Soumettre la recherche
Mettre en ligne
Writing A Five Paragraph Essay
•
Télécharger en tant que PPT, PDF
•
7 j'aime
•
3,355 vues
Joseph Florencio
Suivre
Signaler
Partager
Signaler
Partager
1 sur 10
Télécharger maintenant
Recommandé
40. library debrief, reported speech, oral summarizing, describing pie charts
40. library debrief, reported speech, oral summarizing, describing pie charts
IECP
Steps in writing a thesis Conclusion.
TUL 670-8 Writing a Thesis Conclusion
TUL 670-8 Writing a Thesis Conclusion
Urban Leadership Foundation
Key parts and steps in writing a research paper and how reviewers see it. Simple but key facts to focus on.
10 key elements of a research paper - A writers perspective
10 key elements of a research paper - A writers perspective
Dilum Bandara
Project 2
ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
Lieng Kam Wong
Student slides help writing papers
Student slides help writing papers
ddeorsey
ESSAY QUESTION FNBE JULY 2015
ENG PROJECT 2
ENG PROJECT 2
shensin1015
Conservation Presentation Rubric
Conservation Presentation Rubric
jessica_pena
Project Brief
April 2015 assignment 1
April 2015 assignment 1
Xying Lee
Recommandé
40. library debrief, reported speech, oral summarizing, describing pie charts
40. library debrief, reported speech, oral summarizing, describing pie charts
IECP
Steps in writing a thesis Conclusion.
TUL 670-8 Writing a Thesis Conclusion
TUL 670-8 Writing a Thesis Conclusion
Urban Leadership Foundation
Key parts and steps in writing a research paper and how reviewers see it. Simple but key facts to focus on.
10 key elements of a research paper - A writers perspective
10 key elements of a research paper - A writers perspective
Dilum Bandara
Project 2
ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
Lieng Kam Wong
Student slides help writing papers
Student slides help writing papers
ddeorsey
ESSAY QUESTION FNBE JULY 2015
ENG PROJECT 2
ENG PROJECT 2
shensin1015
Conservation Presentation Rubric
Conservation Presentation Rubric
jessica_pena
Project Brief
April 2015 assignment 1
April 2015 assignment 1
Xying Lee
UI Engl 442 Spring 20 Intro Morphology and Syntax. Final Project options
Final project options
Final project options
Brian Malone
English 1 january 2015
English 1 january 2015
Jian Leo
FNBE 0115
FNBE 0115 - ENGLISH 1 ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
FNBE 0115 - ENGLISH 1 ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
barbaraxchang
brief
Brief
Brief
Leon Lim
ELG 30505 Essay 2 brief for eportfolio
ELG 30505 Essay 2 Brief
ELG 30505 Essay 2 Brief
Natalie Yunxian
...
Section a + b mark scheme
Section a + b mark scheme
twbsmediaconnell
Higher History - Essay structure
Higher History - Essay structure
Higher History - Essay structure
mrmarr
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journal
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journal
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journal
ssuserd93c47
Higher History essays - Planning an essay
Higher History essays - Planning an essay
mrmarr
english
Essay question august2015
Essay question august2015
Flenny Wong
RESEARCH PAPER FORMAT
Research paper format
Research paper format
Beenish Tariq Zuberi Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology
English process essay writing brief
Assignment 1 - Eng1 brief
Assignment 1 - Eng1 brief
Tung97Michelle
Project Brief
Assignment 1
Assignment 1
Joeylau97
English brief
April 2015 assignment 1
April 2015 assignment 1
joshualimlbn
ESSAY
Essay question august2015
Essay question august2015
Ong Ke Qi
bundle 27
Ewrt 1 a class 27 to post
Ewrt 1 a class 27 to post
kimpalmore
April 2015 Assignment 1.doc
April 2015 Assignment 1.doc
ALISON TANG
AP European / Honors World History Essay Scoring Rubric Thesis Statement (50% of the score) Excellent / Original Thesis which fully addresses the topic 6 points Strong Thesis which offers an answer to the questions of the topic 5 points Good thesis which provides a framework to answer the question 4 points (this is the “working thesis” discussed in class) Effort at a thesis which may be faulty or incomplete 3 points Weak thesis which may only generally address the question 2 points No thesis at all – student merely writes on the topic 1 point Content (50% of the score) Command of information in support of thesis 6 points Depth and Breadth of relevant information in support of thesis 5 points Solid use of relevant information in support of thesis 4 points Good use of information, but lacks real depth and/or breadth 3 points Some relevant information – may be superficial (no depth) 2 points A few relevant facts – major omission of information 1 point Little or no relevant facts – could also be error ridden 0 points Negative Components (take points off score – out of 12 pts possible) Major factual errors -1 (each) Project lacks paragraphs or has serious structural issues -1 (each) Grammar, citation or Spelling Errors -1 (each) Conversion Scale 12 points = 100% 11 points = 95% 10 points = 91% 9 points = 85% 8 points = 81% 7 points = 78% 6 points = 75% 5 points = 71% 4 points = 68% 3 points = 64% 2 points = 50% 1 point = 25% Suggestions and Reminders 1) No 1st or 2nd person 2) No contractions – watch the use of possessive 3) Watch words spelled correctly, but used incorrectly (i.e. “there or their”) .
