candidates,
and their spending must not be coordinated with that of the candidates they benefit.
• Super PACs are required to report their donors to the Federal Election Commission on a monthly or
semiannual basis – the super PAC's choice – in off-years, and monthly in the year of an election.
• Hybrid PACs (Carey Committees) — A Carey committee is a hybrid PAC that is not affiliated with a
candidate and has the ability to operate both as a traditional PAC, contributing funds to a candidate's
committee, and as a super PAC, which makes independent expenditures.
• To do so, Carey committees must have a separate bank account for each purpose.
• The committee can collect unlimited contributions from almost any source for its independent expenditure account,
but may not use those funds for its traditional PAC contributions.
Regulating PACS
National elections
• Federal Elections Commission
Texas elections
• Texas Ethics Commission
• Lobbyists
• Candidates
• Political Committees
• Political Parties

Contenu connexe

Tendances

American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13 American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13 d2suarez
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branchrcambou
 
The American Legal System: An Overview
The American Legal System: An OverviewThe American Legal System: An Overview
The American Legal System: An OverviewDan Kennedy
 
The Electoral Process
The Electoral ProcessThe Electoral Process
The Electoral Processkbeacom
 
Texas Elections 2020
Texas Elections 2020Texas Elections 2020
Texas Elections 2020Irma Mathis
 
Legal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case BriefingLegal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case Briefinglisajurs
 
The United States Court System
The United States Court SystemThe United States Court System
The United States Court SystemRobo965
 
Judicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroJudicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroMelissa
 
The us federal court system & supreme court
The us federal court system & supreme courtThe us federal court system & supreme court
The us federal court system & supreme courtpjosephchs
 
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter BehaviorsChapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviorskbeacom
 
Organization Of U.S. Court System
Organization Of U.S. Court SystemOrganization Of U.S. Court System
Organization Of U.S. Court SystemBryan Toth
 
The u.s. legal system a short description federal judic
The u.s. legal system a short description federal judicThe u.s. legal system a short description federal judic
The u.s. legal system a short description federal judicSALU18
 
Dual court system
Dual court systemDual court system
Dual court systemjkegg
 

Tendances (18)

Judicial Branch
Judicial BranchJudicial Branch
Judicial Branch
 
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13 American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
 
Judicial branch
Judicial branchJudicial branch
Judicial branch
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
The American Legal System: An Overview
The American Legal System: An OverviewThe American Legal System: An Overview
The American Legal System: An Overview
 
Dual court system
Dual court systemDual court system
Dual court system
 
The Electoral Process
The Electoral ProcessThe Electoral Process
The Electoral Process
 
Texas Elections 2020
Texas Elections 2020Texas Elections 2020
Texas Elections 2020
 
Legal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case BriefingLegal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case Briefing
 
The United States Court System
The United States Court SystemThe United States Court System
The United States Court System
 
Judicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch IntroJudicial Branch Intro
Judicial Branch Intro
 
The us federal court system & supreme court
The us federal court system & supreme courtThe us federal court system & supreme court
The us federal court system & supreme court
 
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter BehaviorsChapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
 
Organization Of U.S. Court System
Organization Of U.S. Court SystemOrganization Of U.S. Court System
Organization Of U.S. Court System
 
Judiciary ppt
Judiciary pptJudiciary ppt
Judiciary ppt
 
The u.s. legal system a short description federal judic
The u.s. legal system a short description federal judicThe u.s. legal system a short description federal judic
The u.s. legal system a short description federal judic
 
Who Can Vote?
Who Can Vote?Who Can Vote?
Who Can Vote?
 
Dual court system
Dual court systemDual court system
Dual court system
 

Similaire à Elections, Parties and Interest Groups SP2020

Voters & Voter Behavior
Voters & Voter BehaviorVoters & Voter Behavior
Voters & Voter Behaviorkbeacom
 
Chapter 6 presentation
Chapter 6 presentationChapter 6 presentation
Chapter 6 presentationkrobinette
 
Am gov ch06
Am gov ch06Am gov ch06
Am gov ch06whitt088
 
17Supreme Court Cases – the right to voteJesus Mojica.docx
17Supreme Court Cases – the right to voteJesus Mojica.docx17Supreme Court Cases – the right to voteJesus Mojica.docx
17Supreme Court Cases – the right to voteJesus Mojica.docxdrennanmicah
 
