SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  9
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
MPSTME, NMIMS




            ASSIGNMENT NO. 3
                        Operations Management

                                           10/09/2012




Submitted By: Bhavya Dosi (505), Harsh Gupta (506), Divy Prakash Shrivastava (504), Kushagra
Agrawal (526), Prameet Gupta (507)
1.) The Glendale Electronics Store employs five people. Customer Traffic is highest on the weekends and
    lowest during midweek. Accordingly, demand for employee help is given in the following table. Make
    an employee work schedule that will meet staffing requirements and guarantee each employee two
    consecutive days off per week.

Sol.)

                                                       DAYS

                      Monday       Tuesday      Wednesday         Thursday      Friday    Saturday        Sunday


  Requirements        4            3            2                 3             4         5               4

  Adams               4            3            2                 3             4         5               4
  Chang               3            2            2                 3             3         4               3
  Klein               2            2            2                 2             2         3               2
  Ramirez             1            1            1                 2             2         2               1
  Sampson             0            1            1                 1             1         1               0




Here 5 worker work for 25 worker days although slight different assignments may be equally satisfactory



The Schedule is

ADAM is assigned Wednesday & Thursday OFFs

CHANG is assigned Tuesday & Wednesday OFFs

KLEIN is assigned Thursday & Friday OFFs

RAMIREZ is assigned Tuesday & Wednesday OFFs

SIMPSON is assigned Sunday & Monday OFFs
2.) An item has a setup cost of $100 and a weekly holding cost of $0.50 per unit. Given the following net
    requirements, what should the lot sizes be using Lot-for-Lot (L4L), economic order quantity (EOQ) and
    least total cost (LTC)? Also what is the total cost associated with each lot sizing?

                           WEEKS                     Net Requirements
                             1                              10
                             2                              30
                             3                              10
                             4                              50
                             5                              20
                             6                              40
                             7                              50
                             8                              30

Sol.)
         LOT-4-LOT (L4L)

          Week           Net           Production       Ending       Holding        Setup         Total
                     Requirements       Quantity      Inventory       Cost           Cost         Cost
            1             10               10             0             0            100           100
            2             30               30             0             0            100           200
            3             10               10             0             0            100           300
            4             50               50             0             0            100           400
            5             20               20             0             0            100           500
            6             40               40             0             0            100           600
            7             50               50             0             0            100           700
            8             30               30             0             0            100           800

         ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY

         Annual Holding Cost, H = 0.50 * 52
                            = $26 per unit

         Setup Cost, S = $100
         E= ((2DS)/ H)
          = 110 units

           Week          Net          Production       Ending     Holding       Setup          Total
                     Requirements      Quantity      Inventory     Cost          Cost          Cost
             1            10             110             100        50           100            150
             2            30              0              70         35           100            135
             3            10              0              60         30           100            130
             4            50              0              10          5           100            105
             5            20             110             100        50           100            150
             6            40              0              60         30           100            130
             7            50              0              10          5           100            105
             8            30             110             90         45           100            145
Que 3. Develop a production plan and calculate the annual cost for a firm whose demand forecast is
fall, 10,000; winter, 8,000; spring, 7,000; summer, 12,000. Inventory at the beginning off all is 500
units. At the beginning of fall you currently have 30 workers, but you plan to hire temporary workers
at the beginning of summer and lay them off at the end of the summer. In addition, you have
negotiated with the union an option to use the regular workforce on overtime during winter or
spring if overtime is necessary to prevent stock outs at the end of those quarters. Overtime is not
available during the fall. Relevant costs are: hiring, $100 for each temp; layoff, $200 for each worker
laid off; inventory holding, $5 per unit-quarter; backorder, $10 per unit; straight time, $5 per hour;
overtime, $8 per hour. Assume that the productivity is 0.5 units per worker hour, with eight hours
per day and 60 days per season.

