SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  37
ATTITUDES
What is it???
“…a psychological tendency
that is expressed by
evaluating a particular
entity with some degree of
favour or disfavour” – Eagly
& Chaiken, 1993
“… an association in
memory between a
given object and a
given summary
evaluation of the
object” – Fazio, 1995
“… a general and
enduring positive or
negative feeling about
some person, object,
or issue” – Petty &
Cacioppo, 1981
“…the categorisation of a
stimulus object along an
evaluative dimension” – Zanna
& Rempel, 1988
…a psychological tendency
that is expressed by
evaluating a particular
entity with some degree of
favour or disfavour” –
Eagly & Chaiken, 1993
… an association in
memory between a
given object and a
given summary
evaluation of the
object” – Fazio, 1995
… a general and
enduring positive or
negative feeling about
some person, object,
or issue – Petty &
Cacioppo, 1981
…the categorisation of a
stimulus object along an
evaluative dimension – Zanna
& Rempel, 1988
4 out of 4 psychologists agree that attitude involves an
evaluative judgment about someone or something.
Therefore…
We define an attitude as…
an overall evaluation of an object
that is based on cognitive,
affective, and behavioural
information
…an overall evaluation of an object that is
based on cognitive, affective, and behavioural
information
 Three distinct components: AFFECT, COGNITION, BEHAVIOUR
Feeling
Thinking
Doing
Affective Component
 Attitudes can differ in valence (direction –
positive/negative/neutral)
POSITIVE –
Best. Invention. Ever. NEGATIVE –
Worst. Movie. Ever.
NEUTRAL –
Meh.
Affective Component
(cont’d)
 Attitudes can vary in strength.
 Strong attitudes are more:
a) Persistent over time
b) Resistant to change
c) Likely to influence information
processing
d) Likely to predict behaviour
TASK
Imagine that you have been given, as a
graduation present, a choice between
ten brand new cars. You have been told
that this car will be the only car you will
get to drive for the next twenty years, so
you want to pick the car that is the most
reliable. Which one of the following
brands will you choose?
1. Mercury
2. Scion
9. Honda
8. Toyota
7. Infiniti
3. Acura
4. Mitsubitshi
5. Lexus
6. Hyundai
10. Porsche
Based on surveys filled out by more
than 1.4 million people, the
following were deemed as the most
reliable brands in the 2009
Consumer Reports Annual Car
Reliability Survey in ascending
order…
10th – Mercury
9th – Porsche
8th - Hyundai
7th - Lexus
6th - Mitsubishi
5th - Acura
4th - Infiniti
3rd – Toyota
2nd - Honda
1st - Scion
Cognitive Component
 Refers to the beliefs, thoughts and attributes we associate with an
object.
 May be based primarily upon +ve and –ve attributes associated with
the object.
 E.g. Belief #1. More expensive = better quality.
Porsche/Lexus = $$$ = more reliable
 Belief #2. More popular = more people use it = more reliable
Never heard of Scion, therefore probably unreliable.
Behavioural Component
 Refers to past behaviours or experiences regarding an attitude object.
 E.g. People might guess that they must have a negative attitude
toward caged eggs if they remember having signed a petition against
unethical treatment of animals
What’s the difference? Is
there one?
 Breckler (1984) had participants report their cognitive, affective and
behavioural responses about snakes.
 With a real snake in the room, participants indicated whether:
i) snakes are kind/cruel (cognition)
ii) snakes make them feel anxious/happy (affect)
iii) they like to handle snakes (behaviour)
 Scores for each response was computed, showing only moderate
correlation.
 Does not mean they are completely independent of each other.
For example…
Betty’s Attitude towards
Jason Mraz…
 Thoughts:
The music has well-constructed
lyrics and catchy melodies that
express the importance Mraz
places on the beauty and
appreciation of life.
 Feelings:
The music evokes happiness
and relaxation.
 Behavioural:
Attended eight concerts
Therefore…
 The positive cognitions, affects and behaviours all contribute to
Betty’s arguably unhealthy positive attitude toward Jason Mraz.
 BUT…
 Components do not always have the same evaluative implications…
For example…
 Blood donation
 Cognition: ………………………………..
 Affect:…………………………………….
 Behaviour:………………………………...
Quick Task:
 1) Think of something you have
a positive/negative attitude
towards that are similar in
valence across the three
components. Write down how
each of the components
influence this attitude.
 2) Think of something you have
a positive/negative attitude
towards that differ in valence
across the components. Write
down how each of the
components influence this
attitude.
FUNCTION OF
ATTITUDES
Functions
 Katz (1960) proposed that functions include:
1) Knowledge
 The world is too complex… we
group people, objects and events
into categories and develop
stereotyped attitudes. The
attitudes about that category
provide us with meaning,
making inferences about its
members.
2) Instrumentality
 Means to an end
 We develop favourable attitudes towards objects that reward us and
unfavourable attitudes towards punishment. Once developed, it provides a
simple means of evaluating objects.
3) Ego defence
 Some attitudes protect the
person from recognising certain
thoughts or feelings that threaten
their self-image. E.g. displacing
anger to other groups
4) Value expressiveness
 Define the self and maintain self-worth. Some attitudes express the
individual’s basic values and reinforce his or her self-image.
 Some attitudes symbolise a person’s identification with or
membership in particular groups or subcultures.
IN SUM
 An attitude is an overall evaluation of an object that is based on
cognitive, affective, and behavioural information.
 The three components: cognition, affect, behaviour
 Affect can vary in valence and strength; Cognition influenced by
+ve and –ve attributes associated with the object; behaviour is based
on past experiences and actions.
 Functions of attitudes: knowledge, instrumentality, ego defence,
value expressiveness.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared ResourcePEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
peshare.co.uk
 
