Ex head of web at The Science Museum
Possibly still an associate tutor at Leicester..?
Don’t panic. Slides will be made available.
Noooooooooooooo!
Let’s start with an initial high-level question.
Adam made this point recently in a blog post. He’s right but I’m going to play devil’s advocate…
…because if there’s one objective that all the web projects we’ve been involved in in the last 8 years has had in common, it’s this
Sadly, good digital stuff isn’t free, so you’re going to have to ask for money (or time = money) at some point.
…and you want your director to give you this money, so this is going to be your focus too.
Here’s the point: you can (and should) do both. Hopefully these slides will convince you that this isn’t a “visitor attraction vs cultural institution” argument, but that both can play off each other.
Let’s start with this really high level question.
Again, simplifying wildly - but broadly there are those on the cusp of making a decision, who can be tipped into it, and then there are those who are a long way away from the purchase point.
The direct route is only going to work if someone can actually make it. There’s no point in me getting excited about a museum talk in Scotland today, because it’s 600 miles away and I’m not going to make it. But - if my mental model of that organisation is being added to by their online content then *the next time* I *am* in the area, I’m much more likely to respond to their direct marketing.
Don’t believe me - here is some actual data from the awesome Colleen Dillenschneider. Reputation is at the top of the list for tipping people into a cultural organisation.
All of those things, done well, are reputation builders.
Let’s get to the habits. These are 5 things I’ve noticed about museums (both those we work with and others) that set them aside from the others.
This one takes centre stage. If I had to show a single slide today, this would be it.
You can broadly think of museum online content in one of three categories. Firstly, “boring but useful”.
The things that make a difference here are about keeping it blindingly simple. Don’t be clever, don’t be institutional.
Classic institutional error: the donate button. Didn’t your mum tell you not to give money to strangers? Yeh. Instead, show the user some value and THEN (Guardian style), give reasons why you should be supported.
Think like a visitor for the practical stuff. Phone numbers. Clickable postcodes. Opening hours.
Next up is the “I’m coming along, what is there to do?” stuff.
Again, keep it simple. Don’t be clever - use known devices and approaches like calendars, “see also” call-outs. Allow people to skim read but give them the option to dig deeper if they’re interested.
..some simple examples
The playful stuff is where things get a bit more interesting. Here you can relax a bit, allow your
Many of the best digital experience in museums hang off stories - whether object-based or curatorial, educational or visit-related..
Some examples - good typography, call-outs, breaking up text
For the timeline, Timeline.js - free, accessible, actually useful
The “how to” on content planning will depend in large part on how your organisation is structured, and what your preferences are. Also, obviously, software can’t solve this - but can help, if done right.
An example of Trello being used for organising and filtering content
Keep things simple!
Museum objects [and the stories that hang off them] are *the* unique thing that museums have.
.but we so often do this with them…
It doesn’t have to be expensive or complicated.
This just makes anyone with eyes sad.
With just a _little_ bit of care - some work on fonts, colours, etc - things can be transformed from painful to pleasing
Here’s an example (Dallas Museum of Art).
Beauty might be in the eye of the beholder - but even so, basic aesthetics are important!
With objects - you may be deeply impressed that you’ve got a collection of 100,000 things.
But it’s highly likely that users want deeper stuff, particularly images.
If you’re going to do 10 gazillion records, give people curated / editorial paths in.
Example from Waterloo200 (now Age of Revolution) which focused on 200 highly curated, really detailed object records with zoom / 3d views / educational content..
…get your analytics set up on your object pages!
This is some actual traffic on object pages
From Nina Simon’s book.
Here’s a picture of our puppy. She’s not that cute any more.
Taking Nina’s analogy a bit further - ask, what does this mean in an online environment?
In general, Sociable objects have a few traits.
Firstly - they’re not “off on their own collections site”, somewhere separate from your main site. They’re integrated into the main content flow - linked to in sidebars, included in stories, part of your newsletter, examined in blog posts.
Allowing users to engage with the object is the second trait - either through well designed “add your comment” functionality or “tag this” or “we don’t know what this is, what do you think?” approaches.
{86% of tags used by curators aren’t the same ones that users tag stuff with (Steve project) - we need the curatorial input of the crowd..}
The next trait is the idea of having a “call to action” for your object record itself. The idea of a call to action isn’t new in marketing circles, and in fact we use it for all pages of a website when we’re designing them - ask what is it that I want the user to do next?
..and then give them clear, well-labelled navigation to help them do this.
…and although it’s a call to action as well, it’s worth calling out the shareability - as this is absolutely key to the Sociable Object.
There are some easy wins here - share buttons like Share This and ensuring they’re easy to use, trackable via your stats and play nicely with things like mobile browsers - but also some deeper tech.
You can for instance specify which image and text is shared on Facebook from a particular page by getting your developer to tweak what are called OpenGraph or OG tags.
