The Agile Scaling Model (ASM) provides the context and advice for effectively tailoring agile techniques. It describes how to extend the agile construction life cycle into a full-fledged disciplined agile delivery life cycle. It then describes how to tailor agile practices to address scaling factors which an agile team may face, including team size, physical distribution, organizational distribution, regulatory compliance, organizational complexity, technical complexity, and enterprise disciplines (such as enterprise architecture, reuse, and portfolio management).

1. Agile Scaling Model: Be as Agile as You
Need to Be
Scott W. Ambler
Chief Methodologist for Agile and Lean, IBM Rational
www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/ambler
twitter.com/scottwambler
© 2012 IBM Corporation
1

2. 2
Agenda
1 Agile Scaling Model
2 Some practices
3 Organizing large teams
4 Parting thoughts
2 © 2012 IBM Corporation
2

3. Agile Scaling Model (ASM)
Agile Development
Focus is on construction
Goal is to develop a high-quality system in an evolutionary,
collaborative, and self-organizing manner
Value-driven lifecycle with regular production of working
software
Small, co-located team developing straightforward software
Agile Delivery
Extends agile development to address full system lifecycle
Risk and value-driven lifecycle
Self organization within an appropriate governance
framework
Small, co-located team delivering a straightforward solution
Agility at Scale
Disciplined agile delivery and one or more scaling factors
applies
3 © 2012 IBM Corporation
The Agile Scaling Model (ASM) defines a roadmap to effectively adopt and tailor agile strategies to meet
the unique challenges faced by a system delivery team. The first step to scaling agile strategies is to
adopt a disciplined agile delivery lifecycle that scales mainstream agile construction strategies to
address the full delivery process from project initiation to deployment into production. The second step is
to recognize which scaling factors, if any, are applicable to a project team and then tailor your adopted
strategies to address the range of complexities the team faces.
The focus of Agile Development is construction. While clearly important, this is not the full picture. Core
or mainstream approaches focus on the fundamentals and is characterized by value-driven lifecycles
where high-quality potentially shippable software is produced on a regular basis by a highly collaborative,
self-organizing team. The focus is on small (<10) co-located teams developing straightforward systems.
Agile delivery addresses the full delivery lifecycle from project initiation to production. It adds
appropriate, lean governance to balance self organization. It adds a risk-driven viewpoint to the value-
driven approach in order to increase the chance of project success. The focus is on small (<10) co-
located teams developing straightforward systems.
Agility@Scale is disciplined agile development where one or more scaling factors is applicable. It is
important to recognize that team size is only one of several issues that agile teams face at scale. The
scaling factors that an agile team may face includes team size, physical distribution, organizational
distribution, regulatory compliance, cultural or organizational complexity, technical complexity, and
enterprise disciplines (such as enterprise architecture, strategic reuse, and portfolio management).
This course focuses on disciplined agile, where the full lifecycle is taken into account, and on
Agility@Scale for organizational/enterprise-level development
See http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/ambler?tag=ASM for details.
3

4. The Scrum construction lifecycle
4 © 2012 IBM Corporation
See www.ambysoft.com/essays/agileLifecycle.html
This is the Scrum construction lifecycle. There are a lot of good ideas here, but it’s not complete.
Scrum practices:
Product Backlog – Prioritized stack of requirements
Value-Driven Lifecycle – Deliver potentially shippable software each sprint
Self Organization – The people who do the work are the ones who plan and estimate it
Release Planning – Develop and then maintain a high-level project plan
Sprint Planning – At the beginning of a sprint, the team plans in detail what they will deliver and how
they will do the work
Daily Scrum Meeting – Each day, hold a 15-minute coordination meeting
Sprint Demo – At the end of the sprint demo show what you’ve built to key stakeholders
Retrospectives – Take the opportunity to identify opportunities for improvement throughout the
project.
Roles:
Scrum Master – Team lead
Product Owner – Responsible for prioritizing items in the product backlog, represents the
stakeholders
Team Member – Developers, … on the team
4

