Distributed Antenna Systems/Cell Tower Issues and Other FCC Developments

T el om m unia ons a
ec
c ti L w

Th W h erFed er lC ommu ni tons
e
eel
a
cai
C ommi on-W h tC a W e ex p ?
ssi - a n
ect
2014 O utl
ookonCongr s nd theFCC
es a

© 2013 Bes t& KregerL L P
tBes
i

ec
c ti L w

FC C I es
ssu
•W h wilwe h ve a5 p son C ommi on?
en l
a
er
ssi
•I es
ssu
 W iel N P RM
r ess
 E Rae a h pforbr d ba a op i
t nd el
oa nd d ton
 D emi of Til I eg lton a t e rse of net
se
te Ir u ai nd h i
neu taiy?
r lt
 " B estP r ctces" orFed er lP r
a i
a eemp i a sh
ton nd ot
cl s forzoni nd p mitng
ock
nga er ti ?
 FC C “P r
ocess Refor p op l
m” r osas
ec
c ti L w

Fu t r Tea
u e
m?

Th
oma W h er
s
eel

J caRosenwor
essi
cel M i non C l r
g
ybu n

ec
c ti L w

M i e O ’ ely
k
Ri l

A jtP a
i i

DitrbutedAntennaS ys s l
si
tem /Cel
T ow erIs a O therFCC
sues nd
Dev opm ents
el
T CCFU IFal em i r
lS
na
Hous T X – O c
ton,
tober18,
2013
P R ES EN T ED BY

N ihol s ier
c aM l
l
P atner
r

J ephVa ton
os
nEa
P atner
r

© 2013 Bes t& KregerL L P
tBes
i

ec
c ti L w

FCC Has Commenced New Rulemaking on
Wireless
•R ul a i sued T hur da S ept.26;60- y i ti l
em kngis
s y,
da ni a
c m entperod aterFed.R eg.publ a on.
om
i f
i ti
c
•L oc l uthorty i a ik
aa
i s trs:

 Bai sum pti underyi
s s
ca
ons
l ngm a l a or na estha
ny oc l di nc , t
l ai c ngr ntaper i tl i thes
oc l a a
ty
m ttha i ts
m
i
zeofw iel s
r es
f cl esi a ik
a iti ,s trs.
i
 R ul a i lothr tens bity topr entham to
em kngas ea
al
i
ev
r
envr
ionm ental s i v r sa w ela hitorc l
l ens eaea, s l s s ial
y
ti
y
s fc ntaea.
i ia r s
gni
I
ndus y w i m a eas fc ntefor
tr l k
l
i ia f ttol i oc l
gni
i tl a
m
a
uthorty.
i
 L oc l es i need topatii tetopr tthei nter ts
ai w l
ti
l
r cpa
otec
ri es .

ec
c ti L w

Background: Underlying Federal Laws
•47 U . . 332 ( ) 7) b)P r er es oc l
S C.§
c( (
es v L a Authorty to
i
R egul teP l c entofP er ona iel s er ie
a a em
s lW r es S vc
Fa iti S oL ongAs
cl es
i
:

 L oc l does
ai
ty
notpr bi
ohi torefec v y pr bi ovs
f tiel ohi tpr ii
on
ofs vc
er ie;
 l ai does
oc l
ty
notunr s bl dic i i tea i t
eaona y srm na gans
f ti l equiaents vc ;
unc onal
y
vl
er ies
 l ai a ts na ia onw i nar s bl
oc l c ona ppl ti
ty
c
thi eaona eperod of
i
ti e;
m
 m a es
k adecs nw rti
ii
oni i ng;a
nd
 thedecs s uppor by s ta a evdenc
ii
oni s
ted
ubs nti l i
e.