AP European Honors World HistoryEssay Scoring RubricTh.docx
AP European Honors World HistoryEssay Scoring RubricTh.docx
rossskuddershamus
Argumentative Essay by mutiu Olokodana Submission date: 28-Jan-2020 02:37AM (UTC-0500) Submission ID: 1247589300 File name: temp_turnitintool_600359574.DoesTechnologyPromoteLoneliness.docx (18.59K) Word count: 841 Character count: 4498 10. Recycled 42% SIMILARITY INDEX 9% INTERNET SOURCES 5% PUBLICATIONS 42% STUDENT PAPERS 1 29% 2 5% 3 3% 4 2% 5 1% 6 1% 7 1% Argumentative Essay ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES Submitted to Straighterline Student Paper Submitted to University of North Carolina - Wilmington Student Paper Submitted to Cave Creek Unified District Student Paper Submitted to Saint Paul College Student Paper Submitted to Squalicum High School Student Paper Submitted to Grant MacEwan Community College Student Paper Submitted to American Public University System Student Paper Exclude quotes Off Exclude bibliography Off Exclude matches Off QM FINAL GRADE 0/100 Argumentative Essay GRADEMARK REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS Instructor PAGE 1 10. Recycled Unfortunately, your essay is reworded from a paper that was already submitted to Straighterline or another university. This is a type of plagiarism called recycling, which is unacceptable by Straighterline policy. Therefore, you will need to completely rewrite a new essay with a new topic in order for a submission under this assignment to be accepted and graded. PAGE 2 PAGE 3 PAGE 4 RUBRIC: ENG101 V6:ARGUMENTATIVE FINAL THESIS (20%) POINTS (0) POINTS (2) POINTS (3) POINTS (3.50) POINTS (4) POINTS (5) SUPPORT & DEV (15%) POINTS (0) POINTS (2) POINTS (3) POINTS (3.50) 0 / 5 0 / 5 Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions Thesis or potential thesis is neither present in any portion of the essay, nor is it implied in any manner. Thesis may be present but incorrect for the assignment’s objectives/approach. Thesis may be present but the submission overall fails to meet most assignment objectives (such as the essay is only a paragraph) that determining the thesis’ viability is problematic. Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers cannot discern the essay’s central idea. Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed. Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic. Awareness of audience may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too general and supported by irrelevant examples. Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper. Awareness of audience is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the essay. Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Paper demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout. 0 / 5 Thesis support, thesis development, use of examples, logic, ...
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
festockton
1. Citation: Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout. 1. Summary: What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources. 1. Assessment: After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions: What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective? For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources. 1. Critique Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography. Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/ Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric Evaluation Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Points Earned Abstract TOTAL: (15 points) (10 points) Minimum criteria: · Topic Sentence · Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis, · Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research Response to Assignment 3 Feedback (5 points) Minimum criteria: · Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3? 10 points Abstract contains all of the required criteria. Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions. 5 points Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for Assignment 3 ~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3 ~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student 9 - 8 points Abstract contains four of the required criteria. Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions. 7 - 6 points Abstract contains three of the required criteria. Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement. < 6 points Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria. Abstract is not present. (0 points) 0 points Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3 Main Body Content TOTAL: (50 ...
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
SONU61709
Paper Grade Rubric 1. Significantly insufficient (6 points) 2. Insufficient (7 points) 3. Sufficient (8 points) 4. Good (9 points) 5. Excellent (10 points) Description of Event Description of event significantly lacks details relevant to concept; only direct citations included or copying existing definitions. Many relevant facts are missing or inaccurate; more research was needed. Included existing definition by others. Most facts are relevant and presented accurately; some factual information is misleading or inaccurate; put into both students own words and existing definition. Details not missing, and are adequate and relevant to the concept; defined using student’s own words. Concept defined and described completely, put into students own words; other details are complete and fully relevant to the concept. Interpretation of Event No concept presented, used, or defined. Weak/no argument presented. No module concept defined, partial argument; interpretation is inconsistent with concept. Concept defined but no argument/weak support of argument; interpretation is partly consistent with concept Concept correctly defined and well presented; argument is somewhat unclear; interpretation is mostly consistent with concept Understanding of event is correct, and is expanded through exceptional use of concept Evaluation of Event No concept presented or use of concept does little or distracts from the understating of event; no evaluation presented Concept presented but support is weak or lacking, no argument or weak support of argument Concept presented, very weak argument Concept defined and clearly presented, evaluation is inconsistent with concept or unclear. Concept fully integrated into evaluation; understandings of event is expended through the concept Organization and Grammar of Writing Organization of paper is inconsistent and distracting from the thesis, significant grammatical errors and typos (more than 7). Organization of paper only partly supportive of the thesis; substantial grammatical errors and typo (5 to 7), awkward language Organization of paper somewhat inconsistent with thesis; some grammatical or spelling errors (around 4 to 2) Organization of paper clear and content organized to support thesis; minor grammatical or spelling errors (fewer than 2) Organization flawless and fully supports thesis; no grammatical errors nor typos. Information Literacy Fewer than five sources, sources are not diverse or not relevant; no or incomplete credibility assessment.; no reference page and in-text citations. Weak diversity, relevance and credibility assessment of sources. Lacking citations, or wrong format of citations, incorrect citation style. Adequate diversity and credibility assessment. Lacking some citations, inconsistent citation styles throughout the paper Good diversity and credibility assessment of sources; minor citation errors. Exceptional diversity of sources and credibility assessment; correct references and in-text citations. · ...
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
karlhennesey
BIOL 102: Introductory Biology Science Literacy Assignment Content: There are many misconceptions about scientific concepts that are widely accepted by the general public. Some topics include cracking your knuckles cause arthritis and it takes seven years to digest gum. Students are required to research a topic of their choosing and write a term paper on it following the guidelines below. For assistance in choosing a topic, please consult the internet or your professor. Be sure to use credible sources when conducting your literature search. One of the sources MUST be a credible scientific source such as Science Daily, Science News or Scientific American. Make sure that all sources are properly cited within the text and on a References/Works Cited page. Due Date and Submission: Students will complete this assignment and submit an electronic copy by 11:59 pm on 04/10/19. No paper or email submissions will be accepted; this assignment MUST be submitted via Blackboard. The assignment may be submitted early, but NO LATE PAPERS WILL BE ACCEPTED. If a student needs clarification, please email the instructor as soon as possible. DO NOT WAIT UNTIL IT IS DUE TO ASK QUESTIONS! Grading: This assignment will be graded out of 100 points. For a breakdown of points, refer to the second page. Paper Format: Students are expected to turn in a minimum of 3-pages. Use double-space, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, and 1-inch margins on all sides of the pages. The first page is the title page, which should include the title of the specific misconception that you choose along with your name and section number. The body of the paper will be a minimum of 1 full page (excluding graphics) and a maximum of 2 pages of body. The last page will be the References/Works Cited page. Please note Wikipedia is not a valid source. Failure to comply with format guidelines will result in point deductions. Guidelines: Be sure to write a paragraph describing each of the following: 1) Introductory paragraph (4 sentences minimum) a. Thoroughly introduce the misconception by providing a detailed background on the topic i. Give a background on the topics the misconception covers. For example, if you study chocolate causes acne , give a complete overview about chocolate, acne, etc. ii. Any history of the misconception should be explained here as well. b. 2) Explain the correct scientific explanation of the phenomenon. (5 sentences minimum) a. What is the real cause of the misconception? i. What is the actual science underlining the misconception? For example, if you study chocolate causes acne, discuss the scientific composition of chocolate and if there are any studies correlating that with acne formation. Also describe the scientific process of acne and determine if chocolate has an effect. b. Provide specific examples of at least 1 article/reliable resource to support your stance on the correct scientific exp.
