Legal Research Methodology

1. 1
EMPIRICAL LEGAL RESEARCH
THE TERM RESEARCH:
The term ‘Research’ consists of two words: Research = Re + Search
Etymologically 'research' is from a French word 'reacercher meaning 'to search' and a Latin word
'circare' meaning 'to go round in a circle'.1
‘Re’ means again and again and ‘Search’ means to find out
something, the following is the process:
Observes Collection of Data
Person Phenomena Conclusion
Again & Again Analysis of Data
Therefore, research means to observe the phenomena again and again from different dimensions.
The research is a process of which a person observes the phenomena repetitively and collects the data
and on the basis of data he draws some conclusions. Research is oriented towards the discovery of
relationship that exists among phenomena of the world in which we live.2
DEFINITIONS OF RESEARCH:
According to:-
Webster's International Dictionary: "Research has been defined as 'a careful and critical enquiry or
examination in seeking facts or principles, diligent investigation in order to ascertain something"3
P.V. Young:-"Research is a systematic method of discovering the new facts or verifying the old facts,
their sequences, inter-relationship, casual explanations and the natural laws which govern them"4
Fred N.Kerlinger:- "Research is a systematic, controlled, empirical and critical investigation of
hypothetical propositions about the presumed relation among Natural phenomena.5
Redman & Mary:- "Systematized effort to gain new knowledge"6
C. Francies Rummel:- “Research is an endeavour to discover, develop and verify knowledge. It is an
intellectual process that has developed over hundreds of years, ever changing in purpose and form and
always searching for truth.”
1
Dr. S.R.Myneni, Legal Research Methodology, Allahabad Law Agency, Faridabad, India, 4th ed.,2009,p.1
2
Yogesh Kumar Singh, Fundamental of Research Methodology and Statistics, New Age International (P.) Ltd., New Delhi,
India, 2006,p.2-3
3
Supranote 1, p.1
4
Hans Raj, Theory and Practice in Social Research, Surjeet Publication Delhi, India, 1999,p.3
5
Fred N.Kerlinger, Foundation of Beheavioral Research, Surjeet Publication, Delhi India,1986 p.11
6
Supranote 1,p.2

2. 2
Therefore it can be said that; Research is looking into the phenomena again and again and study the
problem differently and thoroughly each time. This repetitive process of searching to come closer and
closer to the truth is known as research. "Repetitive Search is RESEARCH".7
OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH
Any research has the following 3 Objectives:
1. Theoretical objective - Formulate new theories, principles or laws. Such type of research is
explanatory.
2. Factual objective- To find out new facts. This objective is by nature descriptive, which describe facts
or events which happened previously.
3. Application objective- It does not contribute a new knowledge in the fund of human knowledge but
suggests new applications. By application we mean improvement and modification in practice.8
LEGAL RESEARCH:
Legal Research is not essentially different from other types of research. This too is search for authority
to verify some hypothesis and is a continuum. Its issues of enquiry naturally relate to pure law or law in
relation to society. Under the broad theme of enquiry about law, an analysis is made of the rules,
concepts and institutions of the law and of the legal system itself. Such an enquiry tends to be:
1. Evolutive- To find out evolution of legal facts (Rule, concept, institution or the legal system itself)
2. Explicative- To ascertain the nature, scope and source of law in order to explain what law is and also
to spell out the several propositions, parts and facts of law and the legal system.
3. Identificatory- To ascertain for whom (i.e. for whose benefit) a legal fact (Rule, concept, institution or
the system of law) is made and exists.
4. Impact Analysis- To analyze the impact of an established or newly conceived legal provisions, rule or
institution. Impact analysis is the study of the effect of law in and on the society.
5. Projective and predictive- To anticipate the effect of a proposed legal measure. These studies are
mainly attitudinal, intended to anticipate the probable response in terms of rejection or acceptance
of a proposed measure by the people (Pre legislative studies). It helps to minimize incidence of
undesirable consequences by judging the feasibility of proposed law and advise the law makers
accordingly.
6. Interactive: To study the process of interaction between law and other relevant forces, factors and
institutions operative in society. It conceives law is a part of the society therefore it too is covered by
the order of mutual interdependence with the other parts of the society.
7
Prem R. Pant, Social science research and thesis writing, Buddha Academic Publisher and distibutors pvt. Ltd., Kathmandu,
2014, p.4
8
Supranote 2,p.2-3