•L oc l c nnotdeny baed onR Frss
ai a
ty
s
ik .

ec
c ti L w

Background (Cont’d)
•S upr eCour ul tha
em
tr ed tFCC ha a
s uthorty to
i
i pl entpr ii of47 U . . 332 ( ) 7)i
m em
ovs
ons
S C.§
c( n
Arlington v. F.C.C., 133 S .
Ct.1863 (
2013)
.
•Decs ea esnpl c
ii
onl v i a eFCC r es t:
ul tha

 Es bl hedas
ta i
s
hotcoc orl a a ti
l kf oc l c ononac pl
om ete
a ia on(
ppl ti 90/150 da dependi
c
ys
ngonf cl ;
a ity)
i
c l
oncuded tha bs
ta enta eem entw i ppl a al ai
gr
tha i nt, oc l
c
ty
tha al toa tha “ pr um ptiel a tedunr s bl
tf i
s c s es
v y” c
eaona y;
a
nd
 pr i tha oc l c nnotdeny a ppl a onm er y
ovded tl ai a
ty
na i ti
c
el
bec us notherpr i
a ea
ovderar dy ofer s vc i na
lea
f s er iew thi n
aea
r .

ec
c ti L w

Background (Cont’d)
•47 U.S.C. §1455(a) –M odiia onofT ow er /BaeS ta ons
fc ti
s s
ti
 “aS ta
teorl a gov nm entm a notdeny, nd s l
oc l er
y
a hal
a ov a el bl a iti r
ppr e, ny i ef cl es eques oram odiia onof
gi
i
tf
fc ti
a
nexiti iel s erorbaes ti
s ngw r es tow
s ta ontha
tdoes
not
s ta al c ngethephys a di ens ofs htow er
ubs nti l ha
y
i l m
c
i
ons uc
orbaes ti
s ta on.
 “el bl a iti r
i ef cl es eques m ea a r
gi
i
t” ns ny eques or
tf
m odiia on“ofa
fc ti
nexiti iel s erorbaes ti
s ngw r es tow
s ta on”
i oli ol a onofnew tr ns is
nv vngc l ti
oc
a m si
onequi ent;
pm
r ov l
em a oftr ns is
a m si
onequi ent;orr a em entof
pm
epl c
tr ns is
a m si
onequi ent.
pm
•FCC giena
v uthorty toi pl entby 47 U . .
i
m em
S C.§1403
•R ef r
eredtoi ul a i s ec
nr em knga S .6409.

ec
c ti L w

FCC Guidance (Jan 2013)
•Gui nc sued by FCC ’s iel s ea
da eIs
W r es Bur u.

 Defnes s ta al c nge” thr
i “ ubs nti l ha
y
oughc i i
rteradev oped
el
i
nadif entc
fer
ontext( s i es v ti .
hitorcpr er a on)
• Forexa pl no“ s ta a ha
m e,
ubs nti lc nge” i na ti
fa ddi onextends
a
f cl l s n20 f na diec on.
a ity es tha
i
eeti ny r ti

 O fer br ddefni onof“ baes ti tha oul m a e
f s oa
i ti
s ta on”
tc d k
s tutea y tom a f cl esi l ngutity pol .
ta
ppl
ny a iti ,ncudi
i
l
i
es
 I noti
s
ntended tor c aety is , opretay pr
ea hsf suespr i r oper
ty
(i
l
ghtpol )or“ non- ng” r es taf tpl c ent.
es
zoni
ul tha fec a em
 “ I pr v gui nc
nter etie”
da eonl – notbi ngonc ts
y
ndi
our or
l a zoni uthorti .
oc l nga
i es

ec
c ti L w

Historic Site – Now
Hitorc50’- ghsos i ppr eda c entofs pa a
s i
hi i w tha ov tta hm
l
i nel ntenna pantedtom a hexterors f c
x
s i
tc
i ura etom i m i iua
ni zevs l
i pa t. L oc ted a
m c
a
tDufefM i R oa a
i
l
l d ndM D R oute28 ( r tow nR oa nM ontgom er County, ayl nd.
Danes
d)i
y
M ra

