3. What is store image?
The way in which the store is defined in the shoppers’
mind, partly by its functional qualities and partly by an
aura of psychological attributes’ Martineau (1958)
“What exactly do we mean by the image of a store? I
submit that it is more than a factual description of its
many characteristics. In many cases, it is less like a
photograph than a highly interpretative portrait. In
other words, an image is more than a sum of its
parts” Oxenfeldt (1974)
4. What is store image?
The range of tangible and intangible, factual
and emotional factors which combine to form
the image in consumers mind
Impacts on the overall consumer experience
(Marineau 1958).
The Store Personality (Martineau, 1958)
Convergence between concepts of image and
concepts of branding
5. The importance of Store Image
The link between store image and retail patronage is
now widely accepted.
Success or failure of stores can often be related to
problems with image
Image is positively related to store loyalty (Mazursky
and Jacoby, 1986; Osman, 1993)
Research into store image informs positioning
strategies and how to differentiate stores
Link between consumers self concept / ideal self and
store image Martineau (1958).
6. The Dull Personality
“What happens to the retail store that lacks a
sharp character that does not stand for
something special to any class of shoppers?
It ends up as an alternative store in the
customers mind. The shopper does not head
for such a store as the primary place to find
what she wants. Without certain outstanding
departments and lines of merchandise,
without a clear-cut attraction for some group,
it is like a dull person”, Martineau (1958).
7. Question
Can you identify any retailers in the
Irish market suffering from The Dull
Personality syndrome?
9. Martineau refers to the
personality factor
What makes up a store’s image in the minds
of customers?
Layout and architecture
Symbols and colours – In the customers mind
colour schemes and designs have an intrinsic
meaning.
Advertising – needs to be consistent with the
character of the store itself.
Sales Personnel- Martineau suggests that the
biggest single factor in the store image is the
character of the sales personnel!
10. Elements of store image
Lindquist (1974) summarized the results of 21
studies and identified 35 different
components supposedly operating in store
image formation. These were grouped into 9
independent sets: merchandise, service,
clientele, physical facilities, convenience,
promotion, store atmosphere, institutional
attributes and post transaction satisfaction.
Merchandise Components were mentioned
by the highest proportion of researchers
11. Elements of Store Image
McGoldrick lists 18 general areas and 90
more specific elements that have been
identified in previous studies of image and
brand identity (List is not exhaustive)
Elements include tangible and intangible
elements such as feelings, pictures and
associations.
Relative importance of components varies
considerably between markets, sectors,
competitive situations and customer
segments
12. Retailers View of their store
image
Martineau (1958) observed a disconnect between what retailers
were communicating and promoting and what shoppers actually
valued.
Significant gaps between Store managers and customers
perceptions of store image continue to highlighted in many more
recent studies.
A lack of consistent measuring and monitoring of store image
among many retailers observed.
Employees generally less critical of their store than consumers
(Birtwistle et al 1999)
Dept store managers found to overrate the attributes of their
store image (Pathak et al 1975)
13. Researching Store Image
A difficult concept to explore and manage due to the
tangible and intangible nature of it
Attributes of importance will vary across retail sectors
and are not necessarily applicable to other sectors.
Image built up over time and impacts on our attitudes
and behaviour towards a retailer
Central and peripheral cues
Lifestyle and shopping orientations (Osman 1993
Education (Geistfeld, 2003)
Age (Joyce and Lambert, 1996)
14. Researching Store Image
Quantitative research - Scaling techniques
Qualitiative Research - Projective techniques
15. Scaling techniques
The semantic differential
Osgood et al (1957)
Most widely used measurement system in image research
Bi-polar contrasting adjectives
Usually 5 or 7 point scale
Traditional scale rates each retailer on all attributes before
moving to next retailer
17. …semantic scales
Modified Semantic Differential
The Graphic positioning scale
Respondents place a symbol to represent perception of
each retailer
Saves space
Problems with coding for computer analysis and more
complex instructions for respondents
18. Modified Semantic differential
Wide Selection Narrow Selection
Next 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Top Shop 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
River Island 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
etc
Ref McGoldrick pg. 193
20. …semantic scales
Numerical comparative scale
Overcomes some problems association with graphic
positioning
Economical on space
Rating on attribute by attribute basis leads to better
discrimination between stores (Teas, 1994)
However, ratings given to one store will influence ratings
given to others
21. Numerical Comparative Scale
Next Top Shop River Island
Wide selection 1234567 Narrow Selection
Good Value 1224567 Poor Value
Etc
Ref McGoldrick pg. 193
22. The Likert Scale
Likert (1932)
Used to measure attitudes and opinions
Usually 5 or 7 point scale
Measuring degree of agreement or
disagreement to a series of attitudinal
statements
23.
