SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  21
Dr. Amin AL-Mekhlafi
The Cognitive/Developmental Perspective

                       The Computer Analogy
                           Storing
                           Integrating
                           Retrieving


They see no need to believe that:
 humans have language specific device.
 acquisition and learning are different.
                        They believe in:
                        The general theory of learning (the gradual
                        development of knowledge).
The Cognitive/Developmental Perspective
      Information Processing Model
 In IPM, SLA is seen as building
 up of knowledge




              This knowledge becomes automatic during
              speaking and understanding

     Paying
    Attention        Practice
                                    Automaticity
 Paying attention uses some cognitive resources.
   Beginners vs. Proficient language users.




 There is a limit to the amount of information a
    human can pay attention to and learn at one time.
   Gradually, through experience and practice, learners
    become able to use certain parts of the language
    automatically.
Practice includes:
  Language production
  Being exposed to language
  Language comprehension

Practice makes language
processing easier and automatic.
Other cognitive psychologists say that SLA is like learning any
other skill starting as declarative knowledge and then
changing into procedural knowledge.

 Declarative Knowledge            Procedural Knowledge
Information that we have        Knowledge that underlies
and know we have. All           fluent or automatic
learning begins with            performance. Also referred to
declarative knowledge. It is    as 'knowledge how’.
sometimes referred to as
'knowledge that'.
The Cognitive/Developmental Perspective
          Information Processing

 IPM        SLA is like skill learning

                                         Procedural
                                         Knowledge
Information that we have         Knowledge that underlies
and know we have. All            fluent or automatic
learning begins with             performance. Also
declarative knowledge. It        referred to as 'knowledge
is sometimes referred to as      how’.
'knowledge that'.
 Restructuring Model:
   Refers to the interaction of knowledge we already have,
   or on the acquisition of new knowledge (without
   extensive practice) which fits into an existing system and
   causes it to be restructured
   Sudden bursts of progress and backsliding may not be
   explainable in terms of a gradual build-up of
   automaticity through practice.
   They seem rather to be based on.
 Connectionists argue that innate is simply the
   ability to learn, not any specifically linguistic
   structure.
 They attribute greater importance to the role
   of the environment in language learning.
 They see the frequency of the input as the
   principal source of linguistic knowledge.
 Learners develops stronger mental
   ‘connections’ between language elements s/he
   has learned, and the situational or linguistic
   contexts in which they occur.
 “He says”
 “I say”
               The learner will produce the
 “She says”   correct form not because
               he/she knows the rule, but
               because he/she has heard such
               uses very often and the
               presence of the subject ‘he or
               she’ activates the mind to call
               on the correct verb form.
 The Interaction Hypothesis
 The Noticing Hypothesis
 Input Processing
1. Researchers within this perspective
   argue that conversational interaction is
   an essential condition for second
   language acquisition.
2. Comprehensible input is important.
3. How to make input comprehensible?
Interactional
modification
makes input           Comprehensible
comprehensible.       input promotes
                      acquisition.

                Therefore
       Interactional modification
       promotes acquisition.
Modified interaction does not always involve
linguistic simplification. It may also include:

   Elaboration
   Slower speech rate
   Gesture
   The provision of additional contextual cues


