3. Context
Urban groundwater
1. Averaged for 71 cities and towns, groundwater constitutes 48% of the share
in urban water supply (Narain, 2012).
2. Unaccounted water in urban areas exceeds 50% according to the CGWB’s
report on the groundwater scenario in 28 Indian cities (CGWB, 2011).
56 %
4. Here in Bengaluru!
Population as per 2011
Census
8.4 million
Population in 2015 11 million
Demand @ 135 LPCD (Liters
per capita per day)
1485 MLD (Million Litres a
day)
Quantity of water sourced
from Cauvery by BWSSB
1410 MLD
Leakages – 40% ~500 MLD
Groundwater to the
rescue!
~575 MLD
5. New borewells added each month- from 2009-2010
Source: Groundwater hydrology and groundwater quality in and around Bangalore city. A book by
Department of Mines and Geology, March 2011
Total 14.88% increase in borewells from Jan 2009-January 2010
7. TDS: values of >1000 mg/L:- SE
zone accounts for 33% followed by
NE zone and NW zone with 27.5%
and 25.54% respectively
Groundwater quality in Bangalore
Source: Groundwater hydrology and groundwater quality in and around Bangalore city. A book by
Department of Mines and Geology, March 2011
9. Citizen response
A private layout completely dependent
on groundwater demonstrates exemplary
self- regulation solutions from source
to sink
Rainbow Drive Layout
A heartening story of citizen driven
revival and stewardship of the
Kaikondrahalli Lake
Kaikondrahalli Lake
10. What we learn from these practices,
can we apply these at the aquifer level?
12. Hypothesis
Water literate
citizenry
Push them towards
self-regulation
Learnings for
governance
Citizens :
share the story of their wells
and their water with the city
Knowledge partners:
Collation, interpretation,
scenario building and
management responses
Virtual platform:
Visualisation &
communication platform
Conversation & dialogue
space
Citizens :
Conversations
Communication
Engagement with
Governance & Advocacy
Implement responses
13. Project area
Name of the watershed Yamalur sub- watershed
Number of microwatersheds 8
Total Area (sq. km) 33.81
Area under BBMP (sq.km) 23.55
Non BBMP area (sq.km) 10.26
Number of Lakes (known) 15
Number of open wells (identified) 22
Total Residential Population 123780
14. Data collection
• Well and borewell data – static water levels,
pumping and water quality
• Water demand/consumption data
• Waste water generation data
• Data on Waste water management
• Stories about water and wastewater
narratives from citizens
15. Types of Stakeholders Processes of engagement & nature of
participation
Contribution
RWAs, POAs individual households and
individual citizens
Contribution of data from their own
records, permission to install regular
monitoring devices, one time
measurements onsite. Engagement
through events / workshops. Creation of
“Citizen data Volunteers”
Data & stories about demand, supply,
wells/borewells & waste water
management
Skills such as documentation, video/photo
& communication design
Open source tools such as for data
collection & mobile apps
Schools & Educational institutions For creating awareness about sustainable
water management- through rainwater
harvesting, recharge well construction,
water quality awareness
Business campuses and their employees Sharing of the questionnaire for data
collection through emails and telephonic
discussion
Service providers (Borewell diggers,
camera inspection, tanker operators, etc)
One-on-one conversations, Events &
workshops
Data from their service records,
knowledge of what’s happening in the
region
Other researchers Knowledge partnering Research skills, other data and knowledge
Formal institutions (CGWB, BBMP, KSPCB,
etc.)
Creating a space for dialogue between
citizens and the institutions, direct
engagement for knowledge exchange
Secondary data, lake DPRs, knowledge
sharing
16. Software platform-www.groundwaters.in
• Close the feedback loop
• Communicate to citizens-good practices, implementation of
them, governing regulations and laws, contacts of various
service providers to enable implementation, etc.
• Provide a space for continued conversations for peer learning
17. Learnings and looking ahead
Hydrogeology and interpretation of data- demystifying the science
of groundwater in ways which citizenry finds useful is a challenge in
itself
18. Importance of peer to peer learning
Not all ‘governance institutions’ are
unwilling to listen- Citizen dialogue
with KSPCB
19. Challenges
• What happens if this region gets access to
BWSSB supply?
• How do we engage with the disadvantaged
groups within this watershed?
• Change in leadership
Notes de l'éditeur
Questions!
Groundwater surface water nexus
These practices are limited to their fence, their campus. However, does groundwater follow such boundaries? The answer is no! Groundwater which resides in the aquifers does not follow the boundaries in terms of the way we think. Therefore, the response for groundwater management has to be at the aquifer level. Previous studies have also shown that aquifer characteristics are very localized and change from region to region. So the best possible groundwater management response has to be at the aquifer scale. However, the point to note here is that, while developing the aquifer level response, we should not forget the micro scale responses and the citizen movements. We should integrate and learn from these responses and develop our understanding for applying at the larger scale.
And that is what the PAQM project is attempting to do.
Citizens are an integral part of the project not only as data points but also as important stakeholders and real drivers of the implementation of groundwater practices. The project thus hypothesizes that using the stories and data from the citizens and interpreting it through hydrogeology and communicating the results with the citizenry would help in equipping the community with groundwater knowledge. And citizens when aware of this information would lead towards self regulation. And just to clarify, by citizens I don’t only limit myself to residents of the apartments, layouts, etc. but also involve informal sectors, service providers, educational institutions, etc. This attempt of informing the citizenry would also have learnings for governance which can then be used for formulating a better/effective policy for state’s groundater response.
If any project has to sustain and to have a larger macro scale impact, the project has to work within the existing governance framework. Therefore, informing the governance institutions and sharing of the generated knowledge with them is again an integral part of the process. One such outcome so far has been a dialogue with KSPCB. And lastly, if the conversations are started amongst the peers which on one hand increases competition and on the other hand encourages the adoption of existing practices, can lead to better learning outcomes.
And finally I would like to end by saying that’ if citizen response or the citizen science and the hydrogeology and can co-create ‘actionable knowledge’ then that may lead to better outcome for managing the groundwater.