Depreciation and the Time Value of Money: A primer of the arXiv article
13 Dec 2016•0 j'aime
3 j'aime
Soyez le premier à aimer ceci
afficher plus
•1,617 vues
vues
Nombre de vues
0
Sur Slideshare
0
À partir des intégrations
0
Nombre d'intégrations
0
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Signaler
Économie & finance
A primer of the arXiv article by Brendon Farrell
Article link: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1605/1605.00080.pdf
Contact: brendon.farrell@griffithuni.edu.au
Depreciation and the Time Value of Money: A primer of the arXiv article
Depreciation and the
Time Value of Money
A primer of the arXiv article
by Brendon Farrell
Article link: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1605/1605.00080.pdf
Contact: brendon.farrell@griffithuni.edu.au
1Some assertions made within are oversimplifications – Please read arXiv article if greater accuracy is required
Contents
3. What is Depreciation?
4. Depreciation Example
5. Methods of Deprecation
6. Book Value
7. Extrinsic Value
8. Intrinsic Value
9. Financial Analysis
10. Time Value of Money
11. Cash Flow Discounting
12. Depreciation and Intrinsic Value
13. Looking Beyond Lifetime
14. Present Cost of Ownership
15. Delayed Present Cost of Ownership
16. The Intrinsic Value of an Asset
17. Replacement Approach Deprecation
18. Comparison of Deprecation Methods
19. Cost of Capital Impact
20. Conclusion
2
What is Depreciation?
Deprecation is the accounting practice of spreading the cost of an asset
purchase across its useful lifetime.
When an accountant computes the Profit & Loss Statement (P&L) for a
business, an asset with a lifetime spanning multiple years will only be
partially expensed in a given year. This is despite the business likely
paying a large sum outright for the asset.
Accountants do this because an asset with multiple years of life will
yield benefits in each year of its use. The “Matching Principle” of
accounting dictates that costs should be recognised based on incurred
benefit from an asset, rather than from the actual payment for the
asset.
3
Depreciation Example
Using the simplest depreciation method known as ‘Straight-line’. A van
that has a purchase price $10,000 can be depreciated over it’s 10 year
lifetime, with the below formula*:
𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 =
𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒
𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒
Inserting the cost and lifetime into the formula allows one to compute
the depreciation expense each year:
𝑉𝑎𝑛 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 =
$10,000
10
= $1,000
4* Assuming no salvage value at the end of useful life
Methods of Depreciation
Below are some examples of methods that are generally accepted by
accounting standard bodies:
■ Straight-line
■ Doubling Declining Balance
■ Sum-of-years-digits
Each one typically computes a different depreciation expense for the
exact same asset, in a specific period of the asset’s lifetime.
However, they are generally accepted because the depreciation expense
in each individual period will add up to the cost of the asset* over its
lifetime.
5
* Assuming no salvage value at the end of useful life
Book Value
When an asset is purchased by a business, accountants will record the
asset at a value equivalent to its purchase price. As a period passes and
the asset is depreciated, the depreciation expense is removed from the
purchase price of the asset; resulting in what is known as the Book
Value.
Consider the prior example of the van. At purchase its Book Value was
$10,000 but after 6 years, the accountant would have removed $6,000
from the purchase price; this results in a Book Value of $4,000.
After 7 years, the van has a Book Value of $3,000 and after 10 years,
when the van reaches the end of its useful life, it has zero book value*.
6
* Assuming no salvage value at the end of useful life
Extrinsic Value
While an asset has a Book Value calculated by an accountant, by no
means is the Book Value the price at which the asset can be sold. The
van’s sellable value is its Extrinsic Value.
When using straight-line deprecation, the van loses value evenly
throughout its lifetime. However, Vehicles typically have a tendency to
lose their sellable value more rapidly after purchase.
If one wishes to have the Book Value more closely match the market
prices of used vehicles - an accelerated depreciation method such as
Sum-of-years-digits might be used.
Despite the availability of accelerated methods, Extrinsic Values can
and will often differ from Book Values, regardless of the depreciation
method used.
7
Intrinsic Value
Intrinsic Value differs from both Book Value and Extrinsic Value. It is the
value which an owner or potential buyer places on asset ownership.
If you are the owner of an asset and you consider the Intrinsic Value be
lower than what someone else is willing to pay, then you will be enticed
sell the asset.
Inversely, if the Extrinsic Value of an asset is lower than its Intrinsic
Value you will be enticed to buy the asset.
Each individual has the potential to place a different Intrinsic Value on
an asset based on their own particular circumstances, preferences and
assumptions about the future.
8
Financial Analysis
Financial analysts are often tasked with determining a financial asset’s
Intrinsic Value so that better decisions can be made as to whether it is
worth buying or selling.
Financial assets are typically intangible entitlements to future cash
flows. Thus, are very different from a van or piece of equipment.
Shares for instance, entitle an owner to dividends derived from a
company’s earnings. Similarly, bonds entitle their owners to coupon and
maturity payments from bond issuers.
A number of methodologies have been developed to determine the
Intrinsic Value of a wide variety of financial assets.
9
The Time Value of Money
A core principle underpinning most financial asset valuation
methodologies, is the Time Value of Money. Its basis is very simple;
individuals prefer money sooner rather than later.
If the typical person is provided the choice between $10 today vs $10 in
a years time, you would expect them to choose $10 dollars today.
While the above is decision is a no-brainer, if someone is given a choice
between $10 today and $15 next year, than the decision isn’t so clear.
One person might really want to spend $10 on something today,
whereas another might decide the extra $5 in a year is worth the wait.
