SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  12
Worked by:Besa Azemi 
Lecturer:Prof.Bojan Georgievski
• AT&T Corp., originally the American Telephone and 
Telegraph Company, is the subsidiary of AT&T that 
provides voice, video, data, and Internet 
telecommunications and professional services 
to businesses, consumers, and government 
agencies. During its long history, AT&T was at 
times the world's largest telephone company, the 
world's largest cable television operator, and a 
regulated monopoly.
•History of AT & T 
The AT&T Corp., formerly known as the American Telephone and Telegraph 
Corporation, is as old as the telephone itself. 
AT&T can indirectly trace its origin back to the original Bell Telephone Company 
founded by Alexander Graham Bell after his invention of the telephone. One of that 
company's subsidiaries was American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), 
established in 1885, which acquired the Bell Company on December 31, 1899 for legal 
reasons, leaving AT&T as the main company. AT&T established a network of 
subsidiaries in the United States that held a government-authorized phone 
service monopoly, formalized with the Kingsbury Commitment, throughout most of the 
twentieth century. This monopoly was known as the Bell System, and during this 
period, AT&T was also known by the nickname Ma Bell. For periods of time, the former 
AT&T was the world's largest phone company.
•Monopoly 
• Alexander Graham Bell patented the telephone in 1876, and formed Bell 
Telephone which licensed local telephone exchanges in major US 
cities. AT&T was formed in 1885 to connect the local Bell companies. Their logo 
read "The Bell System: AT&T and Associated Companies."The network grew 
rapidly with the slogan "one system, one policy, universal service." In 1913 
AT&T agreed to become a regulated monopoly. Their monopoly would be 
allowed, but they had to connect competing local companies and let the Federal 
Communication Commission (FCC) approve their prices and policies. 
• As a result of a combination of regulatory actions by government and actions by 
AT&T, the firm eventually gained what most regard as monopoly status. 
• Further they lobbied to block other companies from expanding or adding their 
own personal structure. All competitors had to pay AT&T a usage fee to 
connect long distance calls. By subverting the traditional landlines, satellites 
allowed competition to convert calls more efficient and avoid the long line 
connections.
•Erosion of "a natural monopoly” 
• For many years, AT&T had been permitted to retain its monopoly status 
under the assumption that it was a natural monopoly. The first erosion 
to this monopoly occurred in 1956 where the Hush-A-Phone v. United 
States ruling allowed a third-party device to be attached to rented 
telephones owned by AT&T. This was followed by the 
1968Carterfone decision that allowed third-party equipment to be 
connected to the AT&T telephone network. The rise of cheap 
microwave communications equipment in the 1960s and 1970s opened a 
window of opportunity for competitors — no longer was the acquisition 
of expensive rights-of-way necessary for the construction of a long-distance 
telephone network. In light of this, the FCC 
permitted MCI (Microwave Communications, Inc) to sell communication 
services to large businesses. This technical-economic argument against 
the necessity of AT&T's monopoly position would hold for a mere fifteen 
years until the beginning of the fiber-optics revolution sounded the end 
of microwave-based long distance.
•The Breakup of the Belly System 
• The breakup of the Bell System was mandated on January 8, 1982, by an 
agreed consent decree providing that AT&T Corporation would, as had been 
initially proposed by AT&T, relinquish control of the Bell Operating 
Companies that had provided local telephone service in the United States up 
until that point. This effectively took the monopoly that was the Bell System, 
and split it into entirely separate companies which would continue to 
provide telephone service. AT&T would continue to be a provider of long 
distance service, while the now independent Regional Bell Operating 
Companies (RBOCs) would provide local service, and would no longer be directly 
supplied with equipment from AT&T subsidiary Western Electric. 
• From 1984 until 1996 AT&T was an integrated telecommunications 
services and equipment company, succeeding in a newly competitive 
environment.
•Post break-up restructuring 
• On January 1, 1984, a court forced AT&T to give up its 22 local Bell companies, 
establishing sevenRegional Bell Operating Companies (RBOC). A few local 
companies that were not wholly-owned subsidiaries of AT&T remained 
independent, but the RBOCs were very powerful and covered the US.Since that 
time, mergers have reduced the number of RBOCs to four: Verizon (originally 
Bell Atlantic and Nynex), Qwest (Qwest Communications International took over 
US West), BellSouth and SBC (originally Southwestern Bell and Pacific Telesys). 
The AT&T logo has evolved to reflect changing market conditions. 