American politics: Presidential Election
American politics: Presidential ElectionAmerican politics: Presidential Election
American politics: Presidential ElectionAndrea English Teacher
 
Territorial organization of USA
Territorial organization of USA  Territorial organization of USA
Territorial organization of USA VerenFerrera
 
Voter behavior
Voter behaviorVoter behavior
Voter behaviorjpaone76
 
Initiative and referendum process
Initiative and referendum processInitiative and referendum process
Initiative and referendum processStarscreamMuse
 
Vote YES for Progress Redistricting power point
Vote YES for Progress Redistricting power point  Vote YES for Progress Redistricting power point
Vote YES for Progress Redistricting power point Chelsea Schuster
 
LRS Final William Rufkahr
LRS Final William RufkahrLRS Final William Rufkahr
LRS Final William RufkahrWilliam Rufkahr
 
Day 25 new
Day 25 newDay 25 new
Day 25 newaliaq22
 
Electoral Process
Electoral ProcessElectoral Process
Electoral ProcessUD Teacher
 
Participating in Government
Participating in GovernmentParticipating in Government
Participating in Governmentafrancksjrcs
 

Similaire à Elections, Parties and Interest Groups SP2020 (20)

Voters & Voter Behavior
Voters & Voter BehaviorVoters & Voter Behavior
Voters & Voter Behavior
 
Chapter 6 presentation
Chapter 6 presentationChapter 6 presentation
Chapter 6 presentation
 
Am gov ch06
Am gov ch06Am gov ch06
Am gov ch06
 
17Supreme Court Cases – the right to voteJesus Mojica.docx
17Supreme Court Cases – the right to voteJesus Mojica.docx17Supreme Court Cases – the right to voteJesus Mojica.docx
17Supreme Court Cases – the right to voteJesus Mojica.docx
 
Unit 4 voting
Unit 4   votingUnit 4   voting
Unit 4 voting
 
American politics: Presidential Election
American politics: Presidential ElectionAmerican politics: Presidential Election
American politics: Presidential Election
 
Territorial organization of USA
Territorial organization of USA  Territorial organization of USA
Territorial organization of USA
 
Voter behavior
Voter behaviorVoter behavior
Voter behavior
 
Initiative and referendum process
Initiative and referendum processInitiative and referendum process
Initiative and referendum process
 
Vote YES for Progress Redistricting power point
Vote YES for Progress Redistricting power point  Vote YES for Progress Redistricting power point
Vote YES for Progress Redistricting power point
 
Elections
ElectionsElections
Elections
 
LRS Final William Rufkahr
LRS Final William RufkahrLRS Final William Rufkahr
LRS Final William Rufkahr
 
Day 25 new
Day 25 newDay 25 new
Day 25 new
 
Voters
VotersVoters
Voters
 
Electoral Process
Electoral ProcessElectoral Process
Electoral Process
 
Elections Presentation
Elections PresentationElections Presentation
Elections Presentation
 
Participating in Government
Participating in GovernmentParticipating in Government
Participating in Government
 
Chap06
Chap06Chap06
Chap06
 
Electoral college 2014
Electoral college 2014Electoral college 2014
Electoral college 2014
 
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Preclearance
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Preclearance A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Preclearance
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Preclearance
 

Plus de William Carder

Plus de William Carder (10)

Short Review
Short ReviewShort Review
Short Review
 
Constitutions Texas
Constitutions TexasConstitutions Texas
Constitutions Texas
 
Texas legislature
Texas legislatureTexas legislature
Texas legislature
 
Policy in texas
Policy in texasPolicy in texas
Policy in texas
 
Wellbeing texas
Wellbeing texasWellbeing texas
Wellbeing texas
 
Critical thinking texas style 2020
Critical thinking texas style 2020Critical thinking texas style 2020
Critical thinking texas style 2020
 
Local governments revised(1)
Local governments revised(1)Local governments revised(1)
Local governments revised(1)
 
Texas in our federal system 4 3 20
Texas in our federal system 4 3 20Texas in our federal system 4 3 20
Texas in our federal system 4 3 20
 