5. The Disciplined Agile Delivery life cycle (basic)
The Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD) process framework is a
people-first, learning-oriented hybrid agile approach to IT
solution delivery. It has a risk-value lifecycle, is goal-driven,
scalable, and is enterprise aware.
5 © 2012 IBM Corporation
Disciplined agile delivery is an evolutionary (iterative and incremental) approach that
regularly produces high quality solutions in a cost-effective and timely manner via a risk and
value driven lifecycle. It is performed in a highly collaborative, disciplined, and self-
organizing manner within an appropriate governance framework, with active stakeholder
participation to ensure that the team understands and addresses the changing needs of its
stakeholders. Disciplined agile delivery teams provide repeatable results by adopting just the
right amount of ceremony for the situation which they face.
The basic DAD lifecycle expands upon the Scrum construction lifecycle in three important
ways:
It has explicit project phases, recognizing that agile delivery is really iterative in the
small and serial in the large.
It includes a full range of practices. This includes initial requirements and architecture
envisioning at the beginning of the project to increase the chance of building the right
product in the right manner, as well as system release practices.
It includes more robust practices. The lifecycle of this figure explicitly reworks the
product backlog in the previous slide into the more accurate concept of a ranked work
item list. Not only do agile delivery teams implement functional requirements, they
must also fix defects (found through independent testing or by users of existing
versions in production), provide feedback on work from other teams, take training
courses, and so on.
5

6. Agile Scaling Factors
Team size Compliance requirement
Under 10 1000’s of Critical,
developers developers Low risk
audited
Geographical distribution Domain Complexity
Straight Intricate,
Co-located Global -forward emerging
Disciplined
Enterprise discipline Agile Organization distribution
Project Enterprise
Delivery (outsourcing, partnerships)
focus focus Collaborative Contractual
Organizational complexity Technical complexity
Flexible Rigid Heterogeneous,
Homogenous legacy
6 © 2012 IBM Corporation
In the early days, agile development was applied to projects that were small in scope and relatively straightforward.
Today, organizations want to apply agile development to a broader set of projects. Agile needs to adapt to increasing
complexity. Agility@Scale is about explicitly addressing the complexities that disciplined agile delivery teams face in the
real world. The agile scaling factors are:
Geographical distribution. What happens when the team is distributed within a building or across continents?
Team size. Mainstream agile processes work well for small teams (10-15), but but what if the team is fifty people?
One hundred people? One thousand people?
Compliance requirement. What if regulatory issues – such as Sarbanes Oxley, ISO 9000, or FDA CFR 21 – are
applicable?
Domain complexity. What if the problem domain is intricate ( such as bio-chemical process monitoring or air traffic
control), or is changing quickly (such as financial derivatives trading or electronic security assurance). More
complex domains require greater exploration and experimentation, including but not limited to prototyping,
modeling, and simulation.
Organization distribution. Sometimes a project team includes members from different divisions, different partner
companies, or from external services firms.
Technical complexity. Working with legacy systems, multiple platforms, or blending disparate technologies can add
layers of technical complexity to a solution. Sometimes the nature of the problem is very complex in its own right.
Organizational complexity. The existing organizational structure and culture may reflect traditional values,
increasing the complexity of adopting and scaling agile strategies. Different subgroups within the organization may
have different visions as to how they should work. Individually, the strategies can be quite effective, but as a whole
they simply don’t work together effectively.
Enterprise discipline. Organizations want to leverage common infrastructure platforms to lower cost, reduce time to
market, and to improve consistency. They need effective enterprise architecture, enterprise business modeling,
strategic reuse, and portfolio management disciplines. These disciplines must work in concert with, and better yet
enhance, the disciplined agile delivery processes.
Each scaling factor has a range of complexities associated with it. Each team faces a different combination of factors,
and therefore needs a process, team structure, and tooling environment tailored to meet their unique situation.
6

7. 7
Agenda
1 Agile Scaling Model
2 Some practices
3 Organizing large teams
4 Parting thoughts
7 © 2012 IBM Corporation
7

8. Scaling Daily Stand Up Meetings
Disciplined agile delivery
– Call them “coordination meetings”
Geographic distribution
– Meeting occurs over phone, video, electronically…
– Rational Team Concert (RTC) to share information
– Change meeting times to reflect team distribution – spread the pain
Team size
– Kanban strategy is to ask 1 question: What new issues do you foresee?
– Subteams need to coordinate via coordinators, perhaps in a “scrum of
scrums”
Regulatory compliance
– Take meeting attendance and record action items (if any)
Organizational distribution
– Additional coordination between organizations may be required
– Project dashboard access for external organizations may be required
– Document decisions/action items pertaining to external organizations
Enterprise discipline
– Enterprise professionals should be invited to meetings, better yet the
8
teams © 2012 IBM Corporation
•Domain complexity increases the need for regular coordination
•Technical complexity increases the need for regular coordination
•Organizational complexity MAY make it difficult for you to hold these meetings
(it may not be allowed)
•Enterprise architecture, business modelers, … may decide to attend the
meetings
For more information about RTC, visit www.jazz.net
8

