SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  13
Social Psychology Research Report
“I’m fine, ALONE”

Liew Yong Sheng
Nicolas Wong Xiao Ern
Goh Jeng Jhieh
Liu Wei Cheng
Stefan Loke
Kishant Kumar

Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus
School of Architecture, Building and Design
Foundation in Natural and Built Environment 04/13

Lecturer: Ms Chia
I’m Fine, ALONE

Table of Content
1. Abstract

1

2. Introduction

2

3. Method of Research

3

4. Data Collection

5

5. Discussion

8

6. References

10

7. Appendixes

15

8. Appreciation

16
I’m Fine, ALONE

Abstract
Despite scientist proved that studying or teamwork in group have greater efficiency in the
learning process, students themselves may prefer to learn alone. In this research report, the
research should reveal not only the preference of the students in Taylor’s Lakeside University
but also their justification of their preference. The research will use survey forms as a method
of questionnaire. 22 questions were designed to understand the reason behind their opinion in
preferring to study alone. 79 forms were printed out and volunteers were told to fill up the
forms. After the procedure the forms were collected to be analysed. The data shows that
student preferred to study alone more while there are more student preferring to work in
groups. The discussion analyses the justification of student’s preference to study or work
alone. By the end of the research, we found that despite how beneficial study or work in
group, students still prefers to study or work alone because risk in wasting time and several
others unfavourable factor in efficient studying will occur and suffer a greater loss.
I’m Fine, ALONE

Introduction
Modern education encourages learning through groups of their (the students) own through
assignments or examination. Whether or not students are reluctant or passionate enough, they
will have to go through group discussion at least once. Studies such as Jacobs School of
Engineering in California of San Diego have proven that studying in groups have a higher
rate of efficiency.
However, despite the fact that studying in group studies or teamwork have a higher rate of
efficiency. A new question was created from that research itself. Though group studies or
teamwork proves greater efficiency in learning, the students themselves do not necessary
know this fact thus it all boils down to the preference of the students themselves. Students
have their different opinions after going through years of experience in group studies or
teamwork. For this reason, they have different justification and reason for their preferences.
Due to the fact that we, Taylor’s Lakeside University students, have experienced a great
amount of teamwork in our course (Foundation in Natural Built Environment) believed that
the students in Taylor’s University may prefer to study alone rather than studying in groups.
With great curiosity, we decided to research on the preference of the studying or working in
groups or solo along with the student’s justification to further justifies the reason of their
preference.
I’m Fine, ALONE

Method
Hypothesis:
People tend to find peer group as a factor of distraction in the academic world and thus
prefers to study or work alone.

Independent Variable:
Gender
Dependent Variable:
Percentage of preference
Extraneous Variable:
Non-student volunteers

Materials:
79 set of 5-paged forms
Volunteers:
79 Taylor’s University Students
I’m Fine, ALONE
Procedure
The research will use Quantitative and Qualitative method. Quantitative method will be used
to evaluate the level of distraction by using scales whereas Qualitative method will be used to
describe the types of peer group the volunteer have through description. A survey form was
used to carry out the experiment. The questionnaire are to be performed in Taylor’s
University to decrease chances of extraneous variable which may affect result.
The survey form was divided into five sections to break down the analysis. The survey form
begins with a demographic to understand the participants themselves such as age and the
school of which they are currently studying. The survey continues with descriptive questions
to understand the type of peer group the volunteer is working or studying with and their usual
working or studying habits. The second section also serves as a demographic for the
volunteer’s peer group.
The third section begins with a brief of a scale of 1 to 5 (Strongly Disagree to Strongly
Agree) and continues with question with scales 1 to 5. The questions are designed to
investigate the cause of distraction during a group work or study. The survey form continues
to the fourth section. The fourth section were tasked to understand the justification of the
volunteer’s preference. The form ends with the fifth section which is to know the preference
of the student to prove the hypothesis. The survey form was checked and corrected by our
lecturer for any mistake.
Survey forms were printed and were passed around the school campus for students to fill up.
The survey forms were filled up by the students and were collected for analysis.
I’m Fine, ALONE

Data Collection
We found 79 volunteers to fill up the form. Among the 79 volunteers there are 45 males and
34 females. In percentage, females took up 43% of the entire volunteer while the other 57%
are males which, in this research are more dominant.