3. 3
7. Interpretative- To interpret an existing formal legal fact. This is the most common kind of legal
research. Normally statues, texts and judicial decision are the subject matter of research in this
category. Interpretation drawn from grammar, language and law, common sense and public policy
are the tools that aid this kind of research.
8. Collative- To collate legal facts pertaining to a given situation. It may be by way of preparing a digest
of statutory provisions, judicial decisions and customary law or preparing bibliographies of legal
materials including legal writings. It leads to waste of time, as most of the researcher's time is
consumed in trying to locate the existing legal materials on his topic. So well collated material will
serve a useful purpose reducing the labour of researchers.9
LEGAL RESEARCH AS A TOOL OF LAW REFORM:
When research is undertaken as a part of the process of law reform, it is undertaken with a definite end
namely making suggestions for improvements in the law on concrete and easily identifiable matters and
the formulation of those proposals in precise terms.10
Type of Research needed for Law reform:
1. Analytical- Finding out the existing law
2. Historical- Finding out the previous law in order to understand the reason behind the
existing law and the course of its evolution
3. Comparative- Finding out what the law is in the other countries and considering whether it
can be drawn upon, with or without modification
4. Statistical- Collection of statistics to show the working of the existing law
5. Critical- Finding out the defects in the existing law and suggesting reforms
TYPES OF RESEARCH:
Research can be classified from the view point or perspective as,11
BASED ON TYPE OF RESEARCH
Application Pure (Basic or Fundamental) & Applied
Objective Descriptive, Exploratory, Correlative & Explanatory
Inquiry Mode Quantitative & Qualitative
Time(s) Period One time research & Longitudinal
Rational & Factual Conceptual Research & Empirical Research
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH
The word empirical means information gained by experience, observation, or experiment. Empirical
Research can be defined as "research based on experimentation or observation (evidence)". Such
9
S.K.Verma, M Afzal Wani,(eds.), Legal Research Methodology, The Indian Law Institute, 2001,p.139
10
Supra note 9,p.112-113
11
http://www.slideshare.net/anilkumarkhadka/research-methodology-notes?related=1

4. 4
research is conducted to test a hypothesis". The central theme in scientific method is that all evidence
must be empirical which means it is based on evidence.
The term "empirical" was originally used to refer to certain ancient Greek practitioners of medicine who
rejected adherence to the dogmatic doctrines of the day, preferring instead to rely on observation of
phenomena as perceived in experience. The doctrine of empiricism was first explicitly formulated by
John Locke in the 17th century. Locke argued that the mind in a tabula rasa ("Clean Slat or blank tablet,".
Locke actually used the words "White paper") on which experiences print their marks.
Such empiricism denies that humans have innate ideas or that anything is knowable without reference
to experience. This method is generally taken to mean the collection of data on which to base a theory
or derive a conclusion in science. It is part of the scientific method of study, but is often mistakenly
assumed to be synonymous with the experimental method.
The fundamental objective of empirical research is to make inferences- that is, using known facts to
understand unknown facts. Typically we use observable data (known facts) to test certain hypotheses
which are guided by theory to uncover these unknown facts.
Legal research is one of the aspects of study of human behaviour, their interactions, and attitudes
pertaining to any law. Legal Phenomena require their own research methodology. The Nature of Legal
issues and the subject matter of law is radically different from other sciences. Therefore, the content of
proposition and explanations is also different. The methodology of legal studies involves its own rules,
interpretations and criteria for admissible explanations as well as research design, data collecting
techniques and data processing routines. Legal studies lack the appropriate methods, tools and
techniques suitable for the legal issues. In most of the legal investigations, qualitative data has to be
analyzed. Hence, this separate study of legal methodology is taken up.12
The research which is conducted to explore, describe or to interpret the law are purely Legal in nature
otherwise the scope of the law is in and on the society. Laws are made to regulate the behavior of the
people living in a society and social institutions and to control social phenomenon as a whole. Laws are
also enacted to ensure the rights and liberties of the people and to impose duties on them. So most of
the legal research are Socio-legal in nature (to study human attitude, behaviors, their interactions and
perceptions pertaining to a law or a pre-legal study; and study of the impact of a law in the society.)
There is a saying that 'society grows faster than the law‘, Law is an instrument of social change so it must
keep equal pace with a progressive modern, society.
Conducting empirical research in law is of recent origin. Empiric means 'relying solely on observation
and experiment, not on theory'. The empirical research is carried out by collecting and gathering data or
information relating to universe by the first hand study.
Empirical Legal Studies is a growing field of legal study which emphasizes the use of empirical research
approaches similar to other social science disciplines such as economics, political science, sociology, and
12
Dr. S.R.Myneni, Legal Research Methodology, Allahabad Law Agency, Faridabad, India, 4th ed.,2009,p.11