P hotos
by:R ober .Hunniutt, um bi el om m unia ons por ti
tP
c Col
aT ec
c ti Cor a on

ec
c ti L w

Historic Site – Post Guidance?
Il tr ti how i
l a ons
us
ngpotenti lm pa tofc l a onofa ddi ona a oxi a y 20’- ghpol ounteda
ai c
o- ti
oc
na ti l ppr m tel
hi
em
ntennaar y.
ra

P hotos
tP
c Col
aT ec
c ti Cor a on

ec
c ti L w

Historic Site – Now
P hotoofS i eonT .T oby’s nk
m
Ba
Bui ng, um bi ty Hitorc
l
di Col
aCi s i
Ditrc Ki
s it, ngCounty, A . Bl
W
ue
ar s nttoc r oc ti
row poi
urentl a onof
c l er . Bui ngl tedon
eltow s
l
di i
s
N a ona R egitr ofHitorcP l c
ti l s y
s i a es

ec
c ti L w

Historic Site – Post Guidance?
Il tr ti how i
l a ons
us
ng
potenti lm pa tofc
ai c
ol a onus
oc ti
i
ngphotos
of
a tua
c l
r top i tal ti
oof
ns l ons
a

ec
c ti L w

Brickyard Rd. DAS Site – Neighborhood

P hotos
tP
c Col
aT ec
c ti Cor a on

ec
c ti L w

Brickyard Rd. DAS Site – Now
P ol
etos
uppor
tDAS a
ntenna ( hi
s68’ gh)now a ik r oa i ontgom er County ( r
tBrc yadR d nM
y
patofam ul tinode
i tal ti
ns l ontha
a
textends
dow nBrc yadR oa
ik r
d)

P hotos
tP
c Col
aT ec
c ti Cor a on

ec
c ti L w

Brickyard Rd. DAS Site – Post Guidance?
Il tr ti
l a onofa
us
nextens
i
ontoexiti
s ngutity pol i ddi ona s uc a br cnga
l
i
ew tha ti l tr tur l a i ndguy w ies uppor
r tos
ttheextens w hih
i
on, c
rs a oxi a y 20’ a eexiti
ies ppr m tel
bov
s ngDAS a
ntenna. Bl k a
s oc s tbottom r l tr a
efec el tedtypia pol m ountedequi entc bi .
c l epm
a nets

P hotos
tP
c Col
aT ec
c ti Cor a on

ec
c ti L w

The FCC Rulemaking
•P r i ar l
ovdes ea oppor ty toa es the
tuni
ddr s
defcencesntheGui nc
ii i i
da e.
•P r ents ea rs
es ar l iktha
tFCC w i exc
l eed
l
a
uthorty a undom a s tea l a l w s
i nd
ny ta nd oc la
tha otec
tpr tnei
ghbor
hoodstheenvr
,
ionm ent
a hitorc l r s
nd s ia aea.
•Coul s ta al dely i pr es decs
d ubs nti l
y a n- oc s ii
ons
•I por nc om pounded by i
m
ta ec
ndus y pus
tr
hto
w rteGui nc ntos tel w .
i
da ei
ta a
ec
c ti L w

Rulemaking Structure
•In re Acceleration of Broadband Deployment by
Improving Wireless Facilities Siting Policies, T
W
Doc etN o.13k
238, 13- (
FCC
122 9/26/2013)
.
•Fouraea a esed:
r s ddr s
 S houl FCC expedi a ona Envr
d
teN ti l ionm enta ol y
lP i
c
Ac nd N a ona Hitorc lP r er a onr i
ta
ti l s ia es v ti evew
pr eses orDAS a s al el , nd c tegorc l
oc s f
nd m lc l a a
s
ial
y
excudethes
l
edepl ents r r i ?
oym
fom evew

ec
c ti L w

Rulemaking Structure
•Fouraea a esed ( ont’d)
r s ddr s c
 S houl FCC exem pttem por r a
d
ay ntennas uc es
tr tur
fom f evew ?
r
ed.r i
 S houl FCC a
d
doptr es e:S ec on6409? W ha ul ?
ul r
ti
tr es
 S houl FCC ateri s
d
l ts hotcoc ul , e.g.
l kr esto,
•deter i
m new hena ppl a oni c pl
na i ti s om etea a es
c
nd ddr s
r edi i hotcoc
em esfs
l knotm et;
•a es DAS ;
ddr s
•a es m or tora m uni i ngpr er es
ddr s a i ,
s
ti
ef enc .