Percentage of Male and Female

Male

Female
I’m Fine, ALONE
For the sake of being fair to both gender, the percentage of preference were divided by their
own gender multiplied by one hundred percent. Thus the formula of the calculating ther
percentage of preferences are as below.
X 100% = Percentage of Preference to study alone in Male

Strongly

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Disagree

Strongly
Agree

Male

2.22%

13.33%

20.00%

31.11%

33.33%

Female

0.00%

0.00%

33.33%

42.42%

24.24%

Percentage of Preference in Studying Alone Among Male and Female

Percentage of Preference in Studying Alone Among Male and
Female
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral
Male

Female

Agree

Strongly Agree
I’m Fine, ALONE
Strongly

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Agree

Male

6.67%

8.89%

28.89%

35.36%

20.00%

Female

0.06%

6.06%

39.39%

36.36%

18.18%

The method of calculation is similar to the analysis above.

Percentage of Preference in Working Alone Among Male and Female

Percentage of Preference in Working Alone Among Male and
Female
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral
Male

Female

Agree

Strongly Agrees
I’m Fine, ALONE

DISCUSSION
As seen in the above data collection, we can see that male have a total of 15.57% of males
prefers to study in group while none of the female prefer to study in groups. A total of
53.33% from both male and female find that studying alone or studying in groups doesn’t
really matter to them. Finally, there are more female preferring studying alone than male
preferring the option. Though, there is a need to mention that male have higher percentage in
intense disagreement.

Meanwhile, in the percentage of preference in working alone, we have female preferring to
work in groups while the percentage of male preferring in working in group decreases. The
total amount of neutral thoughts are higher in both male and female in this case. What’s
amazing is that the amount of students, in both sex, preferring to work alone decreases
tremendously.

With the result calculated, we further study the justification of why students chose what they
have preferred. 21.5% of student often study with their peers while 30.4% find themselves
studying alone most of the time. There are, however, 48.1% of student find themselves in
both condition occasionally. Approximately 31.6% of student themselves are the factor of
distraction during a group study while 21.6% respond that they are not responsible. There are
32.9% student find that they were distracted by their friends while only 15.2% disagrees.
Interestingly, student tends to follow their friends for a break in the midst of studying or
working. This fact was supported by 64.6% of student agreeing this problem with only 13.9%
disagreeing that they will be distracted by that factor.

Despite how researcher have already proven that studying in group are more efficient. There
are only 31.6% who find that they feel smarter after a group study with a 27.9% of student
disagreeing the fact that they feel smarter after a group study. However, it is undeniable that
through conversation or exchange in knowledge allows student to feel that they know their
friends better. 64.6% of student feel the bond strengthen while only 11.4% disagrees. Few of
the student felt that they were plagiarized while 32.9% do not agree that they were
I’m Fine, ALONE
plagiarized while 48.1% of student, however, are neutral about this. There are 44.3% feels
that studying in group motivates study while only 22.8% disagrees with this.

From this, we know that student prefer to study alone because the percentage of being
distracted was higher. Despite how beneficial group study may be, they feel that running a
risk of wasting time is a greater loss than the benefit of group study.

Regarding teamwork, however, about 54.4% of student have homework involving a lot of
teamwork. An average percentage of 31.6% find themselves doing all the work while the
other 31.6% do not agree with the statement and 36.8% find that teamwork are not always
unfair. The question regarding if they feel that problem solved are easier obtained a
dominating percentage of 62.0% with only 19% disagreeing with the question. Only 39.3% of
students find that teamwork actually boost their creativity while 22.8% find that teamwork do
not.

Finally, we can conclude that a few more students agrees that working in group are more
beneficial but the majority still sides with working alone because they fear the risk of
hogging all the work alone and large usage of time.