Criminal justice
Criminal justiceCriminal justice
Criminal justice
 
Public opinion sp2020
Public opinion sp2020Public opinion sp2020
Public opinion sp2020
 

Dernier

PPT BIJNOR COUNTING Counting of Votes on ETPBs (FOR SERVICE ELECTORS
PPT BIJNOR COUNTING Counting of Votes on ETPBs (FOR SERVICE ELECTORSPPT BIJNOR COUNTING Counting of Votes on ETPBs (FOR SERVICE ELECTORS
PPT BIJNOR COUNTING Counting of Votes on ETPBs (FOR SERVICE ELECTORSgovindsharma81649
 
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - Poster
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - PosterWorld Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - Poster
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - PosterChristina Parmionova
 
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...MOHANI PANDEY
 
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...tanu pandey
 
TEST BANK For Essentials of Negotiation, 7th Edition by Roy Lewicki, Bruce Ba...
TEST BANK For Essentials of Negotiation, 7th Edition by Roy Lewicki, Bruce Ba...TEST BANK For Essentials of Negotiation, 7th Edition by Roy Lewicki, Bruce Ba...
TEST BANK For Essentials of Negotiation, 7th Edition by Roy Lewicki, Bruce Ba...robinsonayot
 
Call Girls Chakan Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Chakan Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance BookingCall Girls Chakan Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Chakan Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Bookingroncy bisnoi
 
Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...
Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...
Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...tanu pandey
 
Night 7k to 12k Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
Night 7k to 12k  Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...Night 7k to 12k  Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
Night 7k to 12k Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...aartirawatdelhi
 
1935 CONSTITUTION REPORT IN RIPH FINALLS
1935 CONSTITUTION REPORT IN RIPH FINALLS1935 CONSTITUTION REPORT IN RIPH FINALLS
1935 CONSTITUTION REPORT IN RIPH FINALLSarandianics
 
A PPT on digital India initiative by Government of India
A PPT on digital India initiative by Government of IndiaA PPT on digital India initiative by Government of India
A PPT on digital India initiative by Government of IndiaMiteshKumar471773
 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...Call Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
Just Call Vip call girls Wardha Escorts ☎️8617370543 Starting From 5K to 25K ...
Just Call Vip call girls Wardha Escorts ☎️8617370543 Starting From 5K to 25K ...Just Call Vip call girls Wardha Escorts ☎️8617370543 Starting From 5K to 25K ...
Just Call Vip call girls Wardha Escorts ☎️8617370543 Starting From 5K to 25K ...Dipal Arora
 
Call On 6297143586 Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...
Call On 6297143586  Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...Call On 6297143586  Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...
Call On 6297143586 Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...tanu pandey
 
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Bookingdharasingh5698
 
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 312024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31JSchaus & Associates
 
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)Congressional Budget Office
 
The NAP process & South-South peer learning
The NAP process & South-South peer learningThe NAP process & South-South peer learning
The NAP process & South-South peer learningNAP Global Network
 
best call girls in Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8005736733 Neha Thakur
best call girls in Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8005736733 Neha Thakurbest call girls in Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8005736733 Neha Thakur
best call girls in Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8005736733 Neha ThakurSUHANI PANDEY
 
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...SUHANI PANDEY
 

Dernier (20)

PPT BIJNOR COUNTING Counting of Votes on ETPBs (FOR SERVICE ELECTORS
PPT BIJNOR COUNTING Counting of Votes on ETPBs (FOR SERVICE ELECTORSPPT BIJNOR COUNTING Counting of Votes on ETPBs (FOR SERVICE ELECTORS
PPT BIJNOR COUNTING Counting of Votes on ETPBs (FOR SERVICE ELECTORS
 
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - Poster
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - PosterWorld Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - Poster
World Press Freedom Day 2024; May 3rd - Poster
 
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Get Premium Budhwar Peth Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
 
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
Akurdi ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready For S...
 
TEST BANK For Essentials of Negotiation, 7th Edition by Roy Lewicki, Bruce Ba...
TEST BANK For Essentials of Negotiation, 7th Edition by Roy Lewicki, Bruce Ba...TEST BANK For Essentials of Negotiation, 7th Edition by Roy Lewicki, Bruce Ba...
TEST BANK For Essentials of Negotiation, 7th Edition by Roy Lewicki, Bruce Ba...
 