Solution:

Productivity = 0.5 units/hour, 8 hours/day, 60 days/season

Labor RT = $5/hour, OT = $8/hour

RT unit cost = $5/0.5 units = $10/unit

OT unit cost = $8/0.5 units = $16/unit

Inventory holding = $5/unit/quarter, Backorder = $10/unit

Hiring = $100/worker, Firing = $200/worker, Fall Inventory = 500 units

Number of units produced by 1 worker in one season = 0.5*8*60 = 240 units
Que: Plan production for the next year. The demand forecast is spring, 20,000; summer, 10,000; fall,
15,000; winter, 18,000. At the beginning of spring you have 70 workers and 1,000 units in inventory.
The union contract specifies that you may lay off workers only once a year, at the beginning of
summer. Also, you may hire new workers only at the end of summer to begin regular work in the
fall. The number of workers laid off at the beginning of summer and the number hired at the end of
summer should result in planned production levels for summer and fall that equal the demand
forecasts for summer and fall, respectively. If demand exceeds supply, use overtime in spring only,
which means that backorders could occur in winter. You are given these costs: hiring, $100 per new
workers; layoff, $200 per worker laid off; holding, $20 per unit-quarter, backorder cost, $8 per unit;
straight-time labor, $10 per hour; overtime, $15 per hour. Productivity is 0.5 units per worker hour,
eight hours per day, 50 days per quarter. Find the total cost.

Solution:

Productivity = 0.5 units/hour, 8 hours/day, 50 days/season

Labor RT = $10/hour, OT = $15/hour

RT unit cost = $10/0.5 units = $20/unit, OT unit cost = $15/0.5 units = $30/unit

Inventory holding = $20/unit/quarter, Backorder = $8/unit

Hiring = $100/worker, Firing = $200/worker, Spring Inventory = 1,000 units

Number of units produced by 1 worker in one season = 0.5*8*50 = 200 units

*Laid off 20 workers at the beginning of summer

** Hired 20 workers at the end of summer to begin regular work in the fall

*** Hired 25 workers at the end of summer to begin regular work in the fall
Assignment 3 group 3
Assignment 3 group 3
Assignment 3 group 3
Assignment 3 group 3

Contenu connexe

Tendances

P&G Supply Chain Management
P&G Supply Chain ManagementP&G Supply Chain Management
P&G Supply Chain Management
Kunal Singh
 
Dell Supply Chain Management
Dell Supply Chain ManagementDell Supply Chain Management
Dell Supply Chain Management
pratikdhar
 
Case Study 1_PrafullaKumarShahi_FaryalQasim
Case Study 1_PrafullaKumarShahi_FaryalQasimCase Study 1_PrafullaKumarShahi_FaryalQasim
Case Study 1_PrafullaKumarShahi_FaryalQasim
Prafulla Kumar Shahi
 

Tendances (20)

Basic EOQ Model, Quantity Discount, Economic Lot Size
Basic EOQ Model, Quantity Discount, Economic Lot SizeBasic EOQ Model, Quantity Discount, Economic Lot Size
Basic EOQ Model, Quantity Discount, Economic Lot Size
 
Merton Truck Company
Merton Truck CompanyMerton Truck Company
Merton Truck Company
 
Wal-Mart, Strategic Development of the company in recent years
Wal-Mart, Strategic Development of the company in recent yearsWal-Mart, Strategic Development of the company in recent years
Wal-Mart, Strategic Development of the company in recent years
 
P&G Supply Chain Management
P&G Supply Chain ManagementP&G Supply Chain Management
P&G Supply Chain Management
 
Beauregard Textile Company Analysis
Beauregard Textile Company AnalysisBeauregard Textile Company Analysis
Beauregard Textile Company Analysis
 
Beauregard textile company case study
Beauregard textile company case studyBeauregard textile company case study
Beauregard textile company case study
 
Square Inc IPO Valuation.pptx
Square Inc IPO Valuation.pptxSquare Inc IPO Valuation.pptx
Square Inc IPO Valuation.pptx
 
Ch12pp
Ch12ppCh12pp
Ch12pp
 
Anshu amazon fresh case study
Anshu amazon fresh case studyAnshu amazon fresh case study
Anshu amazon fresh case study
 
Ribbons and bows report
Ribbons and bows reportRibbons and bows report
Ribbons and bows report
 
Maccounting midwestofficeproducts
Maccounting midwestofficeproductsMaccounting midwestofficeproducts
Maccounting midwestofficeproducts
 
Dell Supply Chain Management
Dell Supply Chain ManagementDell Supply Chain Management
Dell Supply Chain Management
 