ec
c ti L w

Implementation of Sec. 6409
•S houl theFCC m a er esnthi aea
d
k ul i s r ?
( l na v :giel ai es is
ater ties v oc l fr toppor ty;or
ti
tuni
pr i oratr ns onperod)
ovdef
a i
ti
i .
•W ha er ies r ea hed? (
ts vc aer c
tenta v oncus
tiec l i
on,
a l ens orunl ens w iel s er ie)
ny i ed
c
i ed r es s vc .
c
•W ha s tr ns is
ti “ a m si
onequi ent” (
pm
doesti l
i ncude
pow ers i )
uppl ?
es

ec
c ti L w

•W ha s iel s erorbaes ti
ti aw r es tow
s ta on?
 “ T ow er ” a baes ti a thos m s r
s nd s ta ons s
eter ae
nor al under tood?
m l
y
s
 Bui ngsw a
l
di , tertow er , l pol , .
sutity esetc ?
i

•W ha er ies r ea hed? (
ts vc aer c
tenta v oncus
tiec l i
on,
a l ens orunl ens w iel s er ie)
ny i ed
c
i ed r es s vc .
c
•W ha s nexiti
ti a
s ngtow erorbaes ti m us
s ta on( t
s ethi c l bei ef iel s?
om
nga tual
y
nus orw r es)

ec
c ti L w

•W ha r ol a on, em ov l nd r a em ent
taec l ti r
oc
a a epl c
( y c nges
onl ha
totheexiti a ity, ddi ons
s ngf cl ora ti
i
off cl es nd equi entassociated w i
a iti a
i
pm
ththe
exiti a ity)
s ngf cl ?
i
•How does
thel w af tnon-onf m i
a fec
c or ngus
es
( nd w hy aenon-onf m i
a
r
c or ngus needed)
es
?
•M us
tagov nm enta ov
er
ppr eam odiia ontha
fc ti
t
does
notc or toa
onf m
nexiti
s ngper i ondi on?
m tc
ti

ec
c ti L w

•W ha s ubs nti lc ngei
ti as ta a ha
nphys a
i l
c
di ens
m
i
on?
 J ts
us i
zeors ethi
om
ngm or
e?
 I i na ol
sta bs uteorr a v ta r
el ties ndad?
 Does a etes ppl toal tr tur oraedif ent
sm
ta y
ls uc es r fer
tes a opra orl
ts ppr i tef i
ghta utity pol , l ngs
nd l
i
esbui
di ,
etc ? T os l a iti ?
.
teathf cl es
i
 Ar ha
ec nges eaur fom orgi l tr tur
m s ed r
i na s uc eorfom
r
s uc ea m odii
tr tur s
fed?

ec
c ti L w

•W ha
tdoes s lnotdeny a s l ppr e”
“ hal
nd hala ov
m ea
n?
 Ar
ether ny s i l ic s nc w her n
ea peca cr um ta es
ea
a ia onm a bedeni
ppl ti
c
y
ed?
 Doestr r ppr a w her tr tur i a
i equiea ov l
eas uc evol tes
sf c
aety odesorother iepl c per ons nd
,
w s a es s a
pr
oper a ik
ty trs?
 Ca tber d toal i pos on ofc
ni
ea
l m
ow
i
ti
ondi ons
ti ?