BIOL102IntroductoryBiologyScienceLiteracyAssignment.docx
BIOL102IntroductoryBiologyScienceLiteracyAssignment.docx
moirarandell
Contenu connexe
Tendances
UI Engl 442 Spring 20 Intro Morphology and Syntax. Final Project options
Final project options
Final project options
Brian Malone
English 1 january 2015
English 1 january 2015
Jian Leo
FNBE 0115
FNBE 0115 - ENGLISH 1 ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
FNBE 0115 - ENGLISH 1 ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
barbaraxchang
brief
Brief
Brief
Leon Lim
ELG 30505 Essay 2 brief for eportfolio
ELG 30505 Essay 2 Brief
ELG 30505 Essay 2 Brief
Natalie Yunxian
...
Section a + b mark scheme
Section a + b mark scheme
twbsmediaconnell
Higher History - Essay structure
Higher History - Essay structure
Higher History - Essay structure
mrmarr
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journal
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journal
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journal
ssuserd93c47
Higher History essays - Planning an essay
Higher History essays - Planning an essay
mrmarr
english
Essay question august2015
Essay question august2015
Flenny Wong
RESEARCH PAPER FORMAT
Research paper format
Research paper format
Beenish Tariq Zuberi Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology
English process essay writing brief
Assignment 1 - Eng1 brief
Assignment 1 - Eng1 brief
Tung97Michelle
Project Brief
Assignment 1
Assignment 1
Joeylau97
English brief
April 2015 assignment 1
April 2015 assignment 1
joshualimlbn
ESSAY
Essay question august2015
Essay question august2015
Ong Ke Qi
bundle 27
Ewrt 1 a class 27 to post
Ewrt 1 a class 27 to post
kimpalmore
April 2015 Assignment 1.doc
April 2015 Assignment 1.doc
ALISON TANG
Tendances
(17)
Final project options
Final project options
English 1 january 2015
English 1 january 2015
FNBE 0115 - ENGLISH 1 ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
FNBE 0115 - ENGLISH 1 ESSAY WRITING BRIEF
Brief
Brief
ELG 30505 Essay 2 Brief
ELG 30505 Essay 2 Brief
Section a + b mark scheme
Section a + b mark scheme
Higher History - Essay structure
Higher History - Essay structure
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journal
In this assignment, you will research and locate a current journal
Higher History essays - Planning an essay
Higher History essays - Planning an essay
Essay question august2015
Essay question august2015
Research paper format
Research paper format
Assignment 1 - Eng1 brief
Assignment 1 - Eng1 brief
Assignment 1
Assignment 1
April 2015 assignment 1
April 2015 assignment 1
Essay question august2015
Essay question august2015
Ewrt 1 a class 27 to post
Ewrt 1 a class 27 to post
April 2015 Assignment 1.doc
April 2015 Assignment 1.doc
Similaire à Writing A Five Paragraph Essay
AP European / Honors World History Essay Scoring Rubric Thesis Statement (50% of the score) Excellent / Original Thesis which fully addresses the topic 6 points Strong Thesis which offers an answer to the questions of the topic 5 points Good thesis which provides a framework to answer the question 4 points (this is the “working thesis” discussed in class) Effort at a thesis which may be faulty or incomplete 3 points Weak thesis which may only generally address the question 2 points No thesis at all – student merely writes on the topic 1 point Content (50% of the score) Command of information in support of thesis 6 points Depth and Breadth of relevant information in support of thesis 5 points Solid use of relevant information in support of thesis 4 points Good use of information, but lacks real depth and/or breadth 3 points Some relevant information – may be superficial (no depth) 2 points A few relevant facts – major omission of information 1 point Little or no relevant facts – could also be error ridden 0 points Negative Components (take points off score – out of 12 pts possible) Major factual errors -1 (each) Project lacks paragraphs or has serious structural issues -1 (each) Grammar, citation or Spelling Errors -1 (each) Conversion Scale 12 points = 100% 11 points = 95% 10 points = 91% 9 points = 85% 8 points = 81% 7 points = 78% 6 points = 75% 5 points = 71% 4 points = 68% 3 points = 64% 2 points = 50% 1 point = 25% Suggestions and Reminders 1) No 1st or 2nd person 2) No contractions – watch the use of possessive 3) Watch words spelled correctly, but used incorrectly (i.e. “there or their”) .
AP European Honors World HistoryEssay Scoring RubricTh.docx
AP European Honors World HistoryEssay Scoring RubricTh.docx
rossskuddershamus
Argumentative Essay by mutiu Olokodana Submission date: 28-Jan-2020 02:37AM (UTC-0500) Submission ID: 1247589300 File name: temp_turnitintool_600359574.DoesTechnologyPromoteLoneliness.docx (18.59K) Word count: 841 Character count: 4498 10. Recycled 42% SIMILARITY INDEX 9% INTERNET SOURCES 5% PUBLICATIONS 42% STUDENT PAPERS 1 29% 2 5% 3 3% 4 2% 5 1% 6 1% 7 1% Argumentative Essay ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES Submitted to Straighterline Student Paper Submitted to University of North Carolina - Wilmington Student Paper Submitted to Cave Creek Unified District Student Paper Submitted to Saint Paul College Student Paper Submitted to Squalicum High School Student Paper Submitted to Grant MacEwan Community College Student Paper Submitted to American Public University System Student Paper Exclude quotes Off Exclude bibliography Off Exclude matches Off QM FINAL GRADE 0/100 Argumentative Essay GRADEMARK REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS Instructor PAGE 1 10. Recycled Unfortunately, your essay is reworded from a paper that was already submitted to Straighterline or another university. This is a type of plagiarism called recycling, which is unacceptable by Straighterline policy. Therefore, you will need to completely rewrite a new essay with a new topic in order for a submission under this assignment to be accepted and graded. PAGE 2 PAGE 3 PAGE 4 RUBRIC: ENG101 V6:ARGUMENTATIVE FINAL THESIS (20%) POINTS (0) POINTS (2) POINTS (3) POINTS (3.50) POINTS (4) POINTS (5) SUPPORT & DEV (15%) POINTS (0) POINTS (2) POINTS (3) POINTS (3.50) 0 / 5 0 / 5 Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions Thesis or potential thesis is neither present in any portion of the essay, nor is it implied in any manner. Thesis may be present but incorrect for the assignment’s objectives/approach. Thesis may be present but the submission overall fails to meet most assignment objectives (such as the essay is only a paragraph) that determining the thesis’ viability is problematic. Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers cannot discern the essay’s central idea. Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Reveals limited awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently addressed. Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic. Awareness of audience may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too general and supported by irrelevant examples. Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper. Awareness of audience is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the essay. Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Paper demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus maintained throughout. 0 / 5 Thesis support, thesis development, use of examples, logic, ...