5. 5
psychology.13
The methods like observation, interview, questionnaire, survey and case study are used
for the collection of data in empirical legal studies.
EMPIRICAL CYCLE
The Empirical Cycle consists of the following stages:
14
IMPORTANCE OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL RESEARCH
Law is an instrument of social change. It must keep pace with a progressive modern, society. Living in
the present times is a more complicated process that what it was in the past times. The problems of
today cannot be solved by the methods or tools known before. These will have to be altered from time
to time to suit the changing social circumstances. Social change in society can be brought about either
through welfare measures, which must be provided in abundance, or through persuasion by creating a
strong public opinion and awareness against age-old prejudices, or lastly, by legislation. The first two of
these measures have failed to make any appreciable impact; they have failed even to touch the fringe of
the problem of the downtrodden (exploited or demoralized by the people in authority) millions who
need them most.
Social workers and other are engaged in various ways of persuasion but they reach out only to a small
segment of the vast population. Besides, persuasion has only a temporary effect on the people. To
illustrate the point, social workers who revolted against un-touchability, laws prohibiting child marriage
and various other legislative measures of social reform will not root out the evil completely from the
society. This is so because, even though the government of the day, with its majority in parliament, may
pass a law, its implementation requires the support of the judiciary, the police and strong public
opinion.15
13
http:/www.law.harvard.edu/library/empirical-research-services/index.html
14
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_research
15
S.K.Verma, M Afzal Wani,(eds.), Legal Research Methodology, The Indian Law Institute, 2001,p.273
Observation- Collecting and organizing empirical facts to form hypothesis
Induction- The process of forming hypothesis
Deduction- Deduct consequences with newly gained empirical data
Evaluation- Perform evaluation of outcome of testing

6. 6
Legal research can enable us to find out the deficiencies in an enactment and the problems of its
implementation. The deficiencies in enactments and the problems of their implementation can only be
highlighted with the help of Empirical studies.
Elsewhere, It has been pointed out with illustration that scientific knowledge represents knowledge
about true reality (Reality as it exists) and empirical knowledge stands for the empirical reality (Reality
as we perceive it). True reality and empirical reality are not co-terminus. Therefore, empirical knowledge
by itself does not enable us to know the true reality. But the use of the scientific method provides with a
bridge between the empirical knowledge and true knowledge.
Thus empirical research is an integral part of the scientific method which combines reasoning with
observation, and discovery with justification, for the acquisition of scientific knowledge. The search for
the scientific knowledge usually starts with a scientific problem and the knowledge is the product of the
process of understanding and solution of the problem. The solution of a problem is arrived at in two
stages:
First a tentative solution of the problem is obtained through reasoning from the available knowledge,
which is what is meant by discovery; second, the tentative solution is verified through observation,
which is referred to as justification. Empirical Research stands for the various procedures of obtaining,
analyzing and presenting data in the context of justification. It is useful for acquiring scientific
knowledge only if it is undertaken as a complement to the theoretical exercise in scientific method.16
The empirical research can explain:
 What type of law can be enacted
 The causative factors for the delay in administering justice
 Problems that arise because of the variation in the interpretations given by lawyers; and
 The underlying factors which affect the judgment by ascertaining the workload of judges, lawyers
and other personnel in legal machinery
 The empirical studies can assist in suggesting modifications in the existing system of judiciary,
enforcement machinery and in the teaching and practice of law.17
16
Supranote,15,p.309
17
Supranote 16, p.274

7. 7
METHODS IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH:
There are two main methods in empirical research,
Experimental Non-Experimental
They deal with cause and effect relationship. In this method two
groups -experimental group and control group are chosen such
that they do not differ from each other. The experimental group
is exposed to the assumed causal variable while the control group
is not. The two groups are then compared in terms of the
assumed effects. This type of method is only suitable for physical
sciences, like in physics, chemistry, botany, laboratory research
and in natural science.
Subjects are observed without experimental intervention.
In Socio-legal researches, human conduct, attitudes and
behavior are the subject matter of the study which can not
be controlled by the researcher. So the researcher has to
observe without any experimental intervention. The
methods like observation, interview, questionnaire, survey
and case study has to be employed.
METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
Conducting empirical research in law is carried out by collecting and gathering data or information
relating to universe by the first hand study. The methods like observation, interview, questionnaire,
survey and case study are employed in the empirical legal research.
There are two methods of data collection:
a. Census- When the whole area population of persons is contacted the method is known as census
method. Population is constituted of all the individuals, things, events, documents or observation
cases etc.
b. Sampling- Most research studies are based on samples. When a small group is selected as
representative of the whole it is known as sample method. The method of selecting for study a
portion of the universe with a view to draw conclusions about the universe is total is known as
sampling.18
SAMPLING METHOD:
A researcher while doing socio-legal research has to decide basically two important things:
1. What will be the scope of the study? 2. What will be the population or universe of the study?
Researcher may decide to cover the whole population, if he has time, energy, resources and capacity. If
that is done, is known as census method of study. On the other hand he can pick up a small unit out of
the whole study. Such a unit is expected to be representative of the whole population. It is felt that
when this unit is studied, the whole population will be studied. In other word the conclusion drawn will
be representative of the whole group. When that is done it is called sampling method.19
Some
terminology mostly used in sampling method can be defined as follows:
Population or Universe:- Population or Universe means, the entire mass of observations, which is the
parent group from which a sample is to be formed.
18
Supranote 12,p.119
19
Hans Raj, Theory and Practice in Social Research, Surjeet Publication Delhi, India, 1999,p., p.22