Examples of             Comprehension checks
                        Clarification requests
modifications           Self-repetition or paraphrase
Nothing is learned unless it has been
  noticed.
    Learners realize certain language
     features.
    These features will enter the learners’
     own second language system.
L2 learners could not begin to acquire a
 language feature until they had become
 aware of it in the input.
Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory
   Language development takes place in the social
    interactions between individuals.
   L2 learners advance to higher levels of linguistic
    knowledge when they interact with
    knowledgeable speakers.
   Learning occurs when the interaction takes
    place at the learner’s zone of proximal
    development (ZPD).
The ZPD is the
difference between
what a learner can do
without help and
what he or she can
do with help.
Learning is thought to occur when an individual
interacts with an interlocutor within his or her zone
of proximal development (ZPD)-that is, in a situation
in which the learner is capable of performing at a
higher level because there is support from an
interlocutor.
The ZPD                      Krashen's i+ 1
The Z P D is a metaphorical      In Krashen's i+ 1, the input
location in which learners co-   comes from outside the learner
construct knowledge in           and the emphasis is on the
collaboration with an            comprehensibility of input that
interlocutor.                    includes language structures
                                 that are just beyond the
The emphasis in ZPD is on        learner's current
development and how              developmental level.
learners co-construct
knowledge based on their
interaction with their
interlocutor.
 There is no agreement on a “complete”
  theory of second language acquisition yet.
 Each theoretical framework has a different
  focus and it has its limitations.
1. Behaviorism: emphasizing the role of the
  environment, but ignoring the mental
  processes that are involved in learning.
2. Innatism: emphasizes the role of innate abilities.
     But it is based on intuitions and not solid
     evidence.
3.   Information processing and connectionism:
     involving controlled laboratory experiments
     where human learning is similar to computer
     processing.
4.   Interactionist position: modification of
     interaction promotes language acquisition and
     development.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Chapter 4 how languages are learned - pasty m. lightbown and nina spada
Chapter 4   how languages are learned - pasty m. lightbown and nina spadaChapter 4   how languages are learned - pasty m. lightbown and nina spada
Chapter 4 how languages are learned - pasty m. lightbown and nina spadaTshen Tashi
 
Theoretical approaches to first language aquisition
Theoretical approaches to first language aquisitionTheoretical approaches to first language aquisition
Theoretical approaches to first language aquisitionSiwar Bdioui
 
Second language acquisition and error analysis (arfan rai)
Second language acquisition and error analysis (arfan rai)Second language acquisition and error analysis (arfan rai)
Second language acquisition and error analysis (arfan rai)Arfan rai
 
Fossilization
FossilizationFossilization
FossilizationTiana Ken
 
Chapter 1 language learning in early childhood
Chapter 1   language learning in early childhoodChapter 1   language learning in early childhood
Chapter 1 language learning in early childhoodTshen Tashi
 
Individual learner differences
Individual learner differencesIndividual learner differences
Individual learner differencesarezoo aeli
 
FLA First Langugae Acquisition Theories
FLA First Langugae Acquisition TheoriesFLA First Langugae Acquisition Theories
FLA First Langugae Acquisition TheoriesOla Sayed Ahmed
 
First language acquisition
First language acquisitionFirst language acquisition
First language acquisitionFitriana Susanti
 
The logical problem of language learning
The logical problem of language learningThe logical problem of language learning
The logical problem of language learningIndah Palguna
 
Second language acquisition powerpoint online final
Second language acquisition powerpoint online finalSecond language acquisition powerpoint online final
Second language acquisition powerpoint online finalcswstyle
 
Theories Of Language Acquisition[1]
Theories Of Language Acquisition[1]Theories Of Language Acquisition[1]
Theories Of Language Acquisition[1]Dr. Cupid Lucid
 
Neurofunctional theory
Neurofunctional theoryNeurofunctional theory
Neurofunctional theoryKat OngCan
 
Second language acquisition
Second language acquisitionSecond language acquisition
Second language acquisitionDiego Blanco
 
Developmental sequences in learner language
Developmental sequences in learner languageDevelopmental sequences in learner language
Developmental sequences in learner languageiBATEFL.COM
 
First and Second Language Aquisition Theories
First and Second Language Aquisition TheoriesFirst and Second Language Aquisition Theories
First and Second Language Aquisition TheoriesSheila Rad
 

Tendances (20)

Chapter 4 how languages are learned - pasty m. lightbown and nina spada
Chapter 4   how languages are learned - pasty m. lightbown and nina spadaChapter 4   how languages are learned - pasty m. lightbown and nina spada
Chapter 4 how languages are learned - pasty m. lightbown and nina spada
 
FLA
FLAFLA
FLA
 
Theoretical approaches to first language aquisition
Theoretical approaches to first language aquisitionTheoretical approaches to first language aquisition
Theoretical approaches to first language aquisition
 
First language acquisition
First language acquisitionFirst language acquisition
First language acquisition
 
second language acquisition
second language acquisitionsecond language acquisition
second language acquisition
 
Second language acquisition and error analysis (arfan rai)
Second language acquisition and error analysis (arfan rai)Second language acquisition and error analysis (arfan rai)
Second language acquisition and error analysis (arfan rai)
 