• AT&T also spun off their equipment manufacturing and research operations. 
They became a long distance carrier with a new logo.AT&T had competition 
in long distance from companies like MCI and Sprint, but the RBOCs could 
only offer local service. 
• The Telecommunications Act of 1996 required RBOCs to allow competitors 
access to their local lines at regulated wholesale rates. In return, RBOCs 
could offer long distance service if they demonstrated there was local 
competition in their market.
•The new AT &T 
• On September 20, 1995, AT&T announced that it was restructuring into three 
separate publicly traded companies: a systems and equipment company (which 
became Lucent Technologies,) a computer company (NCR) and a 
communications services company (which would remain AT&T.) It was the 
largest voluntary break-up in the history of American business. Lucent became 
independent on September 30, 1996. NCR followed on January 1, 1997. 
Employees generally followed their work. While the Bell Laboratories name went 
to Lucent Technologies, those researchers who supported the communications 
services business stayed with AT&T as the staff of the new AT&T Labs. 
• The new AT&T began evolving from a long distance company to an integrated 
voice and data communications company, as an ever increasing percentage of 
the traffic on its network was data, and to a lesser extent video, rather than 
voice. AT&T worked to reenter the local telephone service business, as 
envisioned by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. AT&T realized that as a 
result of this new law, the stand-alone long distance business was likely to 
decline. The company successfully launched an Internet service, AT&T 
WorldNet® Service , while selling operations, such as AT&T Submarine Systems 
and Skynet Satellite Services, that no longer were a strategic fit.
• Over the next four years, AT&T took many actions to succeed in the changing 
environment. The company invested over $35 billion in acquisitions and 
upgrades to its infrastructure both to manage ever-increasing volumes of 
internet protocol and other data traffic, and to establish direct local connections 
to business customers. AT&T acquired a leading provider of local telephone 
service to business customers (TCG.) It acquired a leading provider of global 
data networking services (IBM Global Network.) It merged with two large cable 
companies, (TCI and MediaOne.) Operating as AT&T Broadband, the unit 
became the largest cable company in the United States. 
• By mid-2000, AT&T had three rapidly evolving networks- data, broadband, and 
wireless, and four separate businesses-cable, wireless, business, and consumer. 
And in 2000, the volume of data traffic for the first time exceeded the volume of 
voice traffic on the AT&T network. 
• In October 2000, AT&T announced that it would restructure over the next two 
years into a family of separate publicly held companies: AT&T Wireless, AT&T 
Broadband, and AT&T. In this way, each business could best obtain the capital 
structure needed to fund its growth. AT&T Wireless became an independent 
company on July 9, 2001. On December 9, 2001, AT&T and the cable-operator 
Comcast reached a definitive agreement to merge AT&T Broadband with 
Comcast. The businesses completed their merger on November 18, 2002, and 
began combined operations as the Comcast Corporation.
• With the completion of the restructuring, David W. Dorman succeeded C. 
Michael Armstrong as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T in 
November 2002. 
• As Dorman assumed leadership of AT&T, the global telecommunications 
industry entered an era of unprecedented chaos and instability – marked by 
oversupply, fraud, a complicated regulatory environment and nonstop pricing 
pressures. Combined, these forces led to an industry meltdown in which 
numerous bankruptcies, defaults and business failures occurred; investors lost 
billions and countless workers in the communications sector lost their jobs. 
To address the dynamic environment, Dorman led an aggressive strategic 
transformation to fundamentally reshape AT&T – to evolve from a consumer-oriented 
voice company to an enterprise-focused networking company. The redesigned AT&T 
became a global IP networking provider dedicated to delivering powerful networks, 
applications and capabilities to business and government customers. Concurrently, 
AT&T introduced a breakthrough alternative to traditional services – VoIP, or Voice 
over Internet Protocol – for consumers and small businesses.
• In January 2005, the most profound aspect of AT&T's ongoing transformation 
was announced: the pending $16 billion merger with SBC Communications to 
create the industry’s premier communications and networking company. 
Through this deal, the people of AT&T have the opportunity to build the defining 
entity in global communications for the 21st century – a company capable of 
delivering advanced networking technologies and a full suite of integrated 
communications services throughout America and around the world.
At &t

