1. Taken together all the plausible descriptive of what is the cause behind a war, morally the war is a
taboo. Killing human for any reason except the unwanted denial for existence is morally wrong but
when we see scientifically that might not be true because we are governed by strong natural protocol of
struggle for existence and a decisive struggle is always simultaneously executed with war. As seen from
the history we had a certainly have countable pages written with people's blood. People have been
involved in war since this landmass was discovered. What has changed is only the way people perceive
its causes when the war is over. This essay certainly taught me some reason why people might distort
the causes of war. The first reason why people might distort the cause of war is they don't want to get
blamed for the massive blood spill because of war. Ethnocentrism is the cause of war for its continuity.
People from both sides think that they are right and they don't want an agreement. "Peculiar Institution
of slavery" transformed to the "lost cause of war" because southerners believed they were defending
their state rights. Southerners were doing so to retain their so called superior way of lives. Racism in the
north is the another cause to the civil war but people distort that reason today because racism is
inhuman these days after the launch of pact of human rights all over the world.
Another historical event that we all Americans want to distort is the attack over Hirosima, Japan. Though
there are reasons that justify our attack was an attempt for future defence it is better if we forget that
event.