In conclusion, students prefer to work and study alone despite how beneficial group study or
work is due to the greater loss when the risk hits the jackpot.
I’m Fine, ALONE

References
1. Chelsea (15th February 2013) Benefits of Studying Solo, Retrieved from
http://www.rhl.org/blog/blog/classes/the-advantages-to-studying-solo/1819/
2. Delith Nath.T (7th December 2012) Study Alone or With Our Friend: Which Is
Better? (forum) Retrieved from, http://www.indiastudychannel.com/experts/28455Study-alone-or-study-with-our-friend-Which-better.aspx
3. Flavia.Im (27th August 2010) What Are The Advantage and Disadvantage of Studying
Alone? (forum) Retrieved from, http://www.englishexperts.com.br/forum/what-arethe-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-studying-alone-t11418.html
4. Kreiter. M (6th February 2013) Benefits of Studying With Friends, Retrieved from,
http://ticker.baruchconnect.com/article/the-benefits-of-studying-with-friends/
5. Martin.M (23rd September 2013) Studying with Friends Prove Effective, Retrieved
from http://www.cbhscircuit.com/?p=4249
6. Student Learning Center Flinders University (September 2006) Studying Alone (pdf
file), Retrieved from
http://www.flinders.edu.au/slc_files/Documents/Brochures/study_alone.pdf
APPRECIATION
To end this report, I would like to first show my appreciation to my lecturer Ms Chia for
guiding us throughout the assignment. Without the help of our lecturer, we would have been
left astray in the midst of confusion.
The next, I would like to thank my group mates, Liu Wei Cheng for coming up with the
brilliant idea. Kishant Kumar for being a responsible leader and for carrying out the actions
accordingly and systematically. Nicolas Wong and Goh Jeng Jhieh for distributing the form
to the students in Taylor’s Lakeside University. Liew Yong Sheng for designing the survey
form and writing the report and finally Stefan Loke for being supportive when needed.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Understanding the College Lifestyle_ A research proposal by Jeff Harmeyer
Understanding the College Lifestyle_ A research proposal by Jeff HarmeyerUnderstanding the College Lifestyle_ A research proposal by Jeff Harmeyer
Understanding the College Lifestyle_ A research proposal by Jeff Harmeyer
Jeff Harmeyer
 
Effects of School of Life Foundation Intervention on Grade Advancement, Drop...
 Effects of School of Life Foundation Intervention on Grade Advancement, Drop... Effects of School of Life Foundation Intervention on Grade Advancement, Drop...
Effects of School of Life Foundation Intervention on Grade Advancement, Drop...
Research Journal of Education
 
The Presentation
The PresentationThe Presentation
The Presentation
Artie
 
Selecting a mate mak
Selecting a mate   makSelecting a mate   mak
Selecting a mate mak
Danish Mak
 
Collect (Hinkley RD)
Collect (Hinkley RD)Collect (Hinkley RD)
Collect (Hinkley RD)
Jess Aires
 
11.the effectiveness of co curricular activities on academic achievements of ...
11.the effectiveness of co curricular activities on academic achievements of ...11.the effectiveness of co curricular activities on academic achievements of ...
11.the effectiveness of co curricular activities on academic achievements of ...
Alexander Decker
 
Action Research Final
Action Research FinalAction Research Final
Action Research Final
Donald Lance
 
cornerstone journal response
cornerstone journal responsecornerstone journal response
cornerstone journal response
Alexis Kroeger
 
Jeffries thesis presentation
Jeffries thesis presentationJeffries thesis presentation
Jeffries thesis presentation
Breann Jeffries
 

Tendances (18)

Understanding the College Lifestyle_ A research proposal by Jeff Harmeyer
Understanding the College Lifestyle_ A research proposal by Jeff HarmeyerUnderstanding the College Lifestyle_ A research proposal by Jeff Harmeyer
Understanding the College Lifestyle_ A research proposal by Jeff Harmeyer
 
1142 2617-1-sm
1142 2617-1-sm1142 2617-1-sm
1142 2617-1-sm
 
Effects of School of Life Foundation Intervention on Grade Advancement, Drop...
 Effects of School of Life Foundation Intervention on Grade Advancement, Drop... Effects of School of Life Foundation Intervention on Grade Advancement, Drop...
Effects of School of Life Foundation Intervention on Grade Advancement, Drop...
 