Call Girls Chakan Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Chakan Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance BookingCall Girls Chakan Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
Call Girls Chakan Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
 
Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...
Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...
Pimpri Chinchwad ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi R...
 
Night 7k to 12k Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
Night 7k to 12k  Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...Night 7k to 12k  Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
Night 7k to 12k Call Girls Service In Navi Mumbai 👉 BOOK NOW 9833363713 👈 ♀️...
 
1935 CONSTITUTION REPORT IN RIPH FINALLS
1935 CONSTITUTION REPORT IN RIPH FINALLS1935 CONSTITUTION REPORT IN RIPH FINALLS
1935 CONSTITUTION REPORT IN RIPH FINALLS
 
A PPT on digital India initiative by Government of India
A PPT on digital India initiative by Government of IndiaA PPT on digital India initiative by Government of India
A PPT on digital India initiative by Government of India
 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Bhosari ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...
 
Just Call Vip call girls Wardha Escorts ☎️8617370543 Starting From 5K to 25K ...
Just Call Vip call girls Wardha Escorts ☎️8617370543 Starting From 5K to 25K ...Just Call Vip call girls Wardha Escorts ☎️8617370543 Starting From 5K to 25K ...
Just Call Vip call girls Wardha Escorts ☎️8617370543 Starting From 5K to 25K ...
 
Russian🍌Dazzling Hottie Get☎️ 9053900678 ☎️call girl In Chandigarh By Chandig...
Russian🍌Dazzling Hottie Get☎️ 9053900678 ☎️call girl In Chandigarh By Chandig...Russian🍌Dazzling Hottie Get☎️ 9053900678 ☎️call girl In Chandigarh By Chandig...
Russian🍌Dazzling Hottie Get☎️ 9053900678 ☎️call girl In Chandigarh By Chandig...
 
Call On 6297143586 Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...
Call On 6297143586  Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...Call On 6297143586  Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...
Call On 6297143586 Yerwada Call Girls In All Pune 24/7 Provide Call With Bes...
 
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Agra 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
 
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 312024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31
2024: The FAR, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 31
 
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
The U.S. Budget and Economic Outlook (Presentation)
 
The NAP process & South-South peer learning
The NAP process & South-South peer learningThe NAP process & South-South peer learning
The NAP process & South-South peer learning
 
best call girls in Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8005736733 Neha Thakur
best call girls in Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8005736733 Neha Thakurbest call girls in Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8005736733 Neha Thakur
best call girls in Pune - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8005736733 Neha Thakur
 
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
VIP Model Call Girls Kiwale ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 2...
 