8. 8
Sample Size: -The proportion of the population taken from the universe for the study is known as
sample size. A good sample size is one which fulfils the requirements of efficiency, Representativeness
and reliability as well as flexibility. The size of the sample is no necessary insurance of its
representativeness. Relatively small samples properly selected may be much more reliable than large
samples properly selected.20
Randomization- Randomization is a method of sampling in which each individual of the population has
the equal chance or probability of selection of the individuals for constituting a sample. All members of
the population have essentially the same probability of being selected. The following are the main
characteristics of randomization.21
20
Supranote, 12, p.225
21
Supranote,2,p.84

9. 9
TYPES OF SAMPLING DESIGNS
Several methods have been devised to select representative samples. In general two types (Probability & Non-
probability) of techniques of sampling are as follows:
Sampling Method
22
Probability Sampling Non Probability Sampling
(Sample selected in such a way that every element chosen Samples which are not determined by
has a known probability of being included. Which gives the chance, but rather by personal convenience
probability that the sample is representative of population.) or judgment of the researcher
Incidental or accidental sample Purposive or Judgment sample Quota sample
Types or Techniques in Probability Sampling
Simple random sampling Stratified sampling Multi-stage sampling.
.
Systematic sampling Cluster sampling
22
Source: P.R. Pant , C.K.Khthari,Yogesh Kumar Singh,Hans Raj & P.R. Joshi
In which each element of the population has an
equal and independent chance of being included
in the sample i.e. a sample selected by
randomization method is known as
simple-random sample and this technique is
simple random-sampling. Randomization can
be done by using the techniques as :
- Tossing a coin , - Throwing a dice
- Lottery method, - Blind folded method
-By using random table of ‘Tippett’s Table’.
It is an improvement over the simple random sampling. This method
requires the complete information about the population. There
should be a list of information of all the individuals of the
population in any systematic way. Now the size of the sample is
decided
Let sample size = n, & Population size = N
Now we select each N/nth individual from the list and thus we
have the desired size of sample which is known as systematic
sample. Thus for this technique of sampling population should be
arranged in any systematic way.
The population is divided into smaller
homogenous group (Strata) on the basis of
some characteristics and from each of these
group a predetermined number of units are
randomly selected. This may be of 3 types
1. Disproportionate stratified sampling.
2. Proportionate stratified sampling.
3. Optimum allocation stratified sampling.
The total population (area) is divided into a
number of relatively small subdivisions
(cluster) and some of these cluster are
randomly selected for inclusion in the overall
sample
It consists in first selecting the
clusters and then selecting a
specified number of elements from
each cluster. This sample is more
comprehensive and representative
of the population.
Researcher selects any easily available
sample he/she come across. In this it is
not possible to know whether the
sample is representative or not.
The researcher uses self judgment in
the choice and includes only those
items of the universe in the sample,
which are convenient to him/her.
Both Stratification and judgment is
used. Sample of prefixed size are taken
from each stratum of the universe using
judgment sampling method

10. 10
A. OBSERVATION METHOD:
In socio-legal research, one of the most important and extensively used methods is observation.
Observation is a method that employs vision as its main means of data collection.
Observation is the process of recognizing and noting people, objects and occurrences rather than asking
for information. Creswell defined it as 'the careful watching and recording of somebody or something in
a systematic way to establish knowledge'. Williman defined it as ' the systematic recording of observable
phenomenon or behaviour in a natural setting.'23
TYPES OF OBSERVATION:24
1. Uncontrolled and controlled observation:- In uncontrolled observation, observation is made in the
natural surroundings and the activities are performed in their usual course without being or guided by
an external force. The observer visits the place of occurrence of phenomena in order to observe. He
resorts to careful scrutiny of real life situation making no attempt to use precision instruments. Most of
the socio legal phenomena have to be observed in an uncontrolled way it is useful in explanatory
studies.
Where as,
Controlled observation controls are imposed in the observation or on the object. Generally the control
on the object in socio- legal studies is difficult, so controls are imposed on the observer himself. Some of
Such control are detail observation plan, use of observation schedules, use of technology and appliances
(Photo, recordings), use of hypotheses, use of control groups, use of team observation etc.
2. Participant and non participant observation:-
In Participant observation the investigator actually participates in the activities of the group under
investigation. Where as in non participant observation the observer does not actually participate in the
activities of the group. But simply observes them from the distance. In this type though the observer
associated himself with the group physically, he keeps aloof from its activities while he observes the
phenomena as it occurs passively. They are also called as quasi-participant or partial participate
observation.
3. Structured and un-structured observation:-
In structured observation, the units to be observed are carefully defined, information to be collected is
recorded, the sources of data are selected and the conditions of observation are standardized. The use
of these techniques pre-supposes that the investigator knows what aspects of the situation under study
are relevant to his research purposes and is in a position therefore to develop a specific plan for making
and recording observations before he actually begins the collection of data. Observation schedule are
prepared in advance and the observation is made according to the plan to record the observed facts in
23
Prem R. Pant, Social science research and thesis writing, Buddha Academic Publisher and distibutors pvt. Ltd., Kathmandu,
2014, p.265
24
Supranote 12,p.186

