Fully meeting the needs of those who need the service most, at the lowest cost to the organization, within limits and directives set by higher authority
2. Managing Healthcare – Global Trend
Challenges Faced by Many Governments
Need to provide healthcare for the even
if they are unable pay
Provide healthcare, public good, with limited
resources and competing needs
3. Managing Healthcare – Global Trend
Challenges Faced by Many Governments
Providing Quality Healthcare
Expectations of better healthcare from
people.
Accountability: Clinical Effectiveness &
Financial Accountability
Success of a government can sometimes
depend on how well they meet peoples’
demands for healthcare
4. Man Trend
Challe ments
Incr
Health
- Incre
aging Healthcare – Global
nges Faced by Many Govern
easing Expenditure on
care
ase in the cost of healthcare
5.
6. Stakeholders Perspective….
Patient
• Needs of the client
• Expectations
• Outcomes
• Relief from the ailment
• Service & Treatment with
compassion
• Services at affordable
cost/on nonpaying basis
Provider (Public
Hospital)
• Able to meet the needs of
the masses
• Medically Safe
• Professionally ethical
• Accessible
• Acceptable
• State of the art-technical
care
• Outcome comparable to
known standards
Management
(Government /Funding
Agencies)
• Quality Improvement and
impact utilization
• Investment and Return on
Public Funds
• Relevant to Community
• Relevant to national
demands
• SUSTAINABLE
7. Quality of Care
Quality of Care is the degree to which
health services for individuals and
populations increase the likelihood of
desired health outcomes and are
consistent with current professional
knowledge. (IOM 1990)
8. Quality in Public Care
Fully meeting the needs of those who need the
service most, at the lowest cost to the
organization, within limits and directives set by
higher authority (Ovretveit)
9.
10. 13
Total Quality Management
A comprehensive & fundamental rule or belief for
Leading & operating an organization aimed at,
Continuous improving performance over a
long term by focusing on Customers while
addressing the needs of all stakeholders
12. Patient-Driven
Quality according to
Importance (US
survey)
Source: The Quality Connection in Health Care by Lynne Cunningham
1. Immediate attention and triage 81
2. Care first and then paperwork 67
3. Knowledgeable personnel 62
4. Explanation in terms we can understand 60
5. Appropriate waits/explanations if you have to wait 57
6. Friendly staff and bedside manner 56
7. Enough staff 48
8. Clean facility 34
9. Ancillary support readily available 33
10. Accessibility/easy to find/physical facility 31
11. State of the art equipment 22
13.
14. Description Implications for
Patients
Implications for
Staff
Cost Implication
Inadequate
clinical details
given to
Pathology
Department
Delays to Patients
Risks of
incorrect tests
Extra work for
pathology
staff
Extra
conversations
with clinical
outcomes
Extra
pathology
costs
Increased length of
stay
More complaints
Some
appointments
cancelled
Patients kept
waiting over an
hour for pre-
booked
appointments
Stress and
frustration
Can’t park as car
parks over-full
Ambulances held up
Staff on
the
defensive
Extra staff time
on explaining
and mollifying
Need for larger
waiting rooms
and car parks
15. • Improve patient care
• Patient centred approach
• Reduce Risk
• Learn from mistakes
• Be accountable
Engage and inform staff :Clinical engagement
Promote an open culture:
What is wrong? not who is wrong?
16. Roots – 5S
Kaizen,
Team Work
BPR
Leadership
Total Quality
ManagemeMnedtia
Reports
Attitudes
Seeds
Fertilizer
29. 39
Professionally (and humanely) agreed level
of performance for a particular setting
which is
Desirable
Achievable
Measurable
Standard
30. • Dignity
• Basic human needs
• Prompt attention in care and treatment
• Confidentiality
• Communication
• Autonomy
Humanely Namely,
31.