This is George Cavan’s matchbox, which he threw onto the platform of his home town on 29th March 1918.
He was killed in France on 13th April.
“Dear wife and bairns, Off to France - love to you all, Daddy”
James Morley put this project together which draws on IWM and other data to “explore the local legacy of the 1st world war”
Two more local examples - Tyne and Wear Museums: 213 images on Facebook - 100k views, 712 comments. Salford & Cheetham Hill in Focus: 6k images, 300 comments
It’s interesting how much museums tend to struggle with this, even now after a decade+ of social media.
..this, we’re starting to understand
But this - strangely, no so much.
I first made this slide in about 2008. There are still many museums who are using social media to *broadcast* rather than genuinely trying to open a dialogue with their users.
It’s also hard to prioritise. Being clear about *why* you’re doing what you do on social media is really critical.
…and this means understanding where your users are hanging out. (These are US figures, again from the excellent CD)
The same graph in a different format - but the message is clear: ignore Facebook at your peril.
The thing we should all take from this - and (if you need it) a way of formulating support for social media - is this: done well, you can indirectly (or directly!) influence visitation.
Don’t forget about the more “obscure” channels and communities of interest too. Actually, this is reddit.com - hardly obscure, it ranks #9 on Alexa for the most visited site in the uk. Bet you didn’t know that.
User research is critical. It’s easy to be scared what with eye-tracking, focus groups and all of that. If you can afford this stuff, great - but if not, just go ask some people to browse your stuff while you watch. It’s highly useful. Also: buy this book.
You’ll find users engage very quickly - but make sure you get back to them, no matter what they say.
..In some communities of interest you’ll get really detailed / in-depth discussion which is different in many ways to the “lighter” stuff.
Popups can work well, with incentives. Most toolsets (this one by Survey Monkey) will provide code that does stuff like only popping up once / etc.
A well known museum social media celebrity
Two great examples - at the top is the Wellcome Collection - recently launched, lovely, lovely design - objects as part of the story…
…below is Rijksmuseum. Both are beautifully designed, user-focused.
Also at top is Magic Tate Ball - an example of serendipitous discovery.
Bottom left is CultureCam - you take a picture of a thing and get back matching Europeana search results. It’s experimental but fun..
Top right: a story about how something is being restored on your blog (Powerhouse Museum). Even let out some of the behind-the-scenes-we-dropped-the-priceless-artefact stories too….!
A couple more examples, this time from Bristol Museum. Longform text, timelines, maps, object stories.
Metropolitan Museum of Art
Done by Improv Everywhere: 1.6m subscribers
Video: 1.4m views
Putting your users at the centre of the equation involves a bunch of different considerations.
First off, consider how people responded to this..
https://www.colleendilen.com/2017/03/15/why-those-with-reported-interest-do-not-visit-cultural-organizations-data/
I mean, they are special, but they aren’t from a user point of view.
Yours is one of a range of attractions (there, I said it) which a person or family may visit. There are many places competing for this space. You’ve got to be better.
Yay, an interactive quiz!
The answer of course is that because you’re subject specialists you knew (probably) at least 2 out of 3 of the answers.
But remember - you aren't most people. Most people, and let’s be honest probably you too - go to Google first.
This is why something like 60% of your referred website traffic probably comes from Google.
Even if you’re going to facebook.com and know the web address, chances are you Google “Facebook” and click on the first result.
The point being that thinking like a user isn’t just post-arrival. It’s about how they got to your stuff online in the first place.
… which is (let’s face it) Google.
The graph shows that if you search for something, you are hugely much more likely to click through on the first page of results.
In other words: you need to be on the first page of Google for relevant searches. Relevant = your org name, key objects, main stories, etc
Improving SEO is a huge topic, and one that whole companies base their business around. Lots of it is technical in nature, but a huge part of it is around creating compelling, linked, changing content.
Being user focused is also about being joined up.
…because of this.
With digital, this is a virtuous cycle - you can’t stop at one iteration, you have to keep ploughing back through and re-visiting, constantly evaluating and adapting as you go.
Use a CMS which enables either automatic “see related” or editorial related content. Always think about skim-reading.
Liverpool museums do this well - here, three views / angles on what is basically the same object.
Joined-upness is about visual connection, marketing consistency, fonts and colours..
Your mailing list is so often forgotten in the land of social media. But: remember that these people have *given you their email address* - they actively want to know what you’re up to. So you’ll see much, much higher engagement via this channel than via anywhere else.
MailChimp (and other providers) have built-in segments - so you can drop “people who haven’t clicked on anything” a “are you ok?” email or whatever..
…or make your own segments without too much work.
Mailchimp also provides automation which allows you to do really cool stuff with timed email campaigns (at simplest) right up to “if person clicks on X then send Y” and other really cool integrations with your website and social channels.