The presentation created by Anne-Christin Tannhauser and Anthony F. Camilleri presents a number of scenarios for the unbundling of learning, together with proposals on how to improve the recognition and transfer of credit achieved through open learning.
12. www.vmpass.eu
12 |
University consortium
Learners Resources Assessment Recognition
3
Partnership agreeing to recognized OER
based learning
Different arrangements for assessment
(zukünftige)
Studenten
15. www.vmpass.eu
15 |
Manylearners wishto have formal,transferable recognition
of theirknowledge & skills!
Challenges:
• non-traditionalproviders are not includedwithincurrent
trust-networks
• thereis no officialrecognition pathwayfor many open
learningexperiences
16. www.vmpass.eu
16 |
Manylearners wishto have formal,transferable recognition
of theirknowledge & skills!
Potential
• Recognitionwould
– create a link between traditional and open&flexible learning
– Create trust in OER, MOOCs, OCW, VirtualMobility
• Assessment and recognitionmight become a business
model for OER,MOOCs, OCW…
17. www.vmpass.eu
17 |
Difficultiesin Recognition
• Thevm/ocwcourseis notdescribed in terms ofexisting
recognition instruments,suchasECTS
• The ECTS is not recognised due to lack oftrustin the
teaching/learningmethodologies used in course delivery
• ECTS is not recognised due to difficulties in integratingthe
content between several courses offered by different
institutions.
18. www.vmpass.eu
18 |
Barriersto Recognition
• Lack of knowledgeabout VM/OCW providers and courses
• Lack of transparency regarding institutionalprocedures,
pedagogy and assessment
• Lack of trust in institutionalquality systems
19. www.vmpass.eu
19 |
A possible solution
• Concept of a “learning passport”
• A flexiblerecordof a flexiblelearningpathway
21. www.vmpass.eu
21 |
Tool to aidrecognitionof open learning
GOAL
• Foruseby staff within HEIs
• Create Transparency
• Create Trust
• Aid portability
• Based on existing tools and practices (ECTS, Diploma
Supplement)
• A moreefficient alternative to RPL
23. www.vmpass.eu
23 |
• Quality Procedures Applied
• Estimated Hours of Workload
• Learning Outcomes described
(Knowledge, Skills, Competences)
• Learning activities required by the
learner
• Certification options offered
Information from
OER provider (HEI)
describes the credit
24. www.vmpass.eu
24 |
• General personal information
• Period in which study occurred
• Information about the learning
activities + evidence source (e.g.
PORTFOLIO)
Information from
the learner
describes the learning experience
25. www.vmpass.eu
25 |
• Assessment Components (form)
• Which LO were verified?
• Quality Control Procedures for Assessment
• Equivalence of certification within institution
• Position of certification within qualification
framework
• Grading scheme (pass/fail, numerical)
Information from
assessing/certifying institution
describes the assessment and certification
27. www.vmpass.eu
29 |
Our Goal
Increase inter-institutionalrecognitionof virtual-mobility
andOpen Educationbased (OER/OCW)courses
Give non-formallearning achievementsmeaning within the
formal education system
Easier access to formal highereducation through
recognitionof allvalid forms of learning
29. www.vmpass.eu
31 |
Learning
passport
Test & Improvethe model
with VM-Pass partners
Arerecognition offices enabled
to recognize openlearning?
University of Leicester
International University of La Rioja
Vytautas Magnus University
Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative
State University
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
European Distance and E-Learning
Network (EDEN)
European Federation for Quality in E-
Learning (EFQUEL)
MENON Network (European Economic
Interest Group)
30. www.vmpass.eu
32 |
Learning
passport
Web Tool “ClearingHouse”
• allow institutions to share the information gathered amongst
each other
• Aim: European Recognition Database for VirtualMobility
31. www.vmpass.eu
33 |
Potential problems with a learningpassport
• Requires information fromseveraldifferent actors,
institutional and individual
• Validationof PriorLearning is labourintensive (and
expensive), even under idealconditions
• Differentinstitutions use different validation
procedures,making harmonisation of qualifications
difficult
32. www.vmpass.eu
34 |
Validating the passport
• Proposal for a collaborative clearinghouseof recognition
data for VM-based education
• Clearinghouse populated withcompleted learning
passports
• Eachpassport validated by a recognitionoffice,and
results of that validationshared withthe rest of the
recognitioncommunity
35. www.vmpass.eu
37 |
Learning
passport
Web Tool “ClearingHouse”
Partner Up! LivingLab
Open Courses Provider
• OCW, MOOCs, Virtual Mobility
• List your offering in Learning Passport
format
• Map against European recognition
instruments.
36. www.vmpass.eu
38 |
Learning
passport
Web Tool “ClearingHouse”
Partner Up! LivingLab
Forward thinking university
• Willing to offer more pathways to
students
• Possibly procedures for prior
learning recognition in place
• Possibly own OCW, MOOCs,
Virtual Mobility
38. www.vmpass.eu
41 |
A lving lab
• Bringtogether a coalition of institutionswho are willing
to test these ideas
• Test the passport
• Develop, Test and Pilot the Clearinghousein a livesetting
• Recruita growing networkof institutions
39. www.vmpass.eu
42 |
A Living Lab
• Co-creation, readiness to exploration & experimentation,
• Evaluation
Quality checking & improving cycles
Changesto the clearinghousefunctionality
& its components
40. www.vmpass.eu
43 |
A Living Lab
Members shape the process and result!
Quality checking & improving cycles
Changesto the clearinghousefunctionality
& its components
41. www.vmpass.eu
44 |
Why Join?
For Course Providers
• Extra visibility for your courses
• Gain data about the perception and
recognition-value of your open-
learning certification schemes
• Receivefeedback onyour open
teaching and learning
• Enhancethe value of your open-
qualifications
For Recognising Institions
• Enable andfacilitate the recognition
of open learning
• Increase attractiveness of your
institution to(potential or current)
students
• Gain valuable experiencein
recognition of openlearning
43. www.vmpass.eu
46 |
• Is creditawarded forlearningoutcomes recognized
through OCW in your owninstitutions?How/Whynot?
• Whichquality procedures enhancetrust in certifications
linkedto OCW?
– What quality mechanisms for OER, OCW, MOOCs, Virtual Mobility
• areyou aware of
• do you use/are in place in your organisation?
• What are feasible options for assessment and
certificationof learningoutcomes achieved withOCW?
http://tinyurl.com/vmpass-eif
44. www.vmpass.eu
47 |
We hope to:
• Create new flexible learning pathwaysfor studentsinside
Higher Education
• Allow institutionsto increase the scope of their offer, by
integratingteaching/learningdone at other institutionsinto
their curricula
• Improve resource-efficiency withinHEIs
• Lead to anincrease in the use andimpact of Open
Educational Resources (OER)
45. www.vmpass.eu
48 |
Join Our Living Lab
Contact:
info@vmpass.eu
vmpass.eu
Presentation from:www.slideshare.net/anthonycamilleri
Released under a Creative Commons
Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Belgium License
You are free:
• to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit
the work
• to Remix — to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the
manner specified by the author or licensor (but
not in any way that suggests that they endorse
you or your use of the work).
Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build
upon this work, you may distribute the resulting
work only under the same or similar license to
this one.