1. A Technologically-Inclined Classroom for the Developing Student Rachel Saparito, Maggie Semetti, Brianna Shaffer, and Rebecca Jardines York College of Pennsylvania
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. The No Child Left Behind Act’s Position on Using Assistive Technologies
7. What is NCLB? Piece of legislation that requires teachers to provide the least restrictive environment and assistive technologies for all students.
8. Why do teachers need to know? Required to be used by all schools. NCLB provides federal funding for schools with these students.
9. Funding provided to: Buy technology Reduce paperwork and increase flexibility Purchase internet filtration systems Focus the funds on enhancing education through advanced technology Offer matching grants for community technology centers
10. If a student needs a certain type of technology, NCLB requires that the school district provides it for them. The student must also advocate for their specific technology, so that the school district will provide it for them.
11. The whole point behind this was to level the playing field for all students, to get those students who need the extra help caught up to other students who were succeeding in the classroom.
18. A commonly used form of assistive technology is called augmentative and alternative communication.
19. The following interview was conducted with Billie Klunk, a graduate of York College who currently works with learning disabled persons ages 18 to 21.
23. Disabled persons who could benefit from AAC devices include those with cerebral palsy, autism, and Lou Gehrig’s disease.
24.
25. With the touch of a few buttons, these devices allow a person’s thoughts to be heard.
26.
27. Studies have shown that students who use AAC have actually improved in areas such as spelling, comprehending, rhyming, and identifying certain words.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33. Credits (2010). About learning disabilities. retrieved from http://www.childdevelopmentinfo.com/learning/learning_disabilities.shtml Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(3), 194-206. doi:10.1080/08990220802387851 Blischak, D. M., Lombardino, L. J., & Dyson, A. T. (2003, March). Use of speech-generating devices: In support of natural speech. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 19(1), 29-35. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.ycp.edu:8000/login.aspxdirect=true&db=ufh&AN=9985328&site=ehost-live Bush, G.W. (2001, September). "No Child Left Behind" [First Draft]. Retrieved February 6, 2010, from http://georgewbush- whitehouse.archives.gov/news/reports/no-child-left-behind.pdf Chamberlain, B., Kasari, C., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2007). Involvement or isolation? The social networks of children with autism in regular classrooms. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 37 (2), 230-242. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0164-4 Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229-243. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database. Cutter, D., Kemp, G., Segal, J. (2009). Learning disabilities in children. retrieved from http://www.helpguide.org/mental/learning_disabilities.htm Definition Of Autism. Definition Of Autism. Retrieved February 6, 2010, from http://www.definitionofautism.com/ Evans, R. (2010). Some Ideas For Teaching Autistic Children. Reference-and-Education, 1. Retrieved February 16, 2010 Fahy, J. (2006, September 20). Devices give people a chance to speak up. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (PA). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.ycp.edu:8000/login.aspx? direct=true&db=nfh&AN=2W62W62666310219&site=ehost-live Gray, T., Parette, H.P., Peterson-Karlan, G.R., Silver-Pacuilla, H., & Smith, Sean. (2006). The state of assistive technology: Themes from an outcomes summit. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 3(1), 16-33. Hodge, S. (2007, August). Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disability & Society, 22(5), 457-471.doi:10.1080/09687590701427552 Johnston, S. S., Reichle, J., & Evans, J. (2004, February). Supporting augmentative and alternative communication use by beginning communicators with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(1), 20-30. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.ycp.edu:8000/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=12795685&site=ehost-live McNaughton, D. (2008, September). ‘‘Reach for the stars’’: Five principles for the next 25 years of AAC . Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(3), 194-206. doi:10.1080/08990220802387851 Pufpaff, L. A. (2008, August). Barriers to participation in kindergarten literacy instruction for a student with augmentative and alternative communication needs. Psychology in the Schools, 45(7), 582-599. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.ycp.edu:8000/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=33385830&site=ehost-live Raskind, M., Stanberry, K., (2010). Assistive technology tools: Math. Retrieved from http://www.greatschools.org/LD/assistive- technology/math-tools.gs?content=949 Raskind, M., Stanberry, K., (2010). Assistive technology tools: Writing. retrieved from http://www.greatschools.org/LD/assistive- technology/writing-tools.gs?content=960 Williams, M. B., Krezman, C., & McNaughton, D. (2008, September). ‘‘Reach for the stars’’: Five principles for the next 25 years of AAC.