Fossilization
FossilizationFossilization
Fossilization
 
Chapter 1 language learning in early childhood
Chapter 1   language learning in early childhoodChapter 1   language learning in early childhood
Chapter 1 language learning in early childhood
 
Individual learner differences
Individual learner differencesIndividual learner differences
Individual learner differences
 
FLA First Langugae Acquisition Theories
FLA First Langugae Acquisition TheoriesFLA First Langugae Acquisition Theories
FLA First Langugae Acquisition Theories
 
First language acquisition
First language acquisitionFirst language acquisition
First language acquisition
 
The logical problem of language learning
The logical problem of language learningThe logical problem of language learning
The logical problem of language learning
 
Second language acquisition powerpoint online final
Second language acquisition powerpoint online finalSecond language acquisition powerpoint online final
Second language acquisition powerpoint online final
 
Theories Of Language Acquisition[1]
Theories Of Language Acquisition[1]Theories Of Language Acquisition[1]
Theories Of Language Acquisition[1]
 
Neurofunctional theory
Neurofunctional theoryNeurofunctional theory
Neurofunctional theory
 
Second language acquisition
Second language acquisitionSecond language acquisition
Second language acquisition
 
Developmental sequences in learner language
Developmental sequences in learner languageDevelopmental sequences in learner language
Developmental sequences in learner language
 
2 theoretical approaches_to_l2 (1)
2 theoretical approaches_to_l2 (1)2 theoretical approaches_to_l2 (1)
2 theoretical approaches_to_l2 (1)
 
First and Second Language Aquisition Theories
First and Second Language Aquisition TheoriesFirst and Second Language Aquisition Theories
First and Second Language Aquisition Theories
 
Nativist theory
Nativist theoryNativist theory
Nativist theory
 

En vedette

Experiences of learning english as a second language in the US
Experiences of learning english as a second language in the USExperiences of learning english as a second language in the US
Experiences of learning english as a second language in the USNOR RUBA'YAH ABD RAHIM
 
Explaining second language learning
Explaining second language learningExplaining second language learning
Explaining second language learningUTPL UTPL
 
Kreshen's theory on language acquisition
Kreshen's theory on language acquisitionKreshen's theory on language acquisition
Kreshen's theory on language acquisitionWan Farid Nazrin
 
Theoriesof Firstand Second Language Session1slideshare
Theoriesof Firstand Second Language Session1slideshareTheoriesof Firstand Second Language Session1slideshare
Theoriesof Firstand Second Language Session1slideshareAndres Atehortua
 
Theories of second language learning
Theories of second language learningTheories of second language learning
Theories of second language learningPeter Szabo
 
Second Language Learning in the Classroom
Second Language Learning in the ClassroomSecond Language Learning in the Classroom
Second Language Learning in the ClassroomAhmed
 
Chomsky’s and skinner’s theory of language acquisition
Chomsky’s and skinner’s theory of language acquisitionChomsky’s and skinner’s theory of language acquisition
Chomsky’s and skinner’s theory of language acquisitionNur Khalidah
 

En vedette (7)

Experiences of learning english as a second language in the US
Experiences of learning english as a second language in the USExperiences of learning english as a second language in the US
Experiences of learning english as a second language in the US
 
Explaining second language learning
Explaining second language learningExplaining second language learning
Explaining second language learning
 
Kreshen's theory on language acquisition
Kreshen's theory on language acquisitionKreshen's theory on language acquisition
Kreshen's theory on language acquisition
 
Theoriesof Firstand Second Language Session1slideshare
Theoriesof Firstand Second Language Session1slideshareTheoriesof Firstand Second Language Session1slideshare
Theoriesof Firstand Second Language Session1slideshare
 
Theories of second language learning
Theories of second language learningTheories of second language learning
Theories of second language learning
 
Second Language Learning in the Classroom
Second Language Learning in the ClassroomSecond Language Learning in the Classroom
Second Language Learning in the Classroom
 
Chomsky’s and skinner’s theory of language acquisition
Chomsky’s and skinner’s theory of language acquisitionChomsky’s and skinner’s theory of language acquisition
Chomsky’s and skinner’s theory of language acquisition
 

