2011 Sep CMMI Process Maturity Report

CMMI® for
SCAMPISM Cl
Class A A
Appraisal R
i l Results
lt
2011 Mid-Year Update

Software Engineering Institute
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213

September 2011

CMMI-SCAMPI v1.2/v1.3 Class A
Appraisal Results © 2011 Carnegie Mellon University
1
September 2011
© 2011 Carnegie Mellon University

Outline

Introduction
Current Status
Community Trends
Organizational Trends
Summary and Terms Used in this Briefing

This briefing is based solely on the appraisals reported to the SEI. It cannot be used as a source for an exact indicator of all
organizations in the world using CMMI models or appraisal methods nor can it be used for certification or verification
purposes.
The SEI does not certify appraisal results or organizations. The SEI licenses SEI Partners, authorizes/certifies lead
appraisers, team leaders and high maturity lead appraisers to conduct appraisals. Neither the SEI nor any other organization
is a “certifying authority” of the results from a SCAMPI appraisal. Therefore requests to the SEI to provide information to be
used for this purpose can not be fulfilled. Information provided by the SEI, such as this briefing, is to demonstrate reported
results of the use of CMMI products and services only.

Appraisal Results
2
September 2011

Introduction - Purpose

Characterize the adoption of CMMI

Describe results from Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process
Improvement (SCAMPISM) v1.2/v1.3 Class A appraisals using Capability
Maturity Model® Integration (CMMI v1.2/ v1.3)*

* Organizations previously appraised against CMMI v1.0 /v1.1 and which have not reappraised against v1.2 or v1.3
are not included in this report.

* SVC,ACQ appraisals are included in this report, P-CMM appraisals are not included in this report,

Appraisal Results
3
September 2011

Introduction - Briefing Contents

This briefing includes three primary sections:

1.
1 Current Status
• Snapshot of the development community based on the most recent
appraisals, since SCAMPI V 1.2 release, of reporting organizations

2. Community Trends
• Global distribution of appraisals
•G
Growth in th number of appraisals performed
th i the b f i l f d
• Shifts in the maturity profile over time

3.
3 Organizational Trends
• Time to move up in maturity based on change in maturity level and time
between appraisals

Appraisal Results
4
September 2011

Process Maturity Profile
by All Reporting Organizations
3600
3400
3200
3000
2800
65.4%
ations

2600
2400
Number of Organiza

2200
2000
1800
1600
1400
r

1200
23.4%
1000
800
600
400
4.0% 5.1%
200 0.5% 1.6%
0
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Optimizing
Managed

Based on most recent appraisal of 4220 organizations
Appraisal Results
5
September 2011

Process Maturity Profile (SVC Only)
by All Reporting Organizations
50

40
nizations
Numb of Organ

30

51.0%
ber

42.9%
20

10

6.1%

0
Not Given Managed Defined

Based on most recent appraisal of 49 organizations
Appraisal Results
6
September 2011

Reporting Organization Categories

Commercial/In-house 80.5%

Contractor for
Military/Government
15.8%

Military/Government Agency 3.7%

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Number of Organizations
g
Based on 4220 organizations reporting an organization category
Appraisal Results
7
September 2011

Process Maturity Profile
by Reporting Organization Categories
100%

90% Commercial/In-house = 3356
C i l/I h
ations Within Category

Contractor for Military/Government = 659
80%
Military/Government Agency = 153

70%
61.7%
60% 58.3%

50%
43.1%
39.9%
% of Organiza

40%

30% 27.6%

20.4%
20%
15.7%

10%
5.8%
3.5% 2.9% 4.6%
1.9% 2.6%
0.4% 0.2% 0.7% 0.3% 1.3%
0%
Managed

Based on most recent appraisal of 4168 organizations reporting an organization category
Appraisal Results
8
September 2011

Organization Size
Based on the total number of employees within the area of the organization that was appraised

1001 to 2000
501 to 1000 1.9%
2000+
4.0%
4 0% 1.6%
1 6%

301 to 500
5.4% 25 or fewer
20.3%

201 to 300 201 to 2000+
5.8%
18.6%

101 to 200 1 to 100
15.1%
15 1% 66.3%
66 3%

26 to 50
0
25.9%
76 to 100
7.6%

51 to 75
12.6%
12 6%
Based on 4197 organizations reporting size data
Appraisal Results
9
September 2011

Organization Size (SVC Only)

