This document summarizes a seminar on participatory research and development for natural resource management. The seminar covered topics such as natural resource management, participatory research and development approaches, changing agendas in the field, and case studies. It defined key concepts and outlined the objectives, components, tools, and principles of participatory research and development for natural resource management. Case studies presented examined the impacts of user participation, approaches to land use modeling, and effects of participatory communication strategies. The seminar emphasized collaboration across stakeholders to address sustainability challenges through participatory approaches.
2. I - SEMINAR
ON
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT FOR
NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
PRESENTATION BY :
BHAGYA VIJAYAN
PALB 3120
Sr. M.Sc.(Agril. Extn.)
3. GIST OF THE SEMINAR
• Introduction
• Objectives
• Natural Resource Management
• Participatory Research & Development
• Changing Agenda of PR&D
• PR&D in NRM
• Research Studies
• Conclusion
4. INTRODUCTION
NATURAL RESOURCES
Natural resources are natural assets/ raw materials
occurring in nature that can be used for economic
production or consumption.
(World Trade Organization)
16-10-2014 4
5. OBJECTIVES OF THE SEMINAR
1. To know the concept of Natural Resource
Management and Participatory Research
2. To understand and discuss Participatory
Research &Development in NRM
3. To review the research studies on PR&D in
NRM
16-10-2014 5
10. KEY DIMENSIONS OF DEVELOPMENT
Empowerment Equity
Sustainability Security
16-10-2014 10
11. GENESIS OF PR&D
• North America & Europe
- (1950’s –’60’s)
Community-based approaches to the creation of
knowledge
• Research – not a dispassionate act but an act of solidarity,
active support and active participation
• International Council for Adult Education -1970’s
• International Participatory Research Network
- (1980’s and 1990’s)
16-10-2014 11
13. PARTICIPATIVE RESEARCH (PR)
• The researcher and participants collaborate
actively in a well defined group process to study and
change their social reality. (Whyte, 1989)
•Primary goal : to create an environment and
process where context-bound knowledge emerges to
develop ‘local theory’
•All members of the organization as well as
community can participate
16-10-2014 13
14. Participants treat each other as
colleagues
The researcher’s role :
co-producer of learning
Researcher has less control over
the research design process
Has to be flexible to the
perspectives of participants
16-10-2014 14
15. IT IMPLIES..................
• Involves a whole range of people
• Subject of the research originates in
the community itself
• Goal - radical transformation and improvement of the lives of
the people by themselves
• Create greater awareness of their own resources & self-reliant
development
• Facilitates accurate and authentic analysis of social reality
• Researcher - committed participant and learner
16-10-2014 15
16. PR & ITS MAJOR COMPONENTS
1.PEOPLE
2.POWER
3.PRAXIS
16-10-2014 16 (Finn, 1994)
17. Phases and Activities of PR&D
Assessment
and Diagnosis
Experimenting With
Technology Options
Sustaining
Local
Innovation
Managing
PR&D
Dissemination and
Scaling Up
16-10-2014 17
18. Promoting and Developing Capacity for PR&D
SYNTHESIS
CAPACITY
DEVELOPMENT
INTEGRATION
SUPPORT
MECHANISMS
16-10-2014 18
19. The Changing Agenda of Participatory
Research and Development
•Encompasses : generating, sharing, exchanging, utilizing
knowledge
•Synergy
•Sources of knowledge: from local systems to global science
•Provides decision-support tools and information
•Holistic perspective : in Agriculture and Natural Resource
Management
16-10-2014 19
20. • Brings isolated
people together
Validates their
experiences
Contextualizes
individual problems or
weakness • Links
• Presents the
knowledge and
experiences of
the researchers
personal
experiences
to social
realities
16-10-2014 20
22. DIALOGUE AND CRITICAL REFLECTION
*Feature that
distinguishes
participatory
research from
other social
research -
dialogue
*Through
dialogue, people
come together
and participate
*Connectedness
leads to shared
meaning
*Encourages
people to voice
their
perspectives
and experiences
*Critically
examine the
sources and
implications of
knowledge
16-10-2014 22
23. Previous
experience
COMMUNITY
PERCEPTIONS OF
THE RESEARCH
Suitable
timings, non
sceptical,
credible
Previous
perceptions
16-10-2014 23
24. The Changing Agenda of Agricultural Research and
Development
Sustaining
productivity
gains
16-10-2014
Strengthening the capacity of
local farming communities Building
24
Equitable
distribution of
benefits
Shifting the focus of
research
synergy
25. Genesis of PR&D in NRM
1960’s
Farm Management Farm Economics, Engineering,Planning
1970’s
Physiology, Pathology , Entomology, Genetics,
Agronomy
Farming System Research
Crop
Ecology
(Janssen and Goldsworthy, 1996)
1980’s
1990’s
Natural Resource Management as part of Sustainable development
16-10-2014 25
26. Understanding PR in terms
of NRM
Emergence of two domains
Depends on two critical factors:
(1) Public concern about major issues
(2) Understanding of the interrelations between problems and the
ability to deal with these interactions in the research
methodology
16-10-2014 26
27. PR in NRM
An approach that aims at improving livelihoods, agro
ecosystem resilience, agricultural productivity and
environmental services, which aims to augment social,
physical, human, natural and financial capital, by solving
complex real-world problems affecting natural resources in
agro-ecosystems with the simultaneous participation of
researcher and people.
