Risk management issues inpostmenopausal health care

1. RISK MANAGEMENT ISSUES IN
POSTMENOPAUSAL HEALTH CARE
Aboubakr elnashar
Benha University Hospital, Egypt
Aboubakr Elnashar

2. Outline
•Risk management (RM)
•Postmenopausal health care (PMHC)
•RM in PMHC: What could go wrong in PMHC? How can risk be reduced?
Aboubakr Elnashar

3. Risk Management
(RM)
Aboubakr Elnashar

4. Back ground
•Preventable errors in medical practice are frequent: Much patient harm Cost a tremendous amount of money.
•How To protect doctors& hospitals from claims? To immprove quality of care?.
Aboubakr Elnashar

5. Managing Risk Definition
•A process for improving the safety& quality of care through reporting, analyzing& learning from adverse incidents involving patients.
Aboubakr Elnashar

6. Misconceptions
I. RM is not primarily about avoiding or mitigating claims
It is a tool for improving the quality of care.
II. RM is not simply the reporting of patient safety incidents.
Incident reporting is on the reactive side of RM.
Minimising the occurrence of patient safety incidents is the Proactive side, E.g.
instead of ‘fire fighting’ after things have gone wrong, a scenario training (‘fire drill’)
III. RM is not the business of service managers
It is the business of all stakeholders in the organisation, clinicians& nonclinicians.
Aboubakr Elnashar

7. Basic Questions
I.Risk Identification: What could go wrong?
II.Risk Analysis: What are the chances of going wrong and what would be the impact?
III.Risk Treatment: What can we do to minimize chances of happening or mitigate damage when it has gone wrong?.
IV.Risk Control, sharing& learning: What can we learn from things that have gone wrong ?.
Aboubakr Elnashar

8. Application At any level of an organisation
•Hospital, unit, department or Process.
• Investigation, Treatment, Surgery
Aboubakr Elnashar

9. Requirements for implementing a departmental RM program
Leadership:
Team:
Aboubakr Elnashar

10. RM process
I.Risk identification Looking at what went wrong
•Analysis of patient safety incidents, including near misses= Root cause analysis Looking at what potentially could go wrong Identifying prospective risk= Failure Mode& Effects Analysis (FMEA).
Aboubakr Elnashar

11. Sources
1.Risk assessment conducted in all clinical areas (wards, clinics, theatre, delivery suite, day assessment unit, etc.)
2. Incident reporting
3.Complaints& claims
4.Staff consultation – workshops, surveys, interviews
5.Clinical audit: a quality improvement process to improve patient care& outcomes through systematic review of care against explicit criteria& the implementation of change
Aboubakr Elnashar

12. Reporting Each unit should have a list of reporting incidents (trigger list) 1. Near miss: A potential for harm or error which is intercepted prior to the completion of the incident/ event resulting in no harm to the patient. 2. Incidents: Any event that has caused harm, or has the potential to harm patient or visitor Any events which involves malfunction or loss of equipment property or any event which might lead to a complaint.
Aboubakr Elnashar

13. 3. Adverse events
•An unintended injury or complication, which results in disability, death or prolonged hospital stay and caused by health care management rather than the disease process.
Aboubakr Elnashar

14. 4. Sentinel events
A subset of adverse events, occurs independently of a patient condition.
Reflects deficiency in hospital system
One who watches or guards
Aboubakr Elnashar

15. II. Risk analysis& evaluation
•Risk score: By multiplying the severity of the incident by the likelihood of its occurrence.
•All reported cases should be entered into a database {permit examination and to generate audits of recurring topics}.
• Confidentiality
• No blame culture based feed back to clinician.
• The review group may introduce a filtering mechanism in order to reduce the number of cases for detailed appraisal
• Assessment of cases is often restricted to whether or not the outcome was substandard, and whether or not contributed to the adverse out come.
Aboubakr Elnashar

16. III. Risk treatment
•Action planes: Elimination Substitution Reduction or Acceptance of the risk
•Depend on:
1.Risk rating
2.Resource implications.
3.Culture.
Aboubakr Elnashar

17. IV. Risk Control, sharing& learning:
What can we learn from things that have gone wrong ?.
Aboubakr Elnashar

18. Postmenopausal health care (PMHC)
Aboubakr Elnashar

19. Management of menopause symptoms or HRT
Preventive& therapeutic management of osteoporosis, other degenerative conditions, postmenopausal bleeding, urinary symptoms psychological wellbeing.
Aboubakr Elnashar