Research Paper
Research PaperResearch Paper
Research Paper
 
The Presentation
The PresentationThe Presentation
The Presentation
 
Research Proposal
Research ProposalResearch Proposal
Research Proposal
 
5ramos
5ramos5ramos
5ramos
 
Selecting a mate mak
Selecting a mate   makSelecting a mate   mak
Selecting a mate mak
 
dissertation_pdf.PDF
dissertation_pdf.PDFdissertation_pdf.PDF
dissertation_pdf.PDF
 
Collect (Hinkley RD)
Collect (Hinkley RD)Collect (Hinkley RD)
Collect (Hinkley RD)
 
11.the effectiveness of co curricular activities on academic achievements of ...
11.the effectiveness of co curricular activities on academic achievements of ...11.the effectiveness of co curricular activities on academic achievements of ...
11.the effectiveness of co curricular activities on academic achievements of ...
 
Article . ihtsham
Article . ihtshamArticle . ihtsham
Article . ihtsham
 
Action Research Final
Action Research FinalAction Research Final
Action Research Final
 
cornerstone journal response
cornerstone journal responsecornerstone journal response
cornerstone journal response
 
Project USP
Project USPProject USP
Project USP
 
Impact of curiosity and external regulation on intrinsic motivation
Impact of curiosity and external regulation on intrinsic motivationImpact of curiosity and external regulation on intrinsic motivation
Impact of curiosity and external regulation on intrinsic motivation
 
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair for Donald Ray Brown, Jr., Di...
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair for Donald Ray Brown, Jr., Di...Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair for Donald Ray Brown, Jr., Di...
Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation Chair for Donald Ray Brown, Jr., Di...
 
Jeffries thesis presentation
Jeffries thesis presentationJeffries thesis presentation
Jeffries thesis presentation
 

En vedette (9)

Volume negociados fundos imobiliários dezembro 2013
Volume negociados fundos imobiliários dezembro 2013Volume negociados fundos imobiliários dezembro 2013
Volume negociados fundos imobiliários dezembro 2013
 
Presentación de Resultados BME 4º Trimestre y año 2013
Presentación de Resultados BME 4º Trimestre y año 2013 Presentación de Resultados BME 4º Trimestre y año 2013
Presentación de Resultados BME 4º Trimestre y año 2013
 
Boletim mercado imobiliario janeiro 2014
Boletim mercado imobiliario janeiro 2014Boletim mercado imobiliario janeiro 2014
Boletim mercado imobiliario janeiro 2014
 
Paez
PaezPaez
Paez
 
Oscilador vanee♥
Oscilador vanee♥Oscilador vanee♥
Oscilador vanee♥
 
Slide bab12
Slide bab12Slide bab12
Slide bab12
 
Reglamento
ReglamentoReglamento
Reglamento
 
Aborto
AbortoAborto
Aborto
 
Aditivos quimicos
Aditivos quimicosAditivos quimicos
Aditivos quimicos
 

Similaire à Social psychology research report

Running Head LASA 1 Final Project Early Methods Section .docx
Running Head LASA 1 Final Project Early Methods Section        .docxRunning Head LASA 1 Final Project Early Methods Section        .docx
Running Head LASA 1 Final Project Early Methods Section .docx
charisellington63520
 
Sigma xi presentation revised
Sigma xi presentation revisedSigma xi presentation revised
Sigma xi presentation revised
mnag56
 
Week 8 Homework ExerciseCCMH525 Version 31University of P.docx
Week 8 Homework ExerciseCCMH525 Version 31University of P.docxWeek 8 Homework ExerciseCCMH525 Version 31University of P.docx
Week 8 Homework ExerciseCCMH525 Version 31University of P.docx
helzerpatrina
 
Retention Convention 2010
Retention Convention 2010Retention Convention 2010
Retention Convention 2010
Sarah_Lawther
 
Psy final report
Psy final reportPsy final report
Psy final report
Wm Chia
 
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docxYour nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
danielfoster65629
 
Running head INTEPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 1 .docx
Running head INTEPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 1 .docxRunning head INTEPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 1 .docx
Running head INTEPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 1 .docx
charisellington63520
 
Anatomy research stlcop poster
Anatomy research stlcop posterAnatomy research stlcop poster
Anatomy research stlcop poster
Danielle Gray
 