Red brand canners
Red brand cannersRed brand canners
Red brand canners
 
Case Study 1_PrafullaKumarShahi_FaryalQasim
Case Study 1_PrafullaKumarShahi_FaryalQasimCase Study 1_PrafullaKumarShahi_FaryalQasim
Case Study 1_PrafullaKumarShahi_FaryalQasim
 
The Cranberry Case
The Cranberry CaseThe Cranberry Case
The Cranberry Case
 
Donner Case, Operation Management, HBR case
Donner Case, Operation Management, HBR caseDonner Case, Operation Management, HBR case
Donner Case, Operation Management, HBR case
 
Apple INC.: Managing a Global Supply Chain
Apple INC.: Managing a Global Supply ChainApple INC.: Managing a Global Supply Chain
Apple INC.: Managing a Global Supply Chain
 
L.L. bean item forecasting and inventory management
L.L. bean item forecasting and inventory managementL.L. bean item forecasting and inventory management
L.L. bean item forecasting and inventory management
 
Dakota product
Dakota productDakota product
Dakota product
 
Benihana of Tokyo, case study
Benihana of Tokyo, case studyBenihana of Tokyo, case study
Benihana of Tokyo, case study
 

En vedette (11)

BRUSNSWICK MOTORS, INC
BRUSNSWICK MOTORS, INCBRUSNSWICK MOTORS, INC
BRUSNSWICK MOTORS, INC
 
Operations Management
Operations ManagementOperations Management
Operations Management
 
Brunswick motors, inc
Brunswick motors, incBrunswick motors, inc
Brunswick motors, inc
 
Fdi in indian retail sector0......docx
Fdi in indian retail sector0......docxFdi in indian retail sector0......docx
Fdi in indian retail sector0......docx
 
Fitter Snacker
Fitter SnackerFitter Snacker
Fitter Snacker
 
english-2 " Our homes"
english-2 " Our homes"english-2 " Our homes"
english-2 " Our homes"
 
Presentation Eureka Forbes
Presentation Eureka ForbesPresentation Eureka Forbes
Presentation Eureka Forbes
 
Chapter 4: Production and Supply Chain Management Information Systems
Chapter 4: Production and Supply Chain Management Information SystemsChapter 4: Production and Supply Chain Management Information Systems
Chapter 4: Production and Supply Chain Management Information Systems
 
Aggregate Planning
Aggregate PlanningAggregate Planning
Aggregate Planning
 
Aggregate Planning
Aggregate  PlanningAggregate  Planning
Aggregate Planning
 
Lot Sizing Techniques
Lot Sizing TechniquesLot Sizing Techniques
Lot Sizing Techniques
 

Similaire à Assignment 3 group 3

Taller de excel
Taller de excelTaller de excel
Taller de excel
adrirocio
 
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Som   case study - dont bother me i cant copeSom   case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Rajendra Inani
 
Company wide statistics
Company wide statisticsCompany wide statistics
Company wide statistics
bry1477
 
Moulding sand-properties lectures
Moulding sand-properties lecturesMoulding sand-properties lectures
Moulding sand-properties lectures
hadushberhe75
 
Financial analysis
Financial analysisFinancial analysis
Financial analysis
kanchan89
 
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Earnings Conference Call | FY 2010 Results
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Earnings Conference Call | FY 2010 ResultsDeutsche EuroShop | Annual Earnings Conference Call | FY 2010 Results
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Earnings Conference Call | FY 2010 Results
Deutsche EuroShop AG
 
Data logging
Data loggingData logging
Data logging
diela9026
 
Salamian dv club_foils_intel_austin
Salamian dv club_foils_intel_austinSalamian dv club_foils_intel_austin
Salamian dv club_foils_intel_austin
Obsidian Software
 
Trabajos realisados en clase jeannette
Trabajos realisados en clase jeannetteTrabajos realisados en clase jeannette
Trabajos realisados en clase jeannette
Diseno Profesional
 
2.1 2.4 presentation
2.1 2.4 presentation2.1 2.4 presentation
2.1 2.4 presentation
dinomtruck
 
