1. POSSIBLE USE OF A BIOTECHNOLOGICAL
APPROACH TO OPTIMIZE AND REGULATE
THE CONTENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF
CYANOGENIC GLUCOSIDES IN SORGHUM TO
INCREASE FOOD SAFETY
Bowater/MiraImagesdailykos
2. Why CyanogenicGlucosides
as a Topic?
• Cyanogenic Plants?
• CyanogenicGlucosides belong to the class of
phytoanticipins
• Mechanical disruption of plant tissue?
3. • What are CyanogenicGlucosides?
• There are four type of linkages present
between glycone and aglycone:
1. C-linkage/glycosidic bond, "nonhydrolysable
by acids or enzymes"
2. O-linkage/glycosidic bond
3. N-linkage/glycosidic bond
4. S-linkage/glycosidic bond
• Toxicity of CyanogenicGlucosides
1. Repel Herbivores
2. Relationship between microorg
3. Easy hosts for fungi and insects-easy
inceptors of pathogens
awakeandliving
Yikrazuul et al. 2008
4. Focus on Sorghum
(Sorghum bicolor L.)?
• Naturally occuringacyanogenic individuals found
in cyanogenic plant species- white clover
• Problem with Sorghum:
5. • Sorghum cyanogenicglucoside = dhurrin
• Problem with dhurrin? ---
hydrolysed by B-glucidosases
• Sorghum as animal fodder-sorghum forage
• Overall:
6. Plant Biotechnology --- please help!
Peter Stuart et al. 2012
Robyn O'Brien et al. 2012
There is a great need for acyogenic forage production
7. • Understand the regulation of dhurrin content in sorghum
seedlings. dhurrin synthesis in sorghum seedlings is regulated by
the rate of de novo synthesis of the biosynthetic enzymes.
• Dhurrin synthesis: involves two cytochrome P450s (CYP79A1 and
CYP71E1) and one UDP-glucosyltransfer- ase (UGT85B1)
12. • Peter Kamp Busk2 and Birger Lindberg
Møller* Studies on Cyanide Potential
• the activity of the first enzyme in the pathway
is always rate limiting
• Outlook: CYP79A1 mutations
• TILLING for forage sorghum:
Cecilia K. Blomstedt et al. 2011
17. • Cytochrome P450’s highly substrate specific
• P414L mutation decreases substrate affinity
• Normal: E-R-R triad: arginine (R) in PERF motif and arginine
residues (R) and glutamic acid (E) in KETLR motif
• locks the haem pocket of active site into proper position
• P141L mutation
Prosser et. al. 2006
18. References
• Blomstedt, C. K., Gleadow, R. M., O'Donnell, N., Naur, P., Jensen, K., Laursen, T., & Olsen, C. E.
(2012). A combined biochemical screen and TILLING approach identifies mutations in Sorghum
bicolor L. Moench resulting in acyanogenic forage production. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 10, 54-
66.
• Busk, P. K., &Moller, B. L. (2002, July). Dhurrin Synthesis in Sorghum Is Regulated at the
Transcriptional Level and Induced by Nitrogen Fertilization in Older Plants. Plant Physiology, 129,
1222-1231.
• Ganjewala, D., Kumar, S., S, A. D., &Ambika, K. (2010). Advances in cyanogenic glycosides
biosynthesis and analyses in plants: A review. ActaBiologicaSzegediensis, 54(1), 1-14.
• Halkier, B. A., &Moller, B. L. (1990, June 18). The biosynthesis of cyanogenicglucosides in higher
plants. The journal of biological chemistry, 54(1), 21114-21121.
• Prosser, D. E., YuDing, G., Zongchao, J., & Glenville, J. (2006, May). Structural motif-based homolgy
modeling of CYP27A1 and site-directed mutational analyses affecting vitamin D hydroxylation.
Biophysical Journal, 90(10), 3389-3409.
• Trigiano, R. N., Windham, M. T., & Windham, A. S. (2003). Plant pathology concepts and laboratory
exercizes. CRC Press, 447.
• Wheeler, J. L., &Mulcahy, C. (1989, December). Consequences for animal production of
cyanogenesis in sorghum forage and hay. Tropical Grasslands, 23(4), 21114-21121.