2011 thesis the influence of time spent by students engaged in co curric...
2011 thesis      the influence of time spent by students engaged in co curric...2011 thesis      the influence of time spent by students engaged in co curric...
2011 thesis the influence of time spent by students engaged in co curric...
SITI FADZILAH OSMAN
 

Similaire à Social psychology research report (20)

Psychology proposal
Psychology proposalPsychology proposal
Psychology proposal
 
Running Head LASA 1 Final Project Early Methods Section .docx
Running Head LASA 1 Final Project Early Methods Section        .docxRunning Head LASA 1 Final Project Early Methods Section        .docx
Running Head LASA 1 Final Project Early Methods Section .docx
 
Sigma xi presentation revised
Sigma xi presentation revisedSigma xi presentation revised
Sigma xi presentation revised
 
Week 8 Homework ExerciseCCMH525 Version 31University of P.docx
Week 8 Homework ExerciseCCMH525 Version 31University of P.docxWeek 8 Homework ExerciseCCMH525 Version 31University of P.docx
Week 8 Homework ExerciseCCMH525 Version 31University of P.docx
 
Retention Convention 2010
Retention Convention 2010Retention Convention 2010
Retention Convention 2010
 
Retention Convention 2010
Retention Convention 2010Retention Convention 2010
Retention Convention 2010
 
Psy final report
Psy final reportPsy final report
Psy final report
 
MGT assignment 1.docx
MGT assignment 1.docxMGT assignment 1.docx
MGT assignment 1.docx
 
Psy final report
Psy final reportPsy final report
Psy final report
 
Survey research
Survey researchSurvey research
Survey research
 
Male retention & engagement
Male retention & engagementMale retention & engagement
Male retention & engagement
 
Survey research ch17-1
Survey research ch17-1Survey research ch17-1
Survey research ch17-1
 
Outside Class Learning: An Exploration
Outside Class Learning: An ExplorationOutside Class Learning: An Exploration
Outside Class Learning: An Exploration
 
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docxYour nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
Your nameInstructors NameEDU671Ashford University Title .docx
 
PR 1 Reasons of Cutt-WPS Office3.pptx
PR 1    Reasons of Cutt-WPS Office3.pptxPR 1    Reasons of Cutt-WPS Office3.pptx
PR 1 Reasons of Cutt-WPS Office3.pptx
 
Running head INTEPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 1 .docx
Running head INTEPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 1 .docxRunning head INTEPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 1 .docx
Running head INTEPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 1 .docx
 
Barriers and strategies for retaining male students research summary
Barriers and strategies for retaining male students research summaryBarriers and strategies for retaining male students research summary
Barriers and strategies for retaining male students research summary
 
Anatomy research stlcop poster
Anatomy research stlcop posterAnatomy research stlcop poster
Anatomy research stlcop poster
 
Week6 finalpaperi rivera71414
Week6 finalpaperi rivera71414Week6 finalpaperi rivera71414
Week6 finalpaperi rivera71414
 
2011 thesis the influence of time spent by students engaged in co curric...
2011 thesis      the influence of time spent by students engaged in co curric...2011 thesis      the influence of time spent by students engaged in co curric...
2011 thesis the influence of time spent by students engaged in co curric...
 

Plus de Arthur Wilson

Pm project-control-compiled
Pm project-control-compiledPm project-control-compiled
Pm project-control-compiled
Arthur Wilson
 
Law relating-to-payment
Law relating-to-paymentLaw relating-to-payment
Law relating-to-payment
Arthur Wilson
 
Vm assignment - presentation slide (1)
Vm   assignment - presentation slide (1)Vm   assignment - presentation slide (1)
Vm assignment - presentation slide (1)
Arthur Wilson
 
Vm compiled-edited (print)
Vm compiled-edited (print)Vm compiled-edited (print)
Vm compiled-edited (print)
Arthur Wilson
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017
De assignment-finalized-28112017De assignment-finalized-28112017
De assignment-finalized-28112017
Arthur Wilson
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 6
De assignment-finalized-28112017 6De assignment-finalized-28112017 6
De assignment-finalized-28112017 6
Arthur Wilson
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 5
De assignment-finalized-28112017 5De assignment-finalized-28112017 5
De assignment-finalized-28112017 5
Arthur Wilson
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 4
De assignment-finalized-28112017 4De assignment-finalized-28112017 4
De assignment-finalized-28112017 4
Arthur Wilson
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 3
De assignment-finalized-28112017 3De assignment-finalized-28112017 3
De assignment-finalized-28112017 3
Arthur Wilson
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 2
De assignment-finalized-28112017 2De assignment-finalized-28112017 2
De assignment-finalized-28112017 2
Arthur Wilson
 