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Airtel ppt report_on_strategy
Airtel ppt report_on_strategyAirtel ppt report_on_strategy
Airtel ppt report_on_strategy
kur1110
 
Comparative study of telecom sector
Comparative study of telecom sectorComparative study of telecom sector
Comparative study of telecom sector
Nirankar Royal
 
Tata Teleservices Industry Analysis
Tata Teleservices Industry AnalysisTata Teleservices Industry Analysis
Tata Teleservices Industry Analysis
I.F.I.M. B-School
 
Telecom industry analysis
Telecom industry analysisTelecom industry analysis
Telecom industry analysis
Heemanish Midde
 
Measurement of performance of bharti airtel by using different ratios
Measurement of performance of bharti airtel by using different ratiosMeasurement of performance of bharti airtel by using different ratios
Measurement of performance of bharti airtel by using different ratios
Partha Pratim Mahanta
 
ATT Strategy Analysis
ATT Strategy AnalysisATT Strategy Analysis
ATT Strategy Analysis
Kyle Hughes
 

Tendances (20)

Airtel ppt report_on_strategy
Airtel ppt report_on_strategyAirtel ppt report_on_strategy
Airtel ppt report_on_strategy
 
Industry Analysis
Industry AnalysisIndustry Analysis
Industry Analysis
 
Vodafone-organization chart(bihar)
Vodafone-organization chart(bihar)Vodafone-organization chart(bihar)
Vodafone-organization chart(bihar)
 
Comparative study of telecom sector
Comparative study of telecom sectorComparative study of telecom sector
Comparative study of telecom sector
 
Strategic Management Analysis - Airtel
Strategic Management Analysis - AirtelStrategic Management Analysis - Airtel
Strategic Management Analysis - Airtel
 
Financial report on airtel
Financial report on airtelFinancial report on airtel
Financial report on airtel
 
Disseratation report impact of reliance jio on telecom industry
Disseratation report impact of reliance jio on telecom industryDisseratation report impact of reliance jio on telecom industry
Disseratation report impact of reliance jio on telecom industry
 
Industry analysis conducted at vodafone
Industry analysis conducted at vodafoneIndustry analysis conducted at vodafone
Industry analysis conducted at vodafone
 
PROJECT ON AIRTEL
PROJECT ON AIRTELPROJECT ON AIRTEL
PROJECT ON AIRTEL
 
India's Mobile Phone Market
India's Mobile Phone MarketIndia's Mobile Phone Market
India's Mobile Phone Market
 
Tata Teleservices Industry Analysis
Tata Teleservices Industry AnalysisTata Teleservices Industry Analysis
Tata Teleservices Industry Analysis
 
Telecom industry analysis
Telecom industry analysisTelecom industry analysis
Telecom industry analysis
 
strategic analysis of bharti airtel
strategic analysis of bharti airtelstrategic analysis of bharti airtel
strategic analysis of bharti airtel
 
Marketing Strategies of Airtel - Project Report
Marketing Strategies of Airtel - Project ReportMarketing Strategies of Airtel - Project Report
Marketing Strategies of Airtel - Project Report
 
V-Guard Big Idea Business Plan
V-Guard Big Idea Business Plan V-Guard Big Idea Business Plan
V-Guard Big Idea Business Plan
 
Measurement of performance of bharti airtel by using different ratios
Measurement of performance of bharti airtel by using different ratiosMeasurement of performance of bharti airtel by using different ratios
Measurement of performance of bharti airtel by using different ratios
 
vodafone, aritel, jio
vodafone, aritel, jiovodafone, aritel, jio
vodafone, aritel, jio
 
ATT Strategy Analysis
ATT Strategy AnalysisATT Strategy Analysis
ATT Strategy Analysis
 
Indian Telecommunication Industry ppt
Indian Telecommunication Industry pptIndian Telecommunication Industry ppt
Indian Telecommunication Industry ppt
 
Airtel
AirtelAirtel
Airtel
 

En vedette

Procurement negotiations PJM400 Mod4
Procurement negotiations PJM400 Mod4Procurement negotiations PJM400 Mod4
Procurement negotiations PJM400 Mod4
KHogan62
 
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case AnalysisAT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
Motaz Agamawi
 
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case AnalysisAT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
Motaz Agamawi
 
Cost Reduction Strategies:Focus and Techniques
Cost Reduction Strategies:Focus and TechniquesCost Reduction Strategies:Focus and Techniques
Cost Reduction Strategies:Focus and Techniques
Thomas Tanel
 

En vedette (12)

Motorola Reinvents its Supplier Negotiation Process Using Emptoris and Saves ...
Motorola Reinvents its Supplier Negotiation Process Using Emptoris and Saves ...Motorola Reinvents its Supplier Negotiation Process Using Emptoris and Saves ...
Motorola Reinvents its Supplier Negotiation Process Using Emptoris and Saves ...
 