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
festockton
1. Citation: Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout. 1. Summary: What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources. 1. Assessment: After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions: What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective? For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources. 1. Critique Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography. Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/ Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric Evaluation Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Points Earned Abstract TOTAL: (15 points) (10 points) Minimum criteria: · Topic Sentence · Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis, · Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research Response to Assignment 3 Feedback (5 points) Minimum criteria: · Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3? 10 points Abstract contains all of the required criteria. Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions. 5 points Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for Assignment 3 ~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3 ~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student 9 - 8 points Abstract contains four of the required criteria. Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions. 7 - 6 points Abstract contains three of the required criteria. Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement. < 6 points Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria. Abstract is not present. (0 points) 0 points Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3 Main Body Content TOTAL: (50 ...
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
SONU61709
Paper Grade Rubric 1. Significantly insufficient (6 points) 2. Insufficient (7 points) 3. Sufficient (8 points) 4. Good (9 points) 5. Excellent (10 points) Description of Event Description of event significantly lacks details relevant to concept; only direct citations included or copying existing definitions. Many relevant facts are missing or inaccurate; more research was needed. Included existing definition by others. Most facts are relevant and presented accurately; some factual information is misleading or inaccurate; put into both students own words and existing definition. Details not missing, and are adequate and relevant to the concept; defined using student’s own words. Concept defined and described completely, put into students own words; other details are complete and fully relevant to the concept. Interpretation of Event No concept presented, used, or defined. Weak/no argument presented. No module concept defined, partial argument; interpretation is inconsistent with concept. Concept defined but no argument/weak support of argument; interpretation is partly consistent with concept Concept correctly defined and well presented; argument is somewhat unclear; interpretation is mostly consistent with concept Understanding of event is correct, and is expanded through exceptional use of concept Evaluation of Event No concept presented or use of concept does little or distracts from the understating of event; no evaluation presented Concept presented but support is weak or lacking, no argument or weak support of argument Concept presented, very weak argument Concept defined and clearly presented, evaluation is inconsistent with concept or unclear. Concept fully integrated into evaluation; understandings of event is expended through the concept Organization and Grammar of Writing Organization of paper is inconsistent and distracting from the thesis, significant grammatical errors and typos (more than 7). Organization of paper only partly supportive of the thesis; substantial grammatical errors and typo (5 to 7), awkward language Organization of paper somewhat inconsistent with thesis; some grammatical or spelling errors (around 4 to 2) Organization of paper clear and content organized to support thesis; minor grammatical or spelling errors (fewer than 2) Organization flawless and fully supports thesis; no grammatical errors nor typos. Information Literacy Fewer than five sources, sources are not diverse or not relevant; no or incomplete credibility assessment.; no reference page and in-text citations. Weak diversity, relevance and credibility assessment of sources. Lacking citations, or wrong format of citations, incorrect citation style. Adequate diversity and credibility assessment. Lacking some citations, inconsistent citation styles throughout the paper Good diversity and credibility assessment of sources; minor citation errors. Exceptional diversity of sources and credibility assessment; correct references and in-text citations. · ...
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
karlhennesey
BIOL 102: Introductory Biology Science Literacy Assignment Content: There are many misconceptions about scientific concepts that are widely accepted by the general public. Some topics include cracking your knuckles cause arthritis and it takes seven years to digest gum. Students are required to research a topic of their choosing and write a term paper on it following the guidelines below. For assistance in choosing a topic, please consult the internet or your professor. Be sure to use credible sources when conducting your literature search. One of the sources MUST be a credible scientific source such as Science Daily, Science News or Scientific American. Make sure that all sources are properly cited within the text and on a References/Works Cited page. Due Date and Submission: Students will complete this assignment and submit an electronic copy by 11:59 pm on 04/10/19. No paper or email submissions will be accepted; this assignment MUST be submitted via Blackboard. The assignment may be submitted early, but NO LATE PAPERS WILL BE ACCEPTED. If a student needs clarification, please email the instructor as soon as possible. DO NOT WAIT UNTIL IT IS DUE TO ASK QUESTIONS! Grading: This assignment will be graded out of 100 points. For a breakdown of points, refer to the second page. Paper Format: Students are expected to turn in a minimum of 3-pages. Use double-space, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, and 1-inch margins on all sides of the pages. The first page is the title page, which should include the title of the specific misconception that you choose along with your name and section number. The body of the paper will be a minimum of 1 full page (excluding graphics) and a maximum of 2 pages of body. The last page will be the References/Works Cited page. Please note Wikipedia is not a valid source. Failure to comply with format guidelines will result in point deductions. Guidelines: Be sure to write a paragraph describing each of the following: 1) Introductory paragraph (4 sentences minimum) a. Thoroughly introduce the misconception by providing a detailed background on the topic i. Give a background on the topics the misconception covers. For example, if you study chocolate causes acne , give a complete overview about chocolate, acne, etc. ii. Any history of the misconception should be explained here as well. b. 2) Explain the correct scientific explanation of the phenomenon. (5 sentences minimum) a. What is the real cause of the misconception? i. What is the actual science underlining the misconception? For example, if you study chocolate causes acne, discuss the scientific composition of chocolate and if there are any studies correlating that with acne formation. Also describe the scientific process of acne and determine if chocolate has an effect. b. Provide specific examples of at least 1 article/reliable resource to support your stance on the correct scientific exp.
