Organisational Health Audits assess through a collaborative process ways organisational and employee performance and well-being can be improved based on Human Activity System (HAS) criteria.
The approach taken recognizes that organisational performance and employee well-being are interconnected, and uses a Human Activity Systems (HAS) model to identify interdependent and interacting factors.
2. An Organisational Health Audit is a means to assess the performance and well-being of
both the organisation and employees (i.e. Organisational Health).
As exampled in the diagram below different interrelated perspectives are involved.
David Alman 2014
Organisation
Performance
Operational
Performance
Role
Performance
Employee &
Group Well-
being
Organisational Health Audits
3. Organisational Health Audits assess conflict issues affecting performance & well-being
David Alman 2014
Organisational Health Audits
4. Organisation Structure
Function A Function B Function C
Processes 1, 2, 3 Processes 4, 5, 6 Processes X1, X2, X3
Teams 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Team 6, Employees 1,
2
Employees X1, X2, X3
“Alignment” examples are shown in the organisation structure above in terms of:
Organisational Structure alignment e.g. Functional “silos” affecting coordination;
Function “C” alignment e.g. a Service Function area providing poor service;
Functions “A” & “B” alignment e.g. an area with poor coordination across Functions that have
interdependent processes (1,2,3,4,5 & 6) in providing delivery to external customers;
“Team 6” alignment e.g. an area with unsatisfactory team performance.
Organisational Health Audits look at the expected or preferred “alignment”
sought by an organisation and employees i.e. “what is” and “what should be”
David Alman 2014
Organisational Health Audits
5. Other examples of alignment between “what is” and “what should be” can include:
Level Alignment Issue Problem- Examples
Organisation
Accountability Framework
Inefficient reporting arrangements; inconsistent accountability
applied across organisation; role confusion.
Organisational Change
Unaccepted change; resistance leading to reversion to past
valued (but now inefficient) practices
Organisational Conflict
Numbers of disputes, complaints, expressions of dissatisfaction
and stress concerns. Increased cost from low commitment,
high turnover, and presenteeism.
Culture
Inappropriate attitudes, behaviours, and decisions causing
ineffective organisation and employee performance
Processes
Operational Productivity
Interdependent processes inefficiently aligned and not
meeting stakeholder wants/needs
Capability Frameworks
Inability to sustain service or quality of service delivery
Roles
Role Selection Poor person/role fit in selection resulting in poor performance
Employee Performance
Purpose of role inadequately understood; inappropriate
behaviour; incompetence in admin/ technical/ professional/
managerial ability; conflict between personal and “core”
organisational values.
David Alman 2014
Organisational Health Audits
6. David Alman 2014
Organisational Health Audits take a “wholistic”, not a piece meal, approach
recognising there are common underlying causes interacting and affecting both
organisational performance and employee well-being (i.e. they are connected).
Organisational Health Audits
7. David Alman 2014
To be “wholistic” Organisational Health Audits use a “systems thinking” approach.
A “System” is “any group of interacting, interrelated, or interdependent parts that form a
complex whole that has a specific purpose” (D. Kim in “Introduction to Systems Thinking”).
Specifically a Human Activity System (HAS) which looks at both organisational activities,
and people interactions in achieving some purpose. See diagram below.
Human
Activity
System
Activity
System
(Human
Designed)
Interactional
system
(Social)
Based on a diagram from D Patching in
“Practical Soft Systems Analysis”
Organisational Health Audits
8. David Alman 2014
Purpose
e.g. Clarity of goals, aims,
targets
Means (Human Designed)
e.g. processes, policies, plans,
organisational structures,
management systems,
Relations (Interactional)
e.g. Social interactions and networks
between individuals and groups,
behaviours, conflicts.
The Human Activity System (HAS) model (within which HAS Criteria are drawn
and used for assessment) is shown below, indicating their interrelationships.
Meaning
e.g. “world view”,
paradigms. beliefs, values,
attitudes – culture &
climate: the way we do
things around here
Organisational Health Audits
9. Organisational Health Audits assess issues based on the Human Activity System
(HAS) model and related “criteria”. Example HAS “criteria” are shown in red ink
below.
Organisational Performance
At Organisation, Process, and Role level covering:
Purposesuch as clarity of goals, aims, targets.
Means such as efficiency & effectiveness of:
Structures e.g. Reporting and role design
Practices e.g. management systems, processes,
procedures, standards, change projects.
Rights e.g. policies, rules, accountability.
Relationssuch as employee and group relations,
leadership effectiveness, value of communication
networks.
Meaningsuch as the values, beliefs, norms,
attitudes that give meaning to what is done.
