Presentasi Diskusi Meja Bundar Teknologi Pemilu Apa yang Dibutuhkan Pemilu Indonesia

1. What Electoral
Technology
Meets Indonesia’s
Needs?
HADAR NAFIS GUMAY
10/20/2017

2. ELECTION
BEFORE 1999
The election result was entered in the Regency/Municipality Level  the data sent
to the national level by VSAT satellite
ELECTION 1999
Manual
ELECTION 2004 E-recap / National Tabulation
 the aim is public could know the election result earlier than the manually recap
 Process : form C1 IT collected to the District Level  entered by operator and
sent to the KPU Data Centre  the data displayed on the KPU website
ELECTION 2009 E-recap / National Tabulation, with new tools (scanner combined with ICR /
Intelligent Character Recognition)
 Form C1 IT collected in teh Regency/Municipality Level  the documents
were scanned  sent to the KPU Data Centre  displayed on the KPU website
HISTORY
IMPLEMENTATION OF ICT IN INDONESIA ELECTION
10/20/2017

3. ELECTION 2014
Situng : Scanning
● C1 Form
o A paper where votes written down in a table for every voting both. Totally
over 445 thousands C1 forms for Legislative election and more than 472
thousand for Presidential election.
● Scanning
o C1 papers were being scanned in district office, 497 offices total.
o The C1 scanned images were uploaded immediately after it scanned.
o The scanning and uploading were integrated in one desktop application that
connected to the internet in a secured connection.
o The scanners type is Automatic Document Feeder (ADF)
10/20/2017

4. ● Data Entry Village Level  Form D1
o Based on polling stations result, the recapitulation was written in a paper, established as an official result in a plenary where
attended by witnesses. The result named as C1.
● Data Entry Sub District Level  Form DA1
o Based on C1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DA1.
o DA1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet, sent to District Office/Portal
● Data Entry District Level  Form DB1
o Based on DA1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DB1.
o DB1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet and then uploaded to SITUNG Portal
● Data Entry Provincial Level (Provinsi)  DC1
o Based on DB1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DC1.
o DC1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet and then uploaded to SITUNG Portal
● Data Entry National Level
o Based on DC1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. Uploaded to public portal
Situng : Publication of Recapitulation Form
10/20/2017

5. ● Verification
o DA1, DB1 and DC1 were subject to verification
o It will be released to public portal once it verified
o Verification conducted by the same officers whose done the
data entry
● Publication
o All C1 were published without verification
o All DA1, DB1 and DC1 were published with verification
SITUNG: Verification & Publication
10/20/2017

6. SITUNG- Scan C1 Form
10/20/2017

7. Scanned C1 Form Public Portal
10/20/2017

8. Scanned C1 Form Public Portal
10/20/2017

9. Scanned C1 Form Public Portal
10/20/2017

10. Incorrect C1 scanned
10/20/2017

11. Correct Scanned C1
10/20/2017

12. C1 Example and Infographics
10/20/2017

13. Portal for Recapitulation
10/20/2017

14. TABULATION – ENTRY RESULT
10/20/2017

15. The Usage of ICT on Election Process
• Information System for Voter Registration
(SIDALIH)
• Information System for Counting (SITUNG)
Information System for Logistics (SILOG)
• Information System for Boundary
Delimitation (SIDAPIL)
• Information System for Candidacy (SILON)
• Information System for Political Party
Verification
10/20/2017

16. ELECTION 2014
The Usage of ICT on 2014 Election Process :
• Information System for Voter Registration (SIDALIH)
• Information System for Counting (SITUNG)
• Information System for Logistics (SILOG)
• Information System for Boundary Delimitation (SIDAPIL)
• Information System for Candidacy (SILON)
• Information System for Political Party Verification
10/20/2017

17. IT Study Team
(e-voting, e-counting, e-recap)
• Responding to the idea of using IT on Voting, Counting, and recapitulation process,
KPU forming the IT Study Team
• This Team consist of representative from CSO, Government, Academics, Election
Observer Experts, Constitutional Expert, and IT Expert
• This team examines whether e-voting, e-counting, and e-recap
• Needed or not needed to be impelemented
• Can or can not be implemented
• The methodology of examination
• Literature Review
• Comparative Study (USA, India, Dutch, Philippine, Brazil, Germany)
• Field visits (South Korea and Philippine)
10/20/2017

18. Election Issues and Technology Needs
1. Voting Stage
• Not many significant problems happened in this stage during the history of
Indonesia election
2. Counting Stage
(+) E-counting might be reduce the potential of human error on filling the
recapitulation form, impartiality of the polling station offices, and speed up the
process
(-) E-counting reduce the value of transparency, public partitipation on counting
process, and euphoria of democracy on polling station
10/20/2017

19. E-voting and E-counting
1. applying e-voting and e-counting can remove the sense of ownership
on voting process , since sovereignty of the people replaced by
technology;
2. The complexity and the weaknesses of the machine can reduce the
public trust to the electoral process itself;
3. Application of the voting machines are not correlated with the
assumption that Indonesia has developed or not, even many
developed countries and well-established democracy leave e-voting;
4. The use of e-voting machines increase the cost of elections, not only
when the machine is purchased, but also the cost of management,
education and training, storage and treatment;
5. The use of e-voting dereasing the trust and politic support when the
loser blaming the accuracy of the technology;
10/20/2017

20. 1. Recapitulation Stage
• This stage is the most problematic stage  it takes a long time
• Changes in the result of recapitulation from the bottom to the upper level is the
main object for Electoral Dispute in Constitutional Court
• E-recap is a strategic choice to overcome the problem
during the recapitulation process
10/20/2017

21. E-Recap is Strategic Choice for Indonesia
1. E-recap shortens the duration needed for recapitulation
process, so the public and electoral contestant can get the
result in a short time. This can reduce vulnerability and
uncertainty;
2. No human error;
3. As a machines, e-recap do not take into account the
emotions and interest of any party;
4. Technologically, e-recap is the most easily process compare
to e-voting and e-counting. By implementing e-recap as the
first stage of implementing technology in election, we have
meet the rule of technology principle, which is starting the
implementation from the most easily stage, to the more and
more difficult ones;
5. E-recap can be designed and manufactured in the country;
10/20/2017

22. Alternative Recommendation of E-Recap
Local Application  the result from each polling station
manually inputted in a computer that has been installed with
recap application
Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD)
Application  using short messages services (SMS) to send
the election result from the polling station
Seven Segment Application  standard of hand-writting in
filling the form
10/20/2017

23. Sample of C1 Form
using Seven-segment
10/20/2017

24. Application of Processing C1 form in seven-
segment
10/20/2017

25. 10/20/2017

26. Thank You
Melayani Pemilih Menggunakan Hak Pilihnya
www.kpu.go.id
10/20/2017