Chapter2 attitude-bba notes
Chapter2 attitude-bba notesChapter2 attitude-bba notes
Chapter2 attitude-bba notes
Flex
 
Perception
PerceptionPerception
Perception
Sheenu
 

Tendances (20)

Perception
PerceptionPerception
Perception
 
Perception
PerceptionPerception
Perception
 
Attitude Week 1
Attitude Week 1Attitude Week 1
Attitude Week 1
 
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared ResourcePEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Thinking fast and slow - How your brain makes decisions
Thinking fast and slow - How your brain makes decisionsThinking fast and slow - How your brain makes decisions
Thinking fast and slow - How your brain makes decisions
 
Attribution theory
Attribution theoryAttribution theory
Attribution theory
 
Thinking Fast & Slow presentation
Thinking Fast & Slow presentationThinking Fast & Slow presentation
Thinking Fast & Slow presentation
 
Attitude
AttitudeAttitude
Attitude
 
Chapter2 attitude-bba notes
Chapter2 attitude-bba notesChapter2 attitude-bba notes
Chapter2 attitude-bba notes
 
Perception and its process
Perception and its processPerception and its process
Perception and its process
 
attitude
attitudeattitude
attitude
 
Perception
PerceptionPerception
Perception
 
Expectancy Value Theory
Expectancy Value TheoryExpectancy Value Theory
Expectancy Value Theory
 
Personality
PersonalityPersonality
Personality
 
Psychology of magic
Psychology of magicPsychology of magic
Psychology of magic
 
Behaviour & attitude (presentation)
Behaviour & attitude (presentation)Behaviour & attitude (presentation)
Behaviour & attitude (presentation)
 
Perception
PerceptionPerception
Perception
 
PSY101 Week 10 personalities
PSY101 Week 10 personalitiesPSY101 Week 10 personalities
PSY101 Week 10 personalities
 
Objective factors influencing Perception
Objective factors influencing PerceptionObjective factors influencing Perception
Objective factors influencing Perception
 
Attribution theory
Attribution theoryAttribution theory
Attribution theory
 

En vedette

06 - Psychosexual stages
06 - Psychosexual stages06 - Psychosexual stages
06 - Psychosexual stages
Dickson College
 
Apl07 causes of prejudice
Apl07   causes of prejudiceApl07   causes of prejudice
Apl07 causes of prejudice
Dickson College
 