1001 to 2000 2000+
2.0% 4.1%

501 to 1000
12.2%
12 2%

201 to 2000+
32.7% 25 or f
fewer
301 to 500 49.0%
6.1%

201 to 300 1 to 100
8.2% 65.3%

101 to 200
2.0%

76 to 100
2.0%
51 to 75
4.1%
26 to 50
10.2%

Appraisal Results
10
September 2011

Maturity Profile by Organization Size

100%

90%
% of Organizations by Size

80%
72.4%

69.8%

68.5%

68.3%

68.1%
70%

61.5%
0.2%
s

57.2%
60

6

54.5%
53.8%

60%

50%
40.7%

39.4%
40%
%
O

30%
23.1%

23.1%
22.5%

22.3%
20.2%

18.0%
17.2%

13.9%
20%

12.8%
11.1%

10.3%
%
9.8%

1
7.4%

6.0%
5.8%
5.4%

5.3%

5.1%
4.7%

10%
4.1%
4.0%

3.5%
3.2%

3.0%
3.0%
2.6%

2.5%

2.2%
2.1%
1.5%

1.5%
1.1%
1.0%

0.9%

0.6%
0.6%

0.6%

0.5%

0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%

1.5%
0%
25 or fewer 26 to 50 51 to 75 76 to 100 101 to 200 201 to 300 301 to 500 501 to 1000 1001 to 2000 2000+
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively Managed Optimizing

Appraisal Results
11
September 2011

USA and Non-USA
Reporting Organization Categories

316
Commercial/In
Commercial/In-
house 3040

Contractor for 468
Military/Government
191

USA: 100% = 864

Non-USA: 100% = 3304
80
Military/Government
Agency 73

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

% of Organizations

Appraisal Results
12
September 2011

Maturity Profile by All Reporting
Organizations in the USA
100%

90%

80%
% of Organizations

70%

60%
453
50%

40% 317

30%

20%

10% 56
41
1
2
0%
g
Managed

Based on 870 organizations in the USA
Appraisal Results
13
September 2011

Maturity Profile by All Reporting
Organizations based outside the USA
100%

90%

80%
ations

2305
70%
% of Organiza

60%

50%

40%

30%

672
20%

10% 176
111
67
19
0%
Managed
Based on 3350 organizations outside the USA

Appraisal Results
14
September 2011

Section 2—Community Trends

Appraisals are conducted through June 2011 and reported to the SEI by
July 2011

• 73 countries reporting appraisals
– Most of the appraisals are from Asia and North America.

• 4612 Appraisals posted on PARS
– Expired appraisals are removed from PARS and replaced with the newest
reappraisal result.

Appraisal Results
15
September 2011

Countries Where Appraisals Have Been
Performed and Reported to the SEI

Argentina Australia Austria Bahrain Bangladesh Belgium Brazil Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Czech Republic Denmark
Egypt Finland France Germany Greece Guatemala Hong Kong Hungary
India Indonesia Ireland Israel Italy Japan Jordan Korea,
Korea Republic Of
Latvia Lebanon Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Malaysia Mauritius Mexico
Morocco Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Norway Pakistan Panama Paraguay
Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russia Saudi Arabia
Singapore Slovakia South AfricaSpain Sri Lanka Sweden Switzerland Taiwan
Thailand Tunisia Turkey Ukraine United Arab E United Kingdom United States Uruguay
Viet Nam
Red country name: New additions with this reporting since March 2011
Appraisal Results
16
September 2011

Number of Appraisals Reported to the SEI
by Continent
4000

3500
ppraisals

3000
2660

2500
500
umber of Ap

2000

1500
Nu

1244

1000

580
500
295

54 13
0
Africa Asia Australia Europe North America South America

Based on 4846 appraisals
North America includes Canada the USA and Mexico; South America includes Central America and the
Canada, USA,
Caribbean ; Australia includes New Zealand
Appraisal Results
17
September 2011

Number of Appraisals and Maturity Levels
Reported to the SEI by Country
Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity Maturity
Number of Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Number of Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Country Appraisals Reported Reported Reported Reported Reported Country Appraisals Reported Reported Reported Reported Reported
Argentina 66 37 23 2 Malaysia 45 8 35 2
Australia 11 3 3 Mauritius 10 or fewer
Austria 10 or fewer Mexico 95 43 45 1 5
Bahrain 10 or fewer Morocco 10 or fewer
Bangladesh 10 or fewer Nepal 10 or fewer
Belgium 10 or fewer Netherlands 11 1 3 6
Brazil 125 1 67 48 7 New Zealand 10 or fewer
Brunei Darussalam 10 or fewer Norway 10 or fewer
Bulgaria 10 or fewer Pakistan 24 1 21 1 1
Canada 30 1 9 12 3 Panama 10 or fewer
Chile 33 1 21 10 1 g y
Paraguay 10 or fewer
China 1557 63 1409 43 35 Peru 18 10 7
Colombia 40 1 15 8 3 5 Philippines 11 1 4 1 4
Costa Rica 10 or fewer Poland 10 or fewer
Czech Republic 10 or fewer Portugal 16 6 9 1
Denmark 10 or fewer Qatar 10 or fewer
Egypt 40 1 24 11 1 Romania 10 or fewer
Finland 10 or fewer Russia 10 or fewer
France 111 66 34 1 Saudi Arabia 11 2 6 1 1
Germany 55 6 19 16 Singapore 14 4 8 1
Greece 10 or fewer Slovakia 10 or fewer
Guatemala 10 or fewer South Africa 10 or fewer
Hong Kong 10 or fewer Spain 186 1 106 62 2 4
Hungary 10 or fewer Sri Lanka 15 2 13
India 462 12 330 3 108 Sweden 10 or fewer
Indonesia 10 or fewer Switzerland 10 or fewer
Ireland 10 or fewer Taiwan 98 1 42 50 4
Israel 13 7 4 Thailand 38 12 25 1
Italy 45 18 23 Tunisia 10 or fewer
Japan 165 7 39 85 6 7 Turkey 22 19 3
Jordan 10 or fewer Ukraine 10 or fewer
Korea, Republic Of 128 49 59 10 4 United Arab Emirates 10 or fewer
Latvia 10 or fewer United Kingdom 74 1 21 26 5
Lebanon 10 or fewer United States 1119 5 417 550 3 60
Lithuania 10 or fewer Uruguay
g y 10 or fewer
Luxembourg 10 or fewer Viet Nam 17 14 1 2
Macedonia 10 or fewer