9. Scaling self organization
Disciplined agile delivery
– Disciplined agile developers are self organizing within an appropriate
governance framework
Regulatory compliance
– Plans, estimates, and so on may need to be recorded
Organizational complexity
– May need to educate management team on collaborative leadership and
facilitation
– May need to provide education to help others shift from command-control
to self-organizing
Enterprise discipline
– Application architecture decisions are constrained by enterprise
infrastructure and futures directions
– Application architecture enhanced by leveraging existing infrastructure
and reusable assets
– Release plan must reflect portfolio and project plans
– Agile teams should follow enterprise-level guidelines (e.g. coding
standards, data standards, UI standards, …)
– Adopt a Lean Development Governance strategy (see paper by Ambler
9 and Kroll) © 2012 IBM Corporation
Lean development governance whitepaper, and other governance writings,
available at http://www.ambysoft.com/onlineWritings.html#Governance
9

10. Scaling iteration demos
Geographic distribution
– Demos occurs physically where possible, but transmitted electronically
– Change demo times to reflect team distribution – spread the pain
– Greater need to schedule the demos ahead of time
Team size
– Prioritize which subteam(s) should demo to the entire team
– Individual subteams should do their own demos to their smaller
community
Regulatory compliance
– Take meeting attendance and record action items (if any)
Domain complexity
– Invite a wider range of stakeholders required, not just insiders
Organizational distribution
– Invite stakeholders from each organization unit
– Separate demos may be required by some organization units specific to
them
Technical complexity
– Some of the work may not be visible through user interface, so may
10
need to do a technical walkthrough instead © 2012 IBM Corporation
Organizational complexity MAY make it difficult to hold regular demos
Enterprise discipline – You MAY choose to discuss how what you’re demoing maps back to your
enterprise business model/vision
Stakeholders - don't forget groups other than insiders.
Need to have planned ahead of time to identify the which aspects external stakeholders are
interested in.
Relationships with stakeholders established during inception.
Unlikely a customer will be able to meet every two weeks. Don't forget business partners who can
help influence purchases later.
Need to arrange attendance ahead of time.
Make sure you have good representation across stakeholder types.
10

11. Think before acting: Agile Modeling practices
Initial up-front modeling
–Requirements envisioning
–Architecture envisioning
Modeling throughout the lifecycle
–Iteration modeling
–JIT model storming
–Lookahead modeling
Documentation throughout the lifecycle
–Continuous documentation
–Executable specifications
–Document late
www.agilemodeling.com
11 © 2012 IBM Corporation
Keep the modeling as light as possible, the details will come out on a just in
time basis later in the project.
The fundamental goal is to come up with a viable technical strategy, not to
produce a detailed technical specification.
http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/initialArchitectureModeling.htm
Diagram used with permission.
Agile principle # 10: Simplicity – the art of maximizing the amount of work not
done – is essential.
Agile principle # 11: The best architectures, requirements, and designs
emerge from self-organizing teams.
11

12. Adopt appropriate governance strategies
Lean development governance
–Teams don’t work in a vacuum
–Self-governance must be constrained by enterprise
goals and environment
Appropriate tooling support can –Whitepaper on ibm.com by Scott Ambler and Per
be a key part of the strategy.
Kroll
IBM Rational products’ personal Automated measurements and project dashboards
and project dashboards and –It is possible to streamline much of the reporting
underlying capabilities make it bureaucracy through automation
possible to assess status based on
–Rational Team Concert (RTC) for project dashboard
the work that is being done and its
state – not just from work item
–Rational Insight for portfolio-level dashboard
status. Adopt corporate development conventions
E.g., if a RRC req’t has an –“Enforce” via static analysis tools
associated test case that has been
successfully executed provides
pretty clear status of that
requirement and verification of its
successful implementation.
12 © 2012 IBM Corporation
Many organizations see self-organization as
teams being out of control
Self-organizing teams must still work within the
organizational environment
They must be governed and monitored
They should follow corporate conventions and
work to your common infrastructure
12