Apl08 reducing prejudice
Apl08   reducing prejudiceApl08   reducing prejudice
Apl08 reducing prejudice
Dickson College
 
Apl02 attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurementApl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02 attitude formation and measurement
Dickson College
 
Apl06 prejudice and discrimination
Apl06   prejudice and discriminationApl06   prejudice and discrimination
Apl06 prejudice and discrimination
Dickson College
 
Apl05 cognitive dissonance
Apl05   cognitive dissonanceApl05   cognitive dissonance
Apl05 cognitive dissonance
Dickson College
 
Pyschosexual development
Pyschosexual developmentPyschosexual development
Pyschosexual development
Home
 

En vedette (8)

06 - Psychosexual stages
06 - Psychosexual stages06 - Psychosexual stages
06 - Psychosexual stages
 
Apl07 causes of prejudice
Apl07   causes of prejudiceApl07   causes of prejudice
Apl07 causes of prejudice
 
Apl04 persuasion
Apl04   persuasionApl04   persuasion
Apl04 persuasion
 
Apl08 reducing prejudice
Apl08   reducing prejudiceApl08   reducing prejudice
Apl08 reducing prejudice
 
Apl02 attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurementApl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02 attitude formation and measurement
 
Apl06 prejudice and discrimination
Apl06   prejudice and discriminationApl06   prejudice and discrimination
Apl06 prejudice and discrimination
 
Apl05 cognitive dissonance
Apl05   cognitive dissonanceApl05   cognitive dissonance
Apl05 cognitive dissonance
 
Pyschosexual development
Pyschosexual developmentPyschosexual development
Pyschosexual development
 

Similaire à Apl01

Q3L01 - Attitude: definition and components
Q3L01 - Attitude: definition and componentsQ3L01 - Attitude: definition and components
Q3L01 - Attitude: definition and components
Dickson College
 
Chapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docx
Chapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docxChapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docx
Chapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docx
christinemaritza
 
perception-120903103557-phpapp01.pdf
perception-120903103557-phpapp01.pdfperception-120903103557-phpapp01.pdf
perception-120903103557-phpapp01.pdf
chandansahoo82
 
Individual differences
Individual differencesIndividual differences
Individual differences
Mukul Chaudhri
 
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared ResourcePEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
peshare.co.uk
 
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared ResourcePEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
peshare.co.uk
 

Similaire à Apl01 (20)

Q3L01 - Attitude: definition and components
Q3L01 - Attitude: definition and componentsQ3L01 - Attitude: definition and components
Q3L01 - Attitude: definition and components
 
Chapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docx
Chapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docxChapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docx
Chapter 4Attitudes, Attributions, and BehaviorTwo women in .docx
 
Using Awareness of Natural vs. Demonstrated Type Functions to Build Resilienc...
Using Awareness of Natural vs. Demonstrated Type Functions to Build Resilienc...Using Awareness of Natural vs. Demonstrated Type Functions to Build Resilienc...
Using Awareness of Natural vs. Demonstrated Type Functions to Build Resilienc...
 
Perception in Organizational Behaviour
Perception in Organizational BehaviourPerception in Organizational Behaviour
Perception in Organizational Behaviour
 
Hpl
HplHpl
Hpl
 
Personality Tests 692
Personality Tests 692Personality Tests 692
Personality Tests 692
 
Personality Tests
Personality TestsPersonality Tests
Personality Tests
 
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning.ppt
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning.pptCritical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning.ppt
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning.ppt
 
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning (1).ppt
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning (1).pptCritical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning (1).ppt
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning (1).ppt
 
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning.ppt
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning.pptCritical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning.ppt
Critical-Thinking---Return-to-Learning.ppt
 
Effective Decision Making
Effective Decision MakingEffective Decision Making
Effective Decision Making
 
Conference Presenation Train Trainers SIEC Vienna Professor Lili Saghafi
Conference Presenation Train Trainers SIEC Vienna Professor Lili SaghafiConference Presenation Train Trainers SIEC Vienna Professor Lili Saghafi
Conference Presenation Train Trainers SIEC Vienna Professor Lili Saghafi
 