ec
c ti L w

•Does
thes tutea y w her
ta
ppl
egov’ti a ti s
s c nga a
pr i
opretora nota ar a ? (
nd
s egul tor tenta v
tie
a w er
ns :no)
.
•W ha ppl a onpr es m a ber r i ny,
ta i ti
c
oc s y
equied fa
a bef ew ha
nd or
tenti (
ty? tenta v na ia on
tie:a ppl ti
c
c nber r .
a
equied)
•W ha em edy i a opra nd c ti ona?
tr
s ppr i tea ons tuti l
(
tenta v ns er
tiea w :deem ed gr nted w i
a
thFCC
r i )
evew .
ec
c ti L w

Revisions To Shot Clock (332(c)(7))
•R ul a i
em kngdoes
noti i
nvteorpr
opos hol ae
ew esl
r ii
evs
onofexiti ul .
s ngr es
•S houl FCC c ngedefni onofc l a on?
d
ha
i ti
ol ti
oc
•S houl FCC caiy w hena ppl a oni
d
l rf
na i ti s
c
c pl
om ete?
•Dom or torapa ethes
a i us
hotcoc ? (
l k tenta v
tie
a w er “ no” )
ns ,
.

ec
c ti L w

Revisions To Shot Clock (332(c)(7))
•Does hotcoc ppl toDAS a tos al el ?
s
l ka y
nd
m lc l
s
(
tenta v ns er “ yes)
tiea w , ” .
 note:thi i pr bl notthem os rtia is sue
ss oba y
tc i c lsue;is
i how onedeter i w hethera di nc s s
s
m nes
nor na ei ori
notpr bi y.
ohi tor

•Ar ef enc f i ngonm unipr
epr er esors
ti
oper
ty
unr s bl dic i i tor
eaona y srm na y?
•S houl FCC r ii em edi (
d
evs
tr
es deem gr nted)
a
?

ec
c ti L w

Approaching the NPRM
•N P R M i l el tos fc ntl af tl ai es
si y
k
i ia y fec oc l .
gni
ti
•N P R M asks the right questions.
 Betterbaa ei
l nc ntonea s ta e
nd ubs nc
 Ver c pl a l i a f c
y om ex nays nd a ts
s

•M a deters tea
y
ta dopti
onofFCC Gui nc
da e.
•N eed ana ona efor w i ots oc l
ti l f t, thl ofl a detal
i
s
 S i ngexa pl
ti
m es
 L oc l ai ti
a v ra ons
 Ec
onom i, neerng, ubl aety Anays
c Engi i P
i f
cS
l i
s
 Coor na v c ?
di ted oies

•T CCFU Ir e?
ol

ec
c ti L w

Approaching the NPRM
•I
ndus y w i a c a c m uni es r tl
tr l tta km ny om
l
ti diec y.
•Fori vdua i a neys
ndii lcty ttor
:
 I a em enti a sue,
fpl c
s nis yourc m uni m us c n
om
ty
ta ti
thi pr eedi
s oc
ng.
 T hependi
ngpr eedi
oc
ngm a af tpendi
y fec
ng
a ia ons
ppl ti .
c
 W ha erha
tev
ppensyou w i need tor ieyourzoni
,
l
l
evs
ng
c
odes
.

ec
c ti L w

TA X E S
W H A T I TA X A B L E
S
N . .Th s i notonl afed er l
B
i s
y
a
i e!
ssu

ec
c ti L w

C A N C O N GRE SS H A RM O N I E
Z
E L E C TRO N I TA X A TI N ?
C
O
I netT a
nter
x
Fr
eedom

M ak a e
r etpl c
Far s
ines

P osi eO n-i a
s
bl
L neT x
R ef m
or

Di ta
gi l
Goods

ec
c ti L w

CelT a
l x
M or t’m
a

C A V E A TS/ V E N S
GI
• C ommu ni tons t x “r m” tt e fed er lorst t l
cai a efor a h
a
ae eveli a
s
ver d a er s g me forl lg
y ng ou a
oca over
nment wh h ve t e
s o a h
mostt l t e l stt g i
o ose,h ea o an.
• L oca over
lg
nment fu t r a lt t t x ori ose fees on a
s’ u e biiy o a
mp
ny
t e of commu ni tons ser ce p ovi eri a i s rsk
yp
cai
vi r d s tserou i .
• C ommu ni tons t x r m may be inevitable i 20 13- a
cai a efor
n
14 t
t e Fed er ll . on’ ose a h st t l
h
a evel D
tl
tt e ae evelbefor t en.
e h
• Refor need notbe ba forl lg
m
d
oca over
nment
s.
• L ocas mu stbe fa
l
rmor a i p ri p nt i i er s a e t be
e ctve a tci a s f nt est r o
p ot ed .
r ect