Fm assignment-final-updated v2.0
Fm assignment-final-updated v2.0Fm assignment-final-updated v2.0
Fm assignment-final-updated v2.0
Arthur Wilson
 
De & be final workshop submission
De & be final workshop submissionDe & be final workshop submission
De & be final workshop submission
Arthur Wilson
 

Plus de Arthur Wilson (20)

Pm group-compileddd
Pm group-compiledddPm group-compileddd
Pm group-compileddd
 
Activity id
Activity idActivity id
Activity id
 
Pm project-control-compiled
Pm project-control-compiledPm project-control-compiled
Pm project-control-compiled
 
Final 2
Final  2Final  2
Final 2
 
Law relating-to-payment
Law relating-to-paymentLaw relating-to-payment
Law relating-to-payment
 
Cl report final
Cl report finalCl report final
Cl report final
 
Vm assignment - presentation slide (1)
Vm   assignment - presentation slide (1)Vm   assignment - presentation slide (1)
Vm assignment - presentation slide (1)
 
Vm compiled-edited (print)
Vm compiled-edited (print)Vm compiled-edited (print)
Vm compiled-edited (print)
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017
De assignment-finalized-28112017De assignment-finalized-28112017
De assignment-finalized-28112017
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 6
De assignment-finalized-28112017 6De assignment-finalized-28112017 6
De assignment-finalized-28112017 6
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 5
De assignment-finalized-28112017 5De assignment-finalized-28112017 5
De assignment-finalized-28112017 5
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 4
De assignment-finalized-28112017 4De assignment-finalized-28112017 4
De assignment-finalized-28112017 4
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 3
De assignment-finalized-28112017 3De assignment-finalized-28112017 3
De assignment-finalized-28112017 3
 
De assignment-finalized-28112017 2
De assignment-finalized-28112017 2De assignment-finalized-28112017 2
De assignment-finalized-28112017 2
 
Research proposal draft v3
Research proposal draft v3Research proposal draft v3
Research proposal draft v3
 
Chapter 2 draft v1
Chapter 2 draft v1Chapter 2 draft v1
Chapter 2 draft v1
 
Fm assignment-final-updated v2.0
Fm assignment-final-updated v2.0Fm assignment-final-updated v2.0
Fm assignment-final-updated v2.0
 
De & be final workshop submission
De & be final workshop submissionDe & be final workshop submission
De & be final workshop submission
 
