ADAPTACLIMA II 4ª REUNIÓN TÉCNICA Y DE COORDINACIÓN Aranda de Duero y Duruelo de la Sierra, días 8, 9 y 10 de octubre de 2013

1. 4ª REUNIÓN TÉCNICA Y DE COORDINACIÓN
Aranda de Duero y Duruelo de la Sierra, días 8, 9 y 10 de octubre de 2013
health co-benefits of
climate change mitigation
Ronaldo E. C. D. Gabriel, Ph.D.
rgabriel@utad.pt
Department of Sport Science, Exercise and Health
Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences
University of Trás-os-Montes & Alto Douro

2. objetivo final del proyecto es su establecimiento como clúster de proyectos en la temática de cambio climático,
con un mayor alcance y rentabilidad de los resultados, al tiempo que se establece como una herramienta en el
asesoramiento de políticas, de aplicación de resultados en la empresa y un referente en la formación,
comunicación y difusión de sus avances en todo el espacio SUDOE.

6. A CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH
FRAMEWORK FOR AN ECOSYSTEM
APPROACH TO HUMAN HEALTH
The first framework reflects the desire of
researchers to understand a situation of
environmental degradation where a
negative impact on health is suspected
The second framework is typical of
situations where there is a suspected
association between observed cases of
declining health, such as high incidences
of malaria, and environmental
degradation.

7. A CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH
FRAMEWORK FOR AN ECOSYSTEM
APPROACH TO HUMAN HEALTH
The objective of the ecosystem approach
to human health is to enhance the health
of communities by instituting ecosystemmanagement methods that will foster
the sustainability of the ecosystem itself
and the health of the human beings who
are part of it.

8. RECOGNISING THE VALUE OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN
PROMOTING HEALTH AND WELLBEING.

9. FORESTS ARE ESSENTIAL TO OUR
SURVIVAL AND WELL-BEING.
“invisible services”:
offer recreation and health services
for many European citizens.
Access to green environments
makes us happier and our bodies
healthier

11. What is green infrastructure?
… green infrastructure refers to the combined structure,
position, connectivity and types of green spaces which
together enable delivery of multiple benefits as goods and
services. It is important to consider green infrastructure
holistically and at landscape as well as individual site scale.
Forest Research (2010). Benefits of green infrastructure.
Report by Forest Research. Forest Research, Farnham.

12. The threat of climate change has generated a global
flood of policy documents, suggested technical fixes, and
lifestyle recommendations. One widely held view is that
their implementation would, almost without exception,
prove socially uncomfortable and economically painful.
But as a series of new studies shows, in one domain
at least—public health—such a view is ill founded. If
properly chosen, action to combat climate change can, of
itself, lead to improvements in health. The news is not all
bad.

13. 2. Transferencia de los resultados obtenidos en el sector del agua de los proyectos SUDOE a su gestión eficiente y
sostenible en los territorios ribereños del Duero.
. SECTOR-ÁMBITO DE ACTUACIÓN: Agua.
. ÁMBITO GEOGRÁFICO: Territorios ribereños del Duero, con transferencia de resultados al resto de
espacio SUDOE.
. PROYECTOS CAPITALIZABLES: ADAPTACLIMA I, SUD’EAU, WAT.
. DESCRIPCIÓN, OBJETIVOS y RESULTADOS: El proyecto está centrado en una doble perspectiva:
1 - Uso sostenible del agua
2 - Territorio fluvial
SEMINARIOS/WORKSHOPS EN PORTUGAL (2)
ANÁLISIS DE ESTUDIOS DE ECO AUDITORÍAS DE AGUA DEL DUERO-PORTUGAL (1)
SEMINARIO CIENTÍFICO (1)

14. 1º SEMINARIOS/WORKSHOPS EN PORTUGAL
Processo de participação – Fevereiro 2014
BUILT ENVIORNMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AND HEALTH CO-BENEFITS

15. THREE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
COMPONENTS:
TRANSPORTATION, BUILDINGS, AND LAND
USE (INCLUDING FORESTRY AND
AGRICULTURE).
the current evidence and potential cobenefits of alternative practices, and
illustrates built environment strategies
that minimize the effects of climate
change and improve health (Table 1).
Younger, M., et al. (2008). American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(5): 517-526.