32. QualityHigh
Specification 1 = Bad Q – Not accepted
Specification 2 = improved Q – Not accepted
Specification 3 = accepted Q – Accepted
Standard is a measuring yard of Quality
Standard is the minimum level of goodness
Standard stipulates the acceptable Quality
level
Standard is the demarcation between Good and
Bad
35. Comments
1. Structure, process and outcome – not
attributes to quality. Provides kinds of
information, based on which one can infer
whether quality is good or bad
2. Predetermined relationship between three
approaches:
Structure Process Outcome
(Linear relation – simplified version. But much
complex in reality)
36. In Diagnosis and Treatment
Structure OutcomeProcess
Characteristics of the
diagnosis laboratory
Physician’s
Characteristics
Test performed by the
laboratory
Test ordered by the
physician
Results of tests
interpreted by the
physician
Treatment chosen and
executed by physician,
other personnel and
patient
Results of tests
Diagnosis: the
illness and its
characteristics
Change in the
patient’shealth
41. But it comes to patient safety, the
numbers are startling
…..1 in 10 patients will be harmed during a hospital stay
WHO, 2014
42. The risk of a hospital-associated infection is significant
In the USA, if you are admitted to a hospital, you have a 5%
chance of contracting an HAI
People per year get an
HAI during a hospital
stay
2 million
Of these
> 99,000
People die annually from HAIs
US$ 28 – 33 billion
per year
in healthcare costs30% Of Intensive
care Unit
patients
developHAI
43. Not just a problem for Hospitals
Of 8.8 million
Outpatient
adverse drug
events, more
than 3 million
are estimated
to be
preventable James 2013
47. Patient Safety Definition
• The avoidance, prevention, and amelioration of adverse
outcomes or injuries stemming from the processes of
healthcare. These events include ‘errors’, deviations’, and
‘accidents.’
51. The Evolution of Safety Culture
Pathological
Who cares as long as we are not caught
Calculative
Safety is driven by Mx systems with collection & analysis
of data. Primarily driven by top Mx. rather than looked
by the workforce
Reactive
Org. Start to take safety seriously but there
is only action after incidents
Proactive
Workforce involvement starts. We work on the
problems that we still find
Generative
Safety is how we do business round here –
safety is inherent part of the business
53. Safety Culture
Informed Culture
Those who manage and operate the
systems have current knowledge about
the factors that determine the safety of
the system
Reporting Culture
Prepared to report their
errors and near misses
Just Culture
Encouraged and even rewarded for
providing safety-related information,
but must be clear about what is
acceptable and unacceptable behavior
Learning Culture
Willingness and know-how to drawthe
right conclusion from a safety
information system and to implement
reforms
Open Culture
Staff feel comfortable discussing
patient safety incidents
and raising safety issues with both
colleagues and senior
managers
54. An eye towards improvement…………..
ALL EVENTS
Repor
t
Event
s
Analyze
Events
Learn from Events
Culture
Chang
e
Reality
Understandi
ng
Data
Not quite
enough
Feedback to
Reporter
55. An eye towards improvement…………..
ALL EVENTS
Repor
t
Event
s
Analyze
Events
Learn from Events
Fix Systems
Culture
Chang
e
Reality
Understandi
ng
Data
Feedback to
Reporter
Patient
Safety
56. Same-handed single patient
room
With evidence-based design
(EBD) safety features
Large bathroom door
Direct path with hand
assist to toilet
Handwashing sink
with sight line
Dublin Methodist Hospital, Dublin Ohio
Design: Karlsberger with Cama
Sound-absorbing ceiling tile
61. Start with what is important; then do what is possible;
suddenly you realize that you will be doing what
you thought was impossible.
St. Francis of Assisi
69. Elder Toyoda to encourage his
son. that is Sakichi told to Kiichiro
• Everyone should tackle some great project at
least once in their life. I devoted most of my
life to inventing new kinds of looms. Now it is
your turn. You should make an effort to
complete something that will benefit society.