Community service
Community serviceCommunity service
Community service
 
Excavation
ExcavationExcavation
Excavation
 

Social psychology research report

  • 1. Social Psychology Research Report “I’m fine, ALONE” Liew Yong Sheng Nicolas Wong Xiao Ern Goh Jeng Jhieh Liu Wei Cheng Stefan Loke Kishant Kumar Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus School of Architecture, Building and Design Foundation in Natural and Built Environment 04/13 Lecturer: Ms Chia
  • 2. I’m Fine, ALONE Table of Content 1. Abstract 1 2. Introduction 2 3. Method of Research 3 4. Data Collection 5 5. Discussion 8 6. References 10 7. Appendixes 15 8. Appreciation 16
  • 3. I’m Fine, ALONE Abstract Despite scientist proved that studying or teamwork in group have greater efficiency in the learning process, students themselves may prefer to learn alone. In this research report, the research should reveal not only the preference of the students in Taylor’s Lakeside University but also their justification of their preference. The research will use survey forms as a method of questionnaire. 22 questions were designed to understand the reason behind their opinion in preferring to study alone. 79 forms were printed out and volunteers were told to fill up the forms. After the procedure the forms were collected to be analysed. The data shows that student preferred to study alone more while there are more student preferring to work in groups. The discussion analyses the justification of student’s preference to study or work alone. By the end of the research, we found that despite how beneficial study or work in group, students still prefers to study or work alone because risk in wasting time and several others unfavourable factor in efficient studying will occur and suffer a greater loss.
  • 4. I’m Fine, ALONE Introduction Modern education encourages learning through groups of their (the students) own through assignments or examination. Whether or not students are reluctant or passionate enough, they will have to go through group discussion at least once. Studies such as Jacobs School of Engineering in California of San Diego have proven that studying in groups have a higher rate of efficiency. However, despite the fact that studying in group studies or teamwork have a higher rate of efficiency. A new question was created from that research itself. Though group studies or teamwork proves greater efficiency in learning, the students themselves do not necessary know this fact thus it all boils down to the preference of the students themselves. Students have their different opinions after going through years of experience in group studies or teamwork. For this reason, they have different justification and reason for their preferences. Due to the fact that we, Taylor’s Lakeside University students, have experienced a great amount of teamwork in our course (Foundation in Natural Built Environment) believed that the students in Taylor’s University may prefer to study alone rather than studying in groups. With great curiosity, we decided to research on the preference of the studying or working in groups or solo along with the student’s justification to further justifies the reason of their preference.
  • 5. I’m Fine, ALONE Method Hypothesis: People tend to find peer group as a factor of distraction in the academic world and thus prefers to study or work alone. Independent Variable: Gender Dependent Variable: Percentage of preference Extraneous Variable: Non-student volunteers Materials: 79 set of 5-paged forms Volunteers: 79 Taylor’s University Students
  • 6. I’m Fine, ALONE Procedure The research will use Quantitative and Qualitative method. Quantitative method will be used to evaluate the level of distraction by using scales whereas Qualitative method will be used to describe the types of peer group the volunteer have through description. A survey form was used to carry out the experiment. The questionnaire are to be performed in Taylor’s University to decrease chances of extraneous variable which may affect result. The survey form was divided into five sections to break down the analysis. The survey form begins with a demographic to understand the participants themselves such as age and the school of which they are currently studying. The survey continues with descriptive questions to understand the type of peer group the volunteer is working or studying with and their usual working or studying habits. The second section also serves as a demographic for the volunteer’s peer group. The third section begins with a brief of a scale of 1 to 5 (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) and continues with question with scales 1 to 5. The questions are designed to investigate the cause of distraction during a group work or study. The survey form continues to the fourth section. The fourth section were tasked to understand the justification of the volunteer’s preference. The form ends with the fifth section which is to know the preference of the student to prove the hypothesis. The survey form was checked and corrected by our lecturer for any mistake. Survey forms were printed and were passed around the school campus for students to fill up. The survey forms were filled up by the students and were collected for analysis.
  • 7. I’m Fine, ALONE Data Collection We found 79 volunteers to fill up the form. Among the 79 volunteers there are 45 males and 34 females. In percentage, females took up 43% of the entire volunteer while the other 57% are males which, in this research are more dominant. Percentage of Male and Female Male Female
  • 8. I’m Fine, ALONE For the sake of being fair to both gender, the percentage of preference were divided by their own gender multiplied by one hundred percent. Thus the formula of the calculating ther percentage of preferences are as below. X 100% = Percentage of Preference to study alone in Male Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Disagree Strongly Agree Male 2.22% 13.33% 20.00% 31.11% 33.33% Female 0.00% 0.00% 33.33% 42.42% 24.24% Percentage of Preference in Studying Alone Among Male and Female Percentage of Preference in Studying Alone Among Male and Female 45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Male Female Agree Strongly Agree