Similaire à Lecture 7. theories explaining second language (2)

Chapter 4 explaining second language learning
Chapter 4   explaining second language learningChapter 4   explaining second language learning
Chapter 4 explaining second language learningTshen Tashi
 
Theories of Second Language Acquisition.
Theories of Second Language Acquisition.Theories of Second Language Acquisition.
Theories of Second Language Acquisition.CoachAcadmico
 
Theories of learning
Theories of learningTheories of learning
Theories of learningSultan Rasyid
 
The intake hypothesis
The intake hypothesis The intake hypothesis
The intake hypothesis maitejenny5
 
Differences in learners
Differences in learnersDifferences in learners
Differences in learnersMuzo Bacan
 
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will 109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will BenitoSumpter862
 
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will 109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will SantosConleyha
 
second language acquisition
second language acquisitionsecond language acquisition
second language acquisitionVui Nguyen
 
METHODOLOGY I (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
METHODOLOGY I (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)METHODOLOGY I (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
METHODOLOGY I (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)Videoconferencias UTPL
 
Second Language Learning 1232663919745890 1
Second Language Learning 1232663919745890 1Second Language Learning 1232663919745890 1
Second Language Learning 1232663919745890 1David Hale
 
GROUP 5 LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND LANGUAGE.pptx
GROUP 5 LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND LANGUAGE.pptxGROUP 5 LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND LANGUAGE.pptx
GROUP 5 LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND LANGUAGE.pptxJunilynBayot
 

Similaire à Lecture 7. theories explaining second language (2) (20)

Chapter 4 explaining second language learning
Chapter 4   explaining second language learningChapter 4   explaining second language learning
Chapter 4 explaining second language learning
 
Acquisition vs learning.
Acquisition vs learning.Acquisition vs learning.
Acquisition vs learning.
 
Inter language
Inter languageInter language
Inter language
 
Theories of Second Language Acquisition.
Theories of Second Language Acquisition.Theories of Second Language Acquisition.
Theories of Second Language Acquisition.
 
Theories of learning
Theories of learningTheories of learning
Theories of learning
 
Methodology
MethodologyMethodology
Methodology
 
Methodology
MethodologyMethodology
Methodology
 
FAMOUS ESL THEORIST
FAMOUS ESL THEORIST FAMOUS ESL THEORIST
FAMOUS ESL THEORIST
 
Natural approach
Natural approachNatural approach
Natural approach
 
Sped 110
Sped 110Sped 110
Sped 110
 
The intake hypothesis
The intake hypothesis The intake hypothesis
The intake hypothesis
 
Differences in learners
Differences in learnersDifferences in learners
Differences in learners
 
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will 109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
 
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will 109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
109Learning OutcomesBy the end of this chapter you will
 
second language acquisition
second language acquisitionsecond language acquisition
second language acquisition
 
Ppt of-interlanguage-chapter-3
Ppt of-interlanguage-chapter-3Ppt of-interlanguage-chapter-3
Ppt of-interlanguage-chapter-3
 
METHODOLOGY I (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
METHODOLOGY I (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)METHODOLOGY I (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
METHODOLOGY I (II Bimestre Abril Agosto 2011)
 
English18
English18English18
English18
 
Second Language Learning 1232663919745890 1
Second Language Learning 1232663919745890 1Second Language Learning 1232663919745890 1
Second Language Learning 1232663919745890 1
 
GROUP 5 LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND LANGUAGE.pptx
GROUP 5 LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND LANGUAGE.pptxGROUP 5 LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND LANGUAGE.pptx
GROUP 5 LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT AND SECOND LANGUAGE.pptx
 

Lecture 7. theories explaining second language (2)