24. Some comments on scales
Good for allowing comparisons between different groups of
respondents in relation to common and defined attributes
Extensive evidence to support their validity, reliability and
sensitivity (Osgood et al, 1957)
25. Some problems with many
previous studies on Image
However, Oppenhiem, 1976 questioned the equality of distance
between intervals
“Are we justified in basing our calculations on the assumption of
equality of interval, both within each scale and between different
scales”
A key criticism is that they involve forced choice measures - the
characteristics may not necessarily comprise the image that
respondents have of the store.
The dimensions used to rate stores largely determined by the
researcher as opposed to the respondent
Many studies have treated the attributes as being equally
important which is not necessarily the case.
26. Open-ended approaches / Projective
Techniques
Objective is to bypass the
inhibiting thinking process of the
respondent
Used when respondents are
unable or unwilling to verbalize
their response
Subjectivity of the
analyst/researcher
Used to gain access to answers
which would be denied by other
approaches
Conducted on individual and
group basis
Project their feelings onto other
people; objects or situations
Uncover those topics such as
feelings; attitudes, motivations
which respondents may have
difficulty in articulating due to
Fear of disapproval
Unwarranted invasion of
privacy
Encourages a state of freedom
and spontaneity of expression
The true purpose of the
research is generally disguised
Disadvantages include cost;
subjectivity potential; time
consuming
27. Open ended techniques
Free association techniques - e.g. word association and
sentence completion
Picture interpretation
Store/brand as a person - identifies personality issues e.g. if
M&S were a person describe the type of person / act out the
type of person
Places, animals, activities and magazines
Use experience
What is user like - how does the user of Dunnes stores differ
from the user of M&S
What distinguishes brands/stores from each other
28. …Open Ended Techniques
Completion tests
Complete stories, sentences or
conversations;
Brand Mapping
Used to identify gaps in the
market, NPD ideas, respondents
perception of product market etc.
Association tests
Pictures and Words
Brand personality tests
Construction tests
Cartoon tests; Picture
response/Thematic
Apperception Test
e.g. pick three images from a
selection that best describe
thoughts feelings and attitudes
towards object in question and
explain why.
Choice ordering
Present list of words and ask
respondent to rank in order or
put into categories based on
factors associated with
product/brand
Expressive techniques
Role Playing - Participant is
asked to assume the role of
another person or object.
Third-person Technique e.g.
Nescafe research in 1950s
Personification - If Guinness was
a person, what type of person
would it be? / Obituary for a
brand
29. Projective Techniques
Belk, Ger and Askegaard (1997),
“Consumer desire in 3 Cultures:
Results from Projective Research” in
Advances in Consumer Research, 24,
pp 24-28
Methods used were:
Collage - your understanding of desire
Association - a sea of objects people or
experiences
Sketches - “Desire” and “not desire” artworks
Synonym examples and feelings - Things a person
might strongly desire
30. What were the key results?
Men and women focus on different objects of
desire
Men focused on
Luxury cars
Women as objects of their desire
Women focused on
Food, especially chocolates
Relationships as the interpersonal objects of their
desire
American and Turkish women more likely to see
desire as sinful
31. Reading
Chapter 5, McGoldrick, P. Retail Marketing, Second edition,
McGraw Hill, 2002.
Journal Articles presented in class
Notes de l'éditeur
some resistance to the term
Retailers need to clearly define image objectives before they design the store and make decisions regarding the physical attributes of that store.
Underpinning any successful image strategy is having a clear point of differentiation
Researching Store Image
Martineau, 1958) refers extensively to personality when talking about a store’s image reinforcing the notion that what we are really talking about is the retailer’s brand image.