BIOL102IntroductoryBiologyScienceLiteracyAssignment.docx
BIOL102IntroductoryBiologyScienceLiteracyAssignment.docx
moirarandell
Grading Rubric for Research Paper Level 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 - Level 4 - Level 5 - Needs Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Improvement Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Points Range: 7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Points Range: 8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Introduction and Thesis Statement The introduction is not included or offers no clear identification of the main topic or structure of the paper. Thesis statement is incomplete, unfocused, and/or missing. The introduction attempts to lead to the main topic but may not adequately present the structure of the paper. Thesis statement attempts to state the paper’s purpose in a single sentence, but it needs improvement in clarity, focus, and/ or conciseness. The introduction somewhat leads to the main topic but may need some clarification; it somewhat adequately presents the structure of the paper. Thesis statement states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence, but it needs improvement. The introduction leads to the main topic and presents the structure of the paper. Thesis statement somewhat clearly states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence. The introduction is engaging, leads to the main topic, and presents the structure of the paper. Thesis statement clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence that is engaging and thoughtprovoking. Total Points Points Range: 0 (0%) - 14 (14%) Points Range: 15 (15%) - 17 (17%) Points Range: 18 (18%) - 19 (19%) Points Range: 20 (20%) - 22 (22%) Points Range: 23 (23%) - 25 (25%) Review of Literature A literature review is present, but ideas are not always connected, do not flow, and may not be related to the topic. There is little to no analysis or synthesis of ideas. Quotations may often be used instead of summaries or synthesis of ideas. The literature review is present; however, analysis or synthesis of all materials needs improvement. Transitions and flow may be somewhat choppy. Some quotations are used instead of summaries or synthesis of ideas. The literature review is present, but analysis or synthesis of some materials may need improvement. Transitions and flow could be improved. Some quotations are used instead of summaries or synthesis of ideas. The literature review is present, but analysis or synthesis of one or two materials may be somewhat lacking. Transition and flow may not always be perfectly smooth. Quoted materials are used only when the specific wording is itself crucial to conveying an author’s point of view. The literature review is present and presents a critical analysis and synthesis of the existing research. Transition and flow are smooth. Quoted materials are used only when the specific wording is itself crucial to conveying an author’s point of view. Total Points Points Range: 0 (0%) - 8 (8%) Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Points Range: 11 (11%) - 11 (11%) Points Range: 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) Points Range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) ...
Grading Rubric for Research PaperLevel 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 .docx
Grading Rubric for Research PaperLevel 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 .docx
whittemorelucilla
11/4/2019 Rubric Detail – ENG115358VA016-1198-001 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_82775154_1&course_id… 1/6 Unacceptable0% F Meets Minimum Expectations 65% D Fair 75% C Proficient 85%B Exe Personal Story 0 (0%) Personal story missing or incomplete. There are questions about the relevance of the story and how it connects to the main idea of the essay. 7.8 (9.75%) Includes an incomplete personal story in the introduction, supporting/body paragraphs, and/or conclusion. Story has major structure and/or language issues that influence the way the audience understands the story. There are concerns about the level of details and how the story supports the main points. 9 (11.25%) Includes a personal story in the introduction, supporting/body paragraphs, and/or conclusion. Story has minor structure and/or language issues that influence the way the audience understands the story. There are some concerns about the level of details and how the story supports the main points. 10.2 (12.75%) ncludes a personal story in the introduction, supporting/body paragraphs, and/or conclusion. Story is generally well structured and language is descriptive and mostly precise. There are some minor concerns about the level of details and how the story supports the main points. Name: Assignment 1.1: Personal Essay Draft ExitExit Grid View List View 11/4/2019 Rubric Detail – ENG115358VA016-1198-001 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_82775154_1&course_id… 2/6 Unacceptable0% F Meets Minimum Expectations 65% D Fair 75% C Proficient 85%B Exe Introduction and Thesis 0 (0%) Introduction does not include a hook and/or background information on the topic. Thesis statement does not include 3 personal reasons why the topic is meaningful, it is not clear, and/or it is wordy. It does not give a preview of the rest of the essay. 7.8 (9.75%) Introduction attempts to hook and/or to provide background information on the topic. Thesis statement includes 3 reasons why the topic is meaningful but they are all general rather than personal, it is not entirely clear; and/or it is wordy. It barely previews the rest of the essay. 9 (11.25%) Introduction includes a sufficient hook and/or background information on the topic. Thesis statement includes 3 reasons why the topic is meaningful but 1-2 are general rather than personal, it is clear, and/or concise. It somewhat previews the rest of the essay. 10.2 (12.75%) Introduction includes an effective hook and/or mostly relevant background information on the topic. Thesis statement includes 3 personal reasons why the topic is meaningful, and is sufficiently clear and concise. It gives an adequate preview of the rest of the essay. 12 Intr a co and bac info top stat per why me com con com pre the Supporting Paragraphs 0 (0%) Did not write or incompletely wrote supporting ...
1142019 Rubric Detail – ENG115358VA016-1198-001httpsb.docx
1142019 Rubric Detail – ENG115358VA016-1198-001httpsb.docx
aulasnilda
EDUC 701 Course Project: Final Paper Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present Title Page and Abstract 10 points A title page is present and provides clarity to the purpose of the paper. An effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body is provided by the abstract. Word count (100–120 words) is met. 8 to 9 points A title page is present but lacks clarity to the purpose of the paper. The Abstract exists but does not provide an effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body. Minimum of 100 words is met. 1 to 7 points A title page is missing. The Abstract is vague and does not convey a personal philosophy of education. The 100-word minimum is not met. 0 points Not present Body – Introduction/ Thesis Statement 10 points Introduction is well-constructed and presents a clear explanation of the problem, conveys a good argument of why the problem is good to research, concludes with the research question, and is strongly aligned with the title and body of the paper. 8 to 9 points A somewhat clear presentation of the problem is present, an argument why the problem is good to research is conveyed, and the title and body of the paper aligns with it. 1 to 8 points The problem is poorly introduced, vaguely stated, or does not align with the title and/or body of the paper. 0 points Not present Body – Literature Review and Learning Theory or Theories 37 to 40 points Literature synthesizes references to support the topic. Learning theories are introduced as well as foundational people and their works. Theoretical frameworks are presented coherently and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education. 34 to 36 points Literature review somewhat synthesizes the references to support the topic. Learning theories are somewhat introduced. Theoretical frameworks are mostly presented and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education. 1 to 33 points Literature review poorly synthesizes the references that support the topic. Learning theories are poorly introduced and explained. Theoretical frameworks are not presented. 0 points Not present Body – Key Terms 18 to 20 points Key terms are well defined, and definitions are supported by authoritative sources. 17 points Key terms are defined, and most definitions are supported by authoritative sources. 1 to 16 points Key terms are adequately defined, and most definitions are not supported by an authoritative source. 0 points Not present Body – Gaps in Literature 18 to 20 points Gaps in the literature are thoroughly identified and described by careful analysis of content. 17 points Gaps in the literature are somewhat identified and described by careful analysis of content. 1 to 16 points Gaps in the literature are not present or are inadequately described. 0 points Not present Body – Biblical Worldview 18 to 20 points A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropr ...
