1. City Council
May 14, 2013

2. Petition for Annexation
• Consider a petition for possible annexation to the city
limits of certain properties situated southwest of San
Angelo
• Area encompassing a 24.484 acre tract extending
northwest from Mills Pass Drive, and located directly
west of an 8.995 acre tract annexed to the City Limits
on March 5, 2013 that comprises the proposed
Prestonwood Addition, Section Two in the southwest
part of the city

3. Intent & Background
• No property is being annexed today or committed to
be annexed today
• Approval would direct staff to begin looking into the
possibility of annexing the property
• Property is situated directly west of property annexed
on March 5, 2013 to City Limits

4. Proposed Timetable
• First public hearing – June 4, 2013
• Second Public hearing – June 18, 2013
• First reading and introduction of an ordinance
annexing the property – July 16, 2013
• Second and final reading of an ordinance annexing the
property – August 6, 2013

9. Zone Change
Z13-11: Harold and Margaret Mueller
• A request for a zone change from Ranch & Estate (R&E) to
Light Manufacturing (ML) to allow for various industrial
activities, on the following property:
• 4017, 4085, 4089, 4091, 4093 and 4125 US Highway 67
Frontage, 3902, 3922 and 3970 Tractor Trail, and 3613,
3669 and 3745 Porter Henderson Drive; more specifically
occupying the Paul Gregory Addition, Block 1, Lots 1-9 (a
replat of Tract B in Section 1 and a replat of Tract C in
Section 2) in northeast San Angelo.
• Six (6) notifications were sent; none received.

10. General Map

11. Site Map

12. Aerial Map

13. Vision Map

14. Looking Northeast at the Subject Property

15. Looking Southwest at the Subject Property

16. Looking East from the Subject Property

17. Staff Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends modifying the proposed
zone change request from Light Manufacturing (MH) to
Heavy Manufacturing (ML).
• Planning Commission recommended approval by a
6-0 vote on April 15, 2013.

18. Criteria of Application
• Compatible with Plans and Policies
• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance
• Compatible with Surrounding Area
• Changed Condition
• Effect on Natural Environment
• Community Need
• Development Patterns

19. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Suitable for industrial development
• Isolated from development
• Low impact on the environment / surrounding uses
• Proximity to major thoroughfares / edge of city-limits
• Serves a community need
• Lack of screening or separation;
• MH zoning allows for most intensive uses in the city;
• Issues with traffic circulation.

21. Historic Overlay Zone
Z 13-13: David and Pam Hilton
• A request for a History Overlay Zone on the following
property:
• 525 Preusser Street, located at the southwest corner of
Preusser Street and North Poe Street; more specifically
occupying the Ellis Addition, Block 4, N 115' of Lots 1 & 2
and E 33.5' of Frary Addition, Block 19, Lot 6, in central
San Angelo.
Twenty-five (25) notifications were sent; none were received.

23. Zoning Map

24. Aerial Map

25. Looking at the Subject Property from N Poe Street

26. Photographs of Subject Property
Looking at the Subject Property from the
corner of N Poe and Preusser Streets

27. Photographs of Subject Property
Looking West along Preusser Street

28. Photographs of Subject Property
Looking North along N Poe Street

29. Photographs of Subject Property
Looking East along Preusser Street

30. Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
Historic Overlay.
• Design and Historic Review Board recommends
approval by 5-0 vote on April 18, 2013.

31. Criteria of Application
1. Possesses significance in history, architecture,
archaeology, or culture;
2. Associated with historically significant events;
3. Associated with persons significant in our past;
4. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of the times;
5. Represents master work;
6. Represents a visual feature of the city;
7. Possesses highly artistic values;
8. Yields information important to our past.

32. History & Background
• House was constructed in 1903;
• Reflective of two styles - Free Classic and Queen
Anne Victorian
– Steep hipped roof, front-facing gable, one story
porch that extends across two sides of the house
– Decorative shingles, classical columns, Dentil
molding, and Palladian windows, and a
complicated, asymmetrical shape

33. History & Background
• Prevalent in late 1800s to early 1900s, far less
common today;
• The style flourished after the height of the Industrial
Revolution;
• Victorians have quite distinctive architectural
design, commonly referred as “fanciful” and
“flamboyant” in nature;
• The two story structure, wood frame construction;
• It measures roughly 2,500 square feet in size, larger
than many of the homes in the area;

34. History & Background
• House is comprised 7 colors – to include vivid
Geranium Leaf green with white (trimming) and purple
accents;
• Preusser Street was named after Mayor J. G.
Preusser (1888 to 1891),12 years following the end of
his term as mayor;
• Planned with wide curb-to-curb access (approximately
70 feet) the street provided sufficient maneuvering
room for stagecoaches;

35. History & Background
• The house was home to Professor Rogers William
Moore family
– Teacher then principle, was a pioneering educator
who established a private school here in the city
which operated from 1906 to 1917
– Miss L. B. Moore was a gifted pianist and taught
lessons from the house

36. History & Background
• Mainly traditional homes in the neighborhood;
• Other traditional homes are much smaller (usually a
single story) and not as well-maintained;
• Inherent need to preserve these historic structures;
• Promote a greater sense of continuity and identity for
the neighborhood;

37. History & Background
• If approved, then any alteration, restoration or
rehabilitation of the building's exterior must have a
"Certificate of Appropriateness" approved by the
Design and Historic Review Board.