Appraisal Results
18
September 2011

Number of SCAMPI A Appraisals Reported to
SEI by Year
1600

TOTAL
1375
1400 1349
POSTED ON PARs
1310 1299
raisals

1200

1004
mber of Appr

1000

941

800
Num

600 556 551

542
509
400

200

11
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Based on 4846 appraisals
Appraisal Results
19
September 2011

Trends in the Community Maturity Profile
100%

90%

2006 11
80%
2007 564
2008
zations

1516

65.4%
64.6%
70%

63.6%

62.9%
2009 2770

8.2%
2010 3,846
% of Organiz

58
60%
2011 4,220

47.9%
50%

40%
31.4%
28.2%

27.3%
25.1%

23.4%
30%
23.8%

20%

9.4%
9.1%
9.0%
6.1%

5.1%
5.7%
10%

5.2%
5.1%
4.9%

4.0%
4.4%

1.6%
1.6%
0.5%

1.3%
1.2%

1.1%
1.0%
0.8%
0.5%
0.4%

0%
Not Given Initial Managed Defined Quantitatively ManagedOptimizing

Based on a cumulative view of the most recent appraisals of organizations up through the year indicated
Appraisal Results
20
September 2011

Time to Move Up

40

Number of months
to move to 75th Percentile
next maturity 30
level 25.5
Median

21
19
20
25th Percentile

10
5

Time Period of Initial
Appraisal 2006 to Present

Level 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 3 to 5

Orgs 7 146 31 40

Appraisal Results
21
September 2011

Summary -1

Since 2006, 4846 SCAMPI v1.2/1.3 appraisals have been reported to
the SEI.
Appraisals report from China, Spain, Brazil, Argentina, and India are
increasing at a rapid rate.

More than 66% of appraised organizational units have 100 or fewer
employees. The percentage is increasing steadily.

The majority of reported appraisals are maturity level 2 and 3
organizations.
The number of appraisals in the USA and China represent more than
55% of th t t l number of appraisals.
f the total b f i l
China is now reporting more appraisals than USA

Appraisal Results
22
September 2011

Summary -2

For organizations that began their CMMI-based SCAMPI effort with V1.2
or later, the median time to move from
• maturity level 2 to 3 is 19 months

• maturity level 3 to 4 is 21 months

• maturity level 3 to 5 is 25.5 months

Appraisal Results
23
September 2011

Terms Used in this Report

Company - Parent of the appraised entity
A company can be a commercial or non-commercial firm, for-profit or not
for-profit business a research and development unit a higher education
business, unit,
unit, a government agency, or branch of service, etc.

Organization - a.k.a. Appraised entity
The organization unit to which the appraisal results apply. An appraised
entity can be the entire company, a selected business unit, units
supporting a particular product line or service, etc.

Non-USA - Appraised entity whose geographic location is not within the United States.
The parent of the appraised entity may or may not be based within the
United States.

PARS - Published Appraisal Results webpage contains CMMI® appraisals
published at the request of the appraisal sponsor.
The link is: http://sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/

Appraisal Results
24
September 2011

Contact Information

SEI Customer Relations (412) 268-5800
268 5800
SEI FAX number (412) 268-5758

Internet Address customer-relations@sei.cmu.edu
@

Mailing Address Customer Relations
Software Engineering Institute
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890

Appraisal Results
25
September 2011

NO WARRANTY
THIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE
MATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN “AS-IS" BASIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY
AS IS BASIS.
MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO
ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR
PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM
USE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANY
WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT,
TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.
Use of any trademarks in this presentation is not intended in any way to infringe on the
rights of the trademark holder
holder.
This Presentation may be reproduced in its entirety, without modification, and freely
distributed in written or electronic form without requesting formal permission. Permission
is required for any other use. Requests for permission should be directed to the Software
Engineering Institute at permission@sei.cmu.edu.
This work was created in the performance of Federal Government Contract Number
FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software
Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center. The
Government of the United States has a royalty-free government-purpose license to use,
duplicate, or disclose the work, in whole or in part and in any manner, and to have or
permit others to do so, for government purposes pursuant to the copyright license under
the clause at 252.227-7013.

Appraisal Results
26
September 2011

2011 Sep CMMI Process Maturity Report

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

En vedette

En vedette (18)

2011 Sep CMMI Process Maturity Report