20. •Unintended harm to patients may occur in the course of PMHC, and measures to ensure patient safety should be actively promoted.
•The magnitude of threat to patient safety varies with the setting.
Aboubakr Elnashar

21. •PMHC is delivered in a variety of settings:
1.General or special-interest clinics in general practice,
2.Community menopause clinics,
3.Hospital- based menopause clinics
4.General outpatient clinics.
•Each centre should conduct its own risk assessment& have measures in place to contain risk.
Aboubakr Elnashar

22. RM in PMHC
Aboubakr Elnashar

23. I.What could go wrong in PMHC? Patient safety incidents& near misses may occur as a result of: 1. Error in diagnosis 2. Error in treatment 3. Failure of communication.
Aboubakr Elnashar

24. 1. Error in diagnosis
a.Inadequate medical history: Full history before presceibing HRT e.g. Symptoms may direct the physician to the climacteric, but the possibility of an undiagnosed endocrine, CV, mental health or other problem should be considered
Aboubakr Elnashar

25. b. Misinterpretation of symptoms E.g.
VMS& tiredness may be due to thyroid over- or under-activity, respectively.
Mental illness may be misdiagnosed as a perimenopausal phenomenon.
Self completed climacteric questionnaire: facilitate history taking within time constraints,
Aboubakr Elnashar

26. C. Failure to examine the patient. E.g. Routine examination of the breasts. Controversy. Breast examination should be performed only where there is a clinical indication (The Committee on Safety of Medicines)
•Many clinicians feel it is safer to perform a routine examination of the breasts.
•Breasts are not always examined when there is a clinical indication: delayed diagnosis.
Aboubakr Elnashar

27. 2. Error in treatment
a.Failing to screen or treat an at-risk woman E.g.
•With an intact uterus: E should not given alone
This principle is not always followed: endometrial cancer (Rees & Purdie, 2006)
Contraception for the perimenopausal woman is not prescribed { Fertility rate is low, Age Medical conditions}
The consequences of an unwanted pregnancy are profound.
Aboubakr Elnashar

28. b. Inadequate monitoring of long term therapy
•Not all postmenopausal are suitable for management in a general primary care facility
•Referral to specialist at the appropriate time :
Diabetes
Previous breast cancer
HRT with abnormal bleeding
Aboubakr Elnashar

29. c. Inadequate follow-up arrangements.
•More careful assessment with a pre-existing medical condition (Rees & Purdie, 2006)
•Refer to: breast disease, cardiology, rheumatology, haematology& urogynaecology
Aboubakr Elnashar

30. 3. Failure of communication I. Between doctor& patient. Consent:
Vital in clinical practice
Avoiding litigation.
Involving patients in their care
Facilitated by the provision of oral& written information for patients.
Aboubakr Elnashar

31. Discussion
Risks, benefits& alternatives of the intervention e.g. HRT
Documented esp if controversy e.g. HRT with history of DVT or Breast ca
Checklist
Aboubakr Elnashar

32. Investigation e.g. cervical smear, mammogram or US. Ordered Follow up the results Inform the women
Aboubakr Elnashar

33. II. Between doctors particularly when a woman is transferred from one doctor to another
Aboubakr Elnashar

34. II. How can risk be reduced? Patient safety is enhanced by quality-oriented organization of menopause services. I. Proactive identification & management of risk Prospectively identifying ‘red flags’ II. Incident reporting III. Clinical audit that assures optimal standards of care. IV. Oral & written information to patients V. Good practice in relation to patient consent VI. Good documentation
Aboubakr Elnashar

35. VII. Nominated guidelines & Care pathways Each unit should have
•The British Menopause Society has published care pathways for menopause& osteoporosis (Rees & Purdie, 2006).
•Care should be standardized through EB guidelines& protocols E.g. HRT: Risk assessment at commencement, Follow-up visits. Advice when there is uncertainty
Aboubakr Elnashar

36. VIII. Education & training of the staff (Mander & Edozien, 1998)
•Quality standards in postmenopausal care (Gray , 2007)
•Stick to safe practice: Guidance from the General Medical Council (GMC, 2006) Medico legal pitfalls in prescribing HRT, 2006
•Safety alerts In 2006, an alert on hepatotoxicity associated with black cohosh, used to treat menopausal symptoms
Aboubakr Elnashar

37. Conclusion
Patient safety incidents& near misses may occur as a result of: Error in diagnosis Error in treatment Failure of communication.
A proactive approach to RM: Help reduce errors in diagnosis& treatment Facilitate communication Enhance patient safety.
Aboubakr Elnashar

38. Aboubakr Elnashar