Biosphere
HOMEOSTASIS
16-10-2014 27
28. Five Principles of Good Practice in PR for NRM
1. Reflects a clear and coherent agenda
2. Addresses and integrates the complexities and dynamics
3. Applies the triangulation principle
4.Contributes to Planning
5. Based on two-way sharing of information
(Vernooy and McDougall, 2003)
16-10-2014 28
30. IMPACT ORIENTATION
• Paradoxical situation with regard to impact
• Desired impact remain rather diffuse
• Participatory NRM research requires a strong
impact orientation
16-10-2014 30
31. RESEARCH FOCUS
Three major research foci:
(1) The development and assessment of
technologies
(2) The generation of new technology contributes to
policy or management recommendations
(3) Developing approaches for organisational and
local innovation
16-10-2014 31
32. PATHWAY/STRATEGY TO IMPACT
• IARCs seek collaboration
(eg; NARC, NGO’s,farmers’ groups )
ROLE OF PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
•Women and marginalised groups neglected
16-10-2014 32
33. An Agro -ecological Basis For Natural Resource
Management
• Poverty alleviation
• Food security and self reliance
• Ecological management of productive
resources
• Empowerment of rural communities
• Establishment of supportive policies
16-10-2014 33
34. LIVELIHOOD SECURITY
Production systems
Processing,
marketing and
consumption
Genetic resources
conservation
16-10-2014 34
35. ETHNOSCIENCE & RAPPORT BUILDING
Learning local
categories for
things
Understanding
how people use
their language
Games and
drawings can
be used to
elicit
information
Nothing but
folk knowledge
16-10-2014 35
37. Role of Development Communication
PROBLEM
IDENTIFICATION
DEVELOPING A
RESEARCH
RELATIONSHIP
INTERVENTION PLANNING
16-10-2014 37
38. Property Rights and NRM
EXCLUDABILITY
ASSURANCE
DURATION
PROPERTY RIGHTS
16-10-2014 38
39. TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS AND NRM
Information
Environmental and
Price Risk
Wealth
Credit
Labour
16-10-2014 39
40. Towards Social and Gender Equity
• Management of agriculture and natural
resources involves interactive roles of
diverse social actors
•These stakeholders are not homogenous
or fixed groups, but differentiated by
social categories of gender, class, caste,
ethnicity and age
•Facilitating the recognition of the social
and gendered nature of technologies,
policies and interventions
•Creating a space for social actors (women
and men) to manoeuvre to have more
access to, control over, and benefits from
natural resources
16-10-2014 40
41. PARTICIPATORY GIS
• Incorporation of GIS in data collection
• Integration of local knowledge and
stakeholders’ perspectives
• Integration of social and natural
science information using spatial
databases in natural resources
research and development
16-10-2014 41
51. I. Measuring the Impact of User Participation in
Agricultural and Natural Resource Management Research
Nancy et.al.,
(2003)
16-10-2014 51
52. To assesses the impact of using participatory methods
• Three agricultural research projects which have a natural
resource management focus
Mixed methods of participation are used
• Four Areas of Focus
>Adoption and economic impact of project technologies
>Human and social capital among participating individuals
and communities
>Feedback to formal research institutions
>Costs of conducting the research
16-10-2014 52
53. TYPES OF PARTICIPATION
STAGE CONVENTIONAL CONSULTATIVE EMPOWERING FARMER
EXPERIMENTATION
collaborative collegial
Design WN,ICRISAT CIP CIP
Testing ICRISAT CIP,WN
Diffusion ICRISAT CIP CIP,WN CIP,WN,ICRISAT
PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS:
1. INTERNATIONAL POTATO CENTRE
2. INTERNATIONAL CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SEMI ARID TROPICS
3. WORLD NEIGHBOURS SOIL CONSERVATION WORK
METHODOLOGY : PRA TOOLS, Mother baby trial
16-10-2014 53
54. FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
User participation was found to influence
priorities and practices
Participation led to greater economic
impacts
Participation led to more relevant
technologies
Use of participatory methods decreased
research costs
16-10-2014 54
55. II. Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling
approaches of land use/ cover change to support public
policies: Application to sustainable management of natural
resources in northern Vietnam
Jean Christophe et.al.,
(2007)
16-10-2014 55
56. • To identify efficient modelling
approaches of land use/ cover
change (LUCC)
• Which will support public
policies related to sustainable
management of natural
resources
• Three modelling
methodologies &were applied
at same research site
16-10-2014 56
57. METHODOLOGY
SAMBA
METHODOLOGY
LAND USE PLANNING
AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM
(LUPAS)
METHODOLOGY
CONVERSION OF LAND
USE AND ITS EFFECTS
(CLUE) METHODOLOGY
16-10-2014 57
59. FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
• More than one tool/
method is needed to
address the different
aspects of eco-regional
analysis
• For better interaction
between the different
groups of stakeholders
more integration
between the methods is
needed
• (SAMBA) was found
to be more efficient
16-10-2014 59
60. III. Participatory Development Communication for Natural
Resources Management in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand
Cherdpong Kheerajit et.al.,
(2013)
16-10-2014 60
61. To study the effect of participatory development
communication in bringing stakeholders together to address
the problem of dissolution of the environment and natural
resources
Methodology
Secondary data collection, Interview
16-10-2014 61
62. The study centers the following variables
1.Information sharing 2.Consultation
5.Behavioural
changes
4.Collaboration 3.Empowerment
16-10-2014 62
63. FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
Participatory development communication plays significant
role in bringing together
Stakeholders
Government
Cost of natural resources management can be
lessened if there is
Proper
participation
proper communication
Participatory development
communication is correlated to
Knowledge Attitude Practice
16-10-2014 63
64. CONCLUSION
Shift from Millennium Development
Goals to Sustainable Development Goals
Dogged progress of Nation
Thrust on food security
Burgeoning population
Collaboration
“Chalein Saath Saath”
16-10-2014 64
65. “Alone we can do so little, together we can do so much”
: Helen Keller
THANK YOU
16-10-2014 65