Procurement negotiations PJM400 Mod4
Procurement negotiations PJM400 Mod4Procurement negotiations PJM400 Mod4
Procurement negotiations PJM400 Mod4
 
Negotiation Preparation Checklist for Procurement Professionals
Negotiation Preparation Checklist for Procurement ProfessionalsNegotiation Preparation Checklist for Procurement Professionals
Negotiation Preparation Checklist for Procurement Professionals
 
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case AnalysisAT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
 
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case AnalysisAT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
 
Negotiation tools & methodology
Negotiation tools & methodologyNegotiation tools & methodology
Negotiation tools & methodology
 
Negotiation
NegotiationNegotiation
Negotiation
 
Strategic Sourcing
Strategic Sourcing Strategic Sourcing
Strategic Sourcing
 
Negotiation Skills
Negotiation SkillsNegotiation Skills
Negotiation Skills
 
Cost Reduction Strategies:Focus and Techniques
Cost Reduction Strategies:Focus and TechniquesCost Reduction Strategies:Focus and Techniques
Cost Reduction Strategies:Focus and Techniques
 
Negotiation Styles In Purchasing
Negotiation Styles In PurchasingNegotiation Styles In Purchasing
Negotiation Styles In Purchasing
 
NEGOTIATION POWERPOINT
NEGOTIATION POWERPOINTNEGOTIATION POWERPOINT
NEGOTIATION POWERPOINT
 

Similaire à At &t

Ba401 Case II-4 The U.S.Telecommunications
Ba401 Case II-4 The U.S.TelecommunicationsBa401 Case II-4 The U.S.Telecommunications
Ba401 Case II-4 The U.S.Telecommunications
aristoTuEY
 
British Telecom Searching for a WinningStrategyCase.docx
British Telecom Searching for a WinningStrategyCase.docxBritish Telecom Searching for a WinningStrategyCase.docx
British Telecom Searching for a WinningStrategyCase.docx
jasoninnes20
 
UTCTelecomSpeach2000
UTCTelecomSpeach2000UTCTelecomSpeach2000
UTCTelecomSpeach2000
Fred A Joyce
 
ManagerialEconomicsandBusinessStrategy,8e Page1Cas.docx
ManagerialEconomicsandBusinessStrategy,8e Page1Cas.docxManagerialEconomicsandBusinessStrategy,8e Page1Cas.docx
ManagerialEconomicsandBusinessStrategy,8e Page1Cas.docx
croysierkathey
 
Strategic Management CaseT-Mobile US032.docx
Strategic Management CaseT-Mobile US032.docxStrategic Management CaseT-Mobile US032.docx
Strategic Management CaseT-Mobile US032.docx
florriezhamphrey3065
 
Ba401 Case2 4 Bt2 C
Ba401 Case2 4 Bt2 CBa401 Case2 4 Bt2 C
Ba401 Case2 4 Bt2 C
chatarin
 
Fibernetics Financialpost Growingundertheradar
Fibernetics Financialpost GrowingundertheradarFibernetics Financialpost Growingundertheradar
Fibernetics Financialpost Growingundertheradar
nicklacey
 
Market Structure
Market StructureMarket Structure
Market Structure
Rey Belen
 
A smart idea for electricity companies
A smart idea for electricity companiesA smart idea for electricity companies
A smart idea for electricity companies
Dave Crawley
 
ATT Inc. Strategy Analysis
ATT Inc. Strategy AnalysisATT Inc. Strategy Analysis
ATT Inc. Strategy Analysis
Kyle Hughes
 

Similaire à At &t (20)