Employee Well-being
Employee Satisfaction e.g. level of
satisfaction with job, relationships, and work
conditions.
Employee Health
Social Well-being e.g. is pro-social group
behaviours supported or are there hazards
from anti-social group behaviour?
Mental Well-being e.g. Is there
emotional & cognitive development or is
there stress and distress?
Physical Well-being e.g. Is there physical
wellness or unacceptable risk exposure to
illness, injury, or death?
David Alman 2014
Organisational Health Audits
10. David Alman 2014
Purposeful Actions
e.g. actions made to achieve a
Purpose
Results
e.g. Outcomes including
adverse consequences
Means and Relations
e.g. Work practices that drive Actions, such as policies, plans,
processes, standards, leadership style, interpersonal conflict
Meaning
e.g. Paradigms, beliefs, norms, assumptions, attitudes that provide “meaning” to
what we do – to the way we do things around here.
Single Loop: Are we doing things right?
e.g. Are the results what we want and expect? What should
change to improve organisation/employee well-being outcomes?
Double Loop: Are we doing the right things?
e.g. Are there better ways of achieving our Purpose? How
could we improve practices & relationships?
Triple Loop: How do we decide what is right?
e.g. Are we approaching this issue with the right attitude? Do we need
a different perspective about what we are doing?
This “Triple Loop” of
Learning model has the
same headings (as the
HAS Model headings
shown in the grey
coloured boxes) Both
relevant to Organisational
Health Audits.
The diagram shows how
the HAS model links to
“Triple loops” in
exploring issues and
assessing the degree of
change involved (shown
in white boxes).
Organisational Health Audits
11. David Alman 2014
Organisational Health Audits
How to carry out an Organisational Health Audit:
Agree the Scope of the Organisational Health Audit. What range of matters is thought to be
affecting organisational and employee performance and well being that need to be clarified and addressed?
Agree the purpose and methodology in carrying out the Organisational Health Audit
with the Executive, including the HAS criteria to be used. For example “assess the effects of the recent
organisational restructure and identify organisational and employee issues that need to be addressed”
Use a collaborative approach in consulting both the executive and employees involved.
Reassure audit privacy for employees both before and in carrying out the Organisational Health
Audit: No personal details will be divulged. Organisational Health Audits can involve different forms of
confidential arrangements:
• Interviews;
• Workshops;
• Individual survey responses
based, where possible, on employee preferred arrangements.
Draft an Organisational Health Report that is discussed with the executive, then shared,
consulted, and agreed in collaboration with employees.
Based on the agreed Organisational Health Report, an agreed implementation action plan is added.
12. Gap Analysis Headings Gap to be addressed
(Actual statements from confidential
interviews, workshops, and survey)
Agreed recommendations
(extracts)
1. “The work” Present Role Descriptions are so generic they are
ineffective in supporting/assessing/ defining role
specific performance.
Revise Role Descriptions to ensure the
Employee Performance Management
System (EPM) meets needs.
2. Training & development Complaints about inadequate understanding of
role by new appointees, and its relation to teams.
Develop localised Role Induction Training
Package (“On boarding”).
3. Communication,
consultation, &
Involvement (CCI)
Lack of information – brick wall; Lack of
communication between levels when decisions
are being made that affects workplace & roles;
lack of ability to make suggestions
Set up regular (inter level) team meetings
to brief and discuss staff relevant issues in
a form that they can relate to.
4. Management approach Lack of leadership; Favouritism; No
support/coaching; Don’t feel I can escalate
complaints for fear of victimisation by manager
Develop a “common” management
approach that ensures staff work and
personal concerns meet their needs.
5. Management of change Don’t see the value of change; there is too much
change/there is too little change; change causes
additional (unaddressed) problems
Include a “collaborative” approach to
change management programs to identify,
& resolve ongoing change issues.
6. Intrapersonal &
interpersonal conflicts
Work causes immense pressures; personality
conflicts; inequity; poor work ethic/attitude; lack
of mutual respect; stress arising from issues
Develop and implement a stress
management model and methodologies
for managers, team leaders, and staff.
David Alman 2014
Sample extract - based on a completed Organisational Health Audit Report
Organisational Health Audits
13. About the author
David Alman lives in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, and offers services in Organisational Health.
Organisational Health is a broad overview term that refers to assessing and improving performance and
well being of both an organisation and its employees, recognising there is a nexus between the two.
Further articles, blogs, and slides, can be found on David’s Proventive Solutions Google Site.
Please refer to https://sites.google.com/site/proventivesolutions/