2. Introduction
Overview
Problem
Goals
Constraints
Literature Review
Design Methodology and Materials
Analysis of Information
Synthesis of Design
Alternative Design Options
Approach to Solution and Final Design
Sustainability
Budget
Timeline
References
3. Problem
Recognition:
Urban and suburban development leads to high runoff
rates and low infiltration rates which reduce the quality
of ground and surface water
Definition:
Rapid increase of development in Charleston, SC
leading to high volume of runoff and flooding
http://www.modelstoglobe.com/ESW/Images/Earth_Globe.png
4. Goal
Design a stormwater management plan for Sea Aire
subdivision that:
Meets state and local regulations by ensuring the peak
flow during a 2 and 25 year storm event doesn’t exceed
pre-development levels
Ensures the post-development runoff volume doesn’t
exceed pre-development levels
7. Constraints
Ecological: Must work with existing soil, water table,
vegetation, and waterways
Ultimate use: Residential living and recreational
space
Skills: Limited knowledge and experience with
stormwater design
Cost: Budget of $1200 for design process. Must account
for travel expenses, software, and testing services
8. Questions of User, Client and Designer
User- Residents of Sea Aire
What is a rain garden, why are there plants in the ditch?
What do I have to do?
Client- New Leaf Builders through Robinson Design
Engineers
Will this meet regulations?
Will it cost more?
Designer- The design team and RDE
Will this be long lived?
Can this be an amenity?
9. Governing Equations
Energy Balance
Mass Balance
Curve Number Method
Horton’s Equation
Universal Soil Loss Equation
10. Stormwater Management
Conventional Methods versus LID methods
Conventional methods provide solutions at the bottom
of the site (ponds, basins, ect.)
Low impact development methods encourage
infiltration from all locations on site in an effort to
mimic the more natural process
11. Comparison of Volume
1 – Pre-development
2 – Conventional Methods
3 – LID Methods
LID methods maintain pre-development
runoff volume
while conventional methods
lead to increased volume
http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/green/upload/lid_hydr.pdf
13. Low Impact Development Methods
Green roofs
Rain water collection
Constructed wetlands
Bioretention cells
Rain gardens
Permeable pavement
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ4Z-m20Aw00nkD4n_06eBr9JWP2j7-09BC-PVkD6LVcGVnJe6M4g
https://encrypted-tbn2.
gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQE5A0MNi9kLQ7syPJpxKb0aRJ3k2h5L7U6Zzy3Fy5c
AJWabiTIF5Vo_Ds
http://www.sciotogardens.com/images/rain%20garden.jpg
14. Constructed Wetlands
Public area of development will
need a way to catch and retain
stormwater
Help filter and remove
containments, “Nature’s Kidney”
Shallow depression in the ground
with a level bottom
https://www.clemson.edu/cafls/safes/faculty_staff/research/hitchcock/7_strosnider_et_al_asabe_2007.pdf
15. Design Methodology and Materials
Analysis of Information
Synthesis of Design
Evaluation of Alternatives
LID Techniques
Stormwater Pond
StormwaterWetland
Selection of Final Approach
16. Analysis of Information
Rainfall Distribution Data: Type II
2-year storm: 4.3 inches
25- year storm: 8.0 inches
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Cummulative Rainfall (in)
Time (hours)
17. Determining Site Runoff
Determined weighted curve number for site using
WebSoil Survey Data
Calculated runoff depth using Curve Number Method
Used HEC HMS and SWMM to compute and compare
runoff depth for the entire site
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
24. Average Residential Lot
Lot Area: 4857 ft2
Roof Area: 1133 ft2
Driveway Area: 527 ft2
Garage Area: 264 ft2
40% of the residential lot is impervious
Robinson Design Engineers: Site Layout
26. Design Considerations
Initial Growth of Vegetation
Avoiding Leaks
Cost of Materials
Access to Roof- Maintenance
Pitch of Roof
Gutter System
http://i.stack.imgur.com/tW8B8.jpg
http://www.jrsmith.com/uploads/fileLibrary/1010_rdp_lg.jpg
27. Vegetative Roof Holding Capacity
Designed to hold 50% of the amount of water falling on the
roof during a 2-year storm
Each layer of a vegetative roof has a certain water capacity
Component Water Holding Capacity Total
Plants - -
Media Layer 40%, 4 inches 148.7 ft3
Filter Fabric - -
Drainage Layer 8 L/m2 32.3 ft3
Root Protection Layer 4 L/m2 14.8 ft3
Waterproof Layer - -
Roof Material - -
Total Water Storage: 195 ft3
28. Rain Barrels
Balance between aesthetics and
storage
1800 gallons roof runoff (2 yr.storm)
2700 gallons roof runoff (25 yr. storm)
Linked barrels increased
volume without overwhelming size
Tank Volume: 200 gallon tanks
Dimensions: 47’’height, 36’’ diameter
To be placed on both the house and
garage
Total Storage Capacity: 800 gallons
(4 barrels total)
Overflow management: Automatic
Downspout Diverter
http://gardenwatersaver.com/c
onnector-kits/
http://gardenwatersaver.com/connector-kits/
31. Design Considerations
Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements (PICPs)
Maintenance
Street sweeping
Pressure washing
Vacuum truck
At least once per year, or after evident damage
32. PICP Design
3-inch pavement layer
Surface slope = 2 to 3%
Storage thickness = 6 to 18
inches
Underdrain pipe = 1 to 4
inches from bottom of
layer
http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/stormwater/PublicationFil
es/ICPIreport2004.pdf
33. Infiltration Trench
Underground water storage and infiltration feature
Coarse gravel surrounded by filter fabric and topped
with soil
Schueler, Controlling Urban Runoff
34. Design Details
Appropriate area and volume
15% of the lot area
2196 ft3
Water storage
40% void space
878 ft3
Infiltration rate
http://stormwaterbook.safl.umn.edu/sites/stormwaterbook.safl.umn.edu/files/fig9.3.jpg
35. Rain Garden
Surface Area: 600 ft2
Soil Media – 70% sand content
Depth: 3 ft. (Infiltration rate x 24 hr)
Ponding Depth: 6 in.