39. Vision Plan Amendment
• Vision Plan Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the
following area of the City:
• Starting approximately 800 feet west from the intersection
of Loop 306 and North Baze Street, thence in a northerly
direction to FM 2105, and easterly through the city landfill
and encompassing properties annexed in December of
2011, and city owned properties east of North US Highway
67 north and east of the current Industrial Park in the far
northeast portion of San Angelo.
Notification is not required

40. General Map

41. Options
The City Council may:
• Approve the proposed Vision Plan map amendments
as presented;
• Remand the Vision Plan map back to Planning
Commission for further discussion; or
• Deny the proposed Vision Plan Map Amendment in its
entirety or on a property by property basis

42. Staff Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
Vision Plan Map Amendment.
• Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Amendment by a 6-0 vote on March 18, 2013

43. History and Background
• Area annexed in December of 2011
• Several contrasting land uses
• “Industrial” adjacent to “Neighborhood & Rural”
• Parcel by parcel analysis of the northeast region of
town
• Proactive vs. reactive Planning
• Avoiding issues before they happen

44. Site Map

46. Thoroughfare Plan Amendment
• Amendment to Smith Boulevard & Paulann Boulevard
planned projections
• Northeastern city limits to San Angelo and nearby
properties annexed in December of 2011.
Notification is not required

47. General Map

48. Options
The City Council may:
• Approve proposed amendment to the planned future
projection, as recommended and presented by City Staff,
MPO Policy Board, and Planning Commission on an
attached map;
• Remand the matter back to the City Staff, MPO Policy
Board, or Planning Commission with recommendations; or
• Deny any and all proposed amendments to these
proposed collector street extensions.

49. Recommendation
• City Staff recommends approval of this request
• On March 18, 2013 the Planning Commission
recommended approval of this request by vote of 6-0
• On April 11, 2013 the MPO Policy board recommend
approval of this request subject to modifications of FM
2105 and roadways east of current City Limits.

50. Site Map

51. History and Background
• Area annexed in December of 2011;
• Thoroughfare plan designates streets and projections;
• Lack of a major east-west thoroughfare in the area
• Paulann’s proposed extension fixes this problem
• Smith Boulevard’s planned projection bisects several
large and inaccessible tracts of land

52. History and Background
• East of N. 277 curvatures and designations of streets
is inappropriate
• Community opportunity to create linkages before
properties become fully developed
• Developers, landowners, and citizens can plan ahead

53. MPO Policy Board Discussion
• Current efforts by TX DOT in area
• Planning efforts underway
• Projections and extensions through City property need
more evaluation
• Extension of Paulann and Smith Boulevard now make
the most sense
• Following map based on MPO Policy Board
recommendation

56. Vision Plan Amendment
• Proposed Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for
the following area of the City:
• Properties located south from the intersection of Grand
Canal Road and US Highway 277, south to the City
Limit Line, and properties located just east of the City
Limits line, but outside the City Limits in southern San
Angelo.

58. Options
The City Council may:
• Approve the proposed Vision Plan map amendments
as presented;
• Remand the Vision Plan map back to Planning
Commission for further discussion; or
• Deny the proposed Vision Plan Map Amendment in its
entirety or on a property by property basis

59. Staff Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
Vision Plan Map Amendment.
• Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Amendment by a 6-0 vote on April 15, 2013

62. Basis for Recommendation
• Industrial Uses directly adjacent to Neighborhood
• No buffer or transition zone
• Land uses at opposite ends of land use spectrum
• Proposal buffers and diversifies the area
• Protects neighborhood moving forward
• Calls for lower intensity uses
• Creates nodes of activities

63. Basis for Recommendation
• Places a “Neighborhood Center” in an area that is
accessible to the neighborhood
• Current location is not readily accessible given traffic
patterns
• Adds open space buffers and protection

65. Planned Development
PD 13-02: Luke Burnett
• A request for approval of a zone change from Office
Warehouse (OW) to Planned Development (PD) to specifically
allow for manufacturing & production as defined in Section
316.B of the Zoning Ordinance on the following property:
• 1245 Grand Canal Road, located approximately 500 feet east
of the intersection of Grand Canal Road and Clarice Court. The
property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of
Sunset Ranch Estates, Section Two, Block Two, Lot 17B in
southern San Angelo.
Eight (8) notifications sent, one returned in favor

67. Overview map

68. Map

69. Aerial photo

71. Looking southwest from subject property

72. Looking at subject property

73. Looking at remainder of property

74. Options
In considering this application, the Council may:
• Approve the proposed zone change; or
• Remand the application back to Planning Commission; or
• Approve subject to modification of proposed conditions; or
• Deny the proposed zone change

75. Staff Recommendation
• City staff recommends approving the proposed zone
change, subject to conditions in draft ordinance
• Planning Commission recommended approval,
subject to proposed conditions by a 6-0 vote on
April 15, 2013

76. History & Background
General Information
• Area annexed in 1997, several heavy uses in place
• Residential areas established shortly after, expanding
as recently as 2005 through re-subdivision
• Zoned Office Warehouse in 2007 from Office
Commercial
• Houses, undeveloped property, and intense uses in
area

77. Criteria for Approval
• Compatible with Plans and Policies;
• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance;
• Compatible with Surrounding Area;
• Changed Conditions;
• Effect on Natural Environment;
• Community Need; and
• Development Patterns

78. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• PD zoning strictest possible
• Limitations on signage, hours, uses, storage & traffic
• Screening provides a transition into the neighborhood
• Clear delineation of boundaries and transitions
• Clustering of higher intensity uses can occur
• Highest and best use of the property
• ML zoning outright would not be appropriate for parcel

79. Conditions of Ordinance
• Commercial traffic not to use Grand Canal west of
property
• Limited uses allowed on subject property;
• Building materials processing and storage
• No retail sales or customer site visits
• No pole signage or illuminated signage
• Limited hours of operation

80. Conditions of Ordinance
• Stringent screening requirements
• Specific site management requirements
• Lighting
• Debris
• Subdivision must occur before zoning takes place
• Lot dimensions may not change