3. 3
Transportation planning at Metro
Cities, counties, and transit agencies figure
out what transportation projects they want
to build and estimate how much money
they have to spend on them.
Metro convenes people to decide
on priorities, analyzes impacts on
regional goals and available
funding, and sets policies.
Metro allocates certain state and federal funds to our
partner agencies to implement the projects that work
best for our region. We set aside some funding to run
Metro grant programs.
6. 6
New benefits, new challenges
The good The bad
• More alternatives to driving
alone in your own car
• More ways to share trips
• More efficient vehicles
• Better mobility for all
• Many involve driving alone
in someone else’s car
• More empty miles
• Less use of transit, the most
efficient way to travel
• Luxury options that don’t
work for everyone
7. 7
Technology changes everything!
some things
certainty about how people travel
transportation revenues
cost of trying something new
importance of data
role of private sector
= our goals
= importance of a well-functioning, well-
maintained transportation system
8. 8
Let’s start preparing for tomorrow by
working with the technologies that are
available today.
Microtransit
Travel information
and payment
Car shareBike share
Transportation
network
companies (TNCs)
Electric vehicles
(EVs)
9. 9
New mobility and transit: a
codependent relationship
New ways to connect to transit
A more complete toolkit for
people who want to live car-free
Competition with transit
More congestion
10. A few times a
week
4%
Several times a
month
10%
Rarely
22%
36%
How are we using Uber and Lyft?
10
Over one-third of us occasionally take Uber and Lyft, mostly for
short leisure trips. Monthly riders are more likely to be wealthy,
male, young, and urban.
11. What would we do if we didn’t have a
car available?
11
Total: 16%
Low-income: 11%
2014 total: n/a
Total: 29%
Low-income: 42%
2014 total: 47%
12. 12
The next ten five two years
Shared AVs will hit
our streets.
People will use TNCs
more—and there will be
more TNCs.
Technology will advance
without much public
participation…
Congestion will get worse
as new choices conflict
with current ones…
Marginalized people and
workers will fall farther
behind…
…or we help shape how
the transportation system
evolves
…or we ensure that new
technologies complement
our current options
…or we use technology to
create a more fair and just
transportation system
13. Next 5 years:
AV pilot
testing and
continued
growth in
shared
mobility
5-10 years:
Shared AVs
mixed with
conventional
vehicles
10-25 years: AV
ownership
increases, majority
of vehicles on the
road are AVs, some
changes to streets
and traffic
25+ years: Our
streets and
communities
change
dramatically
How might technology
develop?
Graphic: RPA
14. •More new
choices, but
they don’t
work for
everyone /
everywhere
•Competition
with transit
•Decreasing
account-
ability
•Increasing
congestion
•Transportation
jobs are
threatened
•Congestion might
increase or decline
•AVs increase safety
•Vehicles emit less
pollution, but drive
more miles
•Transportation
revenues decline
•Communities
have more space
for people
instead of
vehicles, but
sprawl increases
How could it affect the
region?
Graphic: RPA
17. 17
Choices
Provide shared
options
Support transit,
biking, walking
Equity
Ensure tech is
accessible for all
Use tech to
create more
equitable
communities
Information
Give people
better info on
options
Use better data
for planning
Innovation
Anticipate,
learn from and
adapt to tech
Tech strategy policy priorities
18. 18
Setting ourselves up for future success
If we tackle
________ today….
We prepare ourselves to take on
________ tomorrow.
Equity Vibrant communities, congestion,
choices
Choices Vibrant communities, congestion,
safety, environment, equity, health
Information All our goals, especially stewardship and
accountability
Innovation All our goals, especially prosperity and
stewardship
19. 19
Implementation tools
Partnerships, education and outreach
Grant-funded pilot projects
Regulation and codes
Data and data sharing agreements
Pricing
Street design
Land use changes
Near-term
Longer term
Notes de l'éditeur
Metro’s jurisdiction includes about 1.5 million people and 800,000 jobs in Clackamas, Multnomah, and Washington counties. The agency's boundary encompasses Portland, Oregon and 24 other cities – from the Columbia River in the north to the bend of the Willamette River near Wilsonville, and from the foothills of the Coast Range near Forest Grove to the banks of the Sandy River at Troutdale.
Does not include Vancouver, across state lines.
…then we start the process all over again.
This is a simplification.
I think that what we do is really critical, because it’s the only chance that we get to take a collaborative, data-driven look at whether all these different local plans and projects add up to good outcomes.
But we’re also limited in what we can do, because we don’t directly own, build, or operate the transportation system. We set policy that determines how some money (ODOT and the feds make other decisions on their own) will be spent and create our own programs to nudge planning in the right direction. We also play an important role in convening, outreach, and education.
Over the short term, technology strategy will direct how we spend some of our grant funding. Over the long term, it will shape what type of projects we fund.
Metro’s focus and terms here
Includes new technologies – AV/EV/CVs, both passenger and transit vehicles
…and new mobility services – TNCs, microtransit, car/bike share, travel info apps.
Also need to think about managing data, which is increasingly as valuable as infrastructure in powering the transportation system.
We know the changes wrought by technology on our transportation system will be big.
We don’t really know whether they’ll be positive or negative. Don’t trust anyone who tells you that they have it figured out.
We do know that the decisions that we make today will influence where we end up, and we need to chart a course toward techno-utopia.
I’m not really interested in knowing what utopia might look like—I want to know how we start getting to utopia.
We see a lot of potential in the technologies that are on the road today, and more with AVs, especially with respect to safety and system management
Important to note that the bad (and some of the good) is already stuff we see happening today with TNCs. Likely to increase, esp. since TNCs are likely to be the first deployers of AVs
Will talk about the equity issue throughout this presentation; it’s a big one.
Things that don’t change:
= our goals
= the importance and cost of good streets
= our responsibility to be good stewards
These are things we repeat to ourselves a lot as we’re discussing this work.
14-42% of Uber/Lyft riders would have otherwise taken transit.
47-56% are shifting from modes that produce less congestion / emissions.
More congestion, which affects buses and everyone else
Metro conducts regular surveys of how people use different transportation options
This time we focused on understanding TNC usage
TNCs a daily travel option for few people
Mostly used for occasional trips – airport, nightlife
Occasional Uber/Lyft usage is the norm across all race/income groups—not for age.
Hard to know what to think about equity right now—this is not a daily, regular travel option.
Lots more stats available.
20% say they drive less
We don’t need to look into too far into the future to know where to start.
We don’t need to look into too far into the future to know where to start.
VMT goes up, but sharing helps
Better transit suffers less.
We selected these because they are key to addressing the pressing issues discussed in the previous slide. Three of them focus on key goals, two focus on giving us the tools that we need to be effective given how transportation is evolving.
Choices and equity are closely related. We know that marginalized communities are more likely to rely on transit, and benefit from sharing.
The policies are important in and of themselves, but they are also key to addressing some of the challenges that we know are headed our way over the longer term.
These support all of the work areas outlined.
Pilot projects give us the chance to test new approaches to increasing choices and equity using emerging tech.
Coordinating local governments in adopting TNC regulations—which only Portland has on the books but others are exploring—helps us ensure that new options are safe, equitable, and transparent, while creating a consistent regulatory environment that can draw more innovation to our region.
Better tools and modeling directly provide better information, and enable us to better tackle choices, equity, prosperity, and innovation.