Plants: Beautyberry, Palmetto Dwarf, Purple Coneflower
Water Table Level
http://kawarthaconservation.com/images/rain-garden_diagram.jpg
36. Bioretention Cells
Bioretention cells in public area
The cells will overflow into vegetative swales or
underdrain pipes below the bioretention cell to leave
the site via the constructed wetland
http://www.northinlet.sc.edu/LID/FinalDocument/loRes/4.2%20Bioretention%20low%20res.pdf
37. Constructed Wetland
Manage water flowing onto the site through existing
ditch
Treat water for quality and quantity before it leaves the
site
Handle excess runoff from individual lots and
common areas
http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/448/448-407/L_IMG_fig6.jpg
38. Can We Do It?
Design Storm
Pre-Development
Runoff Depth (in)
Post-Development
Runoff Depth (in)
Water Storage Capacities of LID Methods
• If all LID methods were used together the 25 year storm could
theoretically be contained on each property
• Due to spatial and budgetary constraints, not all LID controls will be
installed on a property
• Balance between space allotment, water capacity, and budget
• Therefore, management of flow into the main area from individual
plots must still be considered
Increase in Runoff
Depth After
Development (with
no LID controls) (in)
Runoff Volume (gal)
2 year 0.62 3.14 2.52 7629
25 year 2.7 6.56 3.86 11686
Units Green Roof Rain Barrels Infiltration Trench Permeable Pavement Rain Garden Total Water Storage
Gallons 1465 800 6567 1800 5520 16152
Feet3 196 107 878 241 738 2159
41. Sustainability Measures
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
Materials selected
Carbon and Water costs
Efficiency
Societal Issues
Overall Carbon and Water footprint
42. Life Cycle Assessment
Vegetative Roof:
Polypropylene, HDPE, PVC, media transportation
Rain Garden and Bioretention Cell:
PVC, material transportation, construction
Porous Pavement:
PICP, gravel
Infiltration Trench:
Geotex filter fabric, gravel, excavation and transportation
Rain Barrel:
Polyethylene
Constructed Wetland:
Plants, soil media, drain materials
43. LCA Cont.
Ecological – goal of zero impact on the runoff volume
coming from the site as a means of maintaining the
existing ecosystem
Social – ultimately serves the people living in the
development. Promotes an active lifestyle and provides
an educational opportunity.
Economic – prevents future flooding and erosion
Ethical– aim to balance the wishes of the clients and
the biological integrity of the site
44. Sustainability
Efficiency
Capture 100% of stormwater runoff on site for design
storm
Carbon and Water footprint
Carbon negative
Gravity fed systems
Plants will sequester carbon
Potential for decreased freshwater demands due to
rainwater recycling (rain barrels)
45. Budget
Vegetative Roof
$5700 not including construction cost or initial roofing cost,
approximately $5/ft3
Rain Garden:
$2300, not including installation costs
Porous Pavement:
$3450, not including installation costs
Rain Barrels:
$1170 for all 4
Infiltration Trench:
$1800 gravel and geotex
46. Timeline
Event 9/8 9/10 9/17 9/24 10/1 10/7 10/8 10/15 10/22 10/29 11/5 11/12 11/19 11/26 12/3
Finish Proposal
Present Proposal
Finish majority of Literature Review
Pick Design
Start Writing Midterm Paper
3- week progress report
Develop preliminary Design
Calculations for Design
Finish Writing Midterm paper
Midterm Presentation and paper due
Cost Analysis for Design
Bring together final design
Write Final Paper
Final Presentation
48. References
http://landstudy.org/Resources.html
Fangmeier, D.D., Elliot, W.J., Huffman, R.L.,
Workman, S.R. 2013. Wetlands. Soil and Water
Conservation Engineering. Seventh Edition. 287-302.
Best Management Practices Handbook. South
Carolina Department of Health and Environmental
Control.
www.scdhec.gov/Environment/waterquality/stormwat
er/BMPHandbook/