2. What is Leadership?
LEADERSHIP in this study is defined as an individual’s ability to
make appropriate decisions and engage in socially responsible
activities for the accomplishment of a specific goal.
In this sense, the concern is largely on the leadership capacity
of an individual, rather than a focus on leadership in a group
setting.
Why is leadership important?
Character Development
Responsibility
Autonomy
3. What is the problem?
Currently, there is minimal research relative to the relationship
between professional development (leadership) programming
offed by an institution and the impact of such programs on a
student’s academic success.
The purpose of this study is to contribute to current research by
examining the extent to which professional development
programs impact college student success in the classroom
and ultimately their experience at and commitment to their
institution.
4. Why is it important to study this topic?
The significance of this research is that it will identify best
practices for institutions to utilize when designing
professional development programs for student
employees and enable institutions to ensure that such
programs contribute to a student’s work and academic
success
5. Why is it important to study this topic?
University of Minnesota: Student Employment Leadership Program (SLEP)
Employee workshops
Required attendance, resume review, and LinkedIn profile
Certificate of Accomplishment, attendance at “SELPies” Recognition Event
University of Texas at Austin: Student Employment Excellence Development (SEED)
Employee workshops
Offered by Human Resources
Student Employee Excellence certification, congratulatory letter
National Student Employee Appreciation Week Recognition
Merrimack College: Leadership Institutes
Not specifically for student employees
Six week leadership institute
Certificate of Recognition given at Leadership Banquet
6. Relevant Literature: Source Types
Scholarly Articles
The Review of Higher Education
Journal of College Student
Development
Journal of Diversity in Higher
Education
New Directions for Student
Services
Journal of Education and Work
Journal of Student Financial Aid
The Journal of Leadership
Studies
Credible Websites
Association of College Unions
International (ACUI)
Leadership Programing
Merrimack College
Salem State University
University of Texas at Austin
University of Missouri
7. Relevant Literature:
Two Emerging Topics:
Focus on impact of educational leadership development programs
(Shen et al., 1999; Campbell, Smith, Dugan, & Komives, 2012)
Effect on-campus employment has on a student’s leadership ability
(Huie, Winsler, & Kitsantas, 2012; Salisbury et al., 2012).
Multiple studies have confirmed the positive impact of leadership
development sessions, though the results tend to vary by age, gender
and academic year (Huie, et al., 2013; Shen et al, 1999; Martinez et al,
2012).
There exists a gap in the literature regarding how participation in
leadership programing sponsored by a student’s employer directly
relates to a student’s success in the classroom.
8. Implications for Practice:
Session format
Presenter (Mentor Relationships)
Students, Staff, Faculty
Specific and measurable learning outcomes
Leadership and social independence
There is a greater need for development in students who are
employed while in college due to the multiple social, academic,
and employment responsibilities in which they must manage their
time.
9. Proposed Study and Methodology
Mixed methods – Quantitative and Qualitative
Quantitative – Assessing WHAT educational/work habits currently exist
Pre/Post Survey
Individual Session Survey
Qualitative – Assessing WHY certain educational/work habits exist
Diverse Focus Group
10. Final Thoughts:
Why should institutions do?
Have an understanding of the demographics and
unique characteristics of their student body
Recognize that students are diverse learners and thus
utilize diverse programming
Create leadership programming with specific and
measurable outcomes relative to academic and work
success
Martinez, Bilges, Shabazz, Miller & Morote (2012)
Kulm and Cramer (2006)
Perna (2010)
Institutions put a lot of time and effort into their programs
University of Minnesota
“geared towards the professional development of student employees and provides opportunities to intentionally promote student’s growth in respect the University’s Student Development Outcomes (“SLEP,” n.d.).
Outcomes include Independence and Interdependence, Goal Orientation, Self-Awareness, Resilience, Appreciation of Differences, and Tolerance of Ambiguity (“Student Development Outcomes,” n.d.).
Students are to attend four SELP workshops, submit their resume to the career center, and create an online professional profile using LinkedIn.
Following the completion of these requirements, student employees will receive a certificate of accomplishment and both they and their supervisor will be invited to attend a recognition event known as the “SELPies” (“SELP,” n.d.).
UT Austin - SEED
“provide [students] with opportunities to enhance [their] skill set, knowledge base, and leadership potential so [they] can excel in the student workforce and in [their] future career.” (“Student Employee Excellence Development (SEED)”, n.d.).
Students involved in this program attend on-hour workshops on numerous topics related to employment and a work/life balance.
Session topics include “Transferable Skills,” “Moving Through Conflict,” “Ethical Leadership/Ethical Decision Making,” among numerous others. (“Student Employee Excellence Development (SEED)”, n.d.).
Student Employee Excellence Certification, a congratulatory letter from the Associate Vice-President of Human Resources, and recognition during National Student Employee Appreciation Week. (“Student Employee Excellence Development (SEED)”, n.d.).
Merrimack College
Not specifically for Student Employees
Six week leadership institute designed to “assist students with becoming effective leaders in organizations on campus and in the classroom” (“Student Leadership Development,” n.d.)
In spring 2014 their program topics included Communication/Collaboration, Time Management, Ethics/Social Justice, Conflict Resolution, and Public Speaking/Image/Social Media.
Upon completion of the program students were able to receive a certificate of recognition and invited to the end of year leadership banquet (“Leadership Institute Spring Brochure 2014,” 2014)
Sessions are diverse and varied, there is no universal standard or guarantee of impact/success
Who would benefit?
The institution
Program coordinators
The student themselves
Some researchers argue that the type of work a student performs (whether it be for school or off-campus) may have a larger effect on a student’s academics than the amount of hours worked (though hours do hold significance), dependent upon the requirements of the position (Salisbury et al. 2012).
Other researchers suggest that both working and non-working students have an equal level of leadership ability (and thus academic competence) since both are exposed to leadership opportunities, albeit in different ways.
While some students gain leadership skills through their extracurricular activities, others learn through specific opportunities provided by their workplace (such as being the head of a department or a store manager at an off-campus location, or participating in staff trainings provided by on-campus employers) (Huie et al, 2013; Shen et al, 1999, Martinez et al, 2012).