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
EvonCanales257
Discussion Rubric to follow Outstanding performance Excellent performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. 44 (44%) - 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. supported by at least 3 current, credible sources 40 (40%) - 43 (43%) Responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references 35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s) is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references 31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s) one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references 0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. contains only 1 or no credible references Main Posting: Writing 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Written clearly and concisely May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style Main Posting: Timely and full participation 10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts main discussion by due date 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation First Response: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Respons ...
Discussion Rubric to followOutstanding performanceExcellen.docx
Discussion Rubric to followOutstanding performanceExcellen.docx
madlynplamondon
image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include four major sections: the Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References (please see Purdue University's APA Style GuideLinks to an external site. for more information). Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page. For this assignment, please consider the following: How do you plan to use your eyes more intentionally in sending and receiving clear messages from your friends and family members? Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 30 pts Excellent The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. 24 pts Good The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. 13.5 pts Acceptable The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). 0 pts Unacceptable The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning 30 pts Excellent The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/cla.
image7.pngimage8.png.docx
image7.pngimage8.png.docx
sleeperharwell
HIS 200 Module One Short Response Guidelines and Rubric Overview: The short response activities in the webtext throughout this course are designed to show your understanding of key concepts as you engage with course content. Prompt: During the first week of the course, you will respond to several questions in the webtext as you complete each learning block. At the end of Module One, you will review your answers to these questions and ensure that you have responded to each question. It is important that you answer each question; otherwise, the words “[no response]” will appear in brackets when you submit the assignment. The questions and their original locations in the webtext are listed in this table in case you want to refer back to the reading as you edit, but you can edit your responses to all the questions directly in Module One: Approaches to History, learning block 1-4 (page 4) in the webtext, before exporting to Word for submission to your instructor in the learning environment. Module One: Approaches to History, Learning Block 1-2 (page 3): Question 1: In the following scenario, which historical lens is being applied? Why do you think so? The influx of unskilled Irish immigrants into New York City in the 1840s and early 1850s drives down wages for other workers at the low end of the salary ladder. Question 2: In the following scenario, which historical lens is being applied? Why do you think so? In 1908, Aram Pothier, an immigrant from Quebec, is elected governor of Rhode Island with strong support from the Québécois community. Question 3: In the following scenario, which historical lens is being applied? Why do you think so? Irish immigrants and first-generation Irish-Americans come to dominate the hierarchy of the American Catholic Church in the late nineteenth century. Question 4: In the following scenario, which historical lens is being applied? Why do you think so? Immigration to the United States comes to be seen as a “rite of passage” for young Québécois women in the early twentieth century. Module One: Approaches to History, Learning Block 1-3 (page 4): Question 5: If you had to write a paper on the Lincoln assassination, what would you like to know more about? Create three research questions that would be appropriate for a historical analysis essay, keeping in mind the characteristics of a critical research question. The three questions can be related, or they can address different aspects of the topic. Question 6: If you had to write a paper on Title IX, what would you like to know more about? Create three research questions that would be appropriate for a historical analysis essay, keeping in mind the characteristics of a critical research question. The three questions can be related, or they can address different aspects of the topic. Module One: Approaches to History, Learning Block 1-4 (page 3): Question 7: Write a research question that addresses the Irish immigrant ...
HIS 200 Module One Short Response Guidelines and Rubric
HIS 200 Module One Short Response Guidelines and Rubric
SusanaFurman449
Assignment 07 SP180 Principles of Public Speaking Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the "Assignment Format" page for specific format requirements. Project: Written Speech 1. Submit your speech with a title page, your name, and date submitted. 2. Your response should be a minimum of two (2) double-spaced pages to a maximum of four (4) pages in length; refer to the "Assignment Format" page located on the Course Home page for specific format requirements. 3. Develop your speech based on the preparation outline you submitted for Assignment 6. 4. Write your speech using tips, techniques, and guidelines studied in the lesson. 5. Create a reference list that includes any and all sources you use to locate information. 6. Review the Speech Grading Criteria. Grading Rubric Please refer to the rubric on the next page for the grading criteria for this assignment. CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable 15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points (1) Gets attention, (2) clearly identifies topic, (3) establishes credibility, and (4) previews the main points Meets any three of the four criteria Meets any two of the four criteria Meets only one of the four criteria 20 points 15 points 10 points 5 points Main points are clear, fully developed and well supported, sources are documented Main points are somewhat clear and developed, some support, some documentation Main points need clarity and support lack of sources and documentation Main points are not clear and have no support and no sources or documentation 10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points Use of language contributes to effectiveness of the speech, demonstrates imagination and creativity Use of language good but lacks imagination and creativity Use of language causes potential confusion, unclear Use of language is inappropriate 10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points Speech flows very well, demonstrates identified organizational method Speech well-organized with no clear use of identified organizational method Speech somewhat organized Speech is disorganized, no logical flow 10 points 7 points 3 points 0 points (1) Ties main points and central idea together effectively, (2)effective use of transitions (3) approach is original and inventive, use of stylistics techniques as narratives, examples, quotes, etc. Meets any two of the three criteria Meets any one of the three criteria Meets none of the three criteria 15 points 10 points 5 points 0 points (1) Summarizes central idea and key points briefly, (2) concludes in a memorable fashion with impact, (3) calls for some action Meets any two of the three criteria Meets any one of the three criteria .