13. Parallel Independent Testing
This practice scales TDD, and it is Disciplined agile teams at scale:
Perform the majority of their own testing, ideally via test-driven
an important aspect of delivering a development (TDD)
quality product. Push their working builds to an independent test team on a regular
See notes for more information. basis for investigative testing
Defects must be prioritized and put back on the team’s work stack
Defects can be treated as a type of requirement as long as your
project funding strategy doesn’t get in the way
Independent test teams scale TDD:
TDD is a form of confirmatory testing
TDD is a great start, but it’s not the full testing picture
Critical strategy for addressing non-functional requirements
Const. Const.
… Transition
Iteration Iteration
Independent Testing
13 © 2012 IBM Corporation
TDD isn’t sufficient:
• TDD enables you to validate your system to your current understanding
of the intent of your stakeholders
• TDD is the equivalent of testing against the specification, replacing a lot
of the grunt work done on traditional teams by the testers
• TDD assumes that your stakeholders can communicate their
requirements and that developers can test
Agile teams address some of the communication risk by closely working with
stakeholders, developing working software on a regular basis, and iterating.
Agile teams address the skills risk through close collaboration and a cultural
value for quality.
BUT, stakeholders often miss requirements, particularly non-functional or
quality of service requirements, and they often don’t understand integration
issues, enterprise issues, and so forth.
These issues should be addressed by independent testing efforts.
The independent testers should try to break the system and report back
change stories (defects and enhancement requests) to the development
team.
The bulk of the testing effort is done by the development team, but the
complex testing is done by the testers.
Your testing tools can be used by independent testers to address issues not
easily addressed by OSS tools.
IBM® Rational® ClearQuest® and IBM® Rational® Team Concert can be used
to capture the change stories.
The change stories are prioritized and estimated by the development team,
and then treated like any other type of requirement.
Because the change story is a requirement, it can now be addressed via
TDD, and the tests around it included in the team’s regression test suite.
See www.ddj.com/dept/debug/196603549 for a detailed discussion of these
points.
13

14. 1
4
Agenda
1 Agile Scaling Model
2 Some practices
3 Organizing large teams
4 Parting thoughts
14 © 2012 IBM Corporation
14

15. Organizing large agile teams
Organize the work around your
architecture
– Do not organize around job
roles
– The architecture strategy should
reflect your requirements
strategy – Leads to either
Feature Teams or Component
Teams accordingly
Need to coordinate project
management, requirements
management, and technical
issues – A “Scrum of Scrums”
doesn’t get the job done for very
large teams
Re-introduce some specialist roles
as needed (for example Agile
DBAs or UEX experts)
Provide guidance on infrastructure
15 & development conventions © 2012 IBM Corporation
Note that organizing around architecture presupposes the
definition, representation, and a common understanding of the
architecture of the system under development. See
www.agilemodeling.com
Examples of “conventions” include programming, modeling, tool
usage guidelines.
15

16. Team Organization Strategies
Component team
– Responsible for one or more system components (or services,
frameworks, …)
– Does all the work pertaining to that component
Feature team
– Responsible for implem enting one or more features (or user stories,
scenarios, …)
– Does all the work pertaining to that feature
Internal open source
– For components with rapid rates of change
– Follow normal open source strategies, but keep it in house
None of the approaches are perfect
– You will likely use all strategies, and combinations thereof, within your
organization
16 © 2012 IBM Corporation
16

17. 1
7
Agenda
1 Agile Scaling Model
2 Some practices
3 Organizing large teams
4 Parting thoughts
17 © 2012 IBM Corporation
17

18. 18

19. The basic DAD lifecycle
19 © 2012 IBM Corporation
Disciplined agile delivery is an evolutionary (iterative and incremental) approach that regularly produces high
quality solutions in a cost-effective and timely manner via a risk and value driven lifecycle. It is performed in a
highly collaborative, disciplined, and self-organizing manner within an appropriate governance framework, with
active stakeholder participation to ensure that the team understands and addresses the changing needs of its
stakeholders. Disciplined agile delivery teams provide repeatable results by adopting just the right amount of
ceremony for the situation which they face.
The basic DAD lifecycle expands upon the Scrum construction lifecycle in three important ways:
It has explicit project phases, recognizing that agile delivery is really iterative in the small and serial in
the large.
It includes a full range of practices. This includes initial requirements and architecture envisioning at the
beginning of the project to increase the chance of building the right product in the right manner, as well
as system release practices.
It includes more robust practices. The lifecycle of this figure explicitly reworks the product backlog in the
previous slide into the more accurate concept of a ranked work item list. Not only do agile delivery
teams implement functional requirements, they must also fix defects (found through independent testing
or by users of existing versions in production), provide feedback on work from other teams, take training
courses, and so on.
Diagram used with permission from the forthcoming book “Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD): An Introduction” by
Scott Ambler and Mark Lines publication date June 2012)
19