Ba401 Case II-4 The U.S.Telecommunications
Ba401 Case II-4 The U.S.TelecommunicationsBa401 Case II-4 The U.S.Telecommunications
Ba401 Case II-4 The U.S.Telecommunications
 
The-rise-of-Fiber-optic-Broadband
The-rise-of-Fiber-optic-BroadbandThe-rise-of-Fiber-optic-Broadband
The-rise-of-Fiber-optic-Broadband
 
British Telecom Searching for a WinningStrategyCase.docx
British Telecom Searching for a WinningStrategyCase.docxBritish Telecom Searching for a WinningStrategyCase.docx
British Telecom Searching for a WinningStrategyCase.docx
 
UTCTelecomSpeach2000
UTCTelecomSpeach2000UTCTelecomSpeach2000
UTCTelecomSpeach2000
 
Chaitali Deb - Project - 2013
Chaitali Deb - Project - 2013Chaitali Deb - Project - 2013
Chaitali Deb - Project - 2013
 
TELEZOO-Darden C Case
TELEZOO-Darden C CaseTELEZOO-Darden C Case
TELEZOO-Darden C Case
 
Gmg2010seminar2
Gmg2010seminar2Gmg2010seminar2
Gmg2010seminar2
 
ManagerialEconomicsandBusinessStrategy,8e Page1Cas.docx
ManagerialEconomicsandBusinessStrategy,8e Page1Cas.docxManagerialEconomicsandBusinessStrategy,8e Page1Cas.docx
ManagerialEconomicsandBusinessStrategy,8e Page1Cas.docx
 
Early
EarlyEarly
Early
 
Strategic Management CaseT-Mobile US032.docx
Strategic Management CaseT-Mobile US032.docxStrategic Management CaseT-Mobile US032.docx
Strategic Management CaseT-Mobile US032.docx
 
At&T
At&TAt&T
At&T
 
At&T
At&TAt&T
At&T
 
The Omaha Platform
The Omaha PlatformThe Omaha Platform
The Omaha Platform
 
Ba401 Case2 4 Bt2 C
Ba401 Case2 4 Bt2 CBa401 Case2 4 Bt2 C
Ba401 Case2 4 Bt2 C
 
Fibernetics Financialpost Growingundertheradar
Fibernetics Financialpost GrowingundertheradarFibernetics Financialpost Growingundertheradar
Fibernetics Financialpost Growingundertheradar
 
Trends in communication
Trends in communicationTrends in communication
Trends in communication
 
Fiber Optic Internet Providers | Internet providers
Fiber Optic Internet Providers | Internet providersFiber Optic Internet Providers | Internet providers
Fiber Optic Internet Providers | Internet providers
 
Market Structure
Market StructureMarket Structure
Market Structure
 
A smart idea for electricity companies
A smart idea for electricity companiesA smart idea for electricity companies
A smart idea for electricity companies
 
ATT Inc. Strategy Analysis
ATT Inc. Strategy AnalysisATT Inc. Strategy Analysis
ATT Inc. Strategy Analysis
 

Dernier

Obat Penggugur Kandungan Di Apotik Kimia Farma (087776558899)
Obat Penggugur Kandungan Di Apotik Kimia Farma (087776558899)Obat Penggugur Kandungan Di Apotik Kimia Farma (087776558899)
Obat Penggugur Kandungan Di Apotik Kimia Farma (087776558899)
Cara Menggugurkan Kandungan 087776558899
 

Dernier (6)

9999266834 Call Girls In Noida Sector 52 (Delhi) Call Girl Service
9999266834 Call Girls In Noida Sector 52 (Delhi) Call Girl Service9999266834 Call Girls In Noida Sector 52 (Delhi) Call Girl Service
9999266834 Call Girls In Noida Sector 52 (Delhi) Call Girl Service
 
Leading Mobile App Development Companies in India (2).pdf
Leading Mobile App Development Companies in India (2).pdfLeading Mobile App Development Companies in India (2).pdf
Leading Mobile App Development Companies in India (2).pdf
 
Powerful Love Spells in Arkansas, AR (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
Powerful Love Spells in Arkansas, AR (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost LoverPowerful Love Spells in Arkansas, AR (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
Powerful Love Spells in Arkansas, AR (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 71 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 71 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 71 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 71 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Obat Penggugur Kandungan Di Apotik Kimia Farma (087776558899)
Obat Penggugur Kandungan Di Apotik Kimia Farma (087776558899)Obat Penggugur Kandungan Di Apotik Kimia Farma (087776558899)
Obat Penggugur Kandungan Di Apotik Kimia Farma (087776558899)
 