Elections, Parties and Interest Groups SP2020

  • 1. Elections, Political Parties, Interest Groups State control of elections within their borders Congress has the power to change state election laws. Courts use judicial review to change state electoral laws.
  • 2. Voting in Texas • You must be a US citizen to vote. • You must be 18 years of age on election day. • You must register to vote. • Registration to vote in Texas: • Voters are registered by county. • Voters must have lived in the county for 30 days prior to registering. • Texas closes registration 30 days before an election. • Some states allow election day registration • Registration requirement important restriction on voting • Citizens do not register as a member of a political Party in Texas
  • 3. Historical Impediments to African American Voting Intimidation and Exclusion of African Americans and Hispanics • 1903: Texas switched to party primary elections to choose nominees • White Primary • Democratic party excluded African Americans from membership and voting in primary • 1923: state legislature excludes African Americans from voting in Democratic primary • In Nixon v Herndon (1927), the US Supreme Court ruled against Texas, holding that the law was such a clear violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. • State legislature immediately passed a law granting the authority to the executive committee of each party to exclude black voters • Nixon v Condon (1932), with the Court again citing the Fourteenth, and noting that the state was, in effect, making the decision for the party. • Texas Democrats approach next asimply allowed the Texas Democratic Party, voting at its state convention, to ban African Americans from the primary. • The Court allowed this rule to stand in Grovey v Townsend (1937), agreeing parties were private clubs • In Smith v Allwright (1944), the Court struck down Townsend and ruled that parties are “an agency of the state” that must abide by constitutional law and not thwart voting rights
  • 4. Historical Impediments to Voting in Texas • Poll Tax • From 1902, Texas charged citizens a poll tax to register to vote. • $1.50 - $1.75 per year at a time when average wage was $0.22. • In 1964, the Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution barred poll taxes in all elections for national office. • Texas then created separate ballots for national and state elections where everyone could vote in national elections but those paying the poll tax could vote in state election • Ruled a violation of due process and outlawed by United States v. State of Texas, 252 F. Supp. 234 (W.D. Tex. 1966) • SCOTUS let the district court stand without a full hearing
  • 5. US Congress moves to protect voting rights Voting Rights Act of 1965 • Section 2: No voting qualification or prerequisite shall be applied by any state to abridge voting due to race or color. (language groups added) does not require intent • The Attorney General has brought several cases under Section 2 • Individuals and groups can bring lawsuits challenging practices under section 2 • Section 3: Attorney General may appoint federal examiners to oversee any court orders resulting from a 15th Amendment lawsuit against a state or any political subdivision. • “Bail-in provision:” Court may suspend any voting qualifications or “devices” it finds to have been used for racial discrimination, and retain jurisdiction over the rules and practices of such a subdivision, through such examiners, for as long as it deems necessary. Requires finding of intent to discriminate • Section 4: States and subdivisions meeting certain qualifications based on previous use of literacy tests, very low turnout rates, and other objective indicators as of November 1964 are immediately and automatically to fall under Section 5. • Section (a) “bail-out” provision: a subdivision may petition to exit coverage of Section 5 if it has complied with all requirements for at least 5 years. • Section 5: Subdivisions falling under the criteria of Section 4 or the bail-in provisions of Section 3 must get “pre-clearance” from the Justice Department before making any changes in its laws on electoral systems, representational arrangements, or voter qualifications. • US District Court of the District of Columbia can also review changes for “pre-clearance”
  • 6. Pre-clearance Today • Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013) • The criteria in Section 4 for determining which jurisdictions must seek pre- clearance were invalidated by SCOTUS min a 5-4 vote • Congress can write new rules for determining which jurisdictions must seek pre- clearance under Section 5 but has not done so. • The “bail-in” provision of Section 3 remains a path under which jurisdictions may be required to seek pre-clearance. • Courts can respond to current intentional discrimination • Several jurisdictions have been bailed in by courts • Latest Texas jurisdiction under section 3 pre-clearance • Patino et al v. City of Pasadena et al, No. 4:2014cv03241 - Document 151 (S.D. Tex. 2017) • Alberto Patino, et al v. City of Pasadena, No. 17-20030 (5th Cir. 2017) • Pasadena agrees to court decisions and is placed under Section 3 pre-clearance
  • 7. Texas Motor Voter Registration Online Plaintiff: Jarrod Stringer Defendant: Carlos H. Cascos and Steven C. McCraw Case Number: 5:2016cv00257 Filed: March 14, 2016 Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas Office: San Antonio Office Presiding Judge: Orlando L. Garcia Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Voting Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question In a 2018 ruling, U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia of San Antonio found that Texas was in violation of the federal National Voter Registration Act and the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause because it treated voters who dealt with their driver’s licenses online differently than those who obtained or renewed their licenses in person at Texas Department of Public Safety offices.
