The document discusses strategies for matching community issues to project goals through a community-led change process (CLCP). It outlines identifying community leaders, understanding key issues like ID cards, linking to existing programs, and facilitating solutions. The CLCP process involves community assessment, dream building, action planning, implementation, and measuring change. Differences between the CLCP and traditional intervention approaches are noted, emphasizing community ownership and sustainability through the CLCP.

1. EMPHASIS
Strategies and Approaches

2. CLCP – Matching issues
• Organization , Identify leaders, build knowledge,
get support, and build their capacity
• Find out issues that the community is facing
• If the issues are not matching with those of our
project, like ID card, yet we will find out how
these issues can be overcome
• After that we can try to match or implement our
issues along with theirs. Many times
opportunities for matching will come up like
Pregnancy and HIV

3. ID Cards
• In our Log frame or in our project there is no
mention of ID Card. However, we can facilitate
solutions to ID card from the community like
from members who have procured it.
• Linking with EMPHASIS programs: ID card with
birth, institutional delivery, health, and thereby to
HIV
• A community leader can be made who will take
down the names of those who need ID Cards

4. • Issue comes up when community members want
to open a bank account, Voters ID card,
• Gender resource centers of Modicare and ACT,
the schemes that are available from the Govt.,
we can see whether our population can be
included in the beneficiary categories
• RTI not to be misused for minor issues.
• Legal framework for the NMP in India need to be
understand.
• Entitlement Rights of NMP in India.
• Knowledge sharing on entitlement rights of NMP
in India.

5. • Characteristics in rural & urban areas are
different.
• We need to work together with specific
issues.
• Advocacy and Facilitation are the issues
that need to discussed in dealing with the
NMP.
• Our knowledge about entitlement rights of
NMP.

6. • We are primarily working on to unite the
NMP community on their rights and other
issues.
• Community dreams need to build to
achieve their goals. (CLCP)
• Community vision, goals and EMPHASIS
goals (two important issues).

7. TI & CLCP differences.
TI CLCP
• Donor driven • Community driven
• Fixed target, goals, • Evolving.
programs. • Community leaders.
• Program is restricted • CLCP is basically a
(more or less) on funding. bottom up approach.
• Issues may different • In some communities it is
(Health, HIV/AIDS, a Church driven
Education etc) programs.
• Not sustainable. • Ownership is maximum.
• More sustainable

8. Locations for CLCP:
CARE • Will facilitate in 2 /city
locations.
NGO (Modicare) • 1locations 36
NGO (Anchal) • 1 locations
NGO (BGSVS) • 2 location 10
NGO (BPWT) • 2 locations 60
NGO (Mumbai) • 2 (possible) 15
• 10 Total 121

9. Process of CLCP
• SALT visit (After Action Review)
• Dream building (AAR)
• Self Assessment Tools (AAR)
• Action Planning (AAR)
• Action (AAR)
• Self Measurement of Change (AAR)
• Change in dreams.

10. • Understanding & strategy need to be developed
on program sustainability.
• Understanding of program strategy leads to
proper implementation of the program.
• Everybody believes that the CLCP process is
community driven.
• CLCP is a challenging task for both CARE & its
implementing partners.
• How CLCP process is effective in dealing with
NMP?