If chemistry workbook ch099 a
If chemistry workbook ch099 aIf chemistry workbook ch099 a
If chemistry workbook ch099 a
Julia vbvvvhgcv
 

Similaire à Assignment 3 group 3 (20)

Excel Function in Advanced Use
Excel Function in Advanced UseExcel Function in Advanced Use
Excel Function in Advanced Use
 
Taller de excel
Taller de excelTaller de excel
Taller de excel
 
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Som   case study - dont bother me i cant copeSom   case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
 
Company wide statistics
Company wide statisticsCompany wide statistics
Company wide statistics
 
Fusion improvement
Fusion improvementFusion improvement
Fusion improvement
 
Moulding sand-properties lectures
Moulding sand-properties lecturesMoulding sand-properties lectures
Moulding sand-properties lectures
 
ขอเชิญเข้าร่วมแข่งขัน
ขอเชิญเข้าร่วมแข่งขันขอเชิญเข้าร่วมแข่งขัน
ขอเชิญเข้าร่วมแข่งขัน
 
2009 Face Conference Ma Fiore
2009 Face Conference Ma Fiore2009 Face Conference Ma Fiore
2009 Face Conference Ma Fiore
 
Financial analysis
Financial analysisFinancial analysis
Financial analysis
 
Why monsters matter. (Quo Vadis 2012)
Why monsters matter. (Quo Vadis 2012)Why monsters matter. (Quo Vadis 2012)
Why monsters matter. (Quo Vadis 2012)
 
The power of calibrated descriptive sensory panels
The power of calibrated descriptive sensory panelsThe power of calibrated descriptive sensory panels
The power of calibrated descriptive sensory panels
 
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Earnings Conference Call | FY 2010 Results
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Earnings Conference Call | FY 2010 ResultsDeutsche EuroShop | Annual Earnings Conference Call | FY 2010 Results
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Earnings Conference Call | FY 2010 Results
 
Particle size
Particle sizeParticle size
Particle size
 
Data logging
Data loggingData logging
Data logging
 
Salamian dv club_foils_intel_austin
Salamian dv club_foils_intel_austinSalamian dv club_foils_intel_austin
Salamian dv club_foils_intel_austin
 
Deutsche EuroShop | Bilanzpressekonferenz | Geschäftsjahr 2010
Deutsche EuroShop | Bilanzpressekonferenz | Geschäftsjahr 2010Deutsche EuroShop | Bilanzpressekonferenz | Geschäftsjahr 2010
Deutsche EuroShop | Bilanzpressekonferenz | Geschäftsjahr 2010
 
Trabajos realisados en clase jeannette
Trabajos realisados en clase jeannetteTrabajos realisados en clase jeannette
Trabajos realisados en clase jeannette
 
2.1 2.4 presentation
2.1 2.4 presentation2.1 2.4 presentation
2.1 2.4 presentation
 
Grafica de intervalos
Grafica de intervalosGrafica de intervalos
Grafica de intervalos
 
If chemistry workbook ch099 a
If chemistry workbook ch099 aIf chemistry workbook ch099 a
If chemistry workbook ch099 a
 