Assignment 07SP180 Principles of Public SpeakingDirections B.docx
Assignment 07SP180 Principles of Public SpeakingDirections B.docx
davezstarr61655
RUBRIC FOR WEEK 8 Possible Points: 100.00 Calculated Score: Adjusted Score: Percentage: - Descriptions Comments Writing Assignment Rubric Enter rubric description Exemplary 4 pts Accomplished 3.4 pts Developing 3 pts Beginning 2.6 pts Did not attempt 0 pts Assignment Content 65 % Design and developed deliverables that are aligned with the assignment requirements Exemplary Exceeds expected level of explanation and discussion on the assignment areas/topics. All areas included in the analysis. Accomplished Meets expected level of explanation and discussion on the assignment areas/topics. All areas included in the analysis. Developing Does not meet expected level of explanation and discussion on the assignment . No more than one areas of analysis need improvement and/or additional development. Beginning Does not meet expected level of explanation and discussion on the assignment . Multiple areas of analysis need improvement and/or additional development. One or more areas were not addressed. Did not attempt Does not meet expected level of explanation and discussion on the assignment. Significant areas of analysis need improvement and/or additional development. Assignment not submitted. Assignment Content 10 % Subject Knowledge Exemplary Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content in examples given. Accomplished Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge. Developing The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area. Beginning Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas. Did not attempt Explanation of concepts not provided and/or only surface level understanding is present . Assignment is incomplete or not submitted. Thesis and Support 10 % Student has a supporting thesis and has supported ideas with research and references Exemplary The writing has a clearly articulated original thesis and subordinate ideas supported by reliable and relevant evidence based on original research. Accomplished The writing has a clearly articulated original thesis and subordinate ideas supported by reliable and relevant evidence based on original research. Developing The writing has .
RUBRIC FOR WEEK 8Possible Points 100.00 Calculate.docx
RUBRIC FOR WEEK 8Possible Points 100.00 Calculate.docx
toddr4
Eng 101 e3 The “Summary + Response” ESSAY: Writing based on reading about language, culture & identity The summary+response essay requires you to use and engage with other written materials - that is, ideas and quotations from other writers - in an essay. Articles: Tan, "Mother Tongue" (127-132) In your essay, you will (A) present the writer's ideas accurately and fairly, using your skills in summarizing, paraphrasing, and using quotations. And you will (B) present a thoughtful response, in which you take a stand on the major issue of the original. You don't need additional information from the internet and you don't need to look for any more sources. If you do want to use another source, you need to clear it with your instructor. Preliminary Steps 1. Read, re-read, annotate the article you chose. 2. Complete the "Responding to Writing" worksheet to help clarify and organize your thoughts on the issues. 3. Be able to summarize and paraphrase the material accurately. A Possible Outline for Your Essay Your essay might be organized something like this, in which each of the first-level bullets would be one or more ¶s: • Open: Introduce the issues in a general way, possibly without mentioning the article/author yet. • Introduce & briefly summarize the main article: · Summarize the main, relevant ideas of the article and include important details. (Include the author's full name and title of the article.) · Note that you will also refer to and summarize and quote from the article in the response section of the essay, so you don't need to provide a complete, detailed summary here. • Respond: · You will probably use some of the ideas you generated in the "Responding to Writing" worksheet. · Discuss and offer some analysis of the issues raised in the article, and possibly comment on how the author has presented them, how convincing her/his evidence is, and so on. · Present your own perspectives, thoughts, and perhaps feelings on the issues. You might describe your own life experiences or experiences of friends, as they relate to the issues in question. · In this response section you need to be sure to explain your ideas clearly and support them (with logic, with illustrative examples, maybe with more quotes from the article). · If you wish, you can bring in a couple of ideas/quotes from one or two of the additional articles to supplement or support your points. · This section should be presented in logically organized, focused paragraphs. • Close: Wrap up the essay in a meaningful and satisfying way. Think it through! Don't just grab onto the first thought that comes to you, an initial and superficial reaction. Consider your thoughts and feelings, think hard about the topic and what you have read about it, and form a coherent and thoughtful response. In a thoughtful response, you don't need to solve or resolve the problem or the issue. You don't have to try to have the "last word" on the topic. Saying that it's troubling (or not) or an im ...
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
SALU18
SOCI 403 Social Change American Public University System Written Assignment Four: Final Paper (Due Week 8) IMPORTANT NOTE: This assignment is due in Week 8 to give you ample time to explore our class topics and create a thorough and informed paper. It must be turned in by 11:55 pm (EST) on Sunday of Week 8. Because this is the end of class, NO EXTENSIONS can be given for this paper. When class ends, all assignments must be in! Please plan your time carefully and turn this paper in early if at all possible. In this assignment, you will construct a 10-12 page final research paper. Your paper should utilize sound critical thought and it should provide appropriate APA in-text citations and APA full-reference citations. The overall assignment is worth 20% of your final course grade. Be sure to read the directions for Submitting the Assignment. Your paper will adhere to the general standards of the APA-formatting guidelines. It will include a title page, a short abstract, body of paper (Introduction/Thesis, Analysis, Application of Research, Summary and Conclusion) and a reference page. Comment by mothertao: Where the APA guidelines and the rules of this assignment diverge, stick to the rules of the assignment. The Purdue Online Writing Lab offers information about APA guidelines and formatting: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ This site offers you answers to the most frequently asked questions on APA style as well as other useful APA information: http://www.apastyle.org/learn/faqs/index.aspx ALL Written assignments (i.e. Your Paper assignments) must be submitted TWICE: 1) Through the Sakai assignment submission link, and 2) Through www.turnitin.com. See Turnitin.com Directions Format, Length and Content of Paper: Title (First whole page of paper) Abstract (Separate page) Body of Paper: (10 -12 pages total) Clearly mark each part of the body of your paper with the following four section headings. Watch the page requirements carefully as you will be graded on them. I. Introduction and Thesis Questions/Statement (1 page): Introduce your topic and explain its relevance to you personally. Summarize the significance of this topic for others (e.g., the reader, groups, society). Describe the research questions that will guide your inquiry or the thesis statement that you will explore. II. Analysis Using Concepts/Theories (2 – 3 pages): Clearly and significantly apply at least five concepts/theories from our text to your research topic. While this sounds like what you did in Assignment One, this is no longer an exploration of how these might apply. Rather, these applications should be strong and well-supported in the final draft. III. Application of Research (6 - 7 pages): Clearly and significantly apply findings from at least 8 meaningful, up-to-date resources, 5 of which are from reputable academic journals. Your research in Assignment Two should help you with this, but remember that the final pape.