  • 2. The Cognitive/Developmental Perspective The Computer Analogy  Storing  Integrating  Retrieving They see no need to believe that:  humans have language specific device.  acquisition and learning are different. They believe in: The general theory of learning (the gradual development of knowledge).
  • 3. The Cognitive/Developmental Perspective Information Processing Model In IPM, SLA is seen as building up of knowledge This knowledge becomes automatic during speaking and understanding Paying Attention Practice Automaticity
  • 4.  Paying attention uses some cognitive resources.  Beginners vs. Proficient language users.  There is a limit to the amount of information a human can pay attention to and learn at one time.  Gradually, through experience and practice, learners become able to use certain parts of the language automatically.
  • 5. Practice includes:  Language production  Being exposed to language  Language comprehension Practice makes language processing easier and automatic.
  • 6. Other cognitive psychologists say that SLA is like learning any other skill starting as declarative knowledge and then changing into procedural knowledge. Declarative Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Information that we have Knowledge that underlies and know we have. All fluent or automatic learning begins with performance. Also referred to declarative knowledge. It is as 'knowledge how’. sometimes referred to as 'knowledge that'.
  • 7. The Cognitive/Developmental Perspective Information Processing IPM SLA is like skill learning Procedural Knowledge Information that we have Knowledge that underlies and know we have. All fluent or automatic learning begins with performance. Also declarative knowledge. It referred to as 'knowledge is sometimes referred to as how’. 'knowledge that'.
  • 8.  Restructuring Model:  Refers to the interaction of knowledge we already have, or on the acquisition of new knowledge (without extensive practice) which fits into an existing system and causes it to be restructured  Sudden bursts of progress and backsliding may not be explainable in terms of a gradual build-up of automaticity through practice.  They seem rather to be based on.
  • 9.  Connectionists argue that innate is simply the ability to learn, not any specifically linguistic structure.  They attribute greater importance to the role of the environment in language learning.  They see the frequency of the input as the principal source of linguistic knowledge.  Learners develops stronger mental ‘connections’ between language elements s/he has learned, and the situational or linguistic contexts in which they occur.
  • 10.  “He says”  “I say” The learner will produce the  “She says” correct form not because he/she knows the rule, but because he/she has heard such uses very often and the presence of the subject ‘he or she’ activates the mind to call on the correct verb form.
  • 11.  The Interaction Hypothesis  The Noticing Hypothesis  Input Processing
  • 12. 1. Researchers within this perspective argue that conversational interaction is an essential condition for second language acquisition. 2. Comprehensible input is important. 3. How to make input comprehensible?
  • 13. Interactional modification makes input Comprehensible comprehensible. input promotes acquisition. Therefore Interactional modification promotes acquisition.
  • 14. Modified interaction does not always involve linguistic simplification. It may also include:  Elaboration  Slower speech rate  Gesture  The provision of additional contextual cues Examples of  Comprehension checks  Clarification requests modifications  Self-repetition or paraphrase
  • 15. Nothing is learned unless it has been noticed.  Learners realize certain language features.  These features will enter the learners’ own second language system. L2 learners could not begin to acquire a language feature until they had become aware of it in the input.
  • 16. Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory  Language development takes place in the social interactions between individuals.  L2 learners advance to higher levels of linguistic knowledge when they interact with knowledgeable speakers.  Learning occurs when the interaction takes place at the learner’s zone of proximal development (ZPD).
  • 17. The ZPD is the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can do with help.
  • 18. Learning is thought to occur when an individual interacts with an interlocutor within his or her zone of proximal development (ZPD)-that is, in a situation in which the learner is capable of performing at a higher level because there is support from an interlocutor.
  • 19. The ZPD Krashen's i+ 1 The Z P D is a metaphorical In Krashen's i+ 1, the input location in which learners co- comes from outside the learner construct knowledge in and the emphasis is on the collaboration with an comprehensibility of input that interlocutor. includes language structures that are just beyond the The emphasis in ZPD is on learner's current development and how developmental level. learners co-construct knowledge based on their interaction with their interlocutor.
  • 20.  There is no agreement on a “complete” theory of second language acquisition yet.  Each theoretical framework has a different focus and it has its limitations. 1. Behaviorism: emphasizing the role of the environment, but ignoring the mental processes that are involved in learning.
  • 21. 2. Innatism: emphasizes the role of innate abilities. But it is based on intuitions and not solid evidence. 3. Information processing and connectionism: involving controlled laboratory experiments where human learning is similar to computer processing. 4. Interactionist position: modification of interaction promotes language acquisition and development.