20. The advanced DAD lifecycle
20 © 2012 IBM Corporation
Disciplined agile delivery is an evolutionary (iterative and incremental) approach that regularly produces high
quality solutions in a cost-effective and timely manner via a risk and value driven lifecycle. It is performed in a
highly collaborative, disciplined, and self-organizing manner within an appropriate governance framework, with
active stakeholder participation to ensure that the team understands and addresses the changing needs of its
stakeholders. Disciplined agile delivery teams provide repeatable results by adopting just the right amount of
ceremony for the situation which they face.
The advanced DAD lifecycle is evolved from the basic DAD lifecycle in several important ways:
1. Work items are managed as a categorized pool, not a priortized stack. Work is pulled from the stack as
capacity to perform it is available.
2. The cadences of various activities (planning, demos, retrospectives, and so on) are detached from each other.
These activities are performed when needed, not based on a specific time during an iteration
3. Transition should be very short, with most transition activities automated and any test/fix efforts performed
during construction.
Diagram used with permission from the forthcoming book “Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD): An Introduction” by
Scott Ambler and Mark Lines publication date June 2012)
20

21. Does agile scale? Yes!
Scaling:
–The majority of agile teams are geographically distributed in some
manner
–Organizations have reported successful agile programs of 500+ people
–One third of agile teams are in regulatory situations
–75% of organizations doing agile are doing so on medium complexity or
greater projects
–17% of organizations are successfully applying agile in outsourcing
situations
–78% percent of teams are working with legacy systems
–32% of organizations report successful interaction between enterprise
architects and agile teams
–11% of organizations report that their governance strategy works well
with agile teams (yikes)
Source: DDJ November 2009 State of the IT Union Survey,
www.ambysoft.com/surveys/
21 © 2012 IBM Corporation
21

22. Parting thoughts
There is more to scaling than large teams or geographically distributed teams
Existing agile practices scale
– One size does not fit all
– A given practice for an agile team not at scale will need to be tailored to reflect
the situation
You will need to consider adopting additional practices to scale effectively
22 © 2012 IBM Corporation
22

23. Get involved with the book
Join the discussion today at
www.disciplinedagiledelivery.com
23 © 2012 IBM Corporation
23

24. scott_ambler [at] ca.ibm.com
twitter.com/scottwambler
www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/ambler/
www.ibm.com/rational/agile/
www.jazz.net
© Copyright IBM Corporation 2012. All rights reserved.
The information contained in these materials is provided for informational purposes only, and is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind, express or implied. IBM shall not be responsible
for any damages arising out of the use of, or otherwise related to, these materials. Nothing contained in these materials is intended to, nor shall have the effect of, creating any warranties or
representations from IBM or its suppliers or licensors, or altering the terms and conditions of the applicable license agreement governing the use of IBM software. References in these materials
to IBM products, programs, or services do not imply that they will be available in all countries in which IBM operates. Product release dates and/or capabilities referenced in these materials may
change at any time at IBM’s sole discretion based on market opportunities or other factors, and are not intended to be a commitment to future product or feature availability in any way.
IBM, the IBM logo, the on-demand business logo, Rational, the Rational logo, and other IBM products and services are trademarks of the International Business Machines Corporation,
in the United States, other countries or both. Other company, product, or service names may be trademarks or service marks of others.
24 © 2012 IBM Corporation
Thank you!
24

25. Some agile whitepapers on IBM.com
The Agile Scaling Model (ASM): Adapting Agile Methods for Complex Environments
– ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/sa/wh/n/raw14204usen/RAW14204USEN.PDF
Scaling Agile: An Executive Guide
– ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/sa/wh/n/raw14211usen/RAW14211USEN.PDF
Improving Software Economics: Top 10 Principles of Achieving Agility at Scale
– ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/raw14148usen/RAW14148USEN.PDF
Enable the Agile Enterprise Through Incremental Adoption of Practices
– http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/raw14077usen/RAW14077USEN.PDF
Disciplined Agile Delivery: An Introduction
– http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/raw14261usen/RAW14261USEN.PDF
25 © 2012 IBM Corporation
25