FULL ENJOY - 9999218229 Call Girls in {Mahipalpur}| Delhi NCR
FULL ENJOY - 9999218229 Call Girls in {Mahipalpur}| Delhi NCRFULL ENJOY - 9999218229 Call Girls in {Mahipalpur}| Delhi NCR
FULL ENJOY - 9999218229 Call Girls in {Mahipalpur}| Delhi NCR
 

At &t

  • 1. Worked by:Besa Azemi Lecturer:Prof.Bojan Georgievski
  • 2. • AT&T Corp., originally the American Telephone and Telegraph Company, is the subsidiary of AT&T that provides voice, video, data, and Internet telecommunications and professional services to businesses, consumers, and government agencies. During its long history, AT&T was at times the world's largest telephone company, the world's largest cable television operator, and a regulated monopoly.
  • 3. •History of AT & T The AT&T Corp., formerly known as the American Telephone and Telegraph Corporation, is as old as the telephone itself. AT&T can indirectly trace its origin back to the original Bell Telephone Company founded by Alexander Graham Bell after his invention of the telephone. One of that company's subsidiaries was American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), established in 1885, which acquired the Bell Company on December 31, 1899 for legal reasons, leaving AT&T as the main company. AT&T established a network of subsidiaries in the United States that held a government-authorized phone service monopoly, formalized with the Kingsbury Commitment, throughout most of the twentieth century. This monopoly was known as the Bell System, and during this period, AT&T was also known by the nickname Ma Bell. For periods of time, the former AT&T was the world's largest phone company.
  • 4. •Monopoly • Alexander Graham Bell patented the telephone in 1876, and formed Bell Telephone which licensed local telephone exchanges in major US cities. AT&T was formed in 1885 to connect the local Bell companies. Their logo read "The Bell System: AT&T and Associated Companies."The network grew rapidly with the slogan "one system, one policy, universal service." In 1913 AT&T agreed to become a regulated monopoly. Their monopoly would be allowed, but they had to connect competing local companies and let the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) approve their prices and policies. • As a result of a combination of regulatory actions by government and actions by AT&T, the firm eventually gained what most regard as monopoly status. • Further they lobbied to block other companies from expanding or adding their own personal structure. All competitors had to pay AT&T a usage fee to connect long distance calls. By subverting the traditional landlines, satellites allowed competition to convert calls more efficient and avoid the long line connections.
  • 5. •Erosion of "a natural monopoly” • For many years, AT&T had been permitted to retain its monopoly status under the assumption that it was a natural monopoly. The first erosion to this monopoly occurred in 1956 where the Hush-A-Phone v. United States ruling allowed a third-party device to be attached to rented telephones owned by AT&T. This was followed by the 1968Carterfone decision that allowed third-party equipment to be connected to the AT&T telephone network. The rise of cheap microwave communications equipment in the 1960s and 1970s opened a window of opportunity for competitors — no longer was the acquisition of expensive rights-of-way necessary for the construction of a long-distance telephone network. In light of this, the FCC permitted MCI (Microwave Communications, Inc) to sell communication services to large businesses. This technical-economic argument against the necessity of AT&T's monopoly position would hold for a mere fifteen years until the beginning of the fiber-optics revolution sounded the end of microwave-based long distance.
  • 6. •The Breakup of the Belly System • The breakup of the Bell System was mandated on January 8, 1982, by an agreed consent decree providing that AT&T Corporation would, as had been initially proposed by AT&T, relinquish control of the Bell Operating Companies that had provided local telephone service in the United States up until that point. This effectively took the monopoly that was the Bell System, and split it into entirely separate companies which would continue to provide telephone service. AT&T would continue to be a provider of long distance service, while the now independent Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) would provide local service, and would no longer be directly supplied with equipment from AT&T subsidiary Western Electric. • From 1984 until 1996 AT&T was an integrated telecommunications services and equipment company, succeeding in a newly competitive environment.