33

ec
c ti L w

The Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act
( 31/ R 434)or( 1431)
S
H
S.
Internet Tax Freedom Forever Act (“ITFFA”)



Exp
ecta i t i nex tC ong ess ( 13)a 20 14 d ea lne
ctviy n
r
20
s
d i
a p oa es
p r ch



I
TFA “wal off” om st t a l lt x ai t e lr est
ls
fr
ae nd oca a ton h a g ,
a fa estg owi , m of commu ni tons — br d ba
nd st r ng for
cai
oa nd



34

I
TFA h s been i effectsi 1998 , r enty sch u l t
a
n
nce
cu r l
ed ed o
ex pr i N ovember 20 14
ie n
,

I
TFA mu stbe r eaed oral
ep l
lowed t ex pr a acond ii of
o
ie s
ton
r m ort i i si l a i u sty t x r u cton ex er se,
efor
h s s mp y n nd r a ed i
ci
nottu e t x r m
r a efor
ec
c ti L w

I
TFA
•A s wh twa for l t ecom i su p lnt by
a s mery el
s
pa ed
br d ba , aes a l l a e l
oa nd st t nd ocas r eftwiha
t
sh i i
rnk ngcommu ni tons ser ce t x ba
cai
vi a se.
•L efti pa t e I
n lce, h TFA wilevent al “t x
l
u ly a
ex emp” l, l
t al oramostal of t e entr
l, h
ie
t ecommu ni tons i u sty’ ser ces.
el
cai
nd r s vi
•Unl t ecom t x “r m”s cou ped wihI
ess el
a efor i
l
t TFA
r ea, nd u sty wilh ve no i
ep l i
r l a
ncentve t everl
i o
et
I
TFA ex pr
ie.

ec
c ti L w

Wireless Tax Fairness Act
H . 230 9, 1235
R.
S.
•L a ong ess ( R- 0 2)p ssed t e
stC
r
H 10
a
h
H ou se,
wentnowh e i t e Senae
er n h
t
• W ou l i ose a5- rmor t i m on a new
d mp
yea
aoru
ny
“d i i naor , ny i ea i ex i i ,
scrmi t y”ora ncr se n stng
st t orl lt x es on wiel ser ces;
ae
oca a
r ess vi wou l
d
g a fah
r nd t erex i i a es a ex cl d e t x es
stngt x
nd
u
a
i osed by vot of commu niy
mp
e
t

•W ilr u r i 20 13
l et n n
36

ec
c ti L w

The Digital Goods and Services Tax
Fairness Act of 2013 -- S.
1364
• L eg slton cr t anai
i ai
eaes
tonwi e “t x p efer
d
a r ence”
for
onlne g s a ser ces overcomp i
i ood nd
vi
etngbrck a i -nd
mora l by lmii ae a l lt x es on
t rsaes
i tngst t nd oca a
“d i ia ood s a ser ces.
g t lg
nd
vi ”
•D ownl d ed mu si a vi eos;
oa
c nd d
•P a p - i ( P V )a vi eo- d ema ( oD )
y- er V ew P
nd d onnd V
r
evenu e fr t e ca e fr nch se fee r
om h bl a i
evenu e ba
se