16. EPA 231K13001, June 2013, www.epa.gov/smartgrowth

17. 2º SEMINARIOS/WORKSHOPS EN PORTUGAL
Processo de participação – Outubro 2014
GEOTOURISM, CLIMATE CHANGE AND HEALTH CO-BENEFITS

21. 3rd SEMINAR ON BIOMECHANICS, HEALTH AND SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT:
HEALTH CO-BENEFITS OF CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION – THE ADPTACLIMA II PROJECT.
“3RD SEMINAR ON BIOMECHANICS, HEALTH AND
SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT: HEALTH CO-BENEFITS OF
CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION – THE ADPTACLIMA II
PROJECT.”
(2 dias: 1 de apresentações e outro de saídas de campo
Convidar todos os colegas ADAPTACLIMA II a participar,
Gastar 10 minutos a explicar o que é o SUDOE, convidar a
CCDR-N e etc…
First annoucement Outubro 2013
Livro de resumos
Seminário – Maio 2014

22. “Análisis de estudio de ecoauditorias de agua del duero”

23. http://www.mountaineersbooks.org/Elwha-P1107.aspx

24. health co-benefits of climate change mitigation
health co-benefits of climate change mitigation
health co-benefits of climate change mitigation
health co-benefits of climate change mitigation

28. AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH THAT INCLUDES RELEVANT INFORMATION AND
PROPOSES FOR A STANDARDISED SURVEY AND GRADING METHODOLOGY, WHICH CAN BE
EMPLOYED TO ASSESS THE ABILITY OF A HIKING TRAIL IN PROMOTING A HEALTHY
LIFESTYLE.

29. identificação, através do Footscan Software 7.1 da RsScan International, das zonas
média (HM) e lateral do calcanhar (HL), 1º (M1), 2º (M2), 3º (M3), 4º (M4) e 5º (M5)
metatarsos, halux (T1) e zona de apoio plantar referente ao conjunto dos restantes
dedos do pé (T2-5)
Gabriel R, et al (2008). Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 10, 51-54.

30. Gabriel, et al (2012 - accepted) - Walking trail classification: a biomechanical approach. In Columbus, F., (Eds.). Obesity: risk factors, management and social stigmas. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

31. Level of difficulty
Very easy
Easy
Enjoyable
Moderate
Difficult
Severe
Extreme
Hugo, L (1999). Tourism Geographies, 1, 358-373.
Multiple energy cost or
charge biomechanics
]- ∞, 1[
[1, 2[
[2, 3[
[3, 4[
[4, 5[
[5, 6[
[6, + ∞[
Gabriel, et al (2012 - accepted) - Walking trail classification: a biomechanical
approach. In Columbus, F., (Eds.). Obesity: risk factors, management and social
stigmas. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

36. SHALL BE IMPROVED IN CONJUNCTION WITH RECREATION ECOLOGY RESEARCH FOCUSED ON
DEVELOPING NEW SURVEY METHODS FOR ASSESSING HIKING TRAILS
Marion, J.L., J.F. Wimpey, and L.O. (2011). Park Science, 28, 60 - 65.

37. LANDSCAPE

38. LANDSCAPE

39. LANDSCAPE
Características gerais das Unidades de Paisagem de Portugal e Espanha
Características
C01
Característica
Ecológica
Observações
Considerados os elementos físicos e biológicos dos ecossistemas, e suas relações
sistémicas. É considerado para esta característica uma avaliação de 1 a 5 de acordo
com a sua maior ou menor presença.
C02
Cultural
Considerados os fatores históricos e culturais bem como questões relacionadas com a
identidade da paisagem. É considerado para esta característica uma avaliação de 1 a 5
de acordo com a sua maior ou menor presença.
C03
Sócio –
Economico
Factos sociais e atividades humanas que alteram a paisagem, e instrumentos de gestão
do território que ditam as “regras de jogo”. É considerado para esta característica uma
avaliação de 1 a 5 de acordo com a sua maior ou menor presença.
C04
Sensorial
Relação homem/paisagem. É considerado para esta característica uma avaliação de
S/M/I de acordo com a sua maior ou menor qualidade visual da paisagem, sendo o S
avaliado em 5 valores, o M em 3 valores e o I em 1 valor.

40. LANDSCAPE