  • 8. Texas Motor Voter Registration Online: Judge Orlando Garcia again orders Texas to register 3 voters who tried to register online November 13, 2019: 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a federal district judge’s (Orlando Garcia) ruling eral law by failing to register residents to vote when they updated their driver’s licenses online. The panel of three federal judges that considered the case did not clear the state of wrongdoing but instead determined that the three Texas voters who had brought the lawsuit did not have standing to sue. Round 2: U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia of San Antonio on Thursday (01/30/2020) issued an injunction requiring the state to allow the registrations of three plaintiffs in a suit over the state's voting rules. At a later date, the court is expected to issue a larger ruling covering all Texans' ability to register online. Federal law requires that states conduct voter registration wherever they allow driver's license renewal, and some 40 states now allow online voter registration.
  • 9. Types of Elections • Primary Elections • Held by parties to choose nominees for the general election • In Texas, nominees must win a MAJORITY of the vote • No majority; hold a RUNOFF election of top two • General Election • Held by political jurisdiction to decide which party’s candidate will serve in the office • In Texas, it requires only a PLURALITY (highest vote total) to win the office • Special Elections: elections not held on the regular schedule • to fill vacancies in legislative or executive offices • to authorize bonds • to ratify or reject amendments to the Texas constitution
  • 10. Types of Primary Elections Basic Types • Open • Voters are free to vote in the primary of either party • Closed • Voters must register as a member of a party and can only vote in that parties primary • Jungle Primary: aka top 2 primary, blanket primary, non- partisan open primary • used in some elections in California, Louisiana, Nebraska, and Washington Primaries in Texas • Quasi Open • On primary election day, voters choose to participate in the primary election process (primary and runoff primary) of one party • EG: if you vote in the Democratic primary you can only vote in the Democratic primary runoff
  • 11. Types of Primary Elections • Non-partisan methods of choosing candidates for a general election are created in some states for specific types of elections. • Various names are applied to this type of election; jungle primary, top two primary, blanket primary, non-partisan open primary • How do they work? Office seekers declare for a spot on the ballot for some office. Voters cast ballots for these candidates. If a candidate wins a majority, that person wins the office. If no candidate wins a majority, the top two vote getters face each other in a subsequent election. Some states refer to this second election as the general election and some call it a runoff election. • This subsequent election can occur between two members of the same party
  • 12. Direct and Indirect Primaries Direct Primary • Voters choose the party nominee for office directly • Texas requires direct primary winners to achieve a majority vote (50% plus one vote • If no candidate gets a majority a runoff election is held between top 2 vote getters. • Other states may not require a majority. • Examples: governor, plural executive, TX and US house and senate Indirect Primary • Presidential preference primaries are indirect primaries. • Voters choose a presidential candidate but the results of that vote determine the number of delegates to the party nominating convention pledged to each candidate
  • 13. 2020 Republican Presidential Preference Primaries in Texas 155 delegates; 108 by district and 47 at large (statewide) Delegates soft pledged based on Congressional District results • 108 district delegates are to be allocated to presidential contenders based on the primary results in each of the 36 congressional districts: • Each congressional district is assigned 3 National Convention delegates. • These delegates are allocated to the presidential contenders as follows: • Candidate over 50% gets 3 of the district's delegates. [ • No candidate over 50% but at least 1 candidate gets 20% or more of the vote; plurality winner gets 2 and second place 1 • If no candidate receives 20% of the vote then the top 3 vote getters each receive 1 delegate. Delegates soft pledged based on statewide results • 47 at-large delegates: 10 delegates plus 34 bonus delegates plus 3 RNC delegates will be allocated to the candidates based on statewide primary results. These delegates are allocated to the presidential contenders as follows: • Candidate gets over 50%, that candidate is allocated all 47 at-large delegates. [ • No candidate gets over 50% but 2 get 20%, 47 at- large delegates are allocated proportionally among those candidates receiving 20% or more. • No candidate gets over 50% but 1 gets 20%, 47 at- large delegates are allocated proportionally between the candidate receiving 20% and the candidate receiving the next highest vote total • If no candidate receives 20% of the vote, allocate the 47 at-large delegates proportionally.