Attitudes & values
Attitudes & valuesAttitudes & values
Attitudes & values
 
organisational behaviour 2
organisational behaviour 2organisational behaviour 2
organisational behaviour 2
 
Attitudes
AttitudesAttitudes
Attitudes
 
perception-120903103557-phpapp01.pdf
perception-120903103557-phpapp01.pdfperception-120903103557-phpapp01.pdf
perception-120903103557-phpapp01.pdf
 
Individual differences
Individual differencesIndividual differences
Individual differences
 
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared ResourcePEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
 
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared ResourcePEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Organizational behavior (Full Course Notes) ppt
Organizational behavior (Full Course Notes) pptOrganizational behavior (Full Course Notes) ppt
Organizational behavior (Full Course Notes) ppt
 

Plus de Dickson College

Plus de Dickson College (20)

Apl03 interpersonal communication
Apl03   interpersonal communicationApl03   interpersonal communication
Apl03 interpersonal communication
 
Not Such A Trivial Pursuit Scoreboard
Not Such A Trivial Pursuit ScoreboardNot Such A Trivial Pursuit Scoreboard
Not Such A Trivial Pursuit Scoreboard
 
12 global citizenship
12   global citizenship12   global citizenship
12 global citizenship
 
11 prosocial behaviour
11   prosocial behaviour11   prosocial behaviour
11 prosocial behaviour
 
10 emotional intelligence
10   emotional intelligence10   emotional intelligence
10 emotional intelligence
 
09 positive relationships2
09   positive relationships209   positive relationships2
09 positive relationships2
 
08 stress, coping, trauma, resilience
08   stress, coping, trauma, resilience08   stress, coping, trauma, resilience
08 stress, coping, trauma, resilience
 
07 self and self efficacy
07   self and self efficacy07   self and self efficacy
07 self and self efficacy
 
05 parfit
05   parfit05   parfit
05 parfit
 
04 lyubomirsky pdf
04   lyubomirsky pdf04   lyubomirsky pdf
04 lyubomirsky pdf
 
03 broaden and build
03   broaden and build03   broaden and build
03 broaden and build
 
02 seligman
02   seligman02   seligman
02 seligman
 
01 emotional brain
01   emotional brain01   emotional brain
01 emotional brain
 
Autistic spectrum disorders
Autistic spectrum disordersAutistic spectrum disorders
Autistic spectrum disorders
 
Anxiety disorders
Anxiety disordersAnxiety disorders
Anxiety disorders
 
Personality disorders
Personality disordersPersonality disorders
Personality disorders
 
Schizophrenia
SchizophreniaSchizophrenia
Schizophrenia
 
Models and prevalence
Models and prevalenceModels and prevalence
Models and prevalence
 
