SEOs are addicted to rank tracking and many are still rank tracking as if it was 2012, but what good is this doing us?
We have been tracking SERPs as part of hourly tracking tests and are starting to see rank tracking very differently
What could this mean for the future of rank tracking? This presentation contains early data & insights from the experiment and looks to setup a more productive way of using rank tracking in the future.
12. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Position of organic changes
2. Ads are becoming harder to avoid
3. SERPs aren’t 10 organic results (and haven’t been for a
while)
4. Position 0
13. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Position of organic changes
2. Ads are becoming harder to avoid
3. SERPs aren’t 10 organic results (and haven’t been for a
while)
4. Position 0
5. Personalisation
14. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Position of organic changes
2. Ads are becoming harder to avoid
3. SERPs aren’t 10 organic results (and haven’t been for a
while)
4. Position 0
5. Personalisation
6. Local
15. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Position of organic changes
2. Ads are becoming harder to avoid
3. SERPs aren’t 10 organic results (and haven’t been for a
while)
4. Position 0
5. Personalisation
6. Local
7. Knowledge graph
16. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Position of organic changes
2. Ads are becoming harder to avoid
3. SERPs aren’t 10 organic results (and haven’t been for a
while)
4. Position 0
5. Personalisation
6. Local
7. Knowledge graph
8. Answers
17. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Position of organic changes
2. Ads are becoming harder to avoid
3. SERPs aren’t 10 organic results (and haven’t been for a
while)
4. Position 0
5. Personalisation
6. Local
7. Knowledge graph
8. Answers
9. News
18. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Position of organic changes
2. Ads are becoming harder to avoid
3. SERPs aren’t 10 organic results (and haven’t been for a
while)
4. Position 0
5. Personalisation
6. Local
7. Knowledge graph
8. Answers
9. News
Etc
24. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
“Really Important” Context
What I’m not
• interested in commercial rank tracking
• against the rank tracking industry
• an expert in rank tracking
• presenting a complete argument
What I am
• happy for links/beers/constructive criticism
• looking for people to help test these theories
• an SEO looking for better understanding
• mildly paranoid
39. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
Across 1,056 SERPs we looked at, not one of them was
an exact match to the previous hour — that’s 0%
stability.
http://bit.ly/0-stability-in-serps
108. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Far-better at spotting cannibalisation
2. Helps more accurately see when tweets/news etc are
included
3. Measuring speed of indexation & what it does to the
rest of the SERPs
111. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Far-better at spotting cannibalisation
2. Helps more accurately see when tweets/news etc are
included
3. Measuring speed of indexation & what it does to the
rest of the SERPs
4. Has the ability to make a more accurate correlation
between rankings/traffic
112. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
1. Far-better at spotting cannibalisation
2. Helps more accurately see when tweets/news etc are
included
3. Measuring speed of indexation & what it does to the
rest of the SERPs
4. Has the ability to make a more accurate correlation
between rankings/traffic
(if you assume Google isn’t screwing with us too much!)
121. @ChrisGreen87
@StrategiQ
Search London
18th April 2017
Anything below page 1 is questionable as
to it’s usefulness - measure wisely!
1. We’re using rank tracking wrongly
2. Rank tracking could get less useful
3. Pick better KPIs
4. But use rankings to measure your craft
5. Hourly could add a more surgical approach to SEO
6. We’re going to let a few people try for free
summary