SOCI 403 Social ChangeAmerican Public University SystemWri.docx
SOCI 403 Social ChangeAmerican Public University SystemWri.docx
jensgosney
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
gabchin29
english
Essay question august2014
Essay question august2014
Jacquelyn Vanessa
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
gabchin29
english
Essay question august2014
Essay question august2014
Jacquelyn Vanessa
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
gabchin29
Similaire à Writing A Five Paragraph Essay
(20)
AP European Honors World HistoryEssay Scoring RubricTh.docx
AP European Honors World HistoryEssay Scoring RubricTh.docx
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docx
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
BIOL102IntroductoryBiologyScienceLiteracyAssignment.docx
BIOL102IntroductoryBiologyScienceLiteracyAssignment.docx
Grading Rubric for Research PaperLevel 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 .docx
Grading Rubric for Research PaperLevel 2 - Level 1 - Level 3 .docx
1142019 Rubric Detail – ENG115358VA016-1198-001httpsb.docx
1142019 Rubric Detail – ENG115358VA016-1198-001httpsb.docx
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLe
Discussion Rubric to followOutstanding performanceExcellen.docx
Discussion Rubric to followOutstanding performanceExcellen.docx
image7.pngimage8.png.docx
image7.pngimage8.png.docx
HIS 200 Module One Short Response Guidelines and Rubric
HIS 200 Module One Short Response Guidelines and Rubric
Assignment 07SP180 Principles of Public SpeakingDirections B.docx
Assignment 07SP180 Principles of Public SpeakingDirections B.docx
RUBRIC FOR WEEK 8Possible Points 100.00 Calculate.docx
RUBRIC FOR WEEK 8Possible Points 100.00 Calculate.docx
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
SOCI 403 Social ChangeAmerican Public University SystemWri.docx
SOCI 403 Social ChangeAmerican Public University SystemWri.docx
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
Essay question august2014
Essay question august2014
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
Essay question august2014
Essay question august2014
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
essayquestionaugust2014-141211134110-conversion-gate02.pdf
Plus de Joseph Florencio
unit 1 ppt
Unit 1 - ancient civilizations
Unit 1 - ancient civilizations
Joseph Florencio
Japanese internment documents primary sources
Japanese internment docs.doc
Japanese internment docs.doc
Joseph Florencio
Primary Source Executive order 9066
Beads executive order_9066
Beads executive order_9066
Joseph Florencio
Japanese Internment for Keystone APUSH
Japanese internment
Japanese internment
Joseph Florencio
PPT for Keystone World History
Main causes of the great war
Main causes of the great war
Joseph Florencio
Primary Source for World History Keystone
War as-celebration
War as-celebration
Joseph Florencio
Truman doctrine and containment
Truman doctrine and containment
Joseph Florencio
Brooks Academy Summer School
Summer school history - american history
Summer school history - american history
Joseph Florencio
Cattle cowboys and railroads
Cattle cowboys and railroads
Joseph Florencio
World geography africa
World geography africa
Joseph Florencio
US history -- Korea, Cuba and vietnam
Korea cuba and vietnam
Korea cuba and vietnam
Joseph Florencio
World Geography powerpoint on SW Asia / the middle East and the Islamic World
World geography - sw asia and the islamic world
World geography - sw asia and the islamic world
Joseph Florencio
US history unit on the Cold War
Cold war-1945-1960
Cold war-1945-1960
Joseph Florencio
Texas History unit on the Civil War and Reconstruction
Civil war and texas
Civil war and texas
Joseph Florencio
Health -- Unit #1 Powerpoint
Living A Healthy Life
Living A Healthy Life
Joseph Florencio
Different Roads To Heaven My Paper On Luther, Calvin And Catholic Ideas Be...
Different Roads To Heaven My Paper On Luther, Calvin And Catholic Ideas Be...
Joseph Florencio
Global Studies Unit #4 Europe And Russia
Global Studies Unit #4 Europe And Russia
Joseph Florencio
World History Syllabus St. Thomas More
World History Syllabus St. Thomas More
Joseph Florencio
Global Studies Syllabus St. Thomas More
Global Studies Syllabus St. Thomas More
Joseph Florencio
Global Studies Unit #6B
Unit #6 B East Asia (China)
Unit #6 B East Asia (China)
Joseph Florencio
Plus de Joseph Florencio
(20)
Unit 1 - ancient civilizations
Unit 1 - ancient civilizations
Japanese internment docs.doc
Japanese internment docs.doc
Beads executive order_9066
Beads executive order_9066
Japanese internment
Japanese internment
Main causes of the great war
Main causes of the great war
War as-celebration
War as-celebration
Truman doctrine and containment
Truman doctrine and containment
Summer school history - american history
Summer school history - american history
Cattle cowboys and railroads
Cattle cowboys and railroads
World geography africa
World geography africa
Korea cuba and vietnam
Korea cuba and vietnam
World geography - sw asia and the islamic world
World geography - sw asia and the islamic world
Cold war-1945-1960
Cold war-1945-1960
Civil war and texas
Civil war and texas
Living A Healthy Life
Living A Healthy Life
Different Roads To Heaven My Paper On Luther, Calvin And Catholic Ideas Be...
Different Roads To Heaven My Paper On Luther, Calvin And Catholic Ideas Be...
Global Studies Unit #4 Europe And Russia
Global Studies Unit #4 Europe And Russia
World History Syllabus St. Thomas More
World History Syllabus St. Thomas More
Global Studies Syllabus St. Thomas More
Global Studies Syllabus St. Thomas More
Unit #6 B East Asia (China)
Unit #6 B East Asia (China)
Writing A Five Paragraph Essay
1.
The Five Paragraph
Essay World History and Global Studies Coach Flo
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Télécharger maintenant