11. 11
the prepared schedules- the observation schedule are the record of the facts observed by the
researcher,
Where as, The un-structured observation is exactly the opposite of structured observation. In this
observation the observer does not know in advance which aspects of the situation is likely to change as
he proceeds. They may lead to change in the object he observes. The unstructured observation is
flexible. The observer is always prepared to draw his clues from unanticipated events.
4. Intra-subjective and inter-subjective observation:-
The test of intra subjectivity (or reliability) is that repeated observation of a constant phenomenon by
the same observer will yield constant data, while the test of inter-subjectivity consists of finding that
repeated observations of a constant phenomenon by different observers yield constant data. These
methods assure the freedom from personal or cultural bias or partiality. Inter-subjective observation by
two or more persons provides opportunity to compare their notes and check bias.
Advantage & Disadvantage of Observation Method can be summarized as follows:
25
Advantages Disadvantages
Direct & First hand information can be obtained Low Reliability of the findings
Data can be collected in natural condition It is costly
Less time consuming for the respondents No Natural Atmosphere can be found for the study
Simultaneous occurrence and recording of the information Slow Process or occurrence of phenomenon is slow
B. QUESTIONNAIRE METHOD:
Questionnaire method is a method in socio-legal research, in which information is obtained with the
help of a questionnaire. In other words with the help of a set of questions all the required data is
collected. ' A questionnaire is a formal list of question designed to gather responses from respondents
on a given topic'.26
In this method the investigator does not go to any respondent for the collection of information. He
simply mails the questionnaire and collects the required information on the basis of replies received by
him.
While defining a questionnaire G. Lundberg has said "Fundamentally, the questionnaire is a set of stimuli
to which illiterate people are exposed in order to observe their verbal beheaviour under social stimuli."
Bogardus has said ' a questionnaire is list of questions sent to a number of persons for them to answer.'
Form all the definitions it becomes clear that, Questionnaire is set of questions which is sent to
respondents and the investigator himself does not go to the informant for collecting information. The
25
Supranote 19, p.27
26
Supranote, 23, p.224

12. 12
respondent sends reply by filling in the questionnaire and the information is then fed into the research
project.27
QUESTIONNAIRE & SCHEDULE:
Sometimes two terms are quite confused with each other. But in actual practice there is difference
between the two "The questionnaire is generally sent through the mail to the informants to be answered
as specified in a covering letter, but otherwise without further assistance from the sender. The schedule
on the other hand, is generally filled out by research worker or the enumerator who can interpret the
questions when necessary"
In other words the difference between the two is that, whereas in the case of questionnaire no
interpreter is needed, in the case of schedule there is an interpreter who interprets the questions and
fills in the replies.
In the words of Goode and Hatt, "The questionnaire is differentiated from the schedule and interview
guide by the fact that is is self administered." Thus whereas a questionnaire is self administered, a
schedule is not and needs the assistance of some one else to help him in completing his job.28
FORMS OF QUESTIONNAIRE:29
Questionnaire are of many form. These may broadly divided as structured /standardized questionnaire
and un-structured or non- structure questionnaires.
1. Structured Questionnaires-
In the words of P.V. Young "Structured questionnaires are those which pose definite, concrete and
preordained questions, that is they are prepared in advance and not constructed on the spot during the
questioning period." The forms of particular questions may require responses which are either closed or
open.
2. Closed form questionnaire:-
Closed form questionnaire are used when some sort of categorized data is required. In other words
when the data needs to be put into definite classification. In this the questions in the questionnaire are
so worded that replies can be found out from the alternative replies provided therein. All that
respondents is to do is that he is to pick up reply from one of the alternatives and write that down.
3. Open form questionnaire:-
Open end questionnaire are those where the responses are free and spontaneous expression on the
part of the informant who is not limited in his replies to a particular question posed to him. These
responses are used for intensive studies of limited number of cases or for preliminary exploration of
new problems and situations.
27
Supranote 19, page, 136
28
Supranote,19, p.137
29
Supranote 19, p.147