Assignment 3 group 3

  • 1. MPSTME, NMIMS ASSIGNMENT NO. 3 Operations Management 10/09/2012 Submitted By: Bhavya Dosi (505), Harsh Gupta (506), Divy Prakash Shrivastava (504), Kushagra Agrawal (526), Prameet Gupta (507)
  • 2. 1.) The Glendale Electronics Store employs five people. Customer Traffic is highest on the weekends and lowest during midweek. Accordingly, demand for employee help is given in the following table. Make an employee work schedule that will meet staffing requirements and guarantee each employee two consecutive days off per week. Sol.) DAYS Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Requirements 4 3 2 3 4 5 4 Adams 4 3 2 3 4 5 4 Chang 3 2 2 3 3 4 3 Klein 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 Ramirez 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 Sampson 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Here 5 worker work for 25 worker days although slight different assignments may be equally satisfactory The Schedule is ADAM is assigned Wednesday & Thursday OFFs CHANG is assigned Tuesday & Wednesday OFFs KLEIN is assigned Thursday & Friday OFFs RAMIREZ is assigned Tuesday & Wednesday OFFs SIMPSON is assigned Sunday & Monday OFFs
  • 3. 2.) An item has a setup cost of $100 and a weekly holding cost of $0.50 per unit. Given the following net requirements, what should the lot sizes be using Lot-for-Lot (L4L), economic order quantity (EOQ) and least total cost (LTC)? Also what is the total cost associated with each lot sizing? WEEKS Net Requirements 1 10 2 30 3 10 4 50 5 20 6 40 7 50 8 30 Sol.) LOT-4-LOT (L4L) Week Net Production Ending Holding Setup Total Requirements Quantity Inventory Cost Cost Cost 1 10 10 0 0 100 100 2 30 30 0 0 100 200 3 10 10 0 0 100 300 4 50 50 0 0 100 400 5 20 20 0 0 100 500 6 40 40 0 0 100 600 7 50 50 0 0 100 700 8 30 30 0 0 100 800 ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY Annual Holding Cost, H = 0.50 * 52 = $26 per unit Setup Cost, S = $100 E= ((2DS)/ H) = 110 units Week Net Production Ending Holding Setup Total Requirements Quantity Inventory Cost Cost Cost 1 10 110 100 50 100 150 2 30 0 70 35 100 135 3 10 0 60 30 100 130 4 50 0 10 5 100 105 5 20 110 100 50 100 150 6 40 0 60 30 100 130 7 50 0 10 5 100 105 8 30 110 90 45 100 145
  • 4. Que 3. Develop a production plan and calculate the annual cost for a firm whose demand forecast is fall, 10,000; winter, 8,000; spring, 7,000; summer, 12,000. Inventory at the beginning off all is 500 units. At the beginning of fall you currently have 30 workers, but you plan to hire temporary workers at the beginning of summer and lay them off at the end of the summer. In addition, you have negotiated with the union an option to use the regular workforce on overtime during winter or spring if overtime is necessary to prevent stock outs at the end of those quarters. Overtime is not available during the fall. Relevant costs are: hiring, $100 for each temp; layoff, $200 for each worker laid off; inventory holding, $5 per unit-quarter; backorder, $10 per unit; straight time, $5 per hour; overtime, $8 per hour. Assume that the productivity is 0.5 units per worker hour, with eight hours per day and 60 days per season. Solution: Productivity = 0.5 units/hour, 8 hours/day, 60 days/season Labor RT = $5/hour, OT = $8/hour RT unit cost = $5/0.5 units = $10/unit OT unit cost = $8/0.5 units = $16/unit Inventory holding = $5/unit/quarter, Backorder = $10/unit Hiring = $100/worker, Firing = $200/worker, Fall Inventory = 500 units Number of units produced by 1 worker in one season = 0.5*8*60 = 240 units
  • 5. Que: Plan production for the next year. The demand forecast is spring, 20,000; summer, 10,000; fall, 15,000; winter, 18,000. At the beginning of spring you have 70 workers and 1,000 units in inventory. The union contract specifies that you may lay off workers only once a year, at the beginning of summer. Also, you may hire new workers only at the end of summer to begin regular work in the fall. The number of workers laid off at the beginning of summer and the number hired at the end of summer should result in planned production levels for summer and fall that equal the demand forecasts for summer and fall, respectively. If demand exceeds supply, use overtime in spring only, which means that backorders could occur in winter. You are given these costs: hiring, $100 per new workers; layoff, $200 per worker laid off; holding, $20 per unit-quarter, backorder cost, $8 per unit; straight-time labor, $10 per hour; overtime, $15 per hour. Productivity is 0.5 units per worker hour, eight hours per day, 50 days per quarter. Find the total cost. Solution: Productivity = 0.5 units/hour, 8 hours/day, 50 days/season Labor RT = $10/hour, OT = $15/hour RT unit cost = $10/0.5 units = $20/unit, OT unit cost = $15/0.5 units = $30/unit Inventory holding = $20/unit/quarter, Backorder = $8/unit Hiring = $100/worker, Firing = $200/worker, Spring Inventory = 1,000 units Number of units produced by 1 worker in one season = 0.5*8*50 = 200 units *Laid off 20 workers at the beginning of summer ** Hired 20 workers at the end of summer to begin regular work in the fall *** Hired 25 workers at the end of summer to begin regular work in the fall