abraham maslow
abraham maslowabraham maslow
abraham maslow
 
10 carl rogers
10   carl rogers10   carl rogers
10 carl rogers
 

Apl01

  • 3. “…a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favour or disfavour” – Eagly & Chaiken, 1993 “… an association in memory between a given object and a given summary evaluation of the object” – Fazio, 1995 “… a general and enduring positive or negative feeling about some person, object, or issue” – Petty & Cacioppo, 1981 “…the categorisation of a stimulus object along an evaluative dimension” – Zanna & Rempel, 1988
  • 4. …a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favour or disfavour” – Eagly & Chaiken, 1993 … an association in memory between a given object and a given summary evaluation of the object” – Fazio, 1995 … a general and enduring positive or negative feeling about some person, object, or issue – Petty & Cacioppo, 1981 …the categorisation of a stimulus object along an evaluative dimension – Zanna & Rempel, 1988 4 out of 4 psychologists agree that attitude involves an evaluative judgment about someone or something.
  • 5. Therefore… We define an attitude as… an overall evaluation of an object that is based on cognitive, affective, and behavioural information
  • 6. …an overall evaluation of an object that is based on cognitive, affective, and behavioural information  Three distinct components: AFFECT, COGNITION, BEHAVIOUR Feeling Thinking Doing
  • 7. Affective Component  Attitudes can differ in valence (direction – positive/negative/neutral) POSITIVE – Best. Invention. Ever. NEGATIVE – Worst. Movie. Ever. NEUTRAL – Meh.
  • 8. Affective Component (cont’d)  Attitudes can vary in strength.  Strong attitudes are more: a) Persistent over time b) Resistant to change c) Likely to influence information processing d) Likely to predict behaviour
  • 9. TASK Imagine that you have been given, as a graduation present, a choice between ten brand new cars. You have been told that this car will be the only car you will get to drive for the next twenty years, so you want to pick the car that is the most reliable. Which one of the following brands will you choose?
  • 10. 1. Mercury 2. Scion 9. Honda 8. Toyota 7. Infiniti 3. Acura 4. Mitsubitshi 5. Lexus 6. Hyundai 10. Porsche
  • 11. Based on surveys filled out by more than 1.4 million people, the following were deemed as the most reliable brands in the 2009 Consumer Reports Annual Car Reliability Survey in ascending order…
  • 22. Cognitive Component  Refers to the beliefs, thoughts and attributes we associate with an object.  May be based primarily upon +ve and –ve attributes associated with the object.  E.g. Belief #1. More expensive = better quality. Porsche/Lexus = $$$ = more reliable  Belief #2. More popular = more people use it = more reliable Never heard of Scion, therefore probably unreliable.
  • 23. Behavioural Component  Refers to past behaviours or experiences regarding an attitude object.  E.g. People might guess that they must have a negative attitude toward caged eggs if they remember having signed a petition against unethical treatment of animals
  • 24. What’s the difference? Is there one?  Breckler (1984) had participants report their cognitive, affective and behavioural responses about snakes.  With a real snake in the room, participants indicated whether: i) snakes are kind/cruel (cognition) ii) snakes make them feel anxious/happy (affect) iii) they like to handle snakes (behaviour)  Scores for each response was computed, showing only moderate correlation.  Does not mean they are completely independent of each other.
  • 26. Betty’s Attitude towards Jason Mraz…  Thoughts: The music has well-constructed lyrics and catchy melodies that express the importance Mraz places on the beauty and appreciation of life.  Feelings: The music evokes happiness and relaxation.  Behavioural: Attended eight concerts
  • 27.
  • 28. Therefore…  The positive cognitions, affects and behaviours all contribute to Betty’s arguably unhealthy positive attitude toward Jason Mraz.  BUT…  Components do not always have the same evaluative implications…
  • 29. For example…  Blood donation  Cognition: ………………………………..  Affect:…………………………………….  Behaviour:………………………………...
  • 30. Quick Task:  1) Think of something you have a positive/negative attitude towards that are similar in valence across the three components. Write down how each of the components influence this attitude.  2) Think of something you have a positive/negative attitude towards that differ in valence across the components. Write down how each of the components influence this attitude.
  • 32. Functions  Katz (1960) proposed that functions include:
  • 33. 1) Knowledge  The world is too complex… we group people, objects and events into categories and develop stereotyped attitudes. The attitudes about that category provide us with meaning, making inferences about its members.
  • 34. 2) Instrumentality  Means to an end  We develop favourable attitudes towards objects that reward us and unfavourable attitudes towards punishment. Once developed, it provides a simple means of evaluating objects.
  • 35. 3) Ego defence  Some attitudes protect the person from recognising certain thoughts or feelings that threaten their self-image. E.g. displacing anger to other groups
  • 36. 4) Value expressiveness  Define the self and maintain self-worth. Some attitudes express the individual’s basic values and reinforce his or her self-image.  Some attitudes symbolise a person’s identification with or membership in particular groups or subcultures.
  • 37. IN SUM  An attitude is an overall evaluation of an object that is based on cognitive, affective, and behavioural information.  The three components: cognition, affect, behaviour  Affect can vary in valence and strength; Cognition influenced by +ve and –ve attributes associated with the object; behaviour is based on past experiences and actions.  Functions of attitudes: knowledge, instrumentality, ego defence, value expressiveness.