13. 13
In this question it is possible for the respondent to write a descriptive essay to express his viewpoint and
attitude at length. Open form questionnaire can prove useful where primary information to be
developed is qualitative in nature. But difficulty with these questions is that sometimes wide and
ambiguous responses received are meaningless. Since the responses are non-directed therefore
problem of classification and analysis really becomes very serious.
4. Pictorial Questionnaire:-
The idea of such questions is to promote interest in answering the questions. This type of questionnaire
is used in such studies where social attitudes and prejudices of the children are discussed and
information is sought about them.
5. Un-structured Questionnaire:-
As against structured questionnaires, there are un-structured questionnaires as well. These deal with
definite subject matter areas. Flexibility is the main characteristics of this questionnaire. In the words of
P.V.Young " It is designed to obtain view points, opinions, attitudes and show the relationship and inter-
connection between the data, which might escape notice under more mechanical type of interrogation."
This provides the respondents maximum opportunity to express his viewpoint and experiences. It is
used for limited number of studies e.g. Studies of personal experiences, belief and attitudes.
Essentials of a Good Questionnaire:-30
o Questions should be short & simple
o Questions should proceed in logical sequence moving form easy to more difficult question
o Technical terms and expression capable of different interpretation should be avoided
o Question may be dichotomous (yes/No), multiple choice (alternative choice listed).
o Responses acquired from open ended question's are difficult to analyze so open ended questions is
to be avoided to the extent possible.
o Question affecting sentiments of the respondents should be avoided.
o Brief direction for filling up the questionnaire should be given.
o The physical appearance (attractive looking, quality of the paper along with its color) of the
questionnaire, particularly in mailed survey is a plus point to attract the attention of the recipients.
Advantages and disadvantages of Questionnaire:-
31
Advantages Disadvantages
Less expensive, saves time and energy It is self administered so might have unintelligent reply
It offers great anonymity (ensured the id of the respondent is
kept confidential)
Response rate might be low
Wide area can be covered Opportunity of clarify any issue is lacking
30
C.R.Kothari, Research Methodology- Methods & Techniques, Wishwa Prakashan, Delhi, India,2002,p.128
31
Supranote 19, p.144

14. 14
C. INTERVIEW METHOD:-
The interview method is a kind of verbal techniques for obtaining data. It is the most commonly used
method of data collection in the study of human beheaviour. It is a direct method of data collection.
According to
P.V.Young, " Interview may be regarded as systematic method by which a person enters more or less
imaginatively into the life of a comparative stranger".32
Kerlinger defined, it as 'The interview is a face-to-face interpersonal role situation in which one person,
the interviewer, asks a person being interviewed, the respondent , questions designed to obtain answer
pertinent to the purpose of the research problem.33
Types of interview:- The types of interview may be classified on the basis of the following:
34
32
Supranote 9, p. 463
33
Fred N.Kerlinger, Foundation of Beheavioral Research, Surjeet Publication, Delhi India,1986, p.469
34
Joshi P.R., Research Methodology, Buddha Academic Publisher and distibutors pvt. Ltd., Kathmandu, 2001, p.68

15. 15
1. According to subject matter:-
a. Quantitative Interview- Certain set facts are collected about a large number of persons as in
census.
b. Qualitative Interview- Consists of certain complex, serious and non quantifiable subject matter.
This interview is confined to exploring the causes of some events. Sometimes it is called diagnostic
interview.
c. Mixed Interview- is a method where both types of data are required. Some of the data may be
quantifiable and some not.
2. According to purpose- Every interview is done with certain purpose in view.
a. Clinical Interview- Through this interview the causes of certain abnormalities are ascertained.
b. Treatment Interview- This is a signal to clinical interview cause after abnormalities are
ascertained. Further interviews are held to know the actual cause of mental disorder of the
particular patient.
c. Selection interview- This interview is done to select an individual with some particular qualities.
d. Interview to fulfill curiosity- Through this interview, the interviewer fulfils his own curiosity, which
lurks in his minds.
e. Research interview- This interview is done to collect information about certain problems to find
out the truth.
3. According to Formalness-
a. Structured interview- in this type of interview a complete set of well defined questions are used.
In this method highly standardized techniques of recording are used. in structured interviews,
generally even the alternative questions are fixed. Here the interviewer has to act according to the
written instructions given in the schedule.
b. Unstructured Interview- In this interview the interviewer does not follow a pre planned list of
questions. He enjoys full freedom to ask the respondents. In this type of interview, a deep
knowledge and skill on the part of the researcher are necessary. In the opinion of Johan Gaultung,
"The advantage of unstructured response is to be unprecise, that they permit the unexpected
response."
4. According to Number-
a. Group Interview- in this type of interview a group of persons are interviewed for collecting
information from them. This method economizes both time and money.
b. Individual Interview- In this a single individual is interviewed. Inter personal contact between the
interviewer and interviewee can be established.
5. According to Period of contact-
a. Short contact interview- sometimes in research, filling up of schedules or questionnaires requires
only a single sitting of small duration. For this type of job a short contact interview is the most
useful method.