  • 9. I’m Fine, ALONE Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree Male 6.67% 8.89% 28.89% 35.36% 20.00% Female 0.06% 6.06% 39.39% 36.36% 18.18% The method of calculation is similar to the analysis above. Percentage of Preference in Working Alone Among Male and Female Percentage of Preference in Working Alone Among Male and Female 45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Male Female Agree Strongly Agrees
  • 10. I’m Fine, ALONE DISCUSSION As seen in the above data collection, we can see that male have a total of 15.57% of males prefers to study in group while none of the female prefer to study in groups. A total of 53.33% from both male and female find that studying alone or studying in groups doesn’t really matter to them. Finally, there are more female preferring studying alone than male preferring the option. Though, there is a need to mention that male have higher percentage in intense disagreement. Meanwhile, in the percentage of preference in working alone, we have female preferring to work in groups while the percentage of male preferring in working in group decreases. The total amount of neutral thoughts are higher in both male and female in this case. What’s amazing is that the amount of students, in both sex, preferring to work alone decreases tremendously. With the result calculated, we further study the justification of why students chose what they have preferred. 21.5% of student often study with their peers while 30.4% find themselves studying alone most of the time. There are, however, 48.1% of student find themselves in both condition occasionally. Approximately 31.6% of student themselves are the factor of distraction during a group study while 21.6% respond that they are not responsible. There are 32.9% student find that they were distracted by their friends while only 15.2% disagrees. Interestingly, student tends to follow their friends for a break in the midst of studying or working. This fact was supported by 64.6% of student agreeing this problem with only 13.9% disagreeing that they will be distracted by that factor. Despite how researcher have already proven that studying in group are more efficient. There are only 31.6% who find that they feel smarter after a group study with a 27.9% of student disagreeing the fact that they feel smarter after a group study. However, it is undeniable that
  • 11. through conversation or exchange in knowledge allows student to feel that they know their friends better. 64.6% of student feel the bond strengthen while only 11.4% disagrees. Few of the student felt that they were plagiarized while 32.9% do not agree that they were I’m Fine, ALONE plagiarized while 48.1% of student, however, are neutral about this. There are 44.3% feels that studying in group motivates study while only 22.8% disagrees with this. From this, we know that student prefer to study alone because the percentage of being distracted was higher. Despite how beneficial group study may be, they feel that running a risk of wasting time is a greater loss than the benefit of group study. Regarding teamwork, however, about 54.4% of student have homework involving a lot of teamwork. An average percentage of 31.6% find themselves doing all the work while the other 31.6% do not agree with the statement and 36.8% find that teamwork are not always unfair. The question regarding if they feel that problem solved are easier obtained a dominating percentage of 62.0% with only 19% disagreeing with the question. Only 39.3% of students find that teamwork actually boost their creativity while 22.8% find that teamwork do not. Finally, we can conclude that a few more students agrees that working in group are more beneficial but the majority still sides with working alone because they fear the risk of hogging all the work alone and large usage of time. In conclusion, students prefer to work and study alone despite how beneficial group study or work is due to the greater loss when the risk hits the jackpot.
  • 12. I’m Fine, ALONE References 1. Chelsea (15th February 2013) Benefits of Studying Solo, Retrieved from http://www.rhl.org/blog/blog/classes/the-advantages-to-studying-solo/1819/ 2. Delith Nath.T (7th December 2012) Study Alone or With Our Friend: Which Is Better? (forum) Retrieved from, http://www.indiastudychannel.com/experts/28455Study-alone-or-study-with-our-friend-Which-better.aspx 3. Flavia.Im (27th August 2010) What Are The Advantage and Disadvantage of Studying Alone? (forum) Retrieved from, http://www.englishexperts.com.br/forum/what-arethe-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-studying-alone-t11418.html 4. Kreiter. M (6th February 2013) Benefits of Studying With Friends, Retrieved from, http://ticker.baruchconnect.com/article/the-benefits-of-studying-with-friends/ 5. Martin.M (23rd September 2013) Studying with Friends Prove Effective, Retrieved from http://www.cbhscircuit.com/?p=4249 6. Student Learning Center Flinders University (September 2006) Studying Alone (pdf file), Retrieved from http://www.flinders.edu.au/slc_files/Documents/Brochures/study_alone.pdf
  • 13. APPRECIATION To end this report, I would like to first show my appreciation to my lecturer Ms Chia for guiding us throughout the assignment. Without the help of our lecturer, we would have been left astray in the midst of confusion. The next, I would like to thank my group mates, Liu Wei Cheng for coming up with the brilliant idea. Kishant Kumar for being a responsible leader and for carrying out the actions accordingly and systematically. Nicolas Wong and Goh Jeng Jhieh for distributing the form to the students in Taylor’s Lakeside University. Liew Yong Sheng for designing the survey form and writing the report and finally Stefan Loke for being supportive when needed.