  • 14. 2020 Democratic Presidential Preference Primary; 262 delegates; 228 soft pledged; 34 unpledged 149 delegates soft pledged based on results in the 31 state senate districts • 149 total by senate district State Senate District Delegates State Senate District Delegates SD1 4 SD17 5 SD2 5 SD18 4 SD3 4 SD19 5 SD4 5 SD20 5 SD5 5 SD21 5 SD6 4 SD22 4 SD7 4 SD23 8 SD8 5 SD24 3 SD9 4 SD25 6 SD10 6 SD26 6 SD11 4 SD27 4 SD12 4 SD28 2 SD13 8 SD29 4 SD14 10 SD30 3 SD15 6 SD31 2 SD16 5 TOTAL 149 79 delegates soft pledged based on results of the statewide primary vote • 79 total by statewide at-large vote 49 soft pledged delegates based on the statewide at-large primary vote 30 soft pledged PLEO (Party Leaders and Elected Officials) delegates based on the statewide at- large primary vote 34 UNPLEDGED PLEO delegates aka “Superdelegates” • 21 Democratic National Committee Members • 13 Members of Congress (0 Senators, 13 US Representatives ***** Super delegates cannot vote in the first round in 2020
  • 15. General Elections in Texas: presidential years even numbered years • Elections in Presidential Years • US President • Held to decide which ticket gets the electoral college votes of the state • 48 states, including Texas, allocate electoral college votes on a winner take all basis (Nebraska and Maine allocate electoral college votes proportionally) • Nebraska has 5 electors • 2 allocated according to statewide vote • 3 allocated to winner of the vote counted in their 3 US House districts • Maine has 4 electors • 2 allocated according to statewide vote • 2 allocated to winner of the vote counted in their 2 US House districts • TEXAS: 38 electoral college votes (winner take all)
  • 16. General Elections in Texas • General Elections held every 2 years • US offices • US House: all 36 House seats • Single member districts • Plurality decision rules • US Senate: approximately 1/3 of all senate seats up for election (6 year terms) • In 2018, only one of Texas’ US senators was up for election (Republican Ted Cruz) • Approximately ½ of the 31 members of Texas state senate (4-year terms) • Single member districts • Plurality decision rules • All 150 members of Texas house • Single member districts • Plurality decision rules
  • 17. General Elections in Texas; non-presidential years • General Elections held between Presidential elections (midterms) • US offices • US House: all 36 House seats • Single member districts • Plurality decision rules • US Senate: approximately 1/3 of all senate seats up for election (6 year terms) • In 2018, only one of Texas’ US senators was up for election (Republican Ted Cruz) • Texas State Offices • Approximately ½ of the 31 members of Texas state senate (4 year terms) • Single member districts • Plurality decision rules • All 150 members of Texas house • Single member districts • Plurality decision rules • Offices of Texas Plural executive
  • 18. Political Parties • Party in the electorate; party identification of individuals • Do you think of yourself as a Democrat, Republican, Independent, Other • Party in Government; party affiliation of elected officials • Which party nominated the office holder? • Party Organization; party officials and party meetings
  • 19. Party In the Electorate • Party Identification (Party ID) • Feb 2020 Texas Policy Project Poll •Democrat 43% •Independent 8% •Republican 48%
  • 20. Party in Government US Legislative Branch US House Partisan Balance Party 116th Congress Democratic 235 Republican 198 Vacancies 2 Total 435 US Senate Partisan Balance Party 116th Congress Democratic 45 Republican 53 Independent 2 Total 100 Congressional Partisan Breakdown from Texas Party U.S. Senate U.S. House Total Democratic Party 0 13 13 Republican Party 2 23 25 TOTALS as of March 2019 2 36 38 US Senate US House
  • 21. Party in Government Texas State Legislature Party As of March 2019 Democratic Party 12 Republican Party 19 Vacancies 0 Total 31 Party As of March 2019 Democratic Party 67 Republican Party 83 Vacancies 0 Total 150 Texas State Senate 2019 Texas State House 2019
  • 22. Party in Government Plural Executive Statewide Ken Paxton Republican Party Attorney General of Texas Greg Abbott Republican Party Governor of Texas Dan Patrick Republican Party Lieutenant Governor of Texas Sid Miller Republican Party Texas Commissioner of Agriculture Glenn Hegar Republican Party Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts George P. Bush Republican Party Texas Land Commissioner Wayne Christian Republican Party Texas Railroad Commission Ryan Sitton Republican Party Texas Railroad Commission Christi Craddick Republican Party Texas Railroad Commission By Districts Georgina Perez Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 1 Patricia Hardy Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 11 Pam Little Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 12 Aicha Davis Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 13 Sue Melton-Malone Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 14 Marty Rowley Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 15 Ruben Cortez Jr. Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 2 Marisa Perez-Diaz Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 3 Lawrence Allen Jr. Democratic Party Texas State Board of Education District 4 Ken Mercer Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 5 Donna Bahorich Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 6 Matt Robinson Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 7 Barbara Cargill Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 8 Keven Ellis Republican Party Texas State Board of Education District 9
  • 23. Party Organization Republican • Republic National Committee • Republican Senatorial Committee • Republican Senatorial Conference • House Republican Conference • Republican Governors Association • Republican State Leadership Committee • Texas State Republican Party • Officials • State Executive Committee • 1 woman and 1 man from each of the 31 state senate districts • County Chairs • Tarrant County Executive Committee Democratic • Democratic National Committee • Senate Democratic Caucus • House Democratic Caucus • Democratic Governors Association • Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee • Texas State Democratic Party • Officials • State Executive Committee • 1 woman and 1 man from each of the 31 state senate districts • Democratic National Committee (Texas) • County Parties