16. 16
b. Long contact interview- Where the case history of an individual or a group of persons is required,
prolonged contact interview is necessary.
6. According to the role assumed by the interviewer and respondent-
Besides the above classification P.V. Young has laid emphasis on the classification of interviews
according to the role assumed by the interviewer and respondent at the time of interview. These
classification which are mainly based on methodology, are given below.
a. Focussed Interview- This method has been applied by R.K. Metron for studying the psychological
effects of radio, cinema, television etc. on the public. the main purpose of this type of interview gives
importance to the emotional feelings or attitudes of the individual in a particular situation.
b. Repetitive Interview- The main objective of this interview is to study the dynamic functions,
attitudes and behaviour of certain individual. for studying human beheaviour this method is very
useful. This type of interview requires that the respondents must be permanent resident of a
particular locality so that they may be available for interview at any time.
c. Non Directive Interview - There is no pre- planned set of questions, control or any direction in this
method. in this method an interviewer encourages the respondent to talk about the given topic
without questioning him. For achieving the proper goal, the interviewer should create a suitable
atmosphere in which the individual is able to speak freely and fearlessly about himself. In problems
like divorce and social disorganization, this method is very useful. This is the method by which a list
of information about underground activities is collected.
7. Telephonic Interview-
This method of collecting information consists in contacting respondents on telephone itself. It is not a
very widely used method, but plays important part in industrial surveys, particularly in developed
region. This method now a days becoming also popular in marketing survey.35
Advantages & Disadvantages of Interview Method-
36
Advantages Disadvantages
More information can be obtained More time consuming & Expensive method, specially when
large and widely spread geographical sample is taken
Greater flexibility, an opportunity of restructure the question
is possible, specially in unstructured interview
The possibility of the bias of interviewer as well as
respondent.
Personal and supplementary information about the
respondents can be easily obtained
Training and supervising the field staff is needed
Adoption of the language is possible as per the ability and
educational lever of the person interviewed
Sometimes rapport building with the respondents might not
be easy
35
Supranote, 30, p.123
36
Supranote, 30, p.122

17. 17
D. SURVEY METHOD:37
The word 'survey' has been derived from two words 'sur' or 'veeir' which mean 'over' and 'see'
respectively. The literal meaning of survey is to see over something from a high place. The term is used
for techniques of investigation by direct observation of a phenomenon or collection of information.
Many research problems require the systematic collection of data from population or samples of
population. These studies are usually called surveys, especially when they are concerned with large or
widely spread out groups of people. if they deal with a fraction of a total population, they are called
sample surveys. Survey method is used to collect data when a wide geographical area has to be covered.
A survey consists of asking questions of a representative cross-section of the population at a given point
of time. Survey in legal investigation are called legal surveys. It is a process by which quantitative facts
are collected about the legal aspects of a community and its activities. Legal survey is a method of data
collection that utilizes questionnaire or interview schedule for recording the non-verbal beheaviour of
respondents.
Kinds of Survey:-
a. General and specific Survey- When a survey is conducted for collecting general information about
any population, institution or phenomena without any particular object or hypotheses, it is known as
a general survey. Specific surveys are conducted for specific problems or to testing the validity of
some theory of hypo theses.
b. Regular and ad-hoc surveys- some survey are regular in nature and must be repeated after regular
intervals. An ad hoc survey is undertaken once for all.
c. Preliminary and final survey- A preliminary survey is known as 'Pilot study' and it is the forerunner of
the final survey. Final survey is made exhaustively after the pilot study has been completed.
d. Census and sample survey- In a census survey, every single unit in the universe is to be contacted and
information collected from him. In the case of a sample survey, only a small part of population is
taken as representative of the whole survey is conducted among the sample.
TYPES OF SURVEY-
a. Interview Survey- Survey is conducted by an interviewer using schedule.
b. Questionnaire Survey- Survey is conducted by questionnaire techniques
c. Telephone Interview- Survey is conducted by Telephonic interview
d. Group Survey- Questionnaire or interview method is employed in a group of respondents.
e. Panel Survey- Direct extension of questionnaire or interview survey. In this survey the same group is
surveyed repeatedly over a period of time.
37
Supranote, 12, p.217