10
Cash Flow Discounting
Financial Analysts quantify the decision between cash flows of different
sizes and occurring at different times, by discounting them back to
present terms for comparison:
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 =
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤
1 + Discount Rate Time Ahead
Assuming that you have a required rate of return of 20% p.a. When
faced with the choice between $10 today and $15 in a years time, cash
flow discounting can be used to assist decision making:
$15
1+20% 1 = $12.50
Thus, it is better to take $15 in a years time, because it is equivalent to
$12.50 today.
11
Depreciation and Intrinsic Value
Currently, all well accepted methods of depreciation do not aim to
determine Intrinsic Value. For instance, the Straight-line method simply
spreads the cost of an asset over its lifetime with no concern for the
Time Value of Money.
While accelerated methods might better match market prices in certain
instances, they too do not factor in a discount rate such as the Cost of
Capital.
Hence, using the Book Value of an asset to determine if it is worth
buying or selling that asset would be unwise. As of publishing, no well
accepted depreciation methodology can reasonably determine the
financial benefit resultant from making a buy or sell decision for a used
asset.
12
Looking Beyond Lifetime
The likely reason that well accepted depreciation methods do not factor
the Time Value of Money is because cash flows which could be
discounted are not particularly obvious.
There is often only one cash flow during the lifetime of an asset in order
to acquire it and this typically occurs upon acquisition. Because the
cash flow occurs somewhat immediately upon making a purchase
decision, it already is in present terms and does not need to be
discounted.
However, looking beyond the lifetime of an asset, to its eventual
replacement, another cash flow becomes obvious. As does looking to
the end of the replacement’s lifetime and so forth.
If it is assumed that a business will run indefinitely, with the asset being
a required part of business, one can expect an infinite amount of cash
flows to occur into the future, as the asset is replaced over and over.
13
Present Cost of Ownership
In the prior scenario of the immortal business, with a mortal asset, an
infinite series of cash out flows can be expected into the future. If the
business is about to buy the asset for the first time or imminently
replace the asset, then the present cost of ownership can be calculated
with the below formula:
𝑃 =
𝐶(1 + 𝑟)𝑙
(1 + 𝑟)𝑙−1
Where:
𝑷 = Present expense of continuous asset ownership
𝑪 = Cost of replacement (a negative value)
𝒓 = Cost of capital
𝒍 = Lifetime of the asset
14See arXiv article for formulation
Delayed Present Cost of Ownership
If the business already owns the asset, then the series cash out flows
are delayed by its remaining lifetime. Thus, the Delayed Present Cost of
Ownership will be lower, due to the cash out flows being discounted over
a longer time frame. This Delayed Present Cost of Ownership is
calculated with the below formula:
𝐷 =
𝐶(1 + 𝑟) 𝑎
(1 + 𝑟)𝑙−1
Where:
𝑫= Delayed present expense of continuous asset ownership
𝑪 = Cost of replacement (a negative value)
𝒓 = Cost of capital
𝒍 = Lifetime of the asset
𝒂 = Age of the asset 15See arXiv article for formulation
The Intrinsic Value of an Asset
Because owning an asset reduces the present cost of ownership due to
delaying cash flows. It can be concluded there is Intrinsic Value in
owning the asset vs replacing it, due to savings on present cost that
results. This is quantifiable with the below formula:
𝑉 = 𝐷 − 𝑃 = 𝐶 ×
(1 + 𝑟) 𝑎−(1 + 𝑟)𝑙
(1 + 𝑟)𝑙−1
16
See arXiv article for formulation
Where:
𝑽= Value of the asset
Replacement Approach Depreciation
Because the Intrinsic Value of ownership can be ascertained, a formula
can be determined that will compute the fall in value that coincides with
aging, as a result of the asset approaching its replacement:
∆𝑉 = 𝐶 ×
1 + 𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑑 − 1 + 𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑡
1 + 𝑟 𝑙 − 1
Where:
∆𝑽= The depreciation expense incurred over the period
𝒂 𝒆𝒏𝒅= The age of the asset at the end of the period
𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒕= The age of the asset at the start of the period
Because the Intrinsic Value falls as the asset ages, the fall in value can
be thought of as depreciation.
17
See arXiv article for formulation
Comparison of Depreciation Methods
Replacement Approach Depreciation is different from most other
depreciation methods in that depreciation is incurred more slowly in
early periods but accelerates over time. Below the van is depreciated
using different methods:
It should be noted that Replacement Approach exactly depreciates the
cost of an asset over its lifetime. This is the single commonality
between all generally accepted depreciation methods.
18
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Straight-line Sum of Years Digits Replacement Approach
Cost of Capital Impact
Replacement Approach Depreciation factors in the owners Cost of
Capital into the calculation. As Cost of Capital can vary from business to
business the Intrinsic Value of an asset has the potential to differ. Below
the van is depreciated using different Costs of Capital:
It is evident that the higher an owner’s Cost of Capital the greater value
they will place on the asset. 19
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5% 20% 35%
Conclusion
This primer has highlighted it is possible to apply the Time Value of
Money principle to depreciable assets in order to intrinsically value
them.
Additionally, the fall in intrinsic value that results from asset aging is
effectively its deprecation; with the methodology resultant consistent
with well accepted methods of deprecation.
It must be noted however, a number of assumptions are built into the
formulae presented in the presentation, which limit their utility in many
situations.
Please read my arXiv article Depreciation and the Time Value of Money
to learn more.
Article link: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1605/1605.00080.pdf
Contact: brendon.farrell@griffithuni.edu.au 20