  • 7. •Post break-up restructuring • On January 1, 1984, a court forced AT&T to give up its 22 local Bell companies, establishing sevenRegional Bell Operating Companies (RBOC). A few local companies that were not wholly-owned subsidiaries of AT&T remained independent, but the RBOCs were very powerful and covered the US.Since that time, mergers have reduced the number of RBOCs to four: Verizon (originally Bell Atlantic and Nynex), Qwest (Qwest Communications International took over US West), BellSouth and SBC (originally Southwestern Bell and Pacific Telesys). The AT&T logo has evolved to reflect changing market conditions. • AT&T also spun off their equipment manufacturing and research operations. They became a long distance carrier with a new logo.AT&T had competition in long distance from companies like MCI and Sprint, but the RBOCs could only offer local service. • The Telecommunications Act of 1996 required RBOCs to allow competitors access to their local lines at regulated wholesale rates. In return, RBOCs could offer long distance service if they demonstrated there was local competition in their market.
  • 8. •The new AT &T • On September 20, 1995, AT&T announced that it was restructuring into three separate publicly traded companies: a systems and equipment company (which became Lucent Technologies,) a computer company (NCR) and a communications services company (which would remain AT&T.) It was the largest voluntary break-up in the history of American business. Lucent became independent on September 30, 1996. NCR followed on January 1, 1997. Employees generally followed their work. While the Bell Laboratories name went to Lucent Technologies, those researchers who supported the communications services business stayed with AT&T as the staff of the new AT&T Labs. • The new AT&T began evolving from a long distance company to an integrated voice and data communications company, as an ever increasing percentage of the traffic on its network was data, and to a lesser extent video, rather than voice. AT&T worked to reenter the local telephone service business, as envisioned by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. AT&T realized that as a result of this new law, the stand-alone long distance business was likely to decline. The company successfully launched an Internet service, AT&T WorldNet® Service , while selling operations, such as AT&T Submarine Systems and Skynet Satellite Services, that no longer were a strategic fit.
  • 9. • Over the next four years, AT&T took many actions to succeed in the changing environment. The company invested over $35 billion in acquisitions and upgrades to its infrastructure both to manage ever-increasing volumes of internet protocol and other data traffic, and to establish direct local connections to business customers. AT&T acquired a leading provider of local telephone service to business customers (TCG.) It acquired a leading provider of global data networking services (IBM Global Network.) It merged with two large cable companies, (TCI and MediaOne.) Operating as AT&T Broadband, the unit became the largest cable company in the United States. • By mid-2000, AT&T had three rapidly evolving networks- data, broadband, and wireless, and four separate businesses-cable, wireless, business, and consumer. And in 2000, the volume of data traffic for the first time exceeded the volume of voice traffic on the AT&T network. • In October 2000, AT&T announced that it would restructure over the next two years into a family of separate publicly held companies: AT&T Wireless, AT&T Broadband, and AT&T. In this way, each business could best obtain the capital structure needed to fund its growth. AT&T Wireless became an independent company on July 9, 2001. On December 9, 2001, AT&T and the cable-operator Comcast reached a definitive agreement to merge AT&T Broadband with Comcast. The businesses completed their merger on November 18, 2002, and began combined operations as the Comcast Corporation.
  • 10. • With the completion of the restructuring, David W. Dorman succeeded C. Michael Armstrong as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T in November 2002. • As Dorman assumed leadership of AT&T, the global telecommunications industry entered an era of unprecedented chaos and instability – marked by oversupply, fraud, a complicated regulatory environment and nonstop pricing pressures. Combined, these forces led to an industry meltdown in which numerous bankruptcies, defaults and business failures occurred; investors lost billions and countless workers in the communications sector lost their jobs. To address the dynamic environment, Dorman led an aggressive strategic transformation to fundamentally reshape AT&T – to evolve from a consumer-oriented voice company to an enterprise-focused networking company. The redesigned AT&T became a global IP networking provider dedicated to delivering powerful networks, applications and capabilities to business and government customers. Concurrently, AT&T introduced a breakthrough alternative to traditional services – VoIP, or Voice over Internet Protocol – for consumers and small businesses.
  • 11. • In January 2005, the most profound aspect of AT&T's ongoing transformation was announced: the pending $16 billion merger with SBC Communications to create the industry’s premier communications and networking company. Through this deal, the people of AT&T have the opportunity to build the defining entity in global communications for the 21st century – a company capable of delivering advanced networking technologies and a full suite of integrated communications services throughout America and around the world.