  • 24. Interest Groups • Interest groups are organizations of people who share common political interests and aim to influence public policy by electioneering and lobbying. • Lobbying involves persuasion to convince an elected official or bureaucrat to help enact a law, craft a regulation, or do something else that a group wants. • Electioneering is activity designed to influence the outcome of an election. It could involve elections for political office or a TX constitutional amendment or any other decision made by voting.
  • 25. Interest groups and political parties • Both try to influence policy outcomes and election of candidates. • The major difference is that parties have a formal role in nominating candidates for general elections and interest groups do not. • Parties play a direct role in organizing legislative bodies but interest groups play only an indirect role • Majority party holds top leadership and committee positions
  • 26. Lobbying Inside Strategies • Direct contact to influence policymakers • Written Reports/ testimony • Draft legislation or regulations • Groups can sue policy makers directly • Groups often provide amicus curia (friend of the court) briefs to influence court decisions Outside Strategies • Grassroots lobbying • Mobilize members to contact decisionmakers • Change public opinion • Education
  • 27. Electioneering • 501(c) Groups — Nonprofit, tax-exempt groups organized under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code that can engage in varying amounts of political activity, depending on the type of group. • For example, 501(c)(3) groups operate for religious, charitable, scientific or educational purposes. These groups are not supposed to engage in any political activities, though some voter registration activities are permitted. • 501(c)(4) groups are commonly called "social welfare" organizations that may engage in political activities, as long as these activities do not become their primary purpose. • Similar restrictions apply to Section 501(c)(5) labor and agricultural groups. • Similar restrictions apply to Section 501(c)(6) business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards and boards of trade.
  • 28. Electioneering • 527 Group — A tax-exempt group organized under section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code to raise money for political activities. • These groups are typically created by parties, candidates, groups, committees or associations organized for the purpose of influencing an issue, policy, appointment, or election, at any level og government, be it national, state or local. • Such organizations can raise unlimited funds from individuals, groups, corporations or labor unions, but they must register with the IRS and disclose their contributions and expenditures.
  • 29. Political Action Committees (PACS) • Political Action Committee (PAC) — A political committee that raises and spends limited "hard" money contributions for the express purpose of electing or defeating candidates. • Organizations that raise soft money for issue advocacy may also set up a PAC. • Most PACs represent business, such as the Microsoft PAC; labor, such as the Teamsters PAC; or ideological interests, such as the EMILY's List PAC or the National Rifle Association PAC. • An organization's PAC will collect money from the group's employees or members and make contributions in the name of the PAC to candidates and political parties. • Individuals contributing to a PAC may also contribute directly to candidates and political parties, even those also supported by the PAC. • A PAC can give $5,000 to a candidate per election (primary, general or special) and up to $15,000 annually to a national political party. • PACs may receive up to $5,000 each from individuals, other PACs and party committees per year. • A PAC must register with the Federal Election Commission within 10 days of its formation, providing the name and address of the PAC, its treasurer and any affiliated organizations.
  • 30. Super PACs and Hybrid PACs • Super PACs arose following the July 2010 federal court decision SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission. • Technically known as independent expenditure-only committees, super PACs may raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals, then spend unlimited sums directly to overtly advocate for or against political candidates. • Unlike traditional PACs, super PACs are prohibited from donating money directly to political candidates, and their spending must not be coordinated with that of the candidates they benefit. • Super PACs are required to report their donors to the Federal Election Commission on a monthly or semiannual basis – the super PAC's choice – in off-years, and monthly in the year of an election. • Hybrid PACs (Carey Committees) — A Carey committee is a hybrid PAC that is not affiliated with a candidate and has the ability to operate both as a traditional PAC, contributing funds to a candidate's committee, and as a super PAC, which makes independent expenditures. • To do so, Carey committees must have a separate bank account for each purpose. • The committee can collect unlimited contributions from almost any source for its independent expenditure account, but may not use those funds for its traditional PAC contributions.
  • 31. Regulating PACS National elections • Federal Elections Commission Texas elections • Texas Ethics Commission • Lobbyists • Candidates • Political Committees • Political Parties