This is a MIS based presentation depicting the status of MGNREGA implementation in Naxalbari Block in darjeeling district (Siliguri Mahakuma Parishad area).

1. MAHATMA GANDHI NREGA
IMPLEMENTATION IN
NAXALBARI BLOCK, SILIGURI
MAHAKUMA PARISHAD
An analysis based on the MIS
18 January 2013

2. REGISTRATION

3. BASIC DATA
Gram Panchayats Population Job Cards
06 144915 (2001 Census data) 21005
Job Cards Persons Male Female
21005 37493 18728 (50%) 18765 (50%)
Job Cards SC ST Others
21005 7536 (36%) 6267 (30%) 7202 (34%)

4. GENDER-WISE DISTRIBUTION OF REGISTERED
WORKERS
Male-Female ratio in Workers
18765, 18728, Male Workers registered
Female Workers registered
50% 50%

5. CASTE-WISE DISTRIBUTION OF REGISTERED
HOUSEHOLDS
SC-ST and Others in registered Households
7536,
7202,
36%
34%
SC
ST
6367, Others
30%

6. POVERTY STATUS OF HOUSEHOLDS AS IN MIS
Households marked as BPL
2711,
13%
Marked as BPL
No BPL marking
18294,
87%

7. EMPLOYMENT

8. EMPLOYMENT GENERATED TILL 18 JANUARY
2013
Households Person-days Male Female Female
employed generated percentage
11886 250958 92419 158539 63.17
Person-days SC SC% ST ST%
generated
250958 104223 41.53 80984 32.27

9. PERSON-DAYS PER HOUSEHOLD: RANGE
Range Households Percentage
provided
1-20 days 7448 62.81
21-40 days 3334 28.12
41-60 days 532 4.49
61-80 days 247 2.08
81 + days 297 2.50

10. HOUSEHOLDS PERVIDED WORK: RANGE OF
PERSON-DAYS
Range in person-days per household
4% 2% 3%
1-20 days
28%
21-40 days
63% 41-60 days
61-80 days
81 + days

11. EXPENDITURE

12. EXPENDITURE POSITION AS REFLECTED IN THE
MIS AS ON 18-01-2013
Gram Total Available Total % of TAF
Panchayat/ fund expenditure
Agency
Gossainpur 125.1 123.02 98.34
Hatighisa 112.73 91.41 81.09
Lower Bagdogra 85.54 74.26 86.81
Moniram 54.91 45.6 83.04
Naxalbari 53.31 52.8 99.04
Upper Bagdogra 95.25 61.75 64.83
Block level Line
Department 15.24 4.92 32.28
PO 9.75 5.16 52.92
Total 551.84 458.92 83.16

13. WORKS

14. WORK STATUS
Works taken up Works completed Ongoing works Percentage of works
completed
367 136 231 37
Sl N. Category of assets created during current No. Percentage in total
year
1 Flood Control 07 4.8
2 Rural Connectivity 45 31
3 Water Conservation 07 4.8
4 Renovation of traditional water bodies 01 0.7
5 Drought proofing (Social Forestry) 12 8.3
6 Irrigation canals 35 24.1
7 Land development 38 26.2

15. ISSUES

16. SOME IMPORTANT ISSUES FLAGGED
 No worksite photo uploaded on the website
 Photographs of the workers not uploaded on
the worksite
 MIS shows only 46.6% of the registered
workers as having accounts
 Isit for the fact that accounts are single in the
household whereas there are multiple workers?

17. SOME IMPORTANT ISSUES FLAGGED
 13 works are shown as incomplete from 2009-10
or even before that
 12 works taken up in 2010-11 are still shown as
incomplete
 34 works taken up during 2011-12 are incomplete
as yet
 Majority of material payment is in cash (as high as
Rs. 80.92 lakh material payment is shown to be in
cash whereas cheue payment is to the tune of Rs.
18.33 lakh only

18. SOME IMPORTANT ISSUES FLAGGED
 There are 98 works where no expenditure has
been entered in the MIS for the last 4 months
 6277 households have worked for less than 15
days
 171 households have completed 100 days of work
in the current financial year
 There is no RSBY registration of NREGA workers as
yet
 There are only 700 households among the
households worked so far for 15 days or more
whose status is marked as BPL

19. SWOT
Analysis

20. STRENGTHS
 Equal registration of male and female workers
 High registration of SC, ST households
 Very good women participation in labour force
 High access of SC and ST households to work
 Some good schemes implemented

21. WEAKNESSES
 5609 households (47.19 percent) have been
provided work for less than 15 days
 Poor BPL marking in MIS
 No photo uploading
 No RSBY convergence
 Very little variation in schemes
 Monitoring deficient

22. OPPORTUNITIES
 Widening of the shelf of schemes by the
Ministry of Rural Development
 Renewed focus at the State level on convergent
activities
 Tea Gardens opening up to NREGS

23. THREATS
 Urban / peri-urban nature of most of the area
 Male members of the households accessing
relatively more paying employment
opportunities
 Problem of working in Tea garden areas
 Limited scope of earth work

24. SOME PHOTOGRAPHS OF SCHEMES
IMPLEMENTED IN THE BLOCK

25. SOME PHOTOGRAPHS OF SCHEMES
IMPLEMENTED IN THE BLOCK

26. JOB CARD HOLDERS WITH JOB CARDS

27. SOME MEMBERS OF THE TEAM