37

ec
c ti L w

Main Street Fairness Act

( 7 43 a H . 68 4)
S.
nd R.
• Pa
ssed Senae on astongbip ri n ba s
t
r
- a tsa si
• P end i n H ou se Jd i a y
ngi
u cir
• A lows st t a l lg
l
aes nd oca over
nment t colectsaes
s o l
l
a u se t x es on r
nd
a
emot (ypcal onlne)saes t
e t i ly i
l o
t ei esi ent
h rr d s
• A i t elmi t t e cu r entd i d va a e su ffer
ms o i nae h
r
sa nt g
ed
by brck a - t rr al s vi à- s onlne
i -nd mora et ier s- vi i
r al s
et ier
• Gener t fu nd s
ae
38

ec
c ti L w

D O N ’ FO RGE T TH E TH RE A T A T
T
TH E STA TE L E V E L :
St t C ommu ni tons Ta Refor
ae
cai
x
m

ec
c ti L w

C ommu ni tons Ta “Refor
cai
x
m”
• B a c a p oa
si p r ch
• C ola se alcommu ni tons-elt t x es a fees ( bl
lp l
cai r aed a
nd
ca e
fr nch se fees, er a s P E G fees, B S, a lne t ecom &
a i
p hp
D
lnd i el
wiel
r ess)i o asi l t x
nt
ng e a
• M ove r onsi lt fori osii colecton a a d ii
esp biiy
mp ton, l i nd u tng
of t e t x t t e st t l
h a o h ae evel
• Exa l i u d e V A , ,
mpes ncl
FL KY, H , nd N C
O a
• D O W N SI E : lmi t commu ni tons-elt RO W fees
D E i nae
cai r aed

40

ec
c ti L w

C ommu ni tons Ta “Refor ( ’ )
cai
x
m”contd
•B enefis fori u sty:
t
nd r
• L owert x a mi stai cost
a d ni r ton
s
• L owert x es, cep er a s forD B S
a
ex
tp h p
• Gr t r ecton a anstfu t r t x i ea
eaerp ot i g i
u e a ncr ses

•Ri s t l lg
sk o oca over
nment
s:
• L oss of a lt t contoll lt x stu ct r a p i a
biiy o
r oca a r u e nd olcy, nd
t u s contoloverl lbu d g evenu es
h
r
oca
etr
• L oss of a d ii u t ort t ensu r cor ecta nt a e p i
u tnga h iy o
e
r
mou s r ad

41

ec
c ti L w

Contact Information

PHOTO

ec
c ti L w

Nicholas Miller
B estB est& Kreg
i er
20 0 0 P ennsyl ni venu e N W
va aA
Su ie 430 0
t
W a i t D C 20 0 0 6
sh ng on,
Ph
one: 20 2)37 0 - 9
(
530
Fa : 20 2)7 8 5x (
1234
C el: 20 2)256- 163
l(
0
N i ols. il @ bbk a com
ch a M ler
lw.
W ebsie:www. lw.
t
bbk a com

About BB&K
B estB est& Kreg L P i afu l- vi lw fim
i erL
s
lser ce a r
wihmor t a 20 0 at neys i C ai ni nd
t
e hn
tor
n lfor aa
W a i t D . . elverngeffectve,i y a
sh ng on, C d i i
i tmel nd
ser ce- i ed sol tons t compex l a ssu es
vi orent
u i o
l eg li
fa ngp blc a enci bu si
ci u i g es, nesses a i i d u as.
nd nd vi l
B B & K lwyer ser a ciy at ney t 30 C ai ni
a
s ve s t tor
o
lfor a
cii a a g
tes nd s ener la sp a
a nd ecilcou nselt sp a
o ecil
d i rct sch
sti s, oold i rct cii cou ntes a ot er
sti s, tes,
i nd h
p blc a enci Th fim h s been h png
u i g es. e r a
el i
bu si
nesses, om l lt i er tona, ch eve t ei
fr
oca o nt nai l a i h r
g l formor t a 10 0 yea s.
oas
e hn
r

ec
c ti L w

Distributed Antenna Systems/Cell Tower Issues and Other FCC Developments

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (16)

Plus de Best Best and Krieger LLP

Plus de Best Best and Krieger LLP (20)

Distributed Antenna Systems/Cell Tower Issues and Other FCC Developments