18. 18
5. CASE STUDY METHOD
The credit of introducing case study method in social research goes to Fedric Le Play (1806-1882) who
used this method in studying family budgets. Thereafter Herbert Spencer used this method in studying
ethnographic studies. Dr. William Healy, a psychiatrist was among the first to adopt this case study
method in his work with delinquents.
The case Study method is the method of exploring and analyzing the life of a social unit that might be a
person, a family or an institution, or a community is called case study. The case study method is a
method which aims at studying deeply and thoroughly different aspects of a social unit.38
The facts of the unit i.e. cases may be obtained from many diverse source.39
a. Personal Documents- Public figures, generally, keep diaries, write their autobiographies or
memories. These documents contain the description of the events and their reactions towards them
with direct involvement or as a witness of a distant spectator. They reveal direct information
regarding the structure, dynamics and nature of the problem.
b. Life History Documents- Life history is the study of various events of respondents' life together with
attempt to find their social significance. Life history differs from pure historical narrative facts.
Case data obtained through personal interviews and human documents have been supplemented by an
interesting variety of projective techniques.
TYPES OF CASE STUDY-40
Six types of case studies can be conducted which are as follows:
1. A group or a community case study 4. Content or document analysis
2. Casual comparative studies 5. A follow-up study, and
3. Activity analysis 6. Trend studies
Advantage and disadvantages of Case study method-
41
Advantages Disadvantages
Study of Subjective aspects Difficult to study objectively
Intensive Study Possible Too much dependence of memory
No need of sampling Data of information are not collected in a systematic order
Increase in knowledge More time consuming and costly method.
38
Supranote, 19,p.248
39
Supranote,12,p.224
40
Supranote,21,p.149
41
Supranote,19,p.256-259

19. 19
PROCESSING, ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION & INTERPRETATION OF DATA
The data collected are to be processed with a view to reducing them to manageable proportions. Only
by a careful and systematic processing, the data collected will lend itself for statistical treatment and
presented in various ways in table, graphs, charts etc. and then interpreted meaningfully and
conclusions are drawn in the form of new information, theory, facts and solution for the practical
problems. The data processing & analysis can be shown in the diagrammatically as follows:42
42
Supranote, 30, p.186

20. 20

21. 21
Bibliography:
Kerlinger, F.N.,(1986), Foundation of Beheavioral Research, Surjeet Publication, Delhi India.
S.R.Myneni,S.R.(2009), Legal Research Methodology, Allahabad Law Agency, Faridabad, India
Kothari, C.R ,(2002), Research Methodology- Methods & Techniques, Wishwa Prakashan, Delhi, India.
Singh, Yogesh Kumar,(2006), Fundamental of Research Methodology and Statistics, New Age International (P.)
Ltd., New Delhi, India.
Verma, S.K.& M. Afzal Wani (eds.),(2001), Legal Research Methodology, The Indian Law Institute,
Raj, Hans, (1999), Theory and Practice in Social Research, Surjeet Publication Delhi, India.
Pant, Prem R.,(2014), Social science research and thesis writing, Buddha Academic Publisher and distibutors pvt.
Ltd., Kathmandu.
Joshi P.R., (2001), Research Methodology, Buddha Academic Publisher and distibutors pvt. Ltd., Kathmandu.
http://www.slideshare.net
http:/www.law.harvard.edu
http://en.wikipedia.org

22. 22
RESEARCH PROCESS IN FLOWCHART
Defineresearch
problem
ProblemIdentification
Where =feedback(Helpsincontrollingthesub-systemtowhichitistransmitted)
=feedforward(Servesthevitalfunctionofprovidingcriteriaforevaluation)
Formulate
hypotheses
DeductingReasoning
Observation
Designresearch
(Including
sampledesign)
Analysedata
(Testhypotheses
ifany)
Collectdata
(Execution)
Reviewconcepts
andtheories&
Reviewprevious
researchfinding
Interpretandreport
F
F
F
F
FF
FF
FF
STEPS OF RESEARCH:
The following are the six
steps of research:
1. Selection of the problem- The
problem is selected and defined.
The feasibility of the problem
depends on its delimitations.
Hence, the problem is also
delimited in this step.
2. Formulation of hypotheses-
Some tentative solutions are
given for the problem when
these solutions are based on
certain rationale they are
termed as hypothesis.
Therefore, in this step
hypotheses are formulated.
3. Design of research- These
hypotheses are subjected to
verification. A design of
research is developed for
collection of data or evidences
for testing the hypotheses. It
involves method, sample and
techniques of research. The
appropriate method and
techniques are selected for this
purpose.
4. Collection of data- The methods
of data collection like
observation, questionnaire,
survey and case study etc. are
administered and data are
collected.
5. Analysis of data - The
appropriate statistical
techniques are used to analyze
the data so that some decisions
may be taken about the
hypotheses. The results are
used to draw some conclusions.
6. Formulation of conclusions- The
results are discussed and some
conclusions are drawn in